Mythos Agent

io.github.mythos-agent由 GitHub 账号 mythos-agent 发布v4.0.1更新于 Oct 27, 2026

Open-source AI security agent: SAST, DAST, and policy-as-code over MCP.

概览

AI 生成的概览

开源 AI 安全代码审查代理,可扫描本地代码库中的漏洞、密钥、依赖与 IaC 问题,并给出修复建议。

可以做什么
  • 扫描代码中的漏洞模式、密钥泄露、依赖 CVE、IaC 配置错误,以及 API、JWT、加密与隐私问题
  • 运行多阶段自主 hunt:生成假设、验证发现并生成概念验证利用
  • 按根因模式查找已知 CVE 的变体,并进行数据流污点分析
  • 生成 AI 补丁、回答自然语言安全问题,并将发现映射到 SOC2/HIPAA/PCI/OWASP 策略
  • 导出终端、JSON、HTML 或 SARIF 报告,并提供本地仪表盘
  • 监听文件变化持续扫描,并检查已安装的外部安全工具
适用场景
适合让助手审查本地代码仓库的安全问题、按置信度筛选发现,或检查某个已知 CVE 的根因模式是否出现在代码其他地方。适用于发布前或拉取请求过程中的安全导向代码审查。
运行要求
以本地 npm 包形式运行(npx mythos-agent),需要桌面环境。模式、密钥、依赖与 IaC 扫描无需 API 密钥;完整的自主 hunt 与 AI 功能需配置模型提供方(Anthropic,或通过配置或 ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL 环境变量接入 OpenAI 兼容或本地端点)。可选安装 Semgrep、Gitleaks、Trivy、Checkov、Nuclei 等外部工具以扩大覆盖。
安装前请注意
AI 相关命令会把代码和发现发送给所配置的模型提供方,可能是第三方;使用本地模型可让数据留在本机。fix 命令可对文件应用补丁,watch 模式会在保存时重新扫描。依赖检查会通过网络查询 OSV API。使用前请审阅生成的补丁与概念验证利用代码。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Mythos Agent,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

English · 简体中文

[mythos-agent — Cerby the guard puppy]

[mythos-agent — 10-second security check demo]

mythos-agent

AI code-review assistant for application security.

Open-source. Reads your code, flags likely security issues, explains its reasoning, suggests fixes.

[CI] [npm] [License] [Discord] [Node] [Wired scanners] [Experimental scanners] [Rules]

mythos-agent.com

Quick Start • How It Works • Commands • Hunt Mode • Variant Analysis • Integrations • Contributing • Vision • Roadmap


mythos-agent reviews your code the way a reviewer on a security-focused team would. It walks through likely issue patterns, checks for variants of known CVEs, ranks findings by confidence, and suggests fixes you can accept or reject. See VISION.md for the full framing.

For new contributors: the active 6-month working plan is in the pinned issue [Roadmap] mythos-agent H1 2026 Goals. Look for 🙋 markers to spot items where help is wanted. New here? See CONTRIBUTING.md for good-first-issue guidance.

For security teams and EU CRA-compliant downstream manufacturers: see SECURITY.md for our vulnerability disclosure SLAs, docs/security/cra-stance.md for our EU CRA role declaration, docs/security/threat-model.md for our public threat model, and RELEASES.md for our versioning, LTS, and EOL policy. OpenSSF Best Practices Badge (Passing) submission targeted June 2026; releases are signed via Sigstore and ship with CycloneDX SBOMs for downstream Manufacturer compliance.

bash
npx mythos-agent hunt
🔐 mythos-agent hunt — AI Code-Review Assistant
✔ Phase 1: Reconnaissance — 12 entry points, express, typescript, postgresql✔ Phase 2: Hypothesis — 8 security hypotheses generated✔ Phase 3: Analysis — 15 findings (semgrep, gitleaks, trivy, built-in), 22 false positives dismissed✔ Phase 4: Reproduction — 2 finding chains, 3 reproductions
🧪 Security Hypotheses
  [HIGH] HYPO-001 — Race condition: concurrent payment requests could double-charge    src/payments.ts:45 (race-condition)  [HIGH] HYPO-002 — Auth bypass: JWT token not validated after password change    src/auth.ts:78 (auth-bypass)
📊 Confidence Summary
  3 confirmed | 8 likely | 4 possible | 22 dismissed
⛓️ FINDING CHAINS
 CRITICAL  SQL Injection → Auth Bypass → Data Exfiltration  ├── src/api/search.ts:45      — unsanitized input in SQL query  ├── src/middleware/auth.ts:88  — JWT verification skippable  └── src/api/export.ts:23      — bulk export has no ACL
🧪 Reproductions
  SPX-0001 — SQL injection in search endpoint    See repro steps in docs/reproductions/SPX-0001.md
  Trust Score: 2.3/10 — critical issues found

Quick Start

bash
# Installnpm install -g mythos-agent
# Quick scan (no API key needed)mythos-agent scan
# Full autonomous hunt (needs API key)mythos-agent initmythos-agent hunt
# Find variants of known CVEsmythos-agent variants CVE-2021-44228
# Ask security questionsmythos-agent ask "are there any auth bypasses?"
# Check available toolsmythos-agent tools

How It Works

mythos-agent combines three things no other open-source tool does together:

1. Hypothesis-Driven Scanning

Instead of matching known patterns, the AI reasons about what COULD go wrong, generating hypotheses like "this transaction doesn't lock the row, potential race condition" or "this auth check uses string comparison, potential timing attack."

2. Variant Analysis (Big Sleep technique)

Given a known CVE, mythos-agent finds structurally similar but syntactically different code in your codebase. Same root cause, different location. This is how Google's Big Sleep found 20 real zero-days.

3. Multi-Stage Verification

Every finding goes through a confidence pipeline:

  • Pattern scan → candidate
  • AI hypothesis → theoretical risk confirmed
  • Smart fuzzer → dynamically tested
  • PoC generator → concrete exploit proves it's real

Only findings that survive multiple stages are reported as "confirmed."

Commands

CommandDescription
hunt [path]Full autonomous multi-agent scan (Recon → Hypothesize → Analyze → Exploit)
scan [path]Standard scan (patterns + secrets + deps + IaC + AI)
variants [cve-id]Find variants of known CVEs in your codebase
fix [path]AI-generated patches with --apply
ask [question]Natural language security queries
taint [path]AI data flow / taint analysis
watchContinuous monitoring that scans on file save
dashboardLocal web UI with charts and findings table
report [path]Export as terminal / JSON / HTML / SARIF
policyPolicy-as-code with SOC2/HIPAA/PCI/OWASP compliance
rulesCommunity rule pack registry (search/install/publish)
toolsCheck which external security tools are installed
initSetup wizard (Anthropic, OpenAI, Ollama, LM Studio)

Hunt Mode

mythos-agent hunt runs the full multi-agent pipeline:

┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐│    Recon     │ →   │  Hypothesis  │ →   │   Analyze    │ →   │   Exploit    ││    Agent     │     │    Agent     │     │    Agent     │     │    Agent     │├──────────────┤     ├──────────────┤     ├──────────────┤     ├──────────────┤│ Map entry    │     │ Reason about │     │ All scanners │     │ Chain vulns  ││ points, auth │     │ what could   │     │ + external   │     │ + generate   ││ boundaries,  │     │ go wrong per │     │ tools + AI   │     │ PoC exploits ││ data stores  │     │ function     │     │ verification │     │              │└──────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └──────────────┘

Variant Analysis

Find code in your project that has the same root cause as known CVEs:

bash
# Search for Log4Shell-like patternsmythos-agent variants CVE-2021-44228
# Auto-detect and scan for variantsmythos-agent variants --auto

The variant analyzer extracts the root cause pattern from the CVE (not the surface syntax) and searches your codebase for structurally similar code.

Scanners (15 wired + 28 experimental, 329+ rules)

The Default scanners run on every mythos-agent scan. Experimental scanners are implemented + unit-tested classes that ship in the tarball but are not yet reachable from any CLI, HTTP, MCP, or agent entry point. They are tracked by KNOWN_EXPERIMENTAL in the wiring-invariant test.

CategoryWhat it findsRulesStatus
Code patternsSQLi, XSS, command injection, eval, SSRF, etc.25+Default
Framework rulesReact, Next.js, Express, Django, Flask, Spring, Go27Default
SecretsAWS, GitHub, Stripe, API keys, DB URLs, private keys + entropy22Default
Dependencies (SCA)Known CVEs via OSV API (10 lockfile formats)OSVDefault
IaCDocker, Terraform, Kubernetes misconfigurations13Default
AI/LLM SecurityPrompt injection, unsafe eval of AI output, cost attacks13Default
API SecurityOWASP API Top 10: BOLA, mass assignment, broken auth12Default
Cloud MisconfigAWS/Azure/GCP: public storage, wildcard IAM, open firewalls14Default
Security HeadersCSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy8Default
JWTAlgorithm, expiry, storage, revocation, audience9Default
SessionFixation, expiry, cookie flags, localStorage tokens7Default
Business LogicNegative amounts, coupon reuse, inventory races, role escalation6Default
Crypto AuditWeak hashes, ECB mode, hardcoded keys, deprecated TLS11Default
Privacy/GDPRPII handling, consent, data retention (GDPR article mapping)9Default
Race ConditionsTOCTOU, non-atomic ops, double-spend, missing transactions7Default
ReDoSCatastrophic backtracking in regex (nested quantifiers, overlapping alternatives)—Default
Supply ChainTyposquatting, dependency confusion, dangerous install scripts12Experimental
Zero TrustService trust, mTLS, network segmentation, IP-based auth8Experimental
GraphQLIntrospection, depth limit, field auth, batching8Experimental
WebSocketAuth, origin check, message validation, broadcast XSS7Experimental
CORSOrigin reflection, credentials handling, substring bypass7Experimental
OAuth/OIDCMissing state, no PKCE, implicit flow, client secret exposure7Experimental
SSTIJinja2, EJS, Handlebars, Pug, Nunjucks, Twig, Go templates7Experimental
Additional experimental scanners (21 more, not yet wired into default scan)

SQL injection deep, XSS deep, NoSQL, command injection, deserialization, path traversal, open redirect, XXE, input validation, clickjacking, DNS rebinding, subdomain enumeration, dep confusion, environment variables, logging, error handling, cache, email, upload, memory safety, permissions.

Each exists as a class under src/scanner/ and has unit tests in src/scanner/__tests__/coverage-scanners.test.ts / new-scanners.test.ts, but is not invoked by any CLI command, HTTP API route, MCP handler, or agent pipeline. See KNOWN_EXPERIMENTAL in the wiring-invariant test for each scanner's deferral reason. Wiring one up follows the pattern of the HeadersScanner / JwtScanner / SessionScanner / BusinessLogicScanner commits on main.

Beyond the scanners above, mythos-agent ships complementary analyses (not counted in the scanner totals): call-graph + taint engine, DAST smart fuzzer, AI hypothesis agent, variant analysis, and git-history mining.

External tool integrations: Semgrep (30+ languages), Gitleaks (100+ patterns), Trivy (SCA + containers), Checkov (1000+ IaC policies), Nuclei (9000+ DAST templates)

Integrations

PlatformWhat
VS CodeExtension with inline diagnostics + one-click AI fix
GitHub ActionScan on push/PR + SARIF upload to Code Scanning
PR Review BotInline comments on vulnerable lines in pull requests
DashboardLocal web UI at mythos-agent dashboard
SARIFGitHub Code Scanning, VS Code, any SARIF tool
Policy EngineSOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, OWASP compliance mapping

AI Providers

TierProvidersStatus
1 — PrimaryAnthropic (Claude Sonnet / Opus / Haiku)Fully tested. Published catch-rate numbers in docs/benchmarks/external-scores.md are produced with this tier.
2 — Compatible (proxy today, native in stage 2)Anything OpenAI-compatible — OpenAI, Qwen via DashScope/OpenRouter, Gemini, Mistral, vLLM, Ollama, LM Studio, Bedrock, etc.Today: route through any Anthropic-compatible proxy (LiteLLM, OpenRouter, Vercel AI Gateway, Bedrock) by setting baseURL in .mythos.yml or ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL env. Native OpenAI SDK support lands in stage 2.
3 — Local / communityLocal Ollama / LM Studio / vLLMSame code path as Tier 2; called out separately because privacy and cost-of-zero are the use case. Best-effort; agentic tool-use quality depends on local model size.

Pattern scanning, secrets, deps, and IaC work without any API key.

See docs/multi-model.md for the full tier-system policy + the staged rollout (this README is the summary; that doc is the canonical reference).

Comparison

Featuremythos-agentSemgrepSnykCodeQLNuclei
Pattern scanningYesBestYesYesTemplates
Hypothesis scanningYesNoNoNoNo
Variant analysisYesNoNoPartialNo
AI-guided fuzzingYesNoNoNoTemplates
PoC generationYesNoNoNoNo
AI deep analysisYesNoLimitedNoNo
Vuln chainingYesNoNoNoNo
AI auto-fixYesNoFix PRsNoNo
NL queriesYesNoNoNoNo
SecretsYesYesYesNoNo
SCAYesNoBestNoNo
IaCYesNoYesNoTemplates
DASTYesNoNoNoBest
Open sourceYesPartialNoYesYes

This feature table is a capability comparison, not an accuracy claim. For reproducible, third-party-runnable accuracy numbers vs Semgrep CE / Snyk Code / CodeQL on OWASP Benchmark, CyberSecEval 3, Vul4J, and our CVE replay harness, see docs/benchmarks/external-scores.md.

Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

bash
git clone https://github.com/mythos-agent/mythos-agent.gitcd mythos-agent && npm install && npm run build && npm test

Architecture

src/  agents/         Multi-agent orchestrator + Recon/Hypothesis/Analyzer/Exploit agents  analysis/       Code parser, call graph, taint engine, variant analyzer, service mapper  agent/          AI integration, prompts, tools, fix validator  cli/            44 CLI commands  dast/           Smart fuzzer, PoC generator, payload library  policy/         Policy engine + compliance mapping  report/         Terminal, JSON, HTML, SARIF, dashboard  rules/          Built-in + custom YAML + community registry  scanner/        Pattern, secrets, deps, IaC, diff scanners  store/          Results persistence + incremental cache  tools/          External tool wrappers (Semgrep, Trivy, etc.)vscode-extension/ VS Code extensionaction/           GitHub Actionsbot/              PR Review Bot

License

MIT

来源:README.md,提交 a14abd1

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中启动过该软件包,因此其工具未知。

版本历史

1
  1. v4.0.1最新Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 50%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分

    请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。

  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分