
Docvet
io.github.Alberto-Codes由 GitHub 帳號 Alberto-Codes 發布v3.0.1更新於 Oct 29, 2026
Docstring quality vetting for Python -- enrichment, freshness, coverage, and presence checks
概覽
Docvet 檢查 Python docstring 品質(存在性、完整性、過時程度、渲染與覆蓋率),並透過 MCP 伺服器提供給 AI 助理使用。
- 可以做什麼
- 對整個程式碼庫、git diff 檔案或僅暫存檔案執行全部 docstring 檢查
- 檢查 docstring 是否存在並提供覆蓋率指標,標示缺少的 docstring
- 檢查完整性:缺少 Raises、Returns、Yields、Attributes、Examples 以及參數不一致
- 利用 git diff 與 blame 啟發式規則標示可能過時的 docstring
- 透過 Griffe 檢查 mkdocs 渲染相容性,並找出對 mkdocs 不可見的檔案
- 為缺少的 docstring 章節產生骨架(可先預覽),並顯示目前生效的設定
- 適用情境
- 適合在助理修改 Python 程式碼後需要同步維護 docstring 時使用,也適合在 CI、pre-commit 鉤子或代理工作流程中對 docstring 品質設下關卡。它提供的是結構與變更歷史層面的提示,供人工複核,並不證明文字描述正確。
- 執行需求
- 以本機程序執行,從 PyPI 安裝(pip install docvet);選用的 Griffe 渲染檢查需要 docvet[griffe] 額外相依套件。設定寫在 pyproject.toml 的 [tool.docvet] 中。未宣告任何驗證、環境變數或標頭。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Docvet,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
[CI] [Coverage] [PyPI] [Python] [License] [Renovate enabled] [Ruff] [docs vetted]
docvet
Better docstrings, better AI.
Why docvet?
docvet combines docstring presence metrics, structural checks, history-based staleness signals, and renderer diagnostics in one CLI, with editor and agent interfaces. These checks help reviewers find documentation gaps; they do not prove that prose describes runtime behavior correctly.
Comparison reviewed 2026-10-21 against primary documentation: Ruff's D103 presence rule and DOC501 exception completeness rule (requires --preview and rule selection), pydoclint's supported checks and styles, and interrogate's coverage documentation. Capabilities depend on enabled rules and configuration; -- means no corresponding check is described in these sources.
pydoclint checks arguments, returns, yields, raises, class attributes, and type hints across Google, NumPy, and Sphinx styles. docvet's enrichment alone has 21 rules, including Raises, Yields, Receives, Warns, Attributes, Examples, cross-references, parameter agreement, and more. Add presence (coverage metrics + threshold enforcement), freshness (git diff/blame staleness signals), griffe rendering compatibility, and mkdocs coverage: 32 rules across 5 checks. Rule totals measure catalog entries, not equivalent coverage between tools.
Structural agreement checks compare documented elements with code structure. Freshness uses change history to suggest review: code can change without invalidating prose, and simultaneous code/docstring edits can still leave incorrect prose. Neither establishes semantic correctness.
Quickstart | GitHub Action | Pre-commit | Configuration | AI Agent Integration | Docs
What It Checks
Presence (existence) -- 2 rules:
missing-docstring overload-has-docstring
Enrichment (completeness) -- 21 rules:
missing-raises missing-returns missing-yields missing-receives missing-warns missing-deprecation missing-param-in-docstring extra-param-in-docstring missing-other-parameters missing-attributes undocumented-init-params missing-typed-attributes missing-examples missing-cross-references extra-raises-in-docstring extra-yields-in-docstring extra-returns-in-docstring missing-return-type trivial-docstring prefer-fenced-code-blocks scaffold-incomplete
Freshness (staleness signals) -- 5 rules:
stale-signature stale-body stale-import stale-drift stale-age
Griffe (rendering) -- 3 rules:
griffe-unknown-param griffe-missing-type griffe-format-warning
Coverage (visibility) -- 1 rule:
missing-init
Quickstart
For optional griffe rendering checks:
Example output:
Configuration
Configure via [tool.docvet] in your pyproject.toml. All checks run and print findings. Checks listed in fail-on cause a non-zero exit code; unlisted checks are treated as warnings.
A check in fail-on that cannot run — most often griffe without the docvet[griffe] extra — never certified the gate you configured, so docvet reports it on stderr and exits 1. With --format json the run object reports status: "unavailable" and an unavailable_checks array, which is what distinguishes it from a gate that found problems. Set fail-on-unavailable = false (or pass --no-fail-on-unavailable) to warn and exit 0 instead. Unavailable checks that nothing gates on stay a quiet skip — though fail-on membership is not the only thing that gates: a min-coverage floor gates presence without naming it there.
Pre-commit
Add to your .pre-commit-config.yaml:
For griffe rendering checks, add the optional dependency:
GitHub Action
Add docvet to your GitHub Actions workflow — findings appear as inline annotations on your PR:
Select specific checks or pin a version:
The griffe rendering check needs no setup: the action installs docvet[griffe], pinned or not, so every check the checks input offers is available. Note that docvet releases before 1.7.0 declare that extra without an upper bound, so pinning one installs whatever griffe publishes at the time rather than a version docvet was released against.
Behavior change — this can turn a passing build red.
Earlier releases installed plain
docvet, so the griffe check was skipped and contributed zero findings. It now runs.determine_run_outcome(src/docvet/reporting.py) returns exit code 1 as soon as any check listed infail-onreports findings, so if yourpyproject.tomlhasgriffein[tool.docvet] fail-on, your build goes from green to failing with no change on your side. This repository's ownci.ymldocvet job is exactly such a consumer.These are not new problems — it is the check finally running on docstrings that were always broken. To get back to green, fix the griffe findings or remove
griffefromfail-on.
AI Agent Integration
For tool-specific integration snippets, see the full AI Agent Integration guide.
Add docvet to your AI coding workflow. Drop this into your CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, or agent configuration:
Recommended pyproject.toml configuration:
Subcommand Quick Reference
Better Docstrings, Better AI
AI coding agents rely on docstrings as context when generating and modifying code. Agents modify code but often leave docstrings stale, and research shows stale or incorrect documentation is actively harmful, worse than no docs at all:
- Incorrect docs degrade LLM task success by 22.6 percentage points
- Comment density improves code generation by 40-54%
- Misleading comments reduce LLM fault localization accuracy to 24.55%
- Performance drops substantially without docstrings
As the 2025 DORA report puts it: "AI doesn't fix a team; it amplifies what's already there." The only signal correlating with AI productivity is code quality.
docvet's freshness heuristics flag potential staleness for review, and its enrichment rules check supported docstring sections against code structure. Run docvet check in your CI, pre-commit hooks, or agent toolchain.
Badge
Add a badge to your project to show your docs are vetted:
Used By
Are you using docvet? Open a pull request to add your project here.
License
MIT -- see LICENSE for details.
mcp-name: io.github.Alberto-Codes/docvet
來源:README.md,提交 dfdd2bd
工具
0版本歷史
4- v3.0.1最新Oct 22, 2026
- v3.0.0Oct 21, 2026
- v2.0.3Oct 21, 2026
- v1.16.0Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分