Verify SCITT receipts from Forestrie transparency logs, offline

dev.forestrie由 forestrie.dev 發布v0.8.1更新於 Nov 3, 2026

在你持有的信任根下驗證 SCITT 收據——離線進行,無需後端、無需金鑰、無需網路

AI 翻譯由 AI 模型根據下方的原文描述翻譯,可能有誤。

原文描述

Verify a SCITT receipt under a trust root you hold — offline, no backend, no key, no network

已驗證STDIO僅桌面開發者工具安全與監控

概覽

Verify SCITT receipts from Forestrie transparency logs, offline 的本機 MCP 服務,由 forestrie.dev 發布;無需登入;STDIO。

暫無 AI 概覽:以下資訊來自註冊中心條目和服務本身。

發布者
forestrie.dev

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Verify SCITT receipts from Forestrie transparency logs, offline,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

@forestrie/mcp-verify

Verify a SCITT receipt from a Forestrie transparency log under a trust root you hold. Offline: no backend, no account, no key, no network. An MCP server whose only tools verify and decode receipts.

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "forestrie-verify": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "@forestrie/mcp-verify"]    }  }}
npx -y @forestrie/mcp-verify demo

Why

Agents act on statements they did not witness being made: a quote, an approval, a tool result, another agent's output. Usually the record of what was said is kept by the party that said it, so nobody downstream can ask "did you really say that, and did you say it to everyone?"

A Forestrie receipt is a proof that a statement was sealed into an append-only transparency log. This package checks that proof against a trust root you hold, in your own process, without contacting Forestrie. With the right root it also answers the harder question: whether the log you were shown is the log everyone else was shown. What transparency adds, where it stops, and what a receipt contains: TRANSPARENCY.md.

What it proves

ToolReference verbWhat it answers
verify_receiptforestrie verifyWere these exact payload bytes sequenced at this entry id?
verify_grant_receiptforestrie verify-grantWas this grant admitted to this log — i.e. was the signer entitled to write?
verify_selfforestrie verifyDoes this package's own release receipt vouch for the bytes it ships?
decode_receiptforestrie decode-receipt --jsonWhat is actually in this receipt? (Renders the CBOR only. Verifies nothing.)

Every tool is annotated readOnlyHint: true, openWorldHint: false. That is not decoration: it is the machine-readable form of "this tool touches nothing", and an agent can see it without running anything.

Trust roots

You do not ask for "verification". You say which root you trust, and the result says what that root can see:

RootWhat you supply
genesisthe forest's genesis document, captured when you registered
known-log-keya log owner key (keyXy, P-256) or KS256 address (ks256Address) you hold out of band
known-accumulatora snapshot of the log's peaks, from a chain read
checkpoint-chaina retained chain of .sth checkpoints, plus genesis or keyXy; delegation limits enforced per link

KS256 (secp256k1) roots verify offline too. An EOA root verifies by ecrecover, from a genesis or a known-log-key with ks256Address. A contract root (a Safe) cannot be checked without a chain read, which this package never makes: pass ks256Attestation, an ERC-1271 record fetched elsewhere (@forestrie/mcp-resolve's fetch_ks256_attestation tool, or forestrie-cli's fetch-ks256-attestation). The result is then valid under the contract's signers at the attested block, and says which block. A 20-byte ks256Address asserts, and does not prove, which log it owns. checkpoint-chain takes ks256Attestation too, with the KS256 genesis for the forest chain id; one attestation covers one delegation certificate, so a Safe that rotated its delegate needs one per certificate: pass them as the ks256Attestations array. Every attestation is reported in the result as used, or unused with a reason; none is silently ignored. checkpoint-chain also enforces each link's delegation limits (mmrStart, mmrEnd, expiresAt): delegation_out_of_range, delegation_expired. Since 0.7.0 a peak attached to a receipt is checked against the leaf and inclusion path rather than trusted (@forestrie/receipt-verify 3.2.0), which closes a hole in the known-accumulator and checkpoint-chain roots. Details: docs/trust-roots.md.

The roots are not ordered by strength. The first two check the operator's signature locally and cannot see a split view. The last two match the peak against an accumulator the operator does not control, and can. Every result answers four questions, sealing, split-view, append-authority and attribution, each ok, failed, or not_answered_by_this_root. The last is a real answer and must reach the user; a client that renders only ok is using this tool wrong.

When each root is the effective choice, why a genesis document fetched at check time is weaker than one kept from registration, what a signature root cannot distinguish, and the demo transcript: docs/trust-roots.md.

You do not have to trust the operator

A receipt means something without assuming the Forestrie operator is honest:

  • A pipe, not a store. Only content hashes enter the log. Your statement and its receipt stay with you, and verification is pure over those bytes, so a check never has to ask the operator for anything.
  • The operator does not hold the authority. A log's root key belongs to the log's owner, and the instance bootstrap key to whoever deployed the forest's contract. The operator's sealer signs checkpoints only for logs that have leased its key, within each lease's MMR range.
  • One published history. Checkpoints are published to the univocity contract, which refuses any that are inconsistent with what it already holds. The accumulator roots above check against that.

An operator can still decline to act, and that is visible: it can refuse admission, withhold data it serves, or stop sealing. It cannot rewrite or fork anchored history, or sign for a log that has not leased its key. Who holds which key, and what an operator can and cannot do: key custody and operator powers.

This package's own provenance

Software provenance is the familiar use case for a transparency log, so this package applies it to itself. Every release registers a small statement (package name, version, git commit) in a Forestrie log and ships the receipt inside the tarball. npx -y @forestrie/mcp-verify verify --self, or the verify_self tool, checks it offline. This complements npm's SLSA provenance; it does not replace it. Today the receipt chains to a log on the public development lane. Details: docs/self-registration.md.

That bundle is also the subject of a worked example: fetching this package's own release receipt from the public lane, verifying it under the bundled key, seeing the documented delegation_invalid under the genesis root, and getting split-view ok from a chain read — end to end in a few seconds, with no account. It lives in @forestrie/mcp-resolve's README, because fetching is that package's job, not this one's.

The verification arithmetic comes from @forestrie/receipt-verify, pinned to an exact version and published and attested separately. The tarball ships src and the frozen conformance vectors it is tested against (fixtures/PROVENANCE.md), so the arithmetic can be re-run rather than taken on trust.

Installing the package pulls in more than a verifier needs. @modelcontextprotocol/sdk brings a web stack, including express, hono, jose, cors and ajv, for HTTP transports this package never uses: it constructs only the stdio transport. The verification core never imports the SDK, and the browser-safety gate enforces that, so importing the package's "." export gives you the arithmetic without any of it.

Bundled resources, and the two calls they make runnable

The tarball ships its fixtures as forestrie://fixtures/… MCP resources, so an agent that holds nothing of its own can run a real verification. Two calls reach a pass from resources alone; both are asserted by test/node/mcp-smoke.test.ts.

A grant receipt at the genesis root — verify_grant_receipt with:

ArgumentResource
receiptgolden/grant-receipt.cbor
committedGrantgolden/committed-grant.cbor (derived from golden/manifest.json at read time)
entryIdthe text of golden/entry-id.txt
trust{root: "genesis", genesis: golden/grant-genesis.cbor}

Result: verify-grant: PASS · root=genesis · sealing ok, split-view not answered at this root, append-authority ok, attribution ok.

A payload receipt at an accumulator root, offline, against a real anchor — verify_receipt with the lane-A bundle (fixtures/lane-a/PROVENANCE.md): a real receipt from a public lane and the accumulator the univocity contract had published for its log at block 46770471, captured by an independent chain read. (That lane's content was reset on 2026-09-20; the bytes still verify, the URLs they came from no longer resolve.)

ArgumentResource
receiptlane-a/receipt.cbor
payloadlane-a/statement.cose
entryIdthe text of lane-a/entry-id.txt
trust{root: "known-accumulator", accumulator: lane-a/accumulator.cbor}

Result: verify: PASS · root=known-accumulator · sealing ok, split-view ok, append-authority ok, attribution ok, with anchor.matchedPeak set. Unlike the demo's self-derived snapshot, this anchor is the contract's published state, so the split-view answer is evidence as of that block. The same receipt passes under {root: "known-log-key", keyXy: {b64: <text of lane-a/log-key.xy.b64>}} and reports delegation_invalid under {root: "genesis", genesis: lane-a/genesis.cbor}, because its log is a grandchild of the forest root (docs/self-registration.md).

A resource's bytes are passed back as {b64: <the blob>}; a text resource such as lane-a/log-key.xy.b64 is base64 text already, so its text goes in b64 as is. golden/burial/public-key.xy.b64 offers the burial chain's root key the same way, so checkpoint-chain can be driven from resources — to its documented negative verdict, since the burial bundle ships no leaf preimage.

Registry

This server is listed as dev.forestrie/verify in the official MCP registry.

Development

mise install           # node 22.14.0, pnpm 10.6.5pnpm installpnpm test              # browser-safe gate + encoding-copy gate + server.json gate + unit testspnpm build

Conventions, invariants and the release checklist: AGENTS.md.

Licence

MIT.

來源:README.md,提交 5c52ee0

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

6
  1. v0.8.1最新Nov 3, 2026
  2. v0.7.0Oct 20, 2026
  3. v0.6.1Oct 18, 2026
  4. v0.5.2Sep 26, 2026
  5. v0.5.1Sep 23, 2026
  6. v0.4.1Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分