
Sovereign Gateway
io.github.mattijsmoens由 GitHub 账号 mattijsmoens 发布v0.3.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026
Gating proxy for MCP servers: policy, verification and one audit trail across upstreams.
概览
本地运行的 MCP 网关代理,把多个上游服务器的工具合并到一处,并对每次调用执行策略、注入过滤与审计。
- 可以做什么
- 把多个上游 MCP 服务器的工具目录合并为一个带命名空间的入口(如 git__git_status)。按拒绝列表、允许列表和 PII 策略拦截工具调用。校验参数类型与冻结的工具定义,并过滤参数中的提示注入文本。对返回结果做结构、欺骗、PII 与内容检查,并可套用自定义一致性规则。把每次允许或拒绝的调用写入哈希链式审计日志。可选地让多个模型对同一结果做共识比对。
- 适用场景
- 当助手需要同时访问多个 MCP 服务器,而你希望集中管理哪些工具可用、拦截参数中的提示注入,并保留一份统一的调用审计记录时使用;尤其适合无法修改源码的第三方服务器。
- 运行要求
- 需要本地 Python 环境并用 pip 安装该包,以 stdio 方式运行。需要一份列出上游服务器的 gateway.json,可由现有 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS Code 或 Windsurf 配置生成。文本过滤、意图检查、输出规则和共识为可选附加包;共识需至少两个不同模型提供方,托管提供方的密钥从指定环境变量读取。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Sovereign Gateway,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
sovereign-mcp-gateway
A gating proxy for Model Context Protocol servers. Point your MCP client at the gateway instead of at your servers. It connects to every upstream you list, merges their tool catalogues into one, and puts every call through a verification chain before it reaches the server that would execute it.
[Built on patent-pending components]
--init reads the MCP configuration you already have (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Windsurf) and writes a gateway.json that proxies those same servers, so the first run produces a working config rather than a configuration error. It will not import the gateway's own entry, because that would make it proxy itself.
The gateway is itself an MCP server, so any client that speaks MCP works with no changes.
That base install is a working gateway. Four optional extras add further layers on top — see Installing.
What it stops
An agent reads a GitHub issue whose body carries an instruction aimed at the model rather than at you. It is persuaded, and calls git_commit.
Same tool, same arguments, same server. The difference is whether anything was in a position to refuse.
Read the walkthrough: Your agent reads an issue — or run it:
Why a proxy and not a library
A library has to be adopted by whoever wrote the server. A proxy protects servers you cannot modify — which is most of them, because the useful MCP servers are published packages someone else maintains.
It also gives you one place to hold policy and one audit trail across every server an agent can reach, rather than per-server configuration nobody keeps in sync.
Configure
Start from what you already run
Four things it will not do: import itself, import a remote server it cannot launch as a subprocess, overwrite an existing file without --force, or write a deny_tools list you did not choose. It writes the file, tells you what it took and what it left, and stops.
Pass --config PATH alongside --init to write somewhere other than ./gateway.json.
After running it, replace those servers in your client with a single entry for the gateway. Leaving both means your agent talks to them directly as well as through the proxy, and the audit trail will only show half the traffic.
Check the wiring before a client ever sees it:
The chain
Installing
The base install is a working gateway, not a stub:
That gives you policy → frozen-verify → audit, which already refuses a tool no upstream exposes, an argument of the wrong type, an undeclared parameter, a tool on your deny list, and prompt injection in an argument. Nothing else needed.
Each extra adds a layer on top:
Combine what you want, or take everything:
All four extras are small pure-Python packages — [all] adds no compiled dependencies and no service to run.
A partial install degrades visibly. The gateway prints its active layers at startup, so you can always see what is actually running:
If a layer isn't on that line, it isn't running — whatever you think you installed.
Verified end to end
Against mcp-server-git and mcp-server-sqlite running as real upstreams, driven by a real MCP client:
Afterwards the repository still holds one commit and the database holds exactly the row it should — checked by opening them directly, not by trusting the gateway's own report. Eleven audit records for ten calls; editing any one of them breaks the chain.
Those cases are the test suite, not a screenshot: pytest tests/ -v.
Layer C: N-model consensus
Every other layer is deterministic and local. Layer C is the exception: it asks several independent models to extract the same structured document from a tool's result, canonicalises each answer, and compares the SHA-256 hashes. Agreement is decided by hash, not by prose.
It is off unless configured, because it is the only layer that costs money and latency per call, and the only one that sends tool output to a model.
Two provider types: local (any OpenAI-compatible endpoint — Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio; base_url defaults to http://localhost:11434/v1) and openrouter (the key is read from the named environment variable, never written in the config).
Three rules the gateway enforces at startup rather than discovering at runtime:
- At least two providers. One model cannot disagree with itself; a consensus of one reports agreement on every call, which is worse than no layer because it looks like verification.
- No duplicate models. Two instances of the same model agreeing is not independent verification.
- A missing API key refuses to start. It does not fall back to running without the layer.
All providers run at temperature = 0, enforced in the constructor.
Check your models agree before you trust the layer
--check runs one real consensus call against your configured models and tells you what happened. This matters more than it sounds:
Consensus compares canonical hashes, so two models that are both semantically right but structurally different never agree. A weaker model that echoes the schema back —
— mismatches on every call, forever, and the gateway refuses everything with a reason that correctly reads "the models disagreed". Because they did.
The probe distinguishes the three outcomes:
Install sovereign-mcp-gateway[consensus] or [all] — the HTTP providers need requests, which the core library deliberately does not depend on.
--check also lists the active layers, so you can confirm at a glance:
If consensus is absent from that line, it is not running, whatever the config says.
Namespacing
With namespace on (the default) a tool is exposed as git__git_status. Two upstreams offering the same tool name cannot collide, shadow each other, or be reached through the wrong namespace. Turn it off only when you have a single upstream.
Policy
deny_toolsmatches either the exposed name (git__git_reset) or the upstream tool name (git_reset, on every upstream that has it).allow_tools, when set, refuses everything not listed.pii_policydefaults towarn, notblock. Real tools return personal data as normal output — everygit logentry carries an author email — and blocking those makes the gateway unusable. Setblockwhen your tools should never emit PII.fail_closeddecides what happens when a layer itself errors. Default: refuse.rate_limit_intervalis0, which disables the behavioural floor's own inter-action delay. That delay is right for one agent taking deliberate steps and wrong for a proxy, where a burst of tool calls is ordinary traffic.entropy_policydefaults towarn. The text filter's entropy heuristic hunts for encoded payloads hidden in prose, but tool arguments are routinely structured — paths, identifiers, hashes — where high entropy is normal. A temporary directory path alone was enough to have a legitimate call refused. Setblockwhen your arguments really are prose.
What this does not do
It verifies calls against frozen definitions and inspects arguments and results. It does not read your servers' source, so it cannot see a check that is present, is called, and silently does nothing. That still takes someone reading the implementation.
It also cannot protect against a compromised upstream returning correct-looking data — Layer C consensus in sovereign-mcp addresses that, and requires model providers you configure yourself.
Licence
Business Source License 1.1 — see LICENSE.
The source is public. You may read it, modify it, create derivative works and use it for development, evaluation and any other non-production purpose at no cost.
Production use is also free for an individual, or an organisation of four or fewer people — that is written into the licence as an Additional Use Grant, not just stated here. Larger organisations need a commercial licence.
Each version converts to Apache 2.0 on its Change Date, four years after publication.
To license it for production, or to ask whether your use needs one: [email protected]
来源:README.md,提交 d9f215e
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.3.0最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 40%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分
请在仓库或注册中心条目中声明许可证。