Meteor Mcp

io.github.qso-graph由 GitHub 账号 qso-graph 发布v0.4.1更新于 Nov 3, 2026

Meteor scatter planning between two stations: showers, radiant geometry, live counts

发布方自己的服务:Meteor

已验证STDIO仅桌面位置与生活数据与分析

概览

AI 生成的概览

为业余无线电规划两个网格方格之间的流星散射通联,提供流星雨数据、逐小时几何条件与实时流星计数。

可以做什么
  • 规划两站之间的路径:路径长度、最近的流星雨,以及逐小时反射几何条件,给出 no/marginal/good/best 结论及原因
  • 查询接近峰值的流星雨,以及单个流星雨的全部已发表解,不做平均
  • 读取全球流星网(Global Meteor Network)当日确认的流星计数,按流星雨分类
  • 读取 NASA CNEOS 记录的近期火流星
  • 查看数据来源、引用方式、星表版本与服务器版本
适用场景
适合规划流星散射通联的业余无线电操作者,用来判断两个电台能否在某个流星雨期间通联、何时通联,或查询当前流星雨峰值、实时流星计数与火流星报告。
运行要求
以 Python 包(meteor-mcp)在本地运行,通过 uvx 启动;无需凭据、账号或配置。其中两个工具会读取实时网络数据源,需要网络访问;其余内容在本地计算。
安装前请注意
活动工具返回的是已确认轨迹数量,而非通量密度,且较早读取只覆盖部分日期。路径结论受网格精度影响(4 字符网格约 ±200 公里),接近阈值时可能无法判定。实时数据来自第三方(Global Meteor Network、NASA CNEOS),需遵守其署名要求。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Meteor Mcp,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

meteor-mcp

[PyPI]

Meteor scatter planning for amateur radio: can these two stations work each other on this shower, and when.

That is the whole shape of it. Meteor scatter is a point-to-point mode, so a radiant elevation on its own tells an operator nothing they can act on — the question is always about a path between two stations.

Part of the qso-graph project.

What decides a meteor-scatter contact

Three things, and radiant elevation is only one of them.

1. Path length. Trails burn at about 85–120 km, so a single-hop reflection off something that low works from roughly 400 km to about 2300 km. Shorter and the reflection point would have to be nearly overhead, where there is very little qualifying sky; longer and it sits below both horizons. 800–2000 km is where the geometry is best, and it is what hams actually run.

2. Radiant elevation at the path midpoint — not at either station. The reflection happens near the middle, so that is the sky that matters. Below the horizon there are no trails to reflect from. Very high is also poor, because trails then run down the path rather than across it.

3. The angle between the radiant and the path. This is the one usually left out, and it is the one that decides whether a reflection is geometrically possible at all. A trail reflects specularly only where it is tangent to the ellipsoid with both stations at its foci. Trails running along the path can never be tangent to it; trails running across it can. So a radiant broadside to the path is good and a radiant up- or down-path is poor — at the very same elevation.

All three are reported, and the verdict says which one decided it.

Why there is no score out of a hundred

Because the physics above is a tangency condition, and what a station actually hears also depends on its power, its antenna and the sporadic background. A figure like "73" would imply a precision none of that supports. So the answer is no / marginal / good / best, each with the reason beside it.

Where the numbers come from

Shower radiants, numbers and names are the IAU Meteor Data Center's — the body that names and numbers meteor showers. The package carries the facts read from the MDC's Established showers file with its URL and SHA-256 recorded, so the exact edition served is identifiable. The MDC is maintained on an unpaid voluntary basis and asks to be cited; its requested references are returned by meteor_source_info, printed in NOTICE, and travel inside every answer that uses a radiant.

The MDC lists several published solutions per shower, each from a different study. All of them are kept and none is blended — the average of two published radiants is a third that nobody published and no paper stands behind. Tools return the first-listed solution, labelled, and meteor_shower_info gives them all.

Peaks are stored as solar longitude, not as dates, because that is how the catalogue publishes them and it is the right way round: solar longitude names the same point in the stream every year, while a date drifts. This server converts it to the date it falls on in the year you ask about.

Two tools read the network, because only those two report what is happening right now:

SourceUsed forLicence
Global Meteor NetworkConfirmed meteor counts today, by showerCC BY 4.0 — attribution is a licence condition, and is returned in the answer
NASA CNEOSRecent fireballsUS government work

Everything else is computed locally and needs no network at all.

Your own end comes from your station profile

meteor_window needs both ends of the path, but you should not have to retype your own. Your end is optional, and a host that knows the operator's station supplies it — in QG Desktop that is the Station component.

The fields are ADIF's, not invented here:

ADIF fieldUsed for
MY_GRIDSQUAREThe default grid. ADIF permits 2, 4, 6 or 8 characters
MY_GRIDSQUARE_EXTCharacters 9–12 of a 10- or 12-character locator
MY_LAT / MY_LONAn exact position, when the station has one

A grid is what hams actually use, so a locator is the normal input here, not a degraded one. It may carry 4, 6 or 8 characters. Operators often state 6 or 8 for their own station, while a structured on-air exchange may carry only 4. Which modes constrain it is not asserted here: ADIF enumerates every mode and submode but says nothing about payload length, so there is no authority to infer precision from mode — 4 is the safe floor for all of them.

A grid square is a rectangle, though, and its centre is all a locator gives. Nothing here assumes a precision: the slack is computed from the characters each locator actually carried. At 4 characters that is about ±100 km per end, so a path length carries about ±200 km of slack; at 6 it falls to a few km. That is immaterial on a 1100 km path and decisive against a threshold — a path reported as 2250 km could be 2050 to 2450, which straddles the 2300 km single-hop limit. When a limit falls inside that slack the answer says the call cannot be decided at on-air precision, and what would settle it. The slack is reported either way.

So MY_LAT/MY_LON are used when a station has them, and the answer always says which it used and how precisely each end was located.

A 2-character MY_GRIDSQUARE is a legitimate ADIF value but is refused for a path: a Maidenhead field is 10 by 20 degrees, around 1100 km across, which is wider than the entire usable meteor-scatter range. The refusal explains the precision rather than calling the locator invalid, because it isn't.

Home, portable, and remote all work the same way

ADIF's location fields describe the transmitting station, not where the operator is sitting — MY_LAT is "the logging station's latitude". That is what makes a remote operation come out right without a special case: the reflection geometry depends on where the antenna is. ADIF separates the three callsigns for exactly this reason — STATION_CALLSIGN (used over the air), OPERATOR (the person), and OWNER_CALLSIGN ("the callsign of the OPERATOR's host").

So operating a remote station in FN42 from a chair in DN13 gives the FN42 path, and the operator's own location never enters the calculation.

Install

bash
uvx meteor-mcp            # run it; nothing to install

No credentials, no accounts, no configuration.

Tools

ToolDescription
meteor_windowStart here. Two grid squares in, and the path, the shower, and the hour-by-hour geometry out
meteor_showersWhich showers are near their peak now, closest first, with the peak date
meteor_shower_infoEvery published solution for one shower, unaveraged
meteor_activityHow many meteors the Global Meteor Network has confirmed today, by shower (reads the network)
meteor_fireballsRecent fireballs from NASA CNEOS (reads the network)
meteor_source_infoWhere every number comes from, the edition checksum, and how to cite it
get_version_infoService version and the catalogue edition carried

A count is not a flux

meteor_activity returns the number of confirmed trajectories the Global Meteor Network has recorded today, broken down by IAU shower code. That is not a flux density — meteoroids per square kilometre per hour, corrected for camera coverage and limiting magnitude — which is a different quantity GMN computes separately. The tool is named and documented for what it actually returns. GMN writes the file during the day, so an early read covers a partial day; the generation time comes back with the answer.

Quick Start

Configure your MCP client

meteor-mcp works with any MCP-compatible client. Add the server config and restart.

Claude Desktop

Add to claude_desktop_config.json (~/Library/Application Support/Claude/ on macOS, %APPDATA%\Claude\ on Windows):

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "meteor": {      "command": "uvx",      "args": ["meteor-mcp"]    }  }}
Claude Code

Add to .claude/settings.json:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "meteor": {      "command": "uvx",      "args": ["meteor-mcp"]    }  }}
ChatGPT Desktop

Configure via Settings > Apps & Connectors, or in your agent definition:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "meteor": {      "command": "uvx",      "args": ["meteor-mcp"]    }  }}

Questions it answers

"Can I work EM12 from DN13 on the Perseids tonight, and when?"

"Which meteor showers are near their peak this week?"

"Is the radiant going to be broadside to my path or up it?"

"Is 2100 km too far for single-hop meteor scatter?"

"How many meteors has the Global Meteor Network actually seen today?"

"Show me every published radiant for the Geminids, not an average."

"Were there any fireballs this week?"

Pointing

Point both antennas near the path bearing, not at the radiant. The reflection happens near the path midpoint; the radiant's position decides whether a trail there can be tangent to your path, not where to aim.

Licence

GPL-3.0-or-later. See LICENSE.

来源:README.md,提交 c8706d1

工具

7

meteor_window

Meteor Window

When two stations can work each other by meteor scatter, and why. Give both grid squares. The answer covers the path itself (is it even a meteor-scatter distance), which shower is in play, and then hour by hour whether the geometry can reflect — reported as no / marginal / good / best with the reason that decided it. Three things decide it, and radiant elevation is only one: the path length, the radiant's elevation **at the path midpoint** (where the reflection happens, not at either station), and the angle between the radiant and the path. That last one is the one usually left out and the one that makes a reflection geometrically possible at all — a trail reflects only where it is tangent to the ellipsoid with both stations at its foci, so a radiant broadside to the path works and one up- or down-path does not, at the very same elevation. Your own end can be left out when the host supplies it from the operator's station profile — ADIF's `MY_GRIDSQUARE`, or `MY_LAT` and `MY_LON` when the exact position is known. Those fields describe the **transmitting station**, not where the operator is sitting, which is what makes a remote operation come out right: the reflection geometry depends on where the antenna is.

输入参数whenhoursmy_latmy_lonshowermy_gridtheir_lattheir_lontheir_gridstep_minutes

meteor_showers

Meteor Showers

Which showers are near their peak, closest first. The IAU MDC publishes each maximum as a solar longitude rather than a date, because solar longitude names the same point in the stream every year while a date drifts. The longitude is converted here to the date it falls on in the year asked about.

输入参数whenlimit

meteor_shower_info

Meteor Shower Info

Every published solution for one shower, unaveraged. The MDC carries several solutions per shower, each from a different study, with slightly different radiants and speeds. All of them are returned. None is blended, because the average of two published radiants is a third that nobody published and no paper stands behind.

输入参数shower必填

meteor_activity

Meteor Activity

How many meteors the Global Meteor Network has actually confirmed today. A count of observed trajectories broken down by shower — not a flux density, which is a different quantity GMN computes separately. The file is written during the day, so an early read covers a partial day; the generation time is in the answer. This reads the network. Attribution is a condition of GMN's CC BY 4.0 licence and is carried in the result.

无需输入参数。

meteor_fireballs

Meteor Fireballs

Recent fireballs recorded by NASA CNEOS. Bolides bright enough to be detected from orbit — the "did anyone else see that" events, not a meteor rate. Reads the network.

输入参数limit

meteor_source_info

Meteor Source Info

Where every number in this server comes from, and how to cite it. The shower list is the IAU Meteor Data Center's, carried in the package with its checksum so the exact edition served is identifiable. The live sources are named with their licences. Nothing here is this project's own measurement, and the citations are the owners' own.

无需输入参数。

get_version_info

Get Version Info

This server's version and the edition of the shower list it carries.

无需输入参数。

版本历史

6
  1. v0.4.1最新Oct 29, 2026
  2. v0.3.0Oct 26, 2026
  3. v0.2.1Oct 26, 2026
  4. v0.2.0Oct 25, 2026
  5. v0.1.0Oct 12, 2026
  6. v0.0.1Oct 11, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 90%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分
  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具必需15 分
  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分

其他 Meteor 集成