
Archive
io.github.theluckystrike由 GitHub 账号 theluckystrike 发布v0.22.5更新于 Oct 24, 2026
Zip and unzip archives from your AI chat: create, list, extract. Offline, with bomb guards.
概览
本地 MCP 服务器,让助手在你自己的机器上创建、查看和解压 zip 压缩包,并带有压缩炸弹与路径穿越防护。
- 可以做什么
- 用文件或带通配符的目录树创建压缩包,并向已有压缩包追加文件
- 列出每个条目的大小、压缩比,并标记绝对路径、..、符号链接、重名等危险项
- 将压缩包解压到指定目录,带路径穿越、符号链接和压缩炸弹防护,并支持试运行
- 不进行解压,直接内联读取压缩包中的单个文本条目
- 把一个月内的发票、报价和导出文件打包成一个文件
- 查看压缩包历史与本月剩余免费额度,并检查或激活许可证
- 适用场景
- 适合需要把文件或文件夹打成 zip、在打开别人发来的压缩包之前先查看其内容,或只取出其中一个文本文件而不整体解压的场景。读取不计费,因此免费版也能做安全检查。
- 运行要求
- 作为桌面本地进程运行;npm 包尚未发布,目前可用 .mcpb 一键包或克隆后自行构建安装。无需账号、API 密钥或网络访问。可选 Pro 许可证密钥通过 MCP_LICENSE_KEY 环境变量提供,并离线校验。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Archive,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
mcp-zip
Make a zip, look inside one, and unpack one, in the conversation you are already in. Pack a folder with a glob
(**/*.csv, everything except node_modules). Read the one README out of an archive without unpacking it.
Ask what is inside a zip somebody sent you and be told before you open it: absolute paths, .., symlinks,
duplicate names, and the entry that claims to be 200 MB inside a 199 KB file. Bundle a month of invoices,
quotes and exports into one file to send to an accountant. Everything runs on your machine: no upload, no
account, no API key, and no network call of any kind.
In the official MCP Registry (io.github.theluckystrike/zip-archive-create-extract-bomb-guard).
npm publish for @theluckystrike/mcp-zip is pending, so npx -y @theluckystrike/mcp-zip returns 404 today. Until then, the .mcpb one-click bundle or a clone+build is the working path.
Install
Claude Desktop, ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (macOS) or
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows):
Claude Code:
Cursor, .cursor/mcp.json:
Tools
Free vs Pro
Reading is never metered. The free tier is a limit on what you write, because an archive somebody sent you is exactly the one you most need to inspect before opening, and a paywall in front of that would be a paywall in front of the safety check.
Get Pro: https://mcp.zovo.one/buy/zip - $19 one time, or $39 for every server in the suite, lifetime. Keys verify offline; nothing is sent anywhere.
Why fflate and not a hand-written writer
The choice was fflate (pure JS, 0 dependencies, synchronous zipSync/inflateSync) against writing a
STORE/DEFLATE writer on node:zlib, which is available with no dependency at all.
The container format is written here either way. This server reads the central directory itself, in
src/zipfile.ts, roughly 200 lines: sizes, names, methods, CRCs, external attributes. It has to, because every
guard in the server is a decision made from those headers before anything is inflated, and a library that
hands back {name: bytes} has already decompressed the bomb by the time you can look at it. So the argument for
a library was never "it saves me the format".
What is left is the compressor, and that is the part not to write. node:zlib would do it, but its raw-deflate
calls are async-first, they carry a thread-pool round trip per call, and the sync ones each build a native
stream; packing 200 small files is 200 of those. fflate's deflateSync is a pure-JS implementation with no
native handle, it packs 200 files in 74 ms (measured below), and it means the package still has no native build
step, which is the rule for this whole suite: npx has to work everywhere.
The trade is stated plainly: fflate builds the archive in one buffer, so this server refuses inputs over 512 MB rather than pretending to stream, and it does not read ZIP64 (over 4 GB or over 65,535 entries), which is refused by name rather than misread.
Measured: the file type does not predict the compression ratio, repetition does
Every file below was zipped at level 6 on this machine. The "type" column is what a person would call the file; the ratio is what actually happened.
PDF and DOCX barely move, and that is not a surprise once you look inside them: both are already deflate containers, so zipping them again is packaging, not compression. Bundling a month of invoices is worth doing for the one file, not for the space.
The two CSV rows are the interesting pair. Same tool, same shape, same size, 34x apart: the one with forty repeated client names compresses 82.69x, the one with unique values 2.40x. Nothing about "it is a CSV" predicts which one you have.
Measured: why the bomb ceiling is 100x and not 50x
A compression bomb is refused by ratio, and the obvious instinct is to set that ceiling low, well under the
1022x a zeros file reaches. The table above says why that is wrong: a real CSV export, of the kind
zip_bundle_month collects from the expense tracker, reached 82.69x, which is 83% of the way to a 100x
ceiling and well past a 50x one. A ceiling tuned to be comfortably below a bomb would refuse a real monthly
export, and the person on the other end would learn to pass max_ratio on everything, which turns the guard
off permanently.
So the ratio is the second guard, not the first. The first is the total: the selected entries' declared
uncompressed sizes are added up and compared against a ceiling (1 GB by default, max_total_mb to change it),
because 200 MB out of a 199 KB file is a decision you can make about the archive as a whole without judging any
entry. Both are read from the central directory, so refusing a bomb costs no decompression at all:
Measured: a bounded output buffer is not a bomb guard
fflate.inflateSync(data, { out: new Uint8Array(n) }) looks like the whole answer: cap the buffer, cap the
damage. It is not, and the way it fails is quiet. A 100,000-byte entry inflated into a 10-byte buffer returns
10 bytes and throws nothing. An archive whose header declares 10 bytes for a 100 KB entry would extract as a
10-byte file, reported as a success, with the truncation invisible.
So the buffer bounds the memory and the CRC-32 in the central directory proves the bytes. Every entry this server writes out is checksummed against the header before it reaches the disk, and a mismatch refuses the entry by name. That is the check that turns a lying header from silent data loss into a sentence.
Timings
M-series laptop, over stdio, per call, cold store:
Privacy
Everything stays on your machine. There is no network code in this server at all: no fetch, no HTTP client, no
telemetry. Archives are written where you say, and a small register of what was created lives under
~/.local/share/mcp-servers/zip/ (or $XDG_DATA_HOME). License keys verify offline with a public key.
Zip passwords are not supported, and passing one is refused rather than ignored: the classic zip cipher is broken and AES zip encryption is a vendor extension no two tools agree on, so a "password protected" archive from here would be a false promise.
Built by theluckystrike. Support: [email protected]
Use these docs as an MCP server
Any MCP client (Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code) can read this repository's documentation directly via GitMCP - no install:
- Docs MCP URL: https://gitmcp.io/theluckystrike/mcp-zip
来源:servers/zip/README.md,提交 1bd9d69
工具
0版本历史
2- v0.22.5最新Oct 14, 2026
- v0.21.0Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分