XF Model Source

dev.xpansion由 xpansion.dev 發布官方發布者v0.5.3更新於 Oct 25, 2026

Find the right AI model for your job. Free discovery and ranking; tests on your own key.

已驗證Streamable HTTP可網頁執行資料與分析AI 與機器學習

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

一個託管服務,協助助理釐清工作的真正需求並列出候選模型清單,再用你自己的任務實測模型並選出最合適的一個。

可以做什麼
透過引導式提問釐清工作的真正需求,給出附證據與接近落選者的候選清單,或給出單一最佳已驗證模型及備選與理由。用你的範例任務對候選模型或指定模型進行即時並排測試,執行前先顯示費用估算。查詢同類工作的實際結果:通過率、勝出模型、典型單次任務成本和常見失敗。儲存已完成的工作,供可選的每週複測與出現更佳模型時的電子郵件通知。
適用情境
當你需要為具體且重複出現的工作挑選 AI 模型,並希望依據在你自己的範例上的測試、而非廠商說法或排行榜來做決定時使用。適合比較模型在成本、格式遵循或必要條件方面表現的人。
執行需求
透過 Streamable HTTP 存取的遠端 MCP 端點,無需安裝。需要以電子郵件登入,部分用戶端需使用個人連線連結作為伺服器位址。即時 compare 與 benchmark 需要在 X-OpenRouter-Key 標頭中提供 OpenRouter API 金鑰,並需要連線至 OpenRouter 的網路存取。
安裝前請注意
X-OpenRouter-Key 標頭會攜帶你自己的 OpenRouter 金鑰;即時測試會消耗你的 OpenRouter 額度,執行前請先查看估算並確認。可選的 Model Watch 訂閱為付費服務。watch_job 會儲存工作及其範例任務,儲存前應先徵得同意。單行工作描述與匿名 ID 會被記錄,個人連線連結應視同密碼保管。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 XF Model Source,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Web executable,透過 Streamable HTTP。 遠端服務在工作區中設定後即可從網頁執行環境執行。

交給代理程式安裝

把這段提示詞貼上到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等代理程式,或 SourceWeft 對話中。代理程式會讀取該伺服器的安裝指南,先向你展示發布者、端點和登入方式,經你同意後再把它新增到你的客戶端。金鑰不會寫進任何命令。

閱讀 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/dev.xpansion%2Fxfms/install.md,並按其中說明把這個 MCP 伺服器接入我的客戶端。修改任何設定之前,先告訴我它的發布者、端點和登入方式,等我確認。不要把 API 金鑰寫進命令或我會提交的檔案;問我金鑰應從哪裡取得。

檢視代理程式所依據的安裝指南

其他 MCP 客戶端

把它新增到你客戶端的 mcpServers 設定中。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "xf-model-source": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}

README

XF Model Source (XFMS)

[License: MIT] [smithery badge] [Part of the Xpansion Framework]

Find the AI model your job really needs, and prove it on your own tasks.

AI is specialized. There are 450+ models on OpenRouter, and the one every vendor calls "the best" was not measured on your job. XF Model Source works inside the assistant you already use (Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Continue, any MCP client) and does three things:

  1. Finds what your job needs. It asks a few plain questions and turns your answers into the job's real requirements: what goes in, what must come back, the format, the cost ceiling, what must never happen.
  2. Narrows the field. It checks every model against those requirements using independent test scores, each model's published capabilities and price, and the results of our own comparisons, then produces a shortlist.
  3. Proves it on your tasks. A screening round runs about 12 likely models on one of your sample tasks. Any model that breaks a must-have is ruled out, and the best six run all your tasks. You get the winner, the reasons, and every answer so you can check it yourself.

Scores and claims can't tell you whether a model will follow your exact format or avoid inventing a detail. So the test, not the leaderboard, makes the final call, and each shortlisted model shows how it has really done in our own comparisons.


Connect

The server is hosted. There is nothing to install. The address is:

https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp

  • Claude (claude.ai or the desktop app): Settings, Connectors, Add custom connector, paste the address. Sign in with your email when it opens.
  • Claude Code: run claude mcp add model-source --transport http https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp, then /mcp inside Claude Code to sign in.
  • Codex (in the ChatGPT desktop app): Settings, MCP servers, Add server. Name it model-source, choose Streamable HTTP, paste the address, save, then select Restart. When it shows Authenticate, select it and sign in with your email.
  • Codex (in a terminal): run codex mcp add model-source --url https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp, then codex mcp login model-source.
  • Cursor, Windsurf and other assistants: add an HTTP MCP server at the address (Cursor: ~/.cursor/mcp.json):
json
{  "mcpServers": {    "model-source": { "url": "https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp" }  }}
  • An assistant that can't open a sign-in page: sign in at https://xfms.xpansion.dev/signin and use the personal connection link from your account page as the server address. Treat it like a password.

Sign-in is free and needs only your email. Then ask your assistant: "Help me pick an AI model for pulling the invoice number, date, total and vendor out of invoices as JSON, about 2,000 a month. The cheapest one that gets every field right."

What it costs

  • Discovery and the shortlist are free. Sign-in is free and needs only your email.
  • Comparisons run on your own OpenRouter key, usually a few cents. You see the most a comparison can cost before anything runs, and nothing runs until you say go. Add the key as an X-OpenRouter-Key header. It is used for that run and never stored.
  • XF Model Watch (optional, from $19 a month) re-tests your saved jobs every week and emails you only when a cheaper or better model passes every one of your checks, plus a warning before your model is retired. Solo $19 (3 jobs), Team $49 (10), Agency $149 (40). 14-day money-back. Details: https://xfms.xpansion.dev/watch

Tools

discover (finds the job's real requirements), rank (the full shortlist with the evidence behind it), pick (the single best proven model), compare (the screening round and test on your tasks), benchmark, field_results (what has worked for jobs of the same kind), and watch_job (XF Model Watch).

What we keep

No conversations are kept. We log the one-line description you start with and an anonymous ID to count use. Our own daily comparisons are published at https://xfms.xpansion.dev, every answer and every verdict, so the method can be checked.

How the shortlist is built

  1. No vendor claims as proof. A model saying it supports JSON or a long context is a claim. We record how often each model actually kept its claims in our own comparisons.
  2. Missing evidence is shown as missing, never as good.
  3. Your requirements decide. Must-haves filter; priorities order what is left.
  4. The test decides the winner. Methodology in docs/methodology.md.

Honest limits

A comparison uses a handful of your sample tasks, and a model grades part of the answers. Read a result as strong evidence for your decision, not a guarantee. We can only report on models we have tested, and the ranking before the test is a shortlist, not a verdict.


Part of the Xpansion Framework

XFMS doesn't stand alone — it's the model-selection layer of the Xpansion Framework.

The Xpansion thesis

Humans communicate with intent compressed by contextual experience. AI simply predicts patterns in language. Xpansion is the execution layer that bridges them.

Every sentence a human types carries lifetimes of context that the speaker assumes the other side will decompress — what counts as "good enough," which constraints are non-negotiable, what failures last month taught them, what their house style demands. AI doesn't share that context. It predicts patterns in language, filling in the gaps with whatever's plausible to its training data. The result reads as plausible but isn't intent-honoring: sessions lose context, security holes ship silently, contracts break without warning, and there's no way to verify that what was built actually matches what was asked for. They don't know what they don't know, and neither does AI.

Xpansion closes the gap. It decompresses finite intent upfront, enforces it through code-driven AI behavior, and delivers binary-verified results against the intent across persistent memory that survives every session boundary.

Model Source — the model-selection enforcement

When you say "the best model for this task", you're compressing a lot: what counts as best depends on whether you care about factual reasoning or coherent prose, whether cost matters more than latency, whether you actually need vision or just text, whether the call has to stream, whether a particular benchmark dominates your real workload. AI on its own predicts the pattern — what model do most people pick for queries that look like this? — and gives you a plausible-sounding answer that's often wrong for you.

XFMS does the decompression. It takes your stated purpose, infers which benchmarks actually map to it, honors your stated primary preferences without silently overriding them, surfaces the latent requirements you didn't know to ask about (streaming for real-time chat, vision for OCR), and probes the top picks against your real query to verify the recommendation — not predict it. Then it tells you, in plain English, why it picked what it picked.

One module per enforcement

The rest of the Xpansion stack enforces the same decompress- enforce-verify contract for different parts of the work:

  • Dispatch (Dispatch) — runtime task router. Watches what kind of work you're doing and routes it to the right tool.
  • Finite Intent (XFFI) — turns "build me a feature" into a finite spec with binary terminals before any code gets written. Stops scope drift at the source.
  • Boundary Auditor (XFBA) — checks every code edit against contracts. Stops broken function signatures and mismatched types from ever reaching production.
  • Systemic Impact Analysis (XSIA) — maps the blast radius of a proposed change before it lands. Tells you what else might break.
  • Token Conservation (XFTC) — manages how much of the conversation has to stay in the assistant's working memory. Prevents context loss in long sessions.
  • Execution Audit (XFXA) — verifies every promise from the spec was actually met before declaring a task done. The final binary check.
  • Memory Tree (XFMT) — session snapshots that stay searchable across conversations. Your assistant remembers what you decided last week.
  • Security Auditor (XFSA) — static + AI security scanning on every code edit. Catches secrets, injection paths, and unsafe patterns before they ship.

The full picture, with the rest of the modules, lives at xpansion.dev.

Xpansion is in pre-signup right now. Early access and founding licenses are open at xpansion.dev. XFMS is the first piece to ship public + free — the rest follow.


Local development

bash
git clone https://github.com/VisionAIrySE/XFMS.gitcd XFMSpython3 -m venv .venv.venv/bin/pip install -e .[dev].venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -v

The tests mock the HTTP layer so they run offline — no API keys needed to develop.


License

This client library is MIT-licensed. The recommender engine, the catalog, and the ingestion pipeline are not open source. See NOTICE for the patent reservation language and the relationship to the broader Xpansion Framework IP.


Contact

來源:README.md,提交 7306117

工具

7

rank

Rank models for a discovered job

The full shortlist for a job worked out with discover: 5 proven models and 1 promising newcomer, each with its standing on every requirement, plus near misses and what would change the order. Pass the discover session.

輸入參數session必填

pick

Pick the best model for a discovered job

The single best proven model for a job worked out with discover, with why and the runners-up. Pass the discover session.

輸入參數session必填

discover

Work out what the job really needs

Discovery: finds the true requirements of the person's job before any model is chosen. Start with purpose: the reply carries the discovery instructions and the evidence catalogue. YOU ask the person the questions (one thing each, plain words, offering the returned choices); then call again with the sealed session, their answers and your structured updates. Each reply gives progress, rejected updates with reasons, next targets, answer choices from live data and a shortlist. At most 5 rounds. Ends with a confirmation view; call with confirm=true once the person agrees. The person can stop any time (end_now=true). Nothing about the person is stored by XFMS.

輸入參數answersconfirmcontextend_nowpurposesessionupdatescorrections

benchmark

Test the shortlist on the person's own work

The live test: the 5 proven models and 1 promising newcomer from discovery do the person's real tasks side by side, every requirement is judged, and the results pick the winner. First call (session + tasks) returns the estimate and an offer — nothing is spent. Show the person the cost; only when they agree, call again with offer and go=true. Runs on the person's OpenRouter key (X-OpenRouter-Key header). Save the returned report as a local file.

輸入參數gooffertasksratingssession必填overruledjobs_wantedtest_sessioncurrent_modelruns_per_month

field_results

What has worked for jobs like this

Results from real comparisons on Model Source for one kind of job (call with no job_type for the list): which models passed, how often, which won, typical cost per task and the most common failure. Counted without anyone's job details. A starting point; test on the person's own work before choosing.

輸入參數job_type

watch_job

Watch this job (XF Model Watch subscribers)

Saves a finished job for XF Model Watch, which re-tests it as new models arrive and emails the person only when a model passes every must-have and ranks higher on their priorities. Needs a signed-in subscriber. Ask the person first: Model Watch keeps the job and its example tasks (encrypted, deletable any time). Pass consent=true only if they agree. Pass the discover session, and either test_session from a finished comparison or the tasks, plus the model they use now. The first check runs as soon as the job is saved. To re-check a job the person already watches, pass check_now with the job's id or title instead (once a day per job; the result is emailed and shown at /account).

輸入參數taskstitleconsentsessioncheck_nowtest_sessioncurrent_modelruns_per_month

compare

Test models the person named on their own work

Same live test as benchmark, but on the models the person names (model_ids). Needs a finished discover session so every requirement is judged. Estimate first, then go=true.

輸入參數gooffertasksratingssession必填model_idsoverruledtest_sessioncurrent_modelruns_per_month

版本歷史

2
  1. v0.5.3最新Oct 17, 2026
  2. v0.4.0Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 100%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通必需25 分
  • 已宣告認證方式必需10 分
  • 已列出工具必需15 分
  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分