
Playwright Trace Decoder Mcp
io.github.vola-trebla由 GitHub 账号 vola-trebla 发布v0.2.3更新于 Oct 24, 2026
MCP server for unpacking and analyzing Playwright trace.zip archives
概览
让助手解包并分析 Playwright trace.zip 归档,用于诊断失败的端到端测试运行。
- 可以做什么
- 它提供 16 个工具,读取 Playwright trace 归档并返回结构化诊断信息,而不是原始 JSON。工具涵盖测试元数据、trace 摘要、分页的操作时间线、过滤后的网络日志、控制台错误、ARIA 无障碍树、DOM 变更差异、失败时的截图、竞态条件与 DOM/网络关联分析、因果链、错误签名、通过运行与失败运行的 trace 对比、定位器到源码的映射、性能异常检测以及 trace 裁剪。列表结果支持分页,ARIA 输出经过压缩以减少 token 消耗。
- 适用场景
- 当 Playwright 测试在 CI 中失败且你有 trace.zip 需要检查时使用,尤其适合根因分析、通过运行与失败运行之间的不稳定对比、按错误签名归并重复失败,或判断超时是来自主线程阻塞还是网络饱和。
- 运行要求
- 以 Node.js 进程通过 stdio 在本地运行;npm 包名为 playwright-trace-decoder-mcp,也可用 npm install 和 npm run build 从源码构建。未声明任何认证、环境变量或请求头。trace_path 参数接受本地绝对路径或 HTTPS URL,后者会由服务器下载并缓存该文件。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Playwright Trace Decoder Mcp,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
🎭 playwright-trace-decoder-mcp
[npm version] [npm downloads] [CI] [License: MIT]
An MCP server that unpacks and structures Playwright trace.zip archives so AI agents can perform root-cause analysis on CI failures — without drowning in raw JSON or blowing up the context window.
🤔 The Problem
When a Playwright test fails in CI, you get a trace.zip. It's a binary blob. LLMs can't read it natively, and dumping the raw contents exceeds the context window. Engineers end up copying log snippets into ChatGPT manually like it's 2022.
This MCP server solves that: 16 focused tools that expose exactly the signal an agent needs to diagnose a failure, with pagination and ARIA compression to keep token costs low.
🐸 E2E Failure Investigation Example
Here is a quick look at how an AI agent uses the new tools in v0.3.0 to instantly find and inspect a failure:
-
Locate the exact source code bug via
map_locator_to_source:No more guessing! The agent knows exactly which file, line, and column caused the timeout.
-
Extract critical visual frames around the failure via
extract_critical_frames:Allows the agent to visual-verify page state immediately before/after failure without pulling massive image lists.
-
Trim the trace to save CI storage / transfer costs via
trim_trace_archive:Shrinks large traces by deleting screenshots outside the critical failure window. Saved 79% of disk space!
🛠️ Tools
Tools are grouped by how an agent should sequence them when diagnosing a failure.
Inspection — read trace data
All list-returning tools support limit (1–500, default 50) and offset pagination with a has_more flag.
trace_path accepts either an absolute local path or an HTTPS URL — the server downloads the file automatically and caches it for the session.
DOM / UI analysis
Root-cause analysis
Performance analysis
💬 Suggested agent workflow
🚀 Setup
Build from source
Add to your MCP client
Claude Desktop (~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json)
Cursor (.cursor/mcp.json) or VS Code (.vscode/mcp.json)
Claude Code
Docker
💬 Example usage
Basic failure analysis
Ask your agent:
"The CI run failed. Here's the trace:
/tmp/trace.zip. What went wrong and why?"
The agent calls get_trace_summary → get_causal_chain_for_failure → get_aria_accessibility_tree, drilling deeper as needed — without you copy-pasting anything.
When the page was blank or redirected
"The ARIA tree is empty. Can you show me what was actually on screen when it failed?"
The agent calls get_screenshot_at_failure and gets the JPEG taken closest to the moment of failure — useful for catching captchas, error pages, or unexpected redirects.
Flakiness diagnosis
"This test passes locally but fails in CI. Compare these two traces and tell me what was different."
The agent calls compare_traces, which LCS-aligns both action sequences and surfaces the first structural divergence, timing anomalies, and network requests that only appeared in the failing run.
Grouping duplicate failures across parallel CI runs
"We have 12 failed traces from this pipeline. Are they all the same failure?"
Call generate_error_signature on each — identical signatures mean identical root cause, no need to read every trace.
Diagnosing which API call caused a DOM change
"The modal appeared but I don't know which fetch triggered it."
correlate_dom_and_network joins the HAR log and DOM snapshots automatically. Example output:
Performance timeouts — not just missing elements
"The test times out on
goto, but there's no JS error. What's blocking the page?"
detect_performance_anomalies inspects screencast-frame gaps and flags Long Tasks. Example output:
suspected_cause distinguishes a blocked main thread (main_thread_blocked — frame gaps present), a waterfall of concurrent fetches (network_saturation — ≥5 in-flight), and a navigation/hard timeout (timeout_or_navigation — duration >3 s with no other signals).
Checking what Playwright version and HAR mode a trace uses
"The trace came from an unfamiliar CI configuration. Is the response body data available?"
extract_trace_metadata_strict inspects the archive before you run any other tool:
har_mode: "embed" means body snippets are inline. "attach" means they're in separate resource files. "omit" means headers only — correlate_dom_and_network will return empty response_body_snippet in that case.
🏗️ Architecture
The parser streams each file line-by-line (no full-buffer split) and caches results in-process with an LRU (max 50 entries), keyed by path + mtime. Re-reading the same unmodified trace costs zero I/O.
Frame snapshots store the DOM as nested arrays (["TAG", {attrs}, ...children]). The ARIA translator walks this tree and outputs compact YAML, reducing token cost by ~90% vs raw HTML.
🏗️ Stack
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk— MCP server runtimeadm-zip— zip extractionzodv4 — input schema validation- TypeScript, ESLint, Prettier, Husky, GitHub Actions CI
📋 Scripts
📄 License
MIT
来源:README.md,提交 ad56aec
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.2.3最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分