Vidin

io.github.teunlao由 GitHub 账号 teunlao 发布v0.1.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026

Turn a screen recording into agent-readable annotated keyframes. MCP server + CLI on ffmpeg.

已验证STDIO仅桌面开发者工具媒体与设计

概览

AI 生成的概览

本地 MCP 服务器兼命令行工具,把屏幕录制转换成带标注的关键帧和文字时间线,供助手阅读。

可以做什么
把视频分析成磁盘上的带标注帧,返回报告文本和一张联系表图片(analyze_video)。按帧编号或时间范围获取完整细节帧,并限制数量以免占满上下文(get_frames)。当两帧不足以说明问题时,以更高帧率重新截取某个窄时间窗口(zoom_clip)。低成本读取时长、分辨率、帧率和音频信息(probe_video)。输出包括时间线报告、机器可读清单、联系表和标注帧。
适用场景
当缺陷报告或操作演示以屏幕录制形式提供,而只接受图片、不接受视频的编码助手需要了解发生了什么时适用。它只保留画面变化后稳定下来的帧,因此长录像的查看成本较低。
运行要求
通过 npx 从 npm 包以 stdio 在本地运行;需要安装 ffmpeg,仅在传入视频网址时才需要 yt-dlp。未声明认证、环境变量或请求头。仅支持桌面端。
安装前请注意
会向磁盘写入输出文件(.vidin 输出目录),传入网址时会下载远程视频,从而向第三方发出请求。不报告指针位置和点击,不检测横向滚动,低于默认阈值的小变化可能被漏掉,除非提高灵敏度。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Vidin,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

vidin

Turn a video into something a coding agent can actually read.

Claude Code, Codex and friends accept images, not video. So when a bug report arrives as a screen recording, the video is dead weight — someone has to watch it and retype what happened. vidin watches it instead: it converts the recording into a small set of annotated keyframes plus a written timeline, and serves them to agents over MCP.

[A 20-second recording condensed to six annotated frames]

A 20-second recording in, six frames out: the refund panel, the 500 dialog, the retry toast, the recovery — each boxed and timestamped. (The clip is vidin's synthetic test fixture.)

  • Event-driven, not one-frame-per-second. A frame is kept when the screen changes and then comes to rest. Three minutes of someone reading costs almost nothing; every real UI event is captured.
  • Fast. A 3-minute 1080p recording takes ~4 seconds on an M-series Mac. An hour-long one costs time, not RAM.
  • One command to run. npx @teunlao/vidin — all it asks of the machine is ffmpeg; no sharp, no headless browser, no native image library.
  • Shaped for agent context. The MCP tools return a written report and one contact sheet first; full-detail frames only for the moments that turn out to matter.
  • Timestamps you can scrub to. An agent can say "the error appears at 00:41.2" and you jump straight there in the original file.

Quickstart

sh
brew install ffmpeg        # + yt-dlp, only if you'll pass URLs

Hook it into Claude Code:

sh
claude mcp add vidin -- npx -y @teunlao/vidin mcp

Or in .mcp.json / ~/.codex/config.toml equivalents:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "vidin": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@teunlao/vidin", "mcp"] }  }}

Or straight from the shell:

sh
npx @teunlao/vidin ~/Desktop/bug.mov       # → ./.vidin/bug/npm i -g @teunlao/vidin                    # or put `vidin` on PATH for goodvidin https://example.com/screencast.mp4   # downloaded with yt-dlpvidin zoom bug.mov --from 00:41 --to 00:45 --fps 6vidin probe bug.mov

What comes out

out/  REPORT.md        the entry point: timeline table, what changed where, what to open  manifest.json    the same, machine readable  sheets/          the whole video as labelled 3x3 grids (~1.3k tokens each)  frames/          full-detail annotated frames

[An annotated frame: red dashed box around the error dialog, timestamp bar]

Each frame carries a red dashed box around the regions that changed since the previous kept frame, and a bottom bar with the frame number, the timestamp in the original video, the gap since the previous frame, why the frame was kept, and how much of the screen changed.

The MCP tools

Four tools, shaped so an agent spends context in the right order:

toolwhat it does
analyze_videovideo → frames on disk; returns the report text and one contact sheet image
get_framesfull-detail frames by number or time range, capped so a call can't flood the context
zoom_clipre-extract a narrow window at a higher frame rate — for the moment two frames don't explain
probe_videoduration / resolution / fps / audio, cheap

The intended loop: analyse → look at the sheet → read the timeline → open two or three frames → zoom in if the moment between them is still unclear. Opening everything up front would burn the context before knowing which second matters.

Profiles and tuning

profilefor
bug-reportdefault — someone recorded a screen, narrated a bug, stopped
denseshort clips where every twitch matters (24 fps analysis, up to 80 frames)
walkthroughlong recordings; fewer frames, wider anchors
cheapsmallest footprint, for when the context really is tight (12 frames at 1092px)

Tuning without leaving the profile: --max-frames, --sensitivity (percent of the screen that counts as an event, lower = more frames), --fps, --width, --quality, --no-annotate, --no-sheets.

Why pick frames instead of slicing them

One screenshot per second turns three minutes into 180 frames of which ~90% are identical, because the person was reading, thinking or moving the mouse. Those duplicates don't cost much — they bury the handful of frames where something actually happened, and an agent has to look at all of them to find out which. Frame selection is a signal-to-noise problem wearing a cost problem's clothes.

vidin is event driven instead. It walks the video at 12 fps in downscaled RGB and keeps a frame only when something actually happened:

  • Change is measured against the last kept frame, not the previous sample, so slow drift accumulates instead of hiding under the threshold.
  • Frames land after the change, not inside it. When motion starts, nothing is emitted yet — the selector waits for the screen to come to rest and keeps the settled frame. You get the state after the click, not the animation blur.
  • Colour counts as change. Comparison is per channel, not on brightness. A field turning red or a green toast over a grey panel barely moves the luma and is exactly what a bug report is about.
  • A moving mouse costs nothing, by arithmetic rather than special-casing: at analysis resolution a pointer is an order of magnitude below the event threshold. There was once a subsystem for recognising it; measured on real recordings it changed no decision anywhere, so it is gone.
  • Guard rails. A minimum gap, anchor frames across long still stretches, periodic samples while a long animation runs, and a hard budget (40 frames by default) that drops the least informative frames first while keeping the ends of the timeline.

Two invariants hold whatever path a frame took:

  • Nothing is dropped silently. The comparison baseline only ever advances by keeping a frame. There is no path that folds a changed screen into the baseline without emitting it — that would make the change unrecoverable, since every later comparison would measure zero against a state you never see.
  • Annotations describe the neighbour you can actually see. After the frame budget prunes the middle of the timeline, every survivor's change percentage and boxes are recomputed against the frame that now precedes it.

How it works

ffmpeg ─raw RGB @12fps, 400px─ selector ──timestamps+regions── ffmpeg ──annotated WebP         one decode pass,         event state machine            drawbox/drawtext         streamed                 in plain TypeScript            per frame

Decoding streams two frames at a time; the selector additionally keeps the downscaled buffers of the frames it has kept so it can recompute their deltas after pruning. That is bounded by the frame budget, not by video length: ~32 MB at the defaults. All drawing is done by ffmpeg filters, which is why there is no image library in package.json.

Development

Development runs on Bun; the runtime code itself sticks to node: APIs, which is what lets the published package run anywhere npx does.

sh
git clone https://github.com/teunlao/vidin && cd vidin && bun installbun test

The fixture is a synthetic screen recording with a scripted timeline — a panel, an error dialog, a toast, a recovery, and two stretches of pointer-only motion. The suite asserts that each staged event yields exactly one settled frame and that pointer motion alone yields none. test/regressions.test.ts builds its own clips and pins every failure a review has found, so a fixed bug stays fixed.

Not there yet

  • Audio transcript. Narration is the highest-signal part of a bug report. Planned: local Whisper (whisper.cpp or mlx-whisper) → a transcript.md aligned to the frame timeline.
  • OCR over kept frames, so an agent can grep an error message without spending vision tokens at all.
  • Pointer position and clicks are not reported — deliberately. A drawn crosshair was checked against a real recording and was right about half the time: a growing DevTools request list moves down the screen exactly like a pointer does. A wrong marker asserts "the user was pointing here" on a coin flip, and the pointer is plainly visible in the frame anyway.
  • Horizontal scroll is not detected; vertical is.
  • Small elements need a nudge. The default event threshold is 0.4% of the screen, so a progress bar or a badge below that is not an event on its own. --sensitivity 0.2 or --profile dense catches them, at the cost of more frames.

来源:README.md,提交 5a7c84e

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中启动过该软件包,因此其工具未知。

版本历史

1
  1. v0.1.0最新Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 50%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分

    请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。

  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分