
Endpoint AIops
io.github.AIops-tools由 GitHub 帳號 AIops-tools 發布v0.13.0更新於 Oct 30, 2026
Governed managed-endpoint ops — login-storm & drift analysis, 13 MCP tools with audit/budget/undo.
概覽
針對受管終端機群的治理型 AI 維運 MCP 伺服器:登入風暴與漂移分析,加上具稽核的受控讀寫操作。
- 可以做什麼
- 檢視機群清單與健康狀態:總覽、終端清單與詳情、健康評分
- 分析工作階段:列出登入工作階段並偵測登入風暴,排序拖慢登入的終端與使用者
- 檢查漂移與修補:漂移報告、修補狀態、修補合規性,可依機群多數推導基準
- 修復終端:指派設定檔或重新開機,並標示風險等級
- 檢視與套用復原:列出已記錄的反向操作並執行
- 部分分析工具可注入記錄做離線分析
- 適用情境
- 適合透過管理伺服器 REST API 管理集中控管終端(精簡型電腦、VDI 裝置)的情境,讓助理診斷登入風暴、找出修補或設定漂移,並執行可稽核的修復動作。若需要每次操作都有紀錄、可逆寫入可復原,就值得加入。
- 執行需求
- 以本機 Python 套件透過 stdio 執行(uv tool install 或 pipx)。需要可連線的終端管理伺服器、以 endpoint-aiops init 設定的目標,以及存放在本機加密儲存區的管理主控台帳號或 API 金鑰。主密碼來自 ENDPOINT_AIOPS_MASTER_PASSWORD 或互動式輸入;以外掛方式安裝時 PATH 需有 uvx。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Endpoint AIops,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
Endpoint AIops
Audit availability: Real writes require a committed
pendingaudit row and stop before contacting the platform if storage is unavailable. Reads and previews may continue with a warning; new audit rows store outcome summaries rather than full responses.
Disclaimer: Community-maintained open-source project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any endpoint-management vendor. Product and trademark names belong to their owners. MIT licensed.
Governed AI-ops for managed-endpoint fleets — thin clients, VDI endpoints,
and other centrally-managed devices — with a built-in governance harness:
unified audit log, token/runaway budget guard, undo-token recording, and
descriptive risk tiers. Vendor-neutral: it talks to an
endpoint-management server's REST API (Bearer auth) through a configurable
dialect — see Dialects. Self-contained: no
dependencies beyond httpx and the MCP SDK. The test suite is mock-based; the
endpoint-management REST paths have not yet been exercised against a live
management server — see docs/VERIFICATION.md.
What it does
Two signature analyses, plus the guarded reads and writes around them:
- Login-storm analysis — during a "everyone logs in at 9am" incident, detect the storm (bursts of concurrent logins in a sliding window) and rank the endpoints/users dragging login and boot times. Every flag is reported with its number, not a black-box verdict.
- Patch / config drift — find endpoints that have drifted from the fleet (outdated patch level, stray agent version, divergent OS build or config profile). With no declared baseline it derives one by fleet majority, so it works before a gold image exists.
What works
- CLI (
endpoint-aiops ...):init,overview,endpoint list/get/assign-profile/reboot,session list/storm,drift report/patch,secret set/list/rm/migrate/rotate-password,doctor,mcp. - MCP server (
endpoint-aiops mcporendpoint-aiops-mcp): 13 tools (10 read, 3 write), every one wrapped with the bundled@governed_toolharness. - Encrypted credentials: the management-server API key lives in an encrypted store
~/.endpoint-aiops/secrets.enc(Fernet + scrypt) — never plaintext on disk. Unlock with a master password fromENDPOINT_AIOPS_MASTER_PASSWORD(MCP/CI) or an interactive prompt (CLI). - Reversibility:
endpoint_assign_profile(highrisk) captures the prior profile and records an inverse "reassign the prior profile" undo descriptor.endpoint_reboot(mediumrisk) captures the prior online state for the audit record but declares no undo (a reboot has no safe inverse). - Safety: state-changing CLI ops (
endpoint assign-profile,endpoint reboot) require double confirmation and support--dry-run.
Capability matrix (13 MCP tools)
The analysis tools (login_storm_analysis, drift_report, patch_status,
patch_compliance, endpoint_health_score) accept injected records for
pure/offline analysis; endpoint_health_score and patch_compliance are
injected-only, the others also pull live from a configured target.
What this tool does, and does not, decide
It delivers managed-endpoint operations — reads and writes — accurately and efficiently, and records every one of them. It does not decide whether a write is allowed to happen. That is the agent's judgement, or the permission of the account you connect it with: give it a management-console account or API token scoped to a read-only role and the writes fail at the server — the place that actually owns the permission.
So there is no read-only switch, no policy file, no approval gate to configure.
The one thing the tool guarantees is that nothing is silent: every call, over
MCP and over the CLI alike, lands an audit row in ~/.endpoint-aiops/audit.db,
and reversible writes still capture their before-state and record an inverse
where one exists.
Each tool declares a
risk_level, kept in agreement with its[READ]/[WRITE]documentation tag by a test, and carried into the audit row as a descriptive tier — so a reviewer can see at a glance that a row was a high-risk write. It is a label, not a gate.
Running a smaller / local model? See agent-guardrails.md — it lists the guardrails this tool now enforces for you (so you don't spend prompt budget restating them) and gives a ready-made system prompt for what's left.
Payload conventions
- Absent is not empty. A field the management server did not report comes
back as
null, never as""— the key is always present, so a missing patch level cannot be mistaken for a blank one. - Capped lists announce themselves. Any list a
limitcan cut short is a truncation envelope:{"items": [...], "returned": N, "limit": L, "truncated": bool}, withtruncatedmeasured rather than inferred. Companion totals (driftedCount,behindCount,nonCompliantCount,stormCount, the healthsummary) are always the full, uncapped figures.
Quick start
As a Claude Code plugin
One install gives an agent both the skill and the MCP server:
The MCP server is fetched with uv and pinned to the
package version this plugin declares, so an audit row can be traced back to the
code that wrote it. Credentials are still configured with endpoint-aiops init — see below.
As an OpenClaw plugin
The same bundle is published on ClawHub, where one install delivers the skill and its MCP server together:
Restart the OpenClaw gateway afterwards so it loads the plugin. The MCP server is
fetched with uv, pinned to this exact release, so
uvx has to be on PATH — without it the skill still installs but reports
Visible to model: no. Credentials are configured exactly as below.
As a CLI or standalone MCP server
Run as an MCP server (stdio):
Where that password then lives: an exported variable is readable by every process this shell starts and is recorded by shell history. On a shared or long-lived host, prefer the interactive prompt, or inject it from a secret manager for the life of the one command that needs it.
Governance
Every operation — MCP and CLI — passes through the bundled @governed_tool
harness. It records; it does not authorize (see above).
- Audit — every call (params, outcome summary, status, duration, risk tier, and any
operator-supplied approver/rationale) is logged to
~/.endpoint-aiops/audit.db(relocatable viaENDPOINT_AIOPS_HOME). The CLI writes the same row the MCP path does — there is no unaudited entry point. - Runaway guard — a safety backstop, not an authorization gate: the same
call hammered in a tight loop trips a circuit breaker so a stuck agent can't
burn unbounded calls/time. Disable with
ENDPOINT_RUNAWAY_MAX=0; optional hard ceilings viaENDPOINT_MAX_TOOL_CALLS/ENDPOINT_MAX_TOOL_SECONDS. - Undo recording — reversible writes record an inverse descriptor built from the fetched before-state.
- Risk tier — a descriptive label on the audit row derived from
risk_level; it gates nothing.
Scope
This is the IT-endpoint member of the AIops-tools family (governed AI-ops
with audit + budget + undo + risk tiers). For OT / industrial edge
(Modbus, OPC-UA, PROFINET, …) see the separate industrial-aiops line.
Dialects — which server are you actually pointing at?
A dialect is the management server's API shape: resource paths, response
field names, the transport defaults (port + API base path), and how to
authenticate. Set it per target in config.yaml; endpoint-aiops init asks
for it and prints which one it configured.
The generic default is not an IGEL configuration and never was: IGEL
serves IMI at /umsapi/v3 on 8443, so a target left on the generic shape 404s
on its first probe. That mismatch is why the preset exists.
Where a server genuinely has no such resource, the dialect says so rather than
guessing a URL — IMI exposes no login/boot session resource, so session_list
and login_storm_analysis on an igel-ums target return a teaching error
naming the absent resource instead of calling an invented path.
A dialect selects the auth scheme too, not just paths — IMI rejects the
static Bearer token the generic dialect sends, so it logs in with HTTP Basic at
POST /umsapi/v3/login and carries the returned JSESSIONID cookie (once per
connection, then cached). Because the scheme comes from the dialect, a
credentials failure and a wrong-dialect failure are reported differently: a
401 names the scheme presented and, when the server sends a WWW-Authenticate
challenge, the scheme it actually wants — so a dialect mismatch does not send
you off rotating a perfectly good key.
⚠️ Note for IGEL specifically: a UMS account with too few permissions receives
empty lists rather than a 403. endpoint-aiops doctor authenticates as a
step separate from its reachability probe and warns when a successful login
returns no endpoints, because "no devices" and "not allowed to see the devices"
are otherwise indistinguishable.
Status
The test suite is mock-based. No dialect in this package has been exercised against a real management server, so this package does not claim support for any specific product — including IGEL.
genericis a placeholder shape, not a vendor API.igel-umsis a documented-but-unverified dialect. Its paths and field aliases are modelled from IGEL's published IMI documentation; its auth scheme is documented in the IMI manual and matches what three independent real-world IMI clients do. Neither has been run against an appliance by this project — IGEL UMS has no free edition, so it cannot be verified on the maintainer's hardware.
Both are recorded as UNKNOWN-pending-live in
docs/VERIFICATION.md, which ranks what a live run is
most likely to find wrong and defines the checklist it must cover. If you have a
UMS and run that checklist, the results are very welcome as an issue. Missing a
capability or a server dialect? Open an issue or PR — contributions welcome.
來源:README.md,提交 4bb7b79
工具
0版本歷史
4- v0.13.0最新Oct 30, 2026
- v0.12.0Oct 15, 2026
- v0.11.0Oct 15, 2026
- v0.10.3Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分