Agent Postbox

io.github.Aethelgard-Systems由 GitHub 帳號 Aethelgard-Systems 發布v0.2.1更新於 Oct 29, 2026

Verifiable agent handoffs over GitHub Issues and PRs: bounded writes, read-back, evidence log.

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

把 GitHub 儲存庫變成 AI 代理的信箱,讓代理之間交接任務、留言、貼標籤與審查 PR,並附上回讀回執與簽章證據日誌。

可以做什麼
  • 讀取寄給本代理的 issue 與 PR 收件匣,並讀取單一 issue 或 PR 及其留言
  • 張貼附回執、經回讀確認的留言,新增或移除定址、認領與允許的標籤
  • 提出新 issue,含重複檢查與每日上限
  • 審查 PR(核准、要求修改、留言),綁定到 head commit,且拒絕審查自己的 PR
  • 建立、讀取並確認含驗收條件的交接,綁定所讀文字的雜湊值
  • 驗證雜湊鏈與 Ed25519 簽章的證據日誌,並管理寫入回執
適用情境
適合在同一個 GitHub 儲存庫上執行多個編碼代理的開發者,希望代理之間的交接可被驗證,而不只是口頭回報狀態,同時合併與核准仍由人掌握。
執行需求
本機 Node.js 20 以上版本的行程(npm 套件,stdio 或選用 HTTP 傳輸)。需要一個 GitHub 儲存庫,並為每個代理準備獨立的 GitHub 身分與僅限該儲存庫的細粒度權杖(Issues 與 Pull requests 讀寫、Metadata 讀);預設拒絕傳統權杖。權杖從 AGENT_POSTBOX_TOKEN 讀取,設定檔指定儲存庫、代理名稱、標籤與上限。需要連線至 api.github.com。
安裝前請注意
權杖才是真正的界線:它賦予 issue 與 PR 的寫入權限,應盡量縮小範圍並以分支保護守住 main。代理可以留言、貼標籤、提提案與審查 PR,但不能合併、關閉或設定受保護標籤。只有每個代理使用獨立身分,四眼審查才有效。機密過濾僅為盡力而為,不可信的 issue 文字只是被標示為資料。每日上限只記錄在本機回執檔中。HTTP 傳輸沒有 TLS,離開本機時應置於反向代理之後。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Agent Postbox,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

[agent-postbox – AI agent handoffs with receipts: Agent A hands work through the postbox to Agent B, every write is read back, self-review is blocked, a human approves the merge.]

agent-postbox

Verifiable handoffs for MCP agents. agent-postbox makes agent handoffs over GitHub verifiable – with read-back and evidence instead of bare status messages.

AI coworkers collaborate through GitHub Issues and pull requests – with bounded writes, receipts and four-eyes review.

You already have a durable, auditable, human-readable coordination system: your GitHub repository. agent-postbox turns it into a mailbox for AI agents, so they can hand work to each other, report results and review each other's pull requests, while every write stays small, verified and attributable, and every decision stays with a human.

It is a small Model Context Protocol server (stdio or Streamable HTTP) plus a CLI. Zero runtime dependencies.

text
human ──opens issue──▶  #12  [to:builder]builder ── inbox ─────▶ claims (claimed:builder), works, opens PR #13 [to:reviewer]reviewer ─ review ────▶ REQUEST_CHANGES on #13 @ head commit (cannot review its own PR)builder ── comment ───▶ evidence: tests, output, linkshuman ───────────────▶ merges. Agents cannot merge, close, or set authority labels.

A shared inbox delivers a message. agent-postbox proves the handoff happened – read-back of every write, an acknowledgement bound to the exact text the agent read, no self-review, and a signed evidence log you can verify.

Release: v0.2.1 · For: developers running several coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, …) on one GitHub repo · Zero runtime dependencies.

Try it in 30 seconds

No GitHub account, token or network needed – the demo runs two agents against an in-memory GitHub with synthetic data:

sh
git clone https://github.com/Aethelgard-Systems/agent-postbox.gitcd agent-postboxnpm run demo

Windows PowerShell blocks npm with “running scripts is disabled on this system”? Use npm.cmd run demo or node examples/offline-demo/demo.mjs instead – same demo, no policy change needed.

You will see a builder and a reviewer hand work to each other, a lost network response reconciled instead of posted twice, and three unsafe actions refused (self-review, a human-only label, a token in a comment). Details and limits: examples/offline-demo.

npm run demo:handoff shows the v0.2 flow: a planner hands a task to a builder, the builder's acknowledgement is bound to the text it read (an edited handoff is refused until re-read), and the signed evidence log is verified – then tampered with and caught.

Why

Multi-agent setups usually fail in boring ways: an agent claims it posted something it did not, posts the same thing twice after a timeout, approves its own work, treats text in an issue as an order, or leaks a token into a comment. agent-postbox addresses exactly those failure modes and nothing else.

ProblemWhat agent-postbox does
"I posted it" – but nothing is thereRead-back: every write is fetched again and compared before it counts as done
Timeout → retry → duplicateWrite receipts: ATTEMPTED is stored before sending, CONFIRMED after read-back. An unknown outcome is reconciled only if GitHub shows the exact write by the agent's own identity; otherwise it stays blocked until a human resolves it
Agent approves its own PRFour-eyes: any review (including comments) is refused when the PR author is the token's own identity, which is verified against GitHub; reviews are bound to the head commit
Agent decides things it should only proposeAuthority separation: protected labels (e.g. approved, decision:*) are human-only; proposals carry an explicit no-authority footer
Agent can do anything the token canBounded writes: a fixed endpoint allowlist – no merge, close, delete, body edit, settings or code access
Token or password ends up in a commentSecret filter on every title and body (best effort, see Security)
Issue text tries to instruct the agentAll read content is marked as untrusted data
Runaway agentDaily limits for writes and proposals
"Done" – but done what, against which version of the task?Handoffs (v0.2): a task issue with acceptance criteria; the acknowledgement is bound to the hash of the text the agent read and needs evidence
Logs can be edited after the factEvidence log (v0.2): every receipt state change is hash-chained and Ed25519-signed; evidence verify catches edits, gaps and truncation

Non-goals

Not an agent framework, not a runtime, no database, no dashboard, no worktree orchestration, no role model. Bring your own agents; agent-postbox is only the mailbox.

Tools

ToolEffect
inboxIssues/PRs labelled to:<this-agent>
readOne issue or PR with comments (untrusted content)
commentOne receipted, read-back comment
labelAdd/remove labels: to:<any-agent> (hand off), claimed:<self>, labels from allowedLabels
proposeNew issue labelled proposal, duplicate check, daily limit
reviewPR review (APPROVE, REQUEST_CHANGES, COMMENT) bound to the head commit; refused on own PRs
handoff_createHand a task to another agent: issue labelled to:<agent> + handoff, with acceptance criteria (v0.2)
handoff_readRead a handoff and its acknowledgements; returns body_sha256 (v0.2)
handoff_ackAcknowledge a handoff addressed to you (DONE needs evidence); refused if the text changed since you read it; read back before it counts (v0.2)

The complete tool list costs under 4,500 characters of model context (tested).

Quick start

  1. One identity per agent. Each agent needs its own GitHub identity so that authorship and four-eyes review are real – a dedicated machine account with a fine-grained personal access token limited to one repository (Issues: read/write, Pull requests: read/write, Metadata: read), or a GitHub App installation token. Classic tokens are refused by default.
  2. Install (Node.js ≥ 20):
    sh
    npm install -g github:Aethelgard-Systems/agent-postbox
  3. Configure – agent-postbox.config.json:
    json
    {  "repository": "example-org/example-repo",  "agent": "builder",  "tokenEnv": "AGENT_POSTBOX_TOKEN",  "allowedLabels": ["needs-review", "blocked", "question"],  "protectedLabels": ["approved", "decision:*"],  "limits": { "writesPerDay": 50, "proposalsPerDay": 5 }}
  4. Check without writing anything:
    sh
    AGENT_POSTBOX_TOKEN=... agent-postbox doctor
  5. Connect your MCP client (example for clients using the common mcpServers format). For clients that speak Streamable HTTP, run agent-postbox serve --transport http --port 8471 instead and point them at http://127.0.0.1:8471/mcp (other hosts need AGENT_POSTBOX_HTTP_TOKEN):
    json
    {  "mcpServers": {    "agent-postbox": {      "command": "agent-postbox",      "args": ["serve", "--config", "/path/to/agent-postbox.config.json"],      "env": { "AGENT_POSTBOX_TOKEN": "<this agent's token>" }    }  }}
  6. Copy templates/AGENTS.md and templates/pull_request_template.md into your repository so agents and humans share one protocol.

Step-by-step setup: docs/getting-started.md. A walk-through with two agents reviewing each other is in examples/two-agent-review.

Configuration

KeyDefaultMeaning
repository–owner/repo; the only repository this instance can touch
agent–This agent's name ([a-z0-9-])
loginfrom GET /userGitHub login of the token; required for GitHub App tokens (e.g. my-app[bot])
tokenEnvAGENT_POSTBOX_TOKENEnvironment variable holding the token
addressPrefixto:Label prefix for addressing agents
claimPrefixclaimed:Label prefix for claiming work (self only)
proposalLabelproposalLabel for agent proposals
allowedLabelsneeds-review, blocked, questionExtra labels agents may set (* suffix = prefix match)
protectedLabelsapproved, decision:*Human-only labels; agents can neither add nor remove them
limits50 writes, 5 proposals per day, 6000-char body, 120-char titlePer agent
receiptsFile$XDG_STATE_HOME/agent-postbox/<owner>-<repo>-<agent>.jsonLocal receipt store
allowClassicTokenfalseAccept classic PATs (not recommended)
evidencetrueWrite the signed evidence log (v0.2); false disables it
evidenceFile, evidenceKeyFilenext to receiptsFileEvidence log and its Ed25519 key (created on first use, 0600)
handoffLabelhandoffLabel that marks handoff issues

CLI

text
agent-postbox doctor | inbox | read <n> | comment <n> --body ... | label <n> --add a --remove bagent-postbox propose --title ... --body-file ... | review <n> --event approve|request-changes|comment --body ...agent-postbox handoff create --to <agent> --title ... --body ... [--acceptance "a|b"] | handoff read <n>agent-postbox handoff ack <n> --read-sha256 <hex> --result done|partial|blocked|declined [--evidence "a|b"]agent-postbox receipts list | receipts resolve <key> --as confirmed|failedagent-postbox evidence verify | evidence keyagent-postbox serve [--transport stdio|http] [--host 127.0.0.1] [--port 8471]

All output is JSON. Refusals exit with code 2 and a stable error code (POLICY, SECRET, LIMIT, SELF_REVIEW, UNKNOWN_OUTCOME, READBACK_MISMATCH, …).

Evidence log (v0.2)

Next to the receipts file, agent-postbox keeps <receipts>.evidence.jsonl: one line per receipt state change, hash-chained and signed with the agent's Ed25519 key. It holds keys, kinds, states, read-back verdicts and hashes – never bodies, titles or tokens. agent-postbox evidence verify recomputes the chain and reports any modified, removed, reordered, forged or truncated line. The format is documented in docs/evidence-format.md and shared with companion tools, so one verifier works for all of them.

Known limits (v0.2)

  • An identical comment text on the same issue is posted only once (replay protection); add context to make a new comment distinct.
  • Duplicate-title checks and reconciliation scan up to 1,000 items. GitHub's issue lists can lag a few seconds behind writes: an agent's own duplicates are caught locally, but two different agents proposing the same title within seconds may both succeed.
  • Adding a to:<agent> label creates that label in the repository if it does not exist yet.
  • Reviews and comments are not edited or deleted by agent-postbox – by design.
  • serve over stdio starts even without config or token so clients can list the tools; each tool call then returns CONFIG/TOKEN until it is set up. The HTTP transport refuses to start instead.
  • When the MCP server and the CLI share a receipt file, a lock conflict can pause the server for up to 5 seconds, and concurrent processes may exceed a daily limit by a few writes.
  • The HTTP transport is stateless JSON (no SSE, no sessions, no server-initiated messages) and has no TLS; put it behind your own reverse proxy when it leaves the machine. Browsers are kept out by design (JSON content type required, Host must name the server, Origin refused unless listed in AGENT_POSTBOX_HTTP_ORIGINS).
  • The evidence log proves what was written to it, not what bypassed it; see docs/evidence-format.md "What it does not prove". Truncation at the end is detected through the signed .head sidecar – if the sidecar is deleted, evidence verify warns instead of passing cleanly.

Security model

agent-postbox is designed to reduce the risk of common multi-agent failures. It is not a sandbox.

  • The token is the real boundary. agent-postbox cannot stop someone who has the token from calling GitHub directly. Use one narrowly scoped token per agent and protect main with branch protection and required reviews, so merging stays human.
  • Four-eyes depends on separate identities. If two agents share a token, GitHub sees one author and the four-eyes check cannot help.
  • The secret filter is best effort. It catches common token formats and high-entropy strings; it will miss some secrets and occasionally flag harmless text.
  • Untrusted content stays untrusted. agent-postbox labels everything it reads as data. Whether your agent respects that depends on your agent.
  • Receipts are a local hint, GitHub is the truth. The receipt file is written atomically with mode 0600 under a lock file, so the MCP server and the CLI can share it. It contains keys, states, issue numbers, links and HTTP status codes – no message bodies, titles or tokens.
  • Markers are invisible, not secret. Each write carries an HTML comment marker. It is only trusted when GitHub shows it on content authored by the agent's own identity with the exact expected text.
  • Limits are local. Daily limits count the writes in this agent's receipt file on this machine; they are a brake, not a quota enforced by GitHub.
  • No telemetry, no hosted service. agent-postbox talks only to api.github.com with the token you provide.

Please report vulnerabilities as described in SECURITY.md.

See the threat model for actors, trust boundaries, controls and remaining risks.

AI-assisted development

This project has been developed with the assistance of generative AI tools. AI-generated suggestions are reviewed, selected, modified and integrated by the maintainer before inclusion. No third-party proprietary source code is knowingly included in the project. AI assistance does not alter the licensing terms of this project or of its third-party dependencies.

Disclaimer

This project is free and open-source software provided under the Apache License 2.0.

The software is provided on an "AS IS" basis. No representation or warranty is made that it is suitable for any particular production, security, compliance, legal, or business purpose.

This software can interact with GitHub resources and may perform write operations when configured to do so. Users are responsible for reviewing the permissions they grant, their configuration, and the effects of automated or AI-initiated actions before using the software with important repositories or production workflows.

Security mechanisms, including permission limits, verification steps and secret filtering, reduce risk but must not be treated as a guarantee that every unsafe action, credential, secret, or unintended output will be detected or prevented.

Nothing in this notice excludes or limits liability to the extent that such exclusion or limitation is prohibited by applicable law.

License

Apache License 2.0. Copyright 2026 Marco Gernand. Contributions are welcome under the Developer Certificate of Origin.

來源:README.md,提交 167fb80

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.2.1最新Oct 29, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分