Worklore

io.github.worklore由 GitHub 账号 worklore 发布v0.9.0更新于 Oct 29, 2026

Search worklore stories and x-ray any skill or story capability tier (T0-T4) before you run it.

已验证Streamable HTTP可网页运行知识与记忆开发者工具安全与监控

概览

AI 生成的概览

连接 worklore.dev 的远程 MCP 服务:搜索并阅读带能力等级的开发者故事,并在运行前透视任何技能或提示词。

可以做什么
  • 按关键词、标签或技术栈搜索并浏览开发者故事,完整读取其中一篇及其“Reproduce this”复现约定和能力等级。
  • 针对用户当前项目推荐最多三条值得复现的故事,并说明理由和等级。
  • 透视技能、故事或粘贴的提示词文本,返回能力等级(T0-T4)、内容哈希、带 file:line 的发现项和行为风险信号。
  • 记录复现结果或故事中只读检查的结果,归属于已登录账号。
  • 发布新故事、修订用户自己写的故事,或对他人故事提交修改建议。
适用场景
适合希望借助其他开发者记录的可复现经验来开展工作的场景,也适合用户在运行某个技能或提示词前想先了解它实际能触及什么。搜索和阅读无需账号,试用成本低。
运行要求
需要访问 worklore.dev/mcp 的远程 Streamable HTTP 端点,无需本地包或运行时。搜索、阅读公开故事、项目推荐和透视内联文本无需凭据;写入操作和透视 URL 需要已登录的 OAuth 2.1 会话,仅使用用户的 GitHub 公开资料。
安装前请注意
写入类工具以已登录用户身份行事:发布、编辑、上报复现或检查结果、提交修改建议都会以该账号名义改动公开数据。故事是公开且可执行的文本,应用前应与用户一起阅读,等级表示影响范围而非安全结论。透视 URL 会让服务器代用户抓取该地址。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Worklore,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。

交给智能体安装

把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体,或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南,先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式,经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。

阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/io.github.worklore%2Fworklore/install.md,并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前,先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式,等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件;问我密钥应从哪里获取。

查看智能体所依据的安装指南

其他 MCP 客户端

把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "worklore": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://worklore.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}

README

worklore-mcp

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) connector for worklore.dev — it lets any MCP-capable agent (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, …) search worklore's developer stories, read one with its capability disclosure attached, x-ray any skill or story before running it — all without an account — and, once you've signed in, record how a reproduction went, publish a story of your own, or revise one you published.

  • Endpoint: https://worklore.dev/mcp (Streamable HTTP, JSON-RPC over POST)
  • Auth: none to search and read public stories. Writes (and your private stories) use OAuth 2.1 (PKCE + dynamic client registration). Sign-in is with your GitHub public profile only — worklore sees your handle and avatar, no scopes, no email, no repositories.
  • Listed on: the official MCP Registry as io.github.worklore/worklore, and Smithery
  • Roadmap / progress: Project #1 (a "Relay Board" — the human does the site actions, the agent writes the code)

What it's for

worklore stories are text your agent executes. This connector brings them — and their capability tier — into your agent, so you can find relevant work and see what it can touch before you run it. Tiers describe reach (blast radius), not virtue, and this is never a "safe" verdict. See the write-up: Stop asking "is this skill safe?" — ask "what can it do?" and the tool it wraps, skill-xray.

Capability tiers: T0 inert · T1 local · T2 network · T3 elevated (secrets / persistence / privilege) · T4 opaque (fetches/runs code at runtime).

Tools

Read-only — no sign-in needed (public stories only; check_capability with a url needs sign-in, because the server fetches it for you):

ToolArgumentsReturns
check_capabilitytext or urltier (T0–T4) + sha256 + findings (file:line) + endpoints, plus behavioral red flags — capability disclosure
get_storyslugthe story's full markdown (narrative + "Reproduce this" contract) with its capability tier + findings
search_storiesquery (optional)matching stories (title/summary/tags/stack), each with its capability string
suggest_for_projectcontextup to 3 stories worth reproducing here, with why + tier

Write — these act as you, and need your authenticated session:

ToolArgumentsReturns
report_reproductionslug, result (worked/partial/failed), note (optional)the recorded reproduction. failed is a useful report and must never be inflated
report_checkslug, result (has_problem/no_problem), note (optional)the recorded result of a story's read-only "Check if this applies to you" section, run in your project. Only for stories that have one (get_story says has_check: true). Never record "not applicable" — when your project does not match the check's preconditions, don't call it. One result per person per story; the latest replaces the earlier one
publish_storymarkdown, or the parts (title, narrative, reproduce, tags, type, stack)the published story's slug + URL. Only ever call this with the author's explicit approval of the full draft
edit_storyslug, markdown (the full revised story), kind (rephrase/addition/correction, default rephrase), note (required for a correction), source (optional https URL)the slug, URL, the recorded revision (at, kind, note, source) and how many reproducers were notified. Only the story's author can edit it. Show the author a before/after diff and get their approval first. The story's date never changes. If something in the story was wrong, it is a correction — which tells everyone who reproduced it — never a rephrase
suggest_editslug, markdown (the complete story as you propose it), rationale (one or two lines: what was wrong or outdated, what you changed)the suggestion id, its status (open), the story URL and a note. For a story by SOMEONE ELSE — worklore's pull request. Show the user the before/after diff and get their approval first. The story does not change: its author is notified and either accepts it as a credited revision or declines it, optionally handing the text back as a draft of the user's own. One open suggestion per person per story; sending another replaces it. For the user's own story use edit_story

All eight carry MCP annotations (readOnlyHint / openWorldHint / idempotentHint) so a client can tell the user what a call will do before they approve it, and all eight declare an outputSchema and return structuredContent, so a consuming agent can rely on shape instead of parsing prose.

Every result carries a human capability string (e.g. T0 · inert — touches nothing) so a tier code is never shown bare.

Resources

Since 0.6.0 resources/list is a fixed list of three documents — the same for everyone, every day — all readable without an account:

URIWhat it is
worklore://guideHow to use worklore through MCP: search, read a story with the user before acting, reproduce it, report honestly (failed is useful), x-ray unfamiliar skills and prompts with check_capability, publish or edit only with the user's approval
worklore://story-formatThe story format: frontmatter fields, the narrative, the "Reproduce this" contract (prerequisites / your agent will need from you / steps / verify), the optional read-only check, fail stories, proposals, sanitising, the exact-references rule. Read it before drafting a story
worklore://accessWhat answers without a token and what needs sign-in — rendered from the one access table the server enforces

Stories are reached through one resource template, worklore://story/{slug} (resources/templates/list). Public stories read without a token; a private story reads only for its author and answers like a missing one to everyone else. Every worklore://story/… URI that resources/list handed out before 0.6.0 still reads. To find a story, use search_stories / suggest_for_project.

Why the stories left the list: a list that changes whenever someone publishes cannot be part of a surface fingerprint — the fingerprint would "break" every day without anything breaking, and teach clients to ignore a mismatch. The contents of the three documents may change between releases; the list entries may not without a new version.

Verify the surface yourself

A version number is a promise that nothing a client depends on changed without it. Since 0.6.0 worklore publishes its surface fingerprint in the shared form mcp-surface/1 (SPEC, by Sidney Bissoli), so you check worklore exactly the way you check every other server that publishes it. The registry entry carries it in server.json under _meta → io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided → io.github.sidneybissoli/mcp-surface:

  • declared.sha256 — the sha256 of what a client sees before it calls anything: the initialize result (protocol version, capabilities, instructions, serverInfo without its version) and the four lists (tools, resources, resource templates, prompts), normalised and serialised as the SPEC says;
  • anonymous — which methods answer without a token (plus one named, harmless tools/call: check_capability on inline text), and its sha256.

The fastest check is Sidney's dependency-free verify.mjs (Node 18+). It reads the registry entry for the version, makes sure the endpoint can say "no" to a method that does not exist, captures the live surface, and compares:

bash
curl -sO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SidneyBissoli/mcp-br-commons/main/packages/mcp-surface/exemplos/verify.mjsnode verify.mjs io.github.worklore/worklore 0.7.0

Or in Python, with nothing installed (the declared hash only):

bash
python3 - <<'PY'import hashlib, json, urllib.requestEP = "https://worklore.dev/mcp"def rpc(method, params=None):    body = {"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 1, "method": method, **({"params": params} if params else {})}    req = urllib.request.Request(EP, data=json.dumps(body).encode(),        headers={"Content-Type": "application/json", "Accept": "application/json, text/event-stream"})    return json.load(urllib.request.urlopen(req)).get("result")def canon(v):  # SPEC §3: keys by UTF-16 code unit, no whitespace, JSON.stringify strings    if isinstance(v, dict):        return "{" + ",".join(json.dumps(k, ensure_ascii=False) + ":" + canon(v[k])                              for k in sorted(v, key=lambda s: s.encode("utf-16-be"))) + "}"    if isinstance(v, list):        return "[" + ",".join(canon(x) for x in v) + "]"    return json.dumps(v, ensure_ascii=False)def listed(method, key):  # this server answers each list in one page    res = rpc(method)    return res.get(key) if isinstance(res, dict) else Nonedef by(items, key):    return None if items is None else sorted(items, key=lambda x: str(x.get(key)).encode("utf-16-be"))init = rpc("initialize", {"protocolVersion": "2025-06-18", "capabilities": {},                          "clientInfo": {"name": "verify", "version": "1"}})version = init["serverInfo"]["version"]surface = {"initialize": {"protocolVersion": init.get("protocolVersion"),                          "capabilities": init.get("capabilities"),                          "instructions": init.get("instructions"),                          "serverInfo": {k: v for k, v in init["serverInfo"].items() if k != "version"}},           "tools": by(listed("tools/list", "tools"), "name"),           "resources": by(listed("resources/list", "resources"), "uri"),           "resourceTemplates": by(listed("resources/templates/list", "resourceTemplates"), "uriTemplate"),           "prompts": by(listed("prompts/list", "prompts"), "name")}live = hashlib.sha256(canon(surface).encode()).hexdigest()entry = json.load(urllib.request.urlopen(    "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers/io.github.worklore%2Fworklore/versions/" + version))published = entry["server"]["_meta"]["io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided"][    "io.github.sidneybissoli/mcp-surface"]["declared"]["sha256"]print("version", version, "| live", live[:12], "| registry", published[:12],      "| match" if live == published else "| DIFFERS")PY

If the version is the same and the hash differs, the server changed without saying so. Tell me in an issue. 0.5.1 published worklore's own per-section hashes under a surface key; 0.6.0 replaced them with this one shared format. The idea of publishing the fingerprint with each release came from a comment by @_firelinks under Sidney Bissoli's Your MCP server changed. Its version didn't.

What answers without a token

Since 0.5.0 one rule decides it, everywhere — the site, the REST API and this server alike. It lives as a single table in worklore's backend (access.py, rendered as docs/ACCESS.md); the summary below is generated from it.

The rule. Anyone can search and read all public stories without signing in — site, REST API and MCP alike. Private stories and every write (publish, edit, report a reproduction or a check, visibility, per-user data, anything acting as a person) need a signed-in session. Anonymous reads go through the single visibility rule, so a private story answers exactly like a missing one. Anything that costs worklore on someone else's behalf — the server fetching an arbitrary URL — needs a session too, unless the input is inline text.

  • Methods with no credential: initialize, notifications/initialized, notifications/cancelled, ping, tools/list, resources/list, resources/read, resources/templates/list, prompts/list.
  • Tools with no credential: search_stories, get_story, suggest_for_project, check_capability (without url) — public stories only; a private story answers exactly like a missing one.
  • Need a signed-in session: check_capability with url, report_reproduction, report_check, publish_story, edit_story, suggest_edit. Without one they answer 401 with a WWW-Authenticate header pointing at the authorization server.
  • A JSON-RPC batch answers without a token only if every message in it does.

In practice: you can connect worklore and search, read, get suggestions and x-ray pasted text without an account. Signing in adds your own private stories to what you can see, lets check_capability fetch a URL for you, and is what lets your agent record a reproduction or a check, publish, or edit — all of which act as you.

History. Until 0.4.0 the line sat between describing the server and using it: the list and the call do not need the same answer. Anonymous callers got the server's description — names, descriptions, input and output schemas, annotations — which is the same information already published in the MCP Registry, in Smithery's listing and in this README. They got nothing that executed, nothing per-user, and no session. 0.5.0 keeps the last two and opens reading public stories, which the website never gated in the first place.

This is written down because it was a mistake first. The original build gated the whole endpoint, on reasoning that felt airtight: one gate, one place to get it right. The consequence was invisible from inside the code and obvious from outside — a registry-mirroring directory listed worklore with its name, its description, and zero tools, because a crawler has nobody to authenticate as. The same property also means nobody outside the repository — a scanner, a conformance harness, a curious stranger — can check what the server actually publishes. Two symptoms, one cause. The fix was about fifteen lines: an allow-list of anonymous methods plus a batch check, so a privileged call cannot be smuggled in beside an anonymous one.

The whole thing is written up, with the diff and how to verify it against your own endpoint, here: My MCP server hid its own tool list behind a login. If somebody proposes gating enumeration on a server you work on, that page is the short version of the argument.

Gating enumeration is a legitimate choice for a server whose tool names are sensitive. It is worth making on purpose rather than inheriting it from a transport-level gate, which is how most of them happen — including, by their own audit, the one that prompted this section being written down.

Add the connector

In Claude Code:

claude mcp add --transport http worklore https://worklore.dev/mcp

On claude.ai (web): Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector → name worklore, URL https://worklore.dev/mcp. (Custom connectors need a paid plan.)

Via Smithery:

npx -y smithery mcp add worklore/worklore

Any other MCP client: point it at https://worklore.dev/mcp (Streamable HTTP). Searching and reading work right away; the first call that needs a session (a write, or a URL to x-ray) answers 401 and your client is walked through OAuth — it registers itself, so there is nothing to paste and no API key to manage.

Example prompts

  1. "Use worklore to check what this skill can do before I install it: <paste a URL or the skill text>."
  2. "Search worklore for stories about Flutter golden tests, and tell me each one's capability tier."
  3. "Here's my project: a Python AWS-Lambda backend with DynamoDB. Suggest 3 worklore stories worth reproducing here, and read me the top one's Reproduce-this contract."

Notes

  • The connector is a route on worklore's existing backend Lambda; it reuses the vendored skill-xray scanner.
  • Origin is validated (native clients send none and are allowed; unknown web origins are rejected); HTTPS enforced.
  • How this server was built and shipped, end to end, including what went wrong: Build and ship your own MCP server.

MIT-licensed.

来源:README.md,提交 1d9b8a5

工具

10

check_capability

Check capability (skill-xray)

Disclose what an agent Skill or worklore story CAN DO before you run it: a capability tier T0-T4 bound to a content sha256, with findings that carry file:line evidence, PLUS a separate list of behavioral red flags (prompt-injection / deception / exfiltration-intent / safety-bypass phrasings) for a human to review. This is blast-radius disclosure and triage, never a 'safe' verdict. Prefer a `url` over pasting a file: a skill on GitHub (github.com or raw.githubusercontent.com, up to 200 KB) needs no sign-in, and you do not have to copy the whole file into the call. Other URLs need a signed-in session. If you paste `text`, also pass `expected_sha256` (the file's sha256, e.g. `shasum -a 256 SKILL.md`): a copy that changed on the way is reported instead of scanned. `received` says exactly what was scanned.

输入参数urltextexpected_sha256

get_story

Get a worklore story

Fetch one worklore story by slug — its full markdown (narrative + the 'Reproduce this' contract your agent would run) WITH its capability disclosure attached (tier + findings), so you see what it can do before applying it. Read the capability first; run check_capability on the live artifacts before executing. After you apply the story to the user's task, call report_reproduction with an honest result to record it.

输入参数slug必填

search_stories

Search worklore stories

Search worklore stories by keyword across title, summary, tags and stack. Returns matches with their capability tier.

输入参数query

explore_keywords

Explore worklore keywords

The worklore keyword map: every story tag with its story count, in four editorial groups (tools and agents, building blocks, practices, off the clock), plus the stories under one keyword when you name it. Use it when the user asks what worklore has on a topic, or wants to browse rather than search. Clients that render MCP Apps show it as an interactive explorer (filter, pick a keyword, read a story into the chat); every client gets the same data as text. The same map is https://worklore.dev/ and each keyword is https://worklore.dev/t/<keyword>.

输入参数groupquerykeyword

suggest_for_project

Suggest stories for this project

Given a short description of the current project (stack, what you're building, recent problems), suggest up to 3 worklore stories worth reproducing here, with why each fits and its tier.

输入参数context必填

report_reproduction

Report a reproduction

Call this right after you apply a worklore story's steps to the user's own task, to record the reproduction (attributed to the signed-in account). Use an honest result: 'worked', 'partial' (you produced the output but it isn't verified yet), or 'failed' — all are useful. One counted report per person per story; repeats are acknowledged, not doubled. Never report a story you did not apply.

输入参数noteslug必填result必填

report_check

Report a check result

Record the result of a story's read-only 'Check if this applies to you' section, run in the user's own project (attributed to the signed-in account). Run ONLY that check — change nothing, apply no fix. First decide whether it applies at all: if the project does not match the check's preconditions, do NOT call this — 'not applicable' is never recorded. Otherwise report 'has_problem' or 'no_problem', honestly. One counted result per person per story; a later report replaces the earlier one. Only stories whose get_story result has has_check: true can be checked.

输入参数noteslug必填result必填

publish_story

Publish a worklore story

Publish a NEW worklore story as the signed-in account. worklore stories are PUBLIC and honest, so before you call this you MUST show the human the complete draft — the title, the first-person narrative, and the 'Reproduce this' contract — and get their EXPLICIT approval. Never publish on your own initiative and never invent details. Provide the full story as `markdown` (frontmatter with title/date/tags/type/reproducible, then '# title', the narrative, then '## Reproduce this' with prerequisites/inputs/steps/verify) — call get_story on an existing story first to match the format — OR provide the structured fields title + narrative (+ reproduce, tags, type, stack) and the server assembles it. SANITIZE: no secrets, employer internals, client names, or private URLs. Returns the live URL and capability tier.

输入参数tagstypestacktitlemarkdownnarrativereproducevisibility

edit_story

Edit your worklore story

Revise a worklore story the signed-in account PUBLISHED — only its author can edit it. Call get_story first, then show the human a before/after diff of your change and get their EXPLICIT approval before calling this; never edit on your own initiative. Send the COMPLETE revised story as `markdown` (frontmatter + '# title' + narrative + '## Reproduce this'), not a fragment. Keep the frontmatter `date` exactly as it is: it records when the work happened, and a revision never moves it. Say what kind of edit this is: 'rephrase' (same claims, better wording), 'addition' (new detail, nothing was wrong), or 'correction' (something in the story was WRONG — a step, a claim, a result). If anything was wrong, it is a correction: never hide a correction as a rephrase. A correction requires a one-line `note` saying what was wrong, and notifies everyone who reported reproducing the story. `source` optionally credits what prompted the revision (an https URL). The new text REPLACES the old (worklore keeps no copy of earlier text), while a record of this revision — when, what kind, the note — is appended to the story's public history.

输入参数kindnoteslug必填sourcemarkdown必填

suggest_edit

Suggest an edit to someone's story

Propose a revision of a worklore story written by SOMEONE ELSE, for its author to accept or decline — worklore's pull request. Use it when, while reproducing a story, a step turned out wrong, outdated or missing (a library changed, the docs caught up, a command no longer exists). Call get_story first, make the change in the COMPLETE markdown (frontmatter + '# title' + narrative + '## Reproduce this'; keep the frontmatter `date` exactly as it is), show the human a before/after diff and the rationale, and send it only with their EXPLICIT approval. The story does NOT change: the author is notified, reviews the diff, and either accepts it as a revision (the signed-in account is credited on the story) or declines it, in which case they may hand the text back as a draft of the signed-in account's own, adapted from theirs. One open suggestion per person per story; sending another replaces it. For the user's OWN story use edit_story instead.

输入参数slug必填markdown必填rationale必填

版本历史

11
  1. v0.9.0最新Oct 29, 2026
  2. v0.8.0Oct 23, 2026
  3. v0.7.2Oct 20, 2026
  4. v0.7.1Oct 16, 2026
  5. v0.7.0Oct 15, 2026
  6. v0.6.1Oct 15, 2026
  7. v0.6.0Oct 8, 2026
  8. v0.5.1Oct 7, 2026
  9. v0.5.0Oct 6, 2026
  10. v0.3.0Sep 30, 2026
  11. v0.1.0Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 90%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
  • 已声明认证方式必需10 分
  • 已列出工具必需15 分
  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分

    请在仓库或注册中心条目中声明许可证。