Pg Readonly Mcp

pg-readonly-mcp

[CI] [Python] [License: MIT]

In plain terms: this lets an AI look at your database and do nothing else. Not because it was told not to write — the database login it uses is physically incapable of writing. The official version of this tool had a published flaw that let a "delete everything" command slip past its safety check; this one is tested against that exact attack.

A read-only Postgres MCP server that parses SQL rather than pattern-matching it — because the alternative has already failed in public, once, in a way that is worth being specific about.

The bypass this exists to close

Anthropic's reference Postgres MCP server enforced "read-only" by wrapping each query in a read-only transaction. It also accepted semicolon- delimited multi-statement input. That combination is exploitable:

SELECT 1; COMMIT; DROP SCHEMA public CASCADE;

The COMMIT ends the read-only transaction early. Everything after it runs at full session privilege. Datadog Security Labs disclosed this in 2026; the server was deprecated and archived — and the vulnerable package was still pulling 21,000 weekly downloads after that.

A read-only transaction is a property of how a query runs. It says nothing about what the query is, which is exactly why it was possible to talk your way out of it. This server checks the second thing instead.

Two independent layers

Either one alone would have stopped the disclosed bypass. Both exist because a flaw in one should not be the only thing standing between an agent and a write.

1. The SQL is parsed, not scanned. guard.py uses sqlglot to build a real syntax tree and applies three checks:

• Exactly one statement. sqlglot.parse splits on statement-terminating semicolons the way a driver would, so the payload above becomes three statements and is refused before any of them reach a connection.
• The outer statement is a read shape — SELECT, UNION, INTERSECT, EXCEPT, or a CTE built from those. DROP TABLE users is refused here.
• No write anywhere in the tree, walked in full. This is the check the other two cannot replace: Postgres allows a CTE to carry a data-modifying statement, so WITH x AS (DELETE FROM t RETURNING *) SELECT * FROM x is, at the outer level, a SELECT. A check that only looks at the outer shape misses this completely. Walking every node finds the DELETE regardless of how many levels down it sits.

An unrecognised statement shape — anything sqlglot has no specific rule for — is refused by the same rule as everything else. Unfamiliar is not the same as safe.

2. The connection itself cannot write, independent of what it is asked to run. check_connection_is_readonly refuses to start if the connected role is a superuser, can create databases or roles, can bypass row-level security, or holds any grant beyond SELECT on any table it can see. Not exhaustive — Postgres privilege can also arrive through ownership, PUBLIC grants, or RLS policies this check does not enumerate — but it catches the two ways a misconfiguration most commonly shows up, stated here rather than implied.

What it does not protect against

• A privileged connection string handed to it anyway. The startup check catches the common shapes of over-privilege; it is not an exhaustive privilege audit, and it says so above rather than implying otherwise.
• Resource exhaustion within the limits. A query that legally returns 1,000 rows of very wide data, or that is legitimately expensive to plan, still costs what it costs. Row caps and a statement timeout bound the damage; they do not make an expensive read free.
• What the agent does with the data once it has it. This is a query gate, not a data-loss-prevention tool. Read access to a table is read access to whatever is in it.
• A parser disagreement. sqlglot and Postgres's own parser are two independent implementations of the same grammar. It is not proven that they agree on every edge case Postgres accepts — a genuine, if narrow, gap in a project whose whole premise is not trusting a single layer. Layer two exists partly because of this: even if a parser differential let something unintended through the guard, the connection underneath still cannot write.

Scanner results

Run against agent-audit 0.19.2 on 18 August 2026: 15 findings, 11 auto-suppressed, 4 actionable — 1 BLOCK, 3 WARN.

The BLOCK finding is the most interesting one, and worth reading in full. server.py:156, confidence 1.0: cur.execute(sql) — flagged as SQL injection via unparameterized execution. That line is real. It is also the single most defended line in this codebase: by the time sql reaches it, validate_readonly() has already parsed it, confirmed it is exactly one statement, confirmed that statement is a read shape, and walked every node in it checking for a write. The scanner has no way to see any of that — it is a single-file pattern match, and the validation happens in a different function, in a different module, several lines earlier. It correctly identifies the shape that is dangerous in general and cannot see that the shape has already been checked.

It also could not have been satisfied by doing what it suggests. Parameterized queries protect values substituted into a fixed query shape — WHERE id = %s. They do not apply here, because the query's structure is the input this tool exists to accept. There is no values-only parameterization scheme for "run whichever read-only SQL the caller asks for." The fix for this class of tool is validating the structure, which is what the rest of this file is for.

The WARN on query()'s definition (AGENT-034, "no input validation in the function body") is the same blind spot from a different angle: the function's first line calls validate_readonly(sql) inside a try/except. A call to an imported function is not a pattern the scanner credits as validation.

The two WARNs on hardcoded credentials are in tests/conftest.py: the default admin DSN (postgres:postgres@localhost:5432/postgres, the standard local/CI Postgres default) and the literal password used for roles the test suite creates and drops within the same test. Both are correctly identified as credential-shaped strings; neither is a credential that guards anything — one points at a throwaway local database, the other lives for the duration of a single test.

The remaining 11 findings — all AGENT-041, all in test fixtures that build CREATE SCHEMA / GRANT / DROP ROLE statements from uuid.uuid4()-derived names — were already auto-suppressed by the scanner itself.

A pattern scanner is a smoke detector, not a judge. Publishing what it finds and why is worth more than a clean number would be on its own.

Install

pip install pg-readonly-mcp

From a source checkout: pip install -e .

Configure

Requires a connection string, given either as --dsn or via PG_READONLY_MCP_DSN — the environment variable exists so a password need not appear on a command line or in a client config file that might be committed by accident:

{  "mcpServers": {    "pg-readonly-mcp": {      "command": "pg-readonly-mcp",      "env": { "PG_READONLY_MCP_DSN": "postgresql://readonly_role:...@host:5432/db" }    }  }}

The role in that connection string needs to hold nothing beyond SELECT. The server checks this itself and refuses to start otherwise — see check_connection_is_readonly above.

The tool

One tool, deliberately. A server whose entire value proposition is "we refuse everything except reads" does not need a second surface to also get that right.

Tests

37 tests. 25 need no database and run anywhere — they are guard.py's whole test suite, pure string in, decision out. The other 12 need a live Postgres and are integration tests by design: the point of check_connection_is_readonly is what it does against real role attributes and real grants, and a mocked connection would pass regardless of what the server actually does against a real one.

pytest -q --cov=pg_readonly_mcp

CI runs against a real postgres:16 service container and fails the build if the database-backed tests report as skipped there — the same rule sweep-mcp applies to its symlink tests, for the same reason: a test that quietly does nothing is worse than no test.

Among the 12: a live reproduction of the exact Datadog payload, driven through the actual MCP tool call rather than through guard.py directly — and an assertion that the target schema still exists afterward, not just that an exception was raised. Also covered: a write hidden inside a CTE through the same call path, the row cap, the statement timeout, that a cancelled query leaves the connection usable for the next one, and that a role with CREATEDB and zero table grants is refused on the role attribute alone.

Coverage on CI, against a real Postgres: 78%, guard.py at 100%. The gap in server.py is the generic psycopg.Error catch-all — nothing in the suite deliberately provokes a database error that isn't a cancellation — and main()'s argparse and transport wiring, which the suite exercises through build_server directly instead; the transport is the part least worth mocking and least likely to be where a real mistake hides.

The first version of this pushed did not pass. Two bugs surfaced only once a real Postgres service container ran the suite for the first time, and neither was visible from the code alone: SET statement_timeout = %s reached Postgres as SET statement_timeout = $1 and failed to parse, because SET is a utility statement and does not accept a bind parameter the way a SELECT does — every real call to the tool would have failed identically. Separately, the test fixtures tried to DROP ROLE a role that still held live grants, which Postgres refuses; DROP OWNED BY has to run first. Both are fixed, and the run since is the one these numbers describe. Left in because a suite that only ever reports success is a suite nobody has watched fail.

Layout

src/pg_readonly_mcp/  guard.py    parses and walks the tree. Opens no connection. 135 lines.  server.py   the MCP tool, the connection check, the timeout and row cap.tests/  test_guard.py    25 tests - no database, run anywhere  test_server.py   12 tests - live Postgres required, CI-enforced

guard.py knows nothing about MCP or psycopg. If a query is ever refused for a reason that lives in server.py instead, that is a bug — the judgement belongs one layer down, where it can be tested with a string and nothing else.

Licence

MIT.

Author

Built by Leslie Kadenge. I do independent security reviews of MCP servers; my public survey of thirteen production servers is at les-k.github.io/field-notes.html.