
Lens Mcp
io.github.mrhpython由 GitHub 账号 mrhpython 发布v1.1.1更新于 Nov 10, 2026
Outside-in validation gate for AI-generated text; a separate model checks LLM output, fail-closed.
概览
通过托管的 Lens API 对 AI 生成的文本运行外部验证闸门,返回通过/失败评分并清理 PII。
- 可以做什么
- 将托管的 Soulfield Lens API 封装为 stdio MCP 服务器。闸门层提供 validate_content,由另一个模型对文本运行固定闸门,返回通过/失败、评分、各维度结果和违规详情;scrub_pii 是基于模式的服务端扫描,把结构化 PII 和凭据模式替换为类型标记;lens_health 是无需密钥的状态检查。可选的验证器层增加六个本地工具,用于跨文件一致性检查和缺陷记忆,但仅在本地安装 lens-kit CLI 后可用。
- 适用场景
- 适合在助手生成的文本将要发布或交付时使用,希望由独立模型检查,而不是让生成答案的模型自评。闸门是失败关闭的,边界情况返回 UNKNOWN 而不是静默通过。可选的验证器层适合检查磁盘上的文件,查找禁用词、无依据的数字和丢失的证据标记。
- 运行要求
- 通过 npx 或全局安装 @soulfield/lens-mcp 在本地运行,需要 Node.js。validate_content 和 scrub_pii 需要 SOULFIELD_API_KEY,SOULFIELD_API_BASE 应指向托管服务或你自己的部署。lens_health 不需要密钥。可选的验证器层需要本地安装 lens-kit CLI,或设置 LENS_KIT_BIN 指向其路径。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Lens Mcp,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
Soulfield Lens — MCP server
Long jobs can use validation_submit followed by validation_receipt on a
fresh MCP connection. Save the returned job ID with the candidate SHA-256 locally.
Retrieve that ID after a polling timeout; do not submit the content again.
Pending, failed, expired and incomplete jobs confer no clearance. An uncertain
submission without a returned ID must not be automatically retried. The existing
validate_content tool is unchanged. See test/validation-jobs.test.cjs for
offline recovery and Rights-preservation fixtures.
Outside-in validation for AI-generated text, as an MCP tool.
Every AI tool asks the same model that wrote the answer whether it's any good. It says yes. The Soulfield Lens is outside-in: a separate model runs a fixed gate over your output. It checks text — it doesn't write it. This package puts that gate inside Claude Code, Cursor, and any other MCP-compatible agent, so output can be validated on the path where it's generated.
The gate is fail-closed: a borderline case returns UNKNOWN, never a silent pass. There is no generation step, so it can't fabricate claims of its own — only check. It can still be wrong about a judgment; that is exactly why borderline cases return UNKNOWN instead of a confident yes.
This is a local stdio boundary around the hosted Lens API (api.soulfield.one). It keeps repository access on the caller's machine and sends only the finished artifact text to the API gate.
It exposes two tiers. The gate tier (3 tools) needs nothing but an API key. The validator tier (7 tools) adds one local orchestration entry point plus the optional lens-kit cross-file checks and defect memory that the single-document gate cannot see. Skip local evidence inputs and the gate tier works exactly as before.
Try it before you install anything
The keyless demo endpoint runs the same gate — a few runs a day per IP, no signup:
Install
Or run without installing: npx @soulfield/lens-mcp.
Claude Code
Any MCP client (JSON config)
Production calls need an API key — request one at [email protected]. lens_health works without one.
Tools
Gate tier — hosted API, works out of the box
Validator tier — local; consistency checks require lens-kit
Version note: the validator tier lands in 1.1.0. If
npm view @soulfield/lens-mcp versionstill reports1.0.0, the registry has not caught up with this repo yet andnpx @soulfield/lens-mcpwill give you the three gate-tier tools only. Install from source in the meantime.
Artifact orchestration:
validate_artifactlands in 1.2.0. Its bounded local evidence search is built into this MCP package. Requested consistency checks still requirelens-kit.
Side effect worth knowing: every validator-tier call appends a row to
RUNS.mdin its working directory — that is the kit's run ledger, by design. The directory is thecwdargument, or the server's own cwd if you omit it, so passcwdexplicitly if you care where the ledger lives. Sensitive flag values are redacted in the row (--deny <redacted>), so deny terms do not land on disk.
Prerequisite: pip install lens_kit (Apache-2.0, github.com/mrhpython/lens-kit), or set LENS_KIT_BIN to its path. Without it these six tools return UNKNOWN with an error — never a silent pass. No API key needed: they run locally and make no LLM call.
Why they run locally and not on the hosted API: they take file paths off your disk. A hosted endpoint that accepted arbitrary local paths would be a file-disclosure vector, not a feature. On stdio the paths are your own machine, so the capability is safe here and only here — and for that reason it will not be added to the hosted API.
Choosing deny terms and markers. These three are tripwires, not oracles — on a live run over this project's own copy they produced six flags and zero true defects, across three distinct false-positive classes (negation, superseded-figure, casing). That is the designed behaviour, and it is why the doctrine is adjudicate, never auto-apply. Deny terms work best as strings that are wrong in every context — a real client name, an internal codename — rather than claims you do not make, which legitimately appear inside disclaimers. Markers work best when their casing is stable across source and render.
| lens_catches_relevant | Reads the defect bank before you validate: prior named defects for an artifact type, most-recurrent first. Patterns at threshold are marked [PROMOTE] — they recur often enough to deserve a fixed check. | — |
| lens_catches_add | Records a named defect so it is caught next time: what was wrong, the general pattern, the forward rule. Routine passes are rejected by design — only real defects. | — |
| lens_catches_stats | Per-pattern recurrence counts with promote suggestions. Tells you what to harden next. | — |
The two tiers are complementary, not alternatives. The gate has no tools and no file access — that is precisely what makes it an independent check, and it is also why it cannot see a contradiction spread across two files. The validator tier sees the disk; the gate owns the score. Pair them: gather substrate evidence with the local tools, hand the text to the gate, and never argue a gate FAIL into a PASS. Full protocol: docs/VALIDATOR-AGENT.md.
One local entry point
validate_artifact makes the boundary explicit in one call:
The response includes evidence_scope, files_read, searches_and_commands, claims_verified, and claims_unverified. claims_verified is deliberately empty: grep proves that text exists at a source location, not that the claim is true. The separate validator agent must read the located evidence, reason across the files, and attach the final full-validator receipt.
Evidence file contents and local absolute paths are never added to the API request. Directory searches skip .git, node_modules, symlinks, and binary files and fail closed when configured safety limits are exceeded.
What you get per run: receipts — what was checked, what passed, what was held, and why. Machine-readable, not a badge. We won't hand you a guaranteed accuracy number for your data: scores don't transfer across models, datasets, and runtimes, and a tool that promises a fixed figure on data it has never seen is making the exact claim this gate exists to catch.
Long inputs
Inputs of ~4,000 characters and up are submitted as an async job and polled to completion automatically, so a single long validation never dies on a request timeout. Short inputs use the fast synchronous path. No configuration needed.
Configuration (env vars)
The rest of the product
This wrapper is one of several surfaces on the same engine:
- Free one-output audit — api.soulfield.one/audit. The audit is the demo.
- Wire it in (SDK stop-hook and middleware) — api.soulfield.one/developers.
- Own it — the kit: lenses, compiler, self-improve loop, validator agent, Apache-2.0. Train it on your own data. Public repo: github.com/mrhpython/lens-kit — clone it,
pip install -e ".[dev]", and the test suite runs offline with no key. Installing it is also what activates the validator tier above.
We hold our own marketing copy to the same gate this package exposes.
License
MIT — see LICENSE. (The lens-kit product is licensed separately under Apache-2.0.)
来源:README.md,提交 c1acaf8
工具
0版本历史
1- v1.1.1最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分