
Agent Reliability
dev.agentreliability由 agentreliability.dev 發布官方發布者v0.6.14更新於 Oct 27, 2026
Testing, benchmarking and auditing autonomous AI agents — methods, harnesses, evidence
概覽
一個託管、唯讀的 MCP 伺服器,以精選知識圖譜回答自主 AI 代理的測試、基準評測與稽核問題,並附上引用來源。
- 可以做什麼
- 先取得語料庫概觀,了解內容範圍、類型計數、標籤與新鮮度
- 對知識圖譜做全文檢索,或直接提問並取得附來源與信賴度的論述
- 依 id 取得單一知識物件,或依主題標籤列出相關物件
- 檢視物件的圖譜鄰居及其關係類型
- 查閱完整來源登錄表或某個物件引用的來源,並列出最近驗證的物件
- 適用情境
- 適合需要可引用、有出處的代理評測背景知識時使用,例如評測與基準、以 LLM 作為評判者的失效模式、基準污染、故障注入、核准關卡與事實依據。語料規模固定且不大,較適合查閱式問答而非廣泛研究。
- 執行需求
- 遠端 streamable-HTTP 端點,無需安裝。不需要帳號、API 金鑰或驗證。端點僅接受 POST 請求,並限制每用戶端每分鐘 120 次請求。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Agent Reliability,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Web executable,透過 Streamable HTTP。 遠端服務在工作區中設定後即可從網頁執行環境執行。
交給代理程式安裝
把這段提示詞貼上到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等代理程式,或 SourceWeft 對話中。代理程式會讀取該伺服器的安裝指南,先向你展示發布者、端點和登入方式,經你同意後再把它新增到你的客戶端。金鑰不會寫進任何命令。
閱讀 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/dev.agentreliability%2Fagent-reliability/install.md,並按其中說明把這個 MCP 伺服器接入我的客戶端。修改任何設定之前,先告訴我它的發布者、端點和登入方式,等我確認。不要把 API 金鑰寫進命令或我會提交的檔案;問我金鑰應從哪裡取得。其他 MCP 客戶端
把它新增到你客戶端的 mcpServers 設定中。
{
"mcpServers": {
"agent-reliability": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://agentreliability.dev/mcp?via=manifest"
}
}
}README
Agent Reliability — MCP server
Testing, benchmarking and auditing autonomous AI agents — methods, harnesses, evidence
A remote MCP server over a curated knowledge graph. Every claim it returns is bound to a registered source: the tools hand back claims with their citations and a confidence value, so an agent can show its work instead of asserting.
Nothing to install. It is a hosted streamable-HTTP endpoint:
Also listed on Smithery.
Add it to a client
Claude Code
Claude Desktop / any client reading mcpServers
No API key, no account, no auth. Read-only.
Check it answers, without any client at all:
Tools
Eight, each with an outputSchema, each returning structuredContent.
The intended path is get_overview → search or answer → get_entity
→ get_related. get_overview exists because an agent that has just
arrived needs to know whether this corpus can help before it spends a
call guessing.
What is in the corpus
Subject matter: evals and benchmarks (GAIA, AgentBench, Inspect), LLM-as-judge and its failure modes, Goodhart and benchmark contamination, fault injection and chaos testing, approval gates and autonomy levels, grounding and faithfulness.
Questions it is built to answer
- How do I tell a real eval from a benchmark my agent has memorised?
- What does calibration mean for an LLM judge, and how is it measured?
- Which failure modes does fault injection actually catch?
What an answer actually looks like
A real call against the live endpoint — answer with
"how do I tell a real eval from benchmark contamination" — returns this structuredContent, trimmed:
Note what travels with the answer: the evidence tier, a confidence, the date it was last verified, and the source behind the claim — not as prose an agent has to parse, but as fields it can act on. An agent can decline to use a weak claim, or cite the primary source directly.
When the corpus cannot answer, answered is false. It does not
improvise, and the miss is recorded so the gap can be filled.
Machine-readable surfaces
The MCP endpoint is one of several. The same corpus is served as plain files an agent can read directly:
Each knowledge object has a human page and a machine twin at the same id, with a canonical URL that agrees across all of them.
Behaviour worth knowing before you integrate
POSTonly. Every other method answers405with anAllow: POST, OPTIONSheader.- Rate limit: 120 requests per minute per client, counted in a shared
store, published on every response as
RateLimit-Limit,RateLimit-RemainingandRateLimit-Reset(all three exposed via CORS). It fails open: if the store is unreachable the request is served. - Malformed input gets a spec-correct JSON-RPC error —
-32700for unparseable bodies,-32602for an unknown tool — never an HTML error page. - Request bodies are capped and validated before transport.
Privacy
No accounts, no cookies, no ads. Usage is measured in aggregate with daily-rotating hashed identifiers and a 200-day retention; raw IPs are never stored. Full policy: PRIVACY.md.
Provenance and licence
Knowledge content is CC-BY-4.0: use it, cite it. The source registry is
public precisely so a claim can be checked rather than trusted —
get_sources returns what any given claim rests on.
Claims carry an evidence tier and a last_verified date. Where the
evidence is weaker, the object says so rather than rounding up.
How it is built
Compiled and served by Citarium, a source-available framework for turning a knowledge graph into a website, an API, an MCP server and agent-readable files from a single source, under external evaluation.
The framework's code is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 and
its repository is not public. What is public — and what actually matters for
trusting an answer — is this server, the corpus it serves, and the registered
source behind every claim: get_sources returns what any given claim rests
on, so it can be checked rather than trusted.
This repository is the server's public face: its manifest and its documentation. The corpus itself lives at agentreliability.dev.
Running it yourself
The endpoint above is the server. If you want to run a copy locally — or
if a directory needs to start one in order to inspect it — the recipe is
in CONTAINER.md: fetch-corpus.mjs downloads this
instance's published corpus and @citarium/mcp serves it. Both files are
GENERATED by citarium mirror; edit the instance, not them.
The container serves a snapshot taken when its image was built. This endpoint is the thing itself.
來源:README.md,提交 04a2084
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.6.14最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 85%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通必需25 分
- 已宣告認證方式必需10 分
- 已列出工具必需15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分