Tokenscope

io.github.wartzar-bee由 GitHub 账号 wartzar-bee 发布v0.2.3更新于 Oct 25, 2026

Analyze Claude Code session cost & context attribution: output, cached re-reads, cache writes.

已验证STDIO仅桌面开发者工具数据与分析

概览

AI 生成的概览

本地 MCP 服务器,分析 Claude Code 会话日志,把 token 成本归因到输出、缓存读取、缓存写入和新增输入。

可以做什么
分析 Claude Code 会话的成本与上下文归因,包括每轮上下文增长、按模型和子代理的花费,可读取本地日志或内置演示会话。将当前会话与随附的离线真实会话参考集对比。生成仅含汇总数字的隐私安全分享摘要,输出为 markdown 或 SVG 成本报告卡片。
适用场景
当你想让助手解释某次 Claude Code 会话为何昂贵、上下文在哪些轮次被重复发送,或该会话与典型会话相比如何时适用,无需离开终端。
运行要求
通过 npx 从 npm 包以本地 stdio 进程运行;需要 Node.js,并能访问本地项目目录下的 Claude Code 会话日志。未声明账户、API 密钥、环境变量或网络访问。
安装前请注意
会读取本地 Claude Code 会话日志,其中包含提示词与回复内容;分享摘要据称仅含汇总数字,但公开粘贴前仍应检查输出。价格使用文档默认值且可覆盖,数字可能与你的实际套餐不符。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Tokenscope,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

tokenscope ⏣

See what your AI-coding session actually cost — and what's eating your context. A local, read-only CLI that parses your Claude Code session logs and shows where the money goes: model output vs. context being re-sent every turn (the hidden 60%+ of most bills).

$ npx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope
  tokenscope ⏣  latest session  ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────  Total cost   $868.84   over 967 model turns
  Where the money went  output (model writing)     ████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░  16%  $137.24  cache read (re-sent ctx)   ████████████████░░░░░░░░  66%  $577.59  cache write (new ctx)      ████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░  18%  $153.67
  Context size per turn  (peak 822k · avg 404k · now 822k tokens)  ▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▄▄▄▄▄▅▅▅▅▅▆▆▆▆▇▇▇▇▇▇█
  Insights  • Re-sent (cached) context cost $577.59 (66% of spend) — context re-read every turn.  • Peak context ~822k tokens — /compact or a fresh session would cut per-turn cost.  • Only 16% of spend is the model's actual output.

(A real session, default Opus pricing. Your numbers will differ — prices are overridable.)

Why

Agentic coding (Claude Code, etc.) produces surprise bills, and the cause is mundane: as a session grows, the whole context is re-sent every turn, so cost balloons even when the model writes little. Existing dashboards show totals; tokenscope shows the attribution — output vs. cache-read vs. cache-write vs. fresh input, the per-turn context-growth curve, cost by model, subagent spend, and which tools fill your context — with concrete "trim this" insights.

Try it in 10 seconds (no Claude Code logs needed)

npx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope --demo

Runs on a bundled sample session so you see the full report before pointing it at your own logs — no setup, nothing to configure. (The sample is synthetic, for demonstration.)

Install / run

No install — runs via npx:

npx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope               # your most recent Claude Code sessionnpx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope --demo        # a bundled sample session — no logs needednpx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope --all         # aggregate every sessionnpx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope <file|dir>    # a specific session .jsonlnpx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope --version     # print the installed version and exitnpx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope --json        # machine-readablenpx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope --share       # privacy-safe shareable summary (markdown + SVG card)npx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope --share-svg   # just the SVG "cost report card"npx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope scan          # static token footprint of a source dir (the engine behind ci-guardrail)npx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope scan --diff ../base   # cost delta of the current dir vs a base dir — catch a regression before you pushnpx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope scan --max-total 50000            # exit 1 if the footprint exceeds a budget — a local cost gatenpx @wartzar-bee/tokenscope scan --diff ../base --max-delta 2000   # exit 1 if the diff adds more than N tokens

Reads ~/.claude/projects/**/*.jsonl. Read-only, local, no network, no telemetry — open the source; nothing leaves your machine.

Local cost gate (pre-push / pre-commit)

--max-total N / --max-delta N make scan exit 1 when the token footprint (or a diff's delta) blows a budget — the same check ci-guardrail runs in CI, but locally, before you push. Wire the absolute budget into a git hook so a runaway prompt/config never leaves your machine:

sh
# .git/hooks/pre-push  (chmod +x)npx -y @wartzar-bee/tokenscope scan --dir prompts --max-total 50000 \  || { echo "prompt token footprint over budget — trim before pushing"; exit 1; }

Under budget it prints the report and exits 0; over budget it prints a BLOCKED: line and exits 1. Without a --max-* flag scan just reports (exit 0), so it's opt-in. --max-delta gates the delta between two directories on disk (scan --diff <baseDir> --max-delta N) — point it at a checked-out base tree when you want a regression gate rather than an absolute cap.

Using the pre-commit framework? Add tokenscope to your .pre-commit-config.yaml — no git-hook scripting:

yaml
repos:  - repo: https://github.com/wartzar-bee/tokenscope    rev: v0.2.6    hooks:      - id: tokenscope        args: ["--dir", "prompts", "--max-total", "50000"]   # optional — omit to just report

language: node, zero dependencies. With no args it prints the footprint (exit 0); add --max-total N (or --diff <baseDir> --max-delta N) to fail the commit over budget.

Share your bill (privacy-safe)

--share emits a compact summary built from aggregate numbers only — no file paths, no prompt/response content — so it's safe to paste in public:

  • Markdown for Reddit / Discord / a GitHub issue (total, the output/cache-read/cache-write/fresh split with %, peak/avg context, and the headline "X% of spend was re-sent context").
  • A self-contained SVG "cost report card" (--share-svg) — no binary deps; renders inline on GitHub and is trivially shareable.
  • How you compare — both forms now answer "is my session unusual?" against a shipped, offline reference set of real sessions (e.g. "more cache-efficient than ~80% of measured sessions; median session re-sends 24%"). It's a reference yardstick, not a census — full honest distribution at tokenscope.pages.dev/benchmark.

Prefer not to touch a terminal flag? The same render runs entirely in your browser at the web surface in web/: paste your --json output and it draws the full report + the SVG card locally — nothing is uploaded.

Use it from an AI agent (MCP server)

There's an MCP server that exposes the same engine to AI agents / MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, etc.) as tools: analyze_claude_cost, get_cost_benchmark, and tokenscope_share_summary. Add it to your MCP config:

json
{ "mcpServers": { "tokenscope": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@wartzar-bee/tokenscope-mcp"] } } }

Then ask your agent "use tokenscope to analyze my last Claude Code session." It's the same local, read-only engine — see mcp/README.md.

Pricing

Uses documented default prices (Anthropic cache multipliers: write 1.25×/2×, read 0.1× of input). Verify and override for your exact model/tier via ./.tokenscope.json:

json
{ "pricing": { "claude-opus-4": { "in": 15, "out": 75 } } }

Unknown models are flagged (never silently counted as $0). Token counts are read straight from the logs; cost = those counts × the prices shown.

Part of the wartzar-bee cost toolkit

tokenscope is the measurement engine behind a sibling tool, and one of three open-source cost projects:

  • ci-guardrail — a GitHub Action that runs tokenscope in CI to predict a pull request's token-cost delta and comment on the responsible files (report-only, or fail the build past a threshold): uses: wartzar-bee/ci-guardrail@v1.
  • enclave — the security-first, self-hosted runtime & sandbox the wartzar-bee agent fleet runs on (Apache-2.0).

If you find tokenscope useful, ci-guardrail is the zero-config way to run it on every PR.

Why this exists — further reading

tokenscope came out of running autonomous agents and watching the bill. The write-ups behind it:

Status / roadmap

  • v0.1: Claude Code session cost + context attribution + insights. 20/20 unit tests on the cost math (npm test).
  • Next (evidence-driven): per-tool/-file token attribution; daily/budget alerts; a --watch live meter; OpenAI/Codex log support.

MIT. Not affiliated with Anthropic.

来源:README.md,提交 4a931b2

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中启动过该软件包,因此其工具未知。

版本历史

1
  1. v0.2.3最新Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 50%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分

    请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。

  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分