Email Verifier (SMTP, MX, Catch-All)

io.github.sumitrmardy由 GitHub 账号 sumitrmardy 发布v1.0.0更新于 Oct 27, 2026

Bulk email verification: live SMTP mailbox check, MX, catch-all, disposable and role detection.

已验证Streamable HTTP可网页运行沟通与协作商业与电商

概览

AI 生成的概览

托管在 Apify 上的 MCP 服务器,让助手通过语法、DNS/MX、一次性/角色检测和实时 SMTP 握手批量验证邮箱地址。

可以做什么
  • 批量验证邮箱地址,返回 deliverable、undeliverable、risky 或 unknown 状态,以及评分和十一项固定检查标记。
  • 识别一次性邮箱、角色邮箱、免费邮箱服务商、catch-all 域名和灰名单情况,并用 sub_status 说明每个结论的原因。
  • 返回结构化的逐地址结果,便于代码和智能体据此分支处理,包括对 unknown 结果的重试建议。
  • 通过 Apify Actor 分批处理大列表,同步运行限时 300 秒,超出则改用异步模式。
适用场景
适合在冷邮件外联前清洗线索或注册列表、在注册环节拦截一次性邮箱,或为智能体提供一个判断地址是否适合发信的工具。也适合需要每个地址都有稳定、非空结论而非仪表盘的流水线。
运行要求
远程 MCP 端点 mcp.apify.com,使用 OAuth 登录;不支持 OAuth 的客户端可用 Authorization 头携带 Apify API 令牌。调用 API 需要 Apify 账户,有免费额度。需要能访问 Apify 平台的网络。
安装前请注意
按获得结论的地址计费,包括 undeliverable 和 unknown 结果;重复地址也会计费,调用前应先去重。Authorization 头携带 Apify API 令牌,须妥善保密。邮箱地址会发送到 Apify 的托管服务进行检测。验证过程不会真正发送邮件。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Email Verifier (SMTP, MX, Catch-All),将其添加到工作区。
  2. 连接 所需的 凭据。它们会被私密存储,绝不会在公开页面上展示。
  3. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。

交给智能体安装

把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体,或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南,先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式,经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。

阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/io.github.sumitrmardy%2Femail-verifier/install.md,并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前,先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式,等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件;问我密钥应从哪里获取。

查看智能体所依据的安装指南

其他 MCP 客户端

把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。 客户端会在首次连接时完成 OAuth 登录。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "email-verifier-smtp-mx-catch-all": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=sumitr_mardy/email-verifier"
    }
  }
}

README

English | 简体中文

Bulk Email Verification API — for n8n, AI Agents & MCP

Verify email addresses in bulk: RFC 5322 syntax → DNS/MX → disposable, role and free-provider lists → a live SMTP handshake with a mandatory catch-all probe. No email is ever sent — the check opens an SMTP session, reads the reply codes and hangs up.

[n8n templates] [MCP ready] [OpenAPI] [Pricing] [License]

➜ Try it on Apify

json
{  "email": "[email protected]",  "status": "deliverable",  "sub_status": "valid_mailbox",  "score": 100,  "checks": {    "syntax": true, "domain_exists": true, "mx_found": true,    "smtp_connectable": true, "mailbox_exists": true, "catch_all": false,    "disposable": false, "role_based": false, "free_provider": false,    "a_record_fallback": false, "has_tag": false  },  "mx_record": "aspmx.l.google.com"}

Why pipelines like it

Most verifiers are written for a human reading a dashboard. This one assumes the caller is code.

That changes what the output has to guarantee:

1. status is always one of four values. deliverable, undeliverable, risky, unknown. Never null, never empty, never a fifth value. Enumerate them once and stay correct.

2. All eleven checks keys are present on every record. A check that never ran is false, and the reason lives in sub_status. Nothing disappears.

3. Catch-all domains and Gmail-type providers are reported honestly. They come back risky with a reason, not a fabricated "valid".

Those three together mean you write this:

js
const mailable = results.filter(r => r.status === 'deliverable');const neverSend = results.filter(r => r.status === 'undeliverable' || r.checks.disposable);const retryLater = results.filter(r => r.status === 'unknown');

and not this:

js
const mailable = results.filter(r => r?.status === 'valid' && (r.checks?.catch_all ?? false) === false);

The second line is what every nullable-by-default API forces on you. It matters more for an agent than for a person: an agent cannot write ?? false — it acts on what it reads. A field that sometimes vanishes is not an inconvenience, it is a wrong answer delivered with confidence.


What to do with each result

statussub_statusWhat to do
deliverablevalid_mailboxSend
riskyrole_basedSend only if a shared inbox is acceptable
riskycatch_allMailbox unconfirmable — send at low volume, or enrich another way
riskyfree_provider_unverifiableTreat as a consumer address; mailbox unknowable over SMTP
riskyfull_mailboxHold, retry in a few days
riskydisposableDo not send; block at signup
unknowngreylistedRetry in 30–60 min — not a bad address
unknownsmtp_timeoutRetry later; if it persists, treat as unverified
unknowninternal_errorRetry once
undeliverableanyRemove from the list

Full table with scores and reasoning: docs/statuses.md

The distinction that matters: undeliverable means we found out it is dead; unknown means we could not find out. Tools that merge the two report better-looking numbers and quietly delete real customers from your list.


Use it in n8n

Every template calls the Actor with the core HTTP Request node — no community node to install, works on n8n Cloud and self-hosted. Authentication is an n8n Header Auth credential named Apify API; no token is stored in any file here.

TemplateWhat it doesImport
Verify a Google Sheets lead listReads rows with no verdict, verifies in batches, writes status/score back. Safe to re-run and to schedule.t1-google-sheets.json
Block disposable emails at signupWebhook in, {allow|review|block} out, with the policy in one editable Code node.t2-signup-check.json
Clean a CSV before cold emailUpload an Apollo/Instantly/HubSpot export, get back send_safe / review / drop as three CSVs. Greylisted rows are retried once.t3-clean-csv.json
AI agent toolAn AI Agent with the verifier as its only tool, and a system prompt that teaches it the action table above.t4-ai-agent-tool.json

Chinese versions of all four, with localized sticky notes: workflows/zh-CN/

To import: download the JSON, then in n8n use Workflows → Import from File. Setup steps are on a sticky note inside each workflow.


Use it from an AI agent

MCP — the Apify MCP server, scoped to this one Actor. Config for Claude Desktop and Cursor: agents/mcp/

OpenAPI — one file that Dify, Coze, GPT Actions and LangChain's OpenAPI toolkit can all import: openapi/email-verifier.openapi.yaml

Tool definitions — ready-made JSON for OpenAI function calling and the Anthropic tool API: agents/tool-definitions/

For the agent itself — llms.txt is the whole contract in one pass: endpoint, input, output, the action table, batching limits.

Chinese-first setup guides: Dify · Coze / 扣子


Use it from code

bash
curl -X POST "https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/sumitr_mardy~email-verifier/run-sync-get-dataset-items" \  -H "Authorization: Bearer $APIFY_TOKEN" \  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \  -d '{"emails":["[email protected]","[email protected]"]}'

Python and Node examples, each under 25 lines and with no SDK required: examples/


Large lists

Addresses go in one batch per call, never one call per address — batching is what makes this cheap and fast.

A synchronous Apify run must finish inside 300 seconds. Past that, use the async pattern: start the run, wait for it, then fetch the dataset. Working example: examples/batch-large-list/

Measured throughput and the batch size to use: docs/pricing-and-batching.md


Pricing

Pay per event: one charge per address that gets a verdict — including undeliverable and unknown, because the work was done either way, and a confirmed bad address is exactly the result you were paying for. No per-run charge.

The rate is tiered by your Apify plan and is adjusted to track the market, so it is not reprinted here where it would go stale: see current pricing.

You need an Apify account to call the API; there is a free tier.


Known limits

Stated plainly, because you would find them anyway.

  • Free providers cannot be mailbox-verified. Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo and iCloud answer 250 for addresses that do not exist, then bounce at delivery. Any vendor claiming a per-mailbox Gmail verdict from SMTP is guessing. You get risky/free_provider_unverifiable and checks.mailbox_exists: false.
  • Catch-all domains cannot be mailbox-verified. By definition. The probe detects them and says so rather than returning a confident guess.
  • Greylisting is not a verdict. 421/450 come back as unknown/greylisted, which is retryable. Template T3 does the retry for you.

FAQ

Does it send an email? No. It opens an SMTP session, sends EHLO, MAIL FROM and RCPT TO, reads the reply codes and disconnects. It never issues DATA, so no message body exists anywhere in the process.

Can it verify Gmail addresses? It verifies that the syntax and domain are valid and that the address is not disposable. It cannot confirm that a specific Gmail mailbox exists — Google answers identically for real and fake addresses. Nothing that uses SMTP can do better; tools that claim otherwise are guessing.

What is a catch-all domain? A domain configured to accept mail for every address, existing or not. Before asking about your address, the verifier sends a RCPT TO for a random local part that cannot exist. If that is accepted, the domain is catch-all and every address on it is reported risky/catch_all.

How many emails per call? As many as finish inside the 300-second sync limit. Measure with your own list; see docs/pricing-and-batching.md. Beyond that, use the async pattern.

How do I use it with an Apollo / Instantly / Lemlist export? Template T3 — upload the CSV, get three cleaned lists back. It picks the email column automatically and deduplicates first, so you are not charged twice for the same address.

What happens to duplicates? They are charged. Deduplicate before you call; every template here already does.


MIT licensed. Issues and pull requests welcome — particularly corrections to the n8n templates from anyone running a version where something behaves differently.

来源:README.md,提交 3ba856d

工具

0
该服务器需要登录,因此 SourceWeft 无法在没有账号的情况下读取其工具,也未收录。已连接账号所能看到的内容可能因账号及其权限而异。

版本历史

1
  1. v1.0.0最新Oct 21, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 85%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
  • 已声明认证方式必需10 分
  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分