Metabase
io.github.metabase由 GitHub 账号 metabase 发布v0.1.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026
Lets AI clients search, explore, query, and visualize data in a Metabase instance.
概览
Metabase 内置的远程 MCP 服务器,让 AI 客户端在用户权限范围内搜索、浏览、查询和可视化数据,并创建或更新 Metabase 内容。
- 可以做什么
- 搜索与浏览内容:在实例中搜索、浏览集合以及数据库→模式→表→字段层级、按类型和 ID 获取内容、查询业务术语和筛选器可选值
- 查询数据:执行结构化 MBQL 查询或已保存问题、运行原始 SQL,并把结果渲染为对话内图表或表格
- 创建与编辑内容:写入问题、模型、仪表板、文档、集合、指标、度量和分段,复制内容,管理书签
- 安排推送:创建或更新告警和仪表板订阅
- 通过 learn 工具和 MCP 资源读取任务文档与字段路径目录
- 适用场景
- 适合让助手基于 Metabase 实例中的数据回答问题、探索仪表板和已保存问题,或在对话中直接创建和维护问题、仪表板、告警等 Metabase 内容时使用。
- 运行要求
- 需要一个可访问的 Metabase 实例,并在其 /api/metabase-mcp 路径上开放 MCP 端点(旧的 /api/mcp 别名仍可用)。客户端通过 Streamable HTTP 连接,并使用 Metabase 自带 OAuth 2.0 授权服务器认证;MCP 路径不接受会话 Cookie 和 API 密钥。用户需登录并在授权页批准所请求的权限范围。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Metabase,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
Metabase MCP Server
Metabase includes a built-in Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that lets AI clients connect directly to a Metabase instance. It uses the Streamable HTTP transport and builds on Metabase's Agent API to expose tools for searching, navigating, querying, visualizing, and creating/updating content - all scoped to the connecting user's permissions.
Endpoint
The MCP server is available at:
The legacy /api/mcp path still works as an alias for existing clients, but /api/metabase-mcp is the
canonical URL to advertise.
Connecting a client
Point any MCP-compatible client at the /api/metabase-mcp endpoint. For example, with Claude Code:
For Claude Desktop, create a custom connector using the same URL.
For Cursor, open Settings > MCP and add a new server with the type set to streamable-http and the URL:
Authentication
MCP clients authenticate via OAuth 2.0. Metabase runs its own embedded OAuth server - no external provider is needed.
The flow for a first-time connection:
- The client discovers Metabase's OAuth endpoints.
- The client registers itself with Metabase.
- The user is redirected to Metabase to log in and approve the connection.
- The client receives an access token scoped to the user's Metabase permissions.
MCP accepts only an OAuth access token. On the MCP paths the session middleware ignores session cookies and API
keys, so such a request gets the same 401 discovery challenge as a request with no credential. An mb:full token
holds no MCP scope, so it can connect but call no scoped tool.
Scopes
Access tokens are scoped to limit what tools a client can use:
A tool matches only the exact scope in the table. A wildcard such as * or agent:*, and the ::unrestricted
sentinel, are not MCP scopes, so they grant no tool.
These scopes gate the MCP surface only. No REST endpoint may declare one as its :scope, so a new token issued to an
MCP client grants nothing on the REST API.
The protected-resource metadata's scopes_supported and the scope of the 401 challenge both list every scope in
the table, so a fresh connection asks for all of them. Some clients do not step up after a 403: a manual reconnect
from Claude's connector settings registers a new client and asks for exactly what these list. When they listed only
the baseline, that reconnect never offered writes, raw SQL, or delivery, and the user had no way to grant them
(ENG-11089). The authorization server metadata advertises all of them too.
The baseline (agent:content:read agent:query:run) is locked on the consent screen: when a client requests one of
these, the user cannot untick it. agent:query:run is in the baseline so that charts never need a step-up. Claude
Desktop retries a tool after a step-up over a session that doesn't declare MCP Apps support, so a stepped-up
visualize_query is refused and its chart never embeds.
A tool call or data resource read the token lacks a scope for is refused with HTTP 403 and a
WWW-Authenticate: Bearer error="insufficient_scope" challenge whose scope lists the v2 scopes the token already
holds plus the one required, so a client can step up. Each tool also declares its scope in securitySchemes, which is
draft SEP-1488, supported by ChatGPT. It is
not part of MCP 2025-03-26 (the version this server reports) or the final 2026-07-28 tools spec, so other clients
discover the missing scope from the 403 instead. Inside a JSON-RPC batch the refusal is an in-band -32600 error
instead. UI shell reads are never challenged: see Resources.
OAuth protected resource metadata is available at:
On the consent screen, every scope the client requested starts ticked, and the baseline scopes are also locked. Only
the scopes left ticked are granted, and only for the token this authorization mints. An untick never touches a token
the app already has. A scope left unticked is not remembered by Metabase. A later 403 can trigger another step-up in
clients that support it. Other clients may require manual reauthorization. Each challenge's error_description ends
with a note that the user must grant the permission on the consent screen.
Several clients replace the 403's error_description with their own text, so the initialize result's instructions
explain scope failures to the model too: an auth error usually means a missing permission rather than an expired
login, the model should name the failed tool or resource and the permission it requires, and the user grants it by
reconnecting and leaving the permission ticked on the consent screen. The instructions are one static string, the same
for every caller: there is no per-connection permission list.
Per-group tool access
On Enterprise instances with the ai_controls feature, an admin can narrow the surface per permissions group on Admin > AI > Usage controls > MCP tools access (shown whenever the MCP server is on, with or without an LLM provider). Each group has a row in mcp_group_permission saying whether its members may connect at all and, per tool name, the admin's explicit "yes" or "no"; a tool with no entry takes the default its author declared, so every deftool carries a required :default-access of :allowed or :denied and a tool released later gets exactly that default in every group until an admin overrides it. Entries are keyed by tool name, so renaming a tool needs :renamed-from with its former names (a stored entry under a former name still applies and the admin API presents it under the current name), or the author accepts that every admin's choice for it is discarded; metabase.mcp.v2.tool-names-test pins the live names so neither happens by accident. A user's effective policy is the tool_access of each group of theirs whose row enables MCP: MCP is on when any such group exists, and a tool is allowed when any of those groups resolves it to yes. The rows alone decide it, and they also record the permission mode: simple mode (Administrators, All Users, and All tenant users) or group-level mode (every other group), which is the state in which All Users has no row. A switch deletes the rows of the groups the new mode hides and seeds the groups it enables on entry that have no row (Data Analysts on entering group-level mode, All Users and All tenant users on leaving it), and PUT refuses a group the current mode hides, so no request reads a cached mode. The policy is applied on top of OAuth scopes in tools/list and tools/call (v2/registry.clj), and a user whose groups grant no access is refused at initialize and at resources/read (for sessions opened before MCP was turned off) with an error naming the fix. App-only tools (_meta {:ui {:visibility ["app"]}}, i.e. refresh_ui_credential) are not on the admin page: they are allowed while the policy allows any MCP Apps tool. Superusers and internal callers are never narrowed; OSS allows everything. On Enterprise the stored rows are enforced even without the ai_controls feature (an expired or unverifiable token keeps the restrictions an admin configured); the feature only gates the admin page and API. The resolver is permissions.clj (defenterprise, EE implementation in metabase-enterprise.mcp.permissions) and the admin API is /api/ee/ai-controls/mcp-permissions.
Available tools
Generated from the v2 registry (deftool). The scope named here is what the registry checks before the tool
runs; some handlers check a further scope once they know what the call does - agent:sql:run when a source
resolves to native SQL (question_write), and agent:query:run for the execution an alert or subscription defers
(alert_write, subscription_write). Those refusals carry the same 403 insufficient_scope challenge. tools/list
shows every tool whatever the token holds, and a token missing the scope may not call it.
execute_query returns row_limit rows per call (default 100, max 2000) — a page size, not a bound on the result.
A truncated page reports truncated: true and, when the query has a total order, a next_cursor to pass back as
cursor for the next page, until a page arrives with truncated: false. A query that wants only its first N rows
carries limit: N in its stage (with an order-by); the server spends that limit down across pages, so the last
page comes back complete with no cursor and pagination ends by itself.
Resources
The server exposes MCP resources so clients can fetch supplementary content by URI without inflating tool descriptions.
Every resource is listed whatever the token's scopes. A data resource, such as the fields catalog, is read only by a
token holding its scope; otherwise the read gets the 403 insufficient_scope challenge described under
Scopes. A UI shell is read by any token, because an MCP Apps host reads a tool's shell
alongside the tool call, and if that read were refused, the host would not step up after the tool call's 403. The
shells carry no data. A shell read by a token without the shell's scope never mints a UI credential. The chart data is
gated by the tool call and by refresh_ui_credential (both agent:query:run), which the iframe needs before it can
query anything. An unknown URI is a -32602 "Resource not found" error.
Skill packs are delivered through the learn tool rather than as resources.
Entity navigation is done with the get_content and browse_* tools rather than a URI scheme; the ui://
resources above exist only so a client that can render an iframe has something to mount.
Supported JSON-RPC methods
Requests can be sent individually or as a JSON-RPC batch. The server responds with JSON or SSE depending on the
Accept header.
Architecture
The implementation lives in these files:
-
transport.clj- The HTTP transport. Parses JSON-RPC requests, validates authentication and session headers, enforces origin checks (DNS rebinding protection), and dispatches to the appropriate method. Supports both JSON and SSE response formats. -
v2/api.clj- The tool surface handler. Wires the transport to the v2 tool + resource registries and defines method dispatch (tools/list,tools/call,resources/list,resources/read,ping). -
v2/registry.clj- The v2 tool registry. Tools self-register viadeftool; the registry checks scopes, validates arguments, dispatches calls, and records usage. -
scope.clj- Scope matching logic. Exact matches only: wildcards, nil scopes, and the::unrestrictedsentinel match nothing.
Request flow
Further reading
来源:src/metabase/mcp/README.md,提交 ffebfce
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.1.0最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 40%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式必需10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分
请在仓库或注册中心条目中声明许可证。