
Ariel Memory
io.github.Cipher208由 GitHub 帳號 Cipher208 發布v1.0.0更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Two-layer memory MCP server for AI agents with 37 tools, RAG, graphs, wiki, auth
發布方自己的服務:Memory.fit
概覽
以本機 SQLite 為基礎的 AI 代理記憶伺服器,提供多層持久記憶、混合搜尋與知識圖譜。
- 可以做什麼
- Ariel Memory 將代理記憶儲存在本機上的純 SQLite 檔案中。代理預設看到六個工具:think 將內容路由到正確的層(事實、情節、wiki 或圖譜),dream 跨所有層執行混合搜尋並回傳受 token 預算限制的摘要,forget 執行刪除並封存,evolve 記錄代理個性與規則,project 追蹤每個專案的決策與產出,memory_hook 支援推送式擷取。可選的額外層級最多暴露 65 個細粒度操作,包括帶類型節點與邊的知識圖譜、wiki 頁面、來源追蹤以及每小時自我維護。
- 適用情境
- 當助理需要跨工作階段持久記憶,且不想將資料傳送到雲端 API 或執行獨立的向量資料庫時,值得加入。它適合需要記住使用者偏好、先前決策與專案情境的代理,以及資料必須留在本機網路或氣隙環境中的情境。
- 執行需求
- 以本機 stdio 程序執行,可透過 npm 套件 mcp-ariel-memory 或 PyPI 套件 a-memory 安裝。未宣告帳戶、API 金鑰或環境變數。隱私閘門與圖譜挖掘器所需的可選 spaCy NER 模型需以 a-memory-ner 指令個別安裝;略過它們會安全降級。可透過命令列參數啟用附儀表板的 HTTP 傳輸。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Ariel Memory,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
a-memory
Your AI agents forget. a-memory makes them remember. 4-tier agent memory with hybrid search and a real knowledge graph — all in plain SQLite files. Zero cloud. Zero external APIs.
[CI] [codecov] [License: MIT] [Python 3.11+] [Ruff] [MCP Compatible] [Docs] [Release]
Also available on PyPI:
pip install a-memory— optional extras:a-memory[embeddings]for real multilingual embeddings.
Why SQLite?
Every other memory server sends your agent's data through a cloud API or requires a separate vector database.
a-memory stores everything in SQLite files on your machine.
- Zero infrastructure. No Docker, no database server, no embedding API keys.
- Zero data leaving your network. Works air-gapped.
- Layer-isolated by design. User facts and agent identity never share a namespace.
- One directory = entire memory. Back up with
cp, sync with rsync.
Why this exists
Three problems a-memory solves:
① Agent self-evolution — your AI stops repeating mistakes between sessions. It remembers decisions, errors, and corrections in a dedicated agent layer, and an hourly consolidation sweep promotes what matters into long-term facts.
② User persona persistence — your agent knows who it's talking to even after weeks of silence. Preferences, history, emotional context live in the user layer, isolated from agent identity.
③ Project continuity — project tracks per-project context: decisions with rationale and outcomes, artifact maps, a graphify-powered code index — so a fresh session picks up where the last one left off.
Get started
The server runs without these, but the privacy gate (hooks ingest) and the graph
miners need two spaCy NER models. Neither is on PyPI — en-core-web-sm 404s there and
ru-core-news-sm is an unrelated placeholder — so they can only be installed by wheel URL,
and a wheel URL cannot be a dependency: PyPI rejects any distribution whose metadata
carries a direct URL. One command installs them from the URLs the package already knows:
From a source checkout, python scripts/install_ner_models.py is the same command.
Skipping them is safe: the gate falls back and reports degraded instead of failing.
Point your MCP client at it:
HTTP transport with dashboard:
Or run from source:
The seven primitives
Agents see exactly seven tools — one verb per intent, plus the event bridge (6 verbs + memory_hook), no tool-choice paralysis:
Quick demo — Python MCP client:
66 fine-grained operations exist in total, grouped into coherent opt-in tiers: the 7 primitives are exposed by default; add context (recall protocol, /new session recap, smart context budget, steering hints, tool-output compression), insight (Memory Query DSL, provenance fact-blame, quality loop, reflections, stats), write (typed memory schemas, declarative rules engine, scratchpad, counterfactuals, episodes), plus wiki and review (staged mutations, memory_report_card, daily_brief). The usual live-agent surface is one preset — ARIEL_EXPOSE=agent (59 tools), equivalent to primitives,context,insight,write,wiki,review. The remaining 7 are admin-tier: ARIEL_EXPOSE=operator (66) or all.
Tier history, because older guides still name a
brieftier: it was dissolved on 2026-09-07 —daily_briefnow ridesreview. If a doc tells you to passbrief, it is pre-1.10 and the token is simply ignored.
⚠️ Env sanitization gotcha (stdio): MCP clients pass a sanitized environment to stdio servers — setting
ARIEL_EXPOSEin your shell profile does nothing. Define the tier set in your MCP client config (theenvblock of the server entry — see configuration guide). The server logs its resolved surface at startup (tool exposure: N/M tools) — if your agent reports seeing only the primitives, check that line first, then restart the client session (tool lists are cached per session).
Features
Architecture
Comparison
Notes (Sep 2026): mem0 now ships a self-hosted Docker image and a managed cloud with hybrid BM25+entity search; chroma is 29k★ and added hybrid+FTS5 to its Cloud tier (OSS server remains vector-only). What still differentiates a-memory: zero-infra SQLite (no Docker), NaCl-encrypted auth/saga secrets, layer isolation, hourly self-maintenance, and the temporal graph timeline.
Roadmap
- 4-layer memory hierarchy with layer isolation
- Hybrid search (FTS5 + MIB binary embeddings)
- Knowledge graphs (epistemic + temporal)
- Hourly consolidation sweep + DB self-maintenance
- mcp 2.x native SDK
- Repo renamed to
Cipher208/a-memory; PyPI package live (pip install a-memory) - Temporal timeline wired end to end (think/evolve/project events + dream recent digest)
- Dream-cycle inject + auto-generated CONTEXT.md snapshot (curated context + 6 wiki perspectives + recent episodes, per-layer, per-agent)
- Phase C — auto-hooks keystone (push-model memory: per-agent conversation daemons, external event dispatcher, importance-gated auto-save, staged mutations with review/revert, dream markers, session-start inject, gap reports; guide)
- Phase D — compaction-aware rehydrate (drift log + salvage into the summarizer + one-shot rehydrate blocks; MiMoCode plugin / Hermes native MemoryProvider / CowAgent hooks — integration guide)
- Phase D — /recall protocol (multi-axis proportional recall: markers → session → semantic → expand → day; drives Hermes per-turn prefetch)
- Phase D — Skill = Memory (Markdown skills as a first-class wiki type, progressive disclosure
wiki_list → wiki_search → wiki_read, 4KB lint cap, promotion pipeline, shared SSOT sync, usage-driven evolution — skills guide) - Phase D — working memory + meta-memories (agent scratchpad re-injected at session start, deterministic reflections, smart context budget with weighted floors, counterfactual notes, was_useful quality feedback loop)
- Phase D — memory tools D1.2-D1.9 (session continuity recap + steering hints, tool-output compression + recall verification, provenance fact-blame, Memory Query DSL, typed memory schemas, declarative rules engine; coherent
ARIEL_EXPOSEtiers: context / insight / write) - Phase E — hardening & closure (18 items across 3 waves): durability — atomic L1 persistence (temp→fsync→os.replace) + per-instance ring files, a circuit breaker guarding the embedding model path (3 failures → open 30s → hash-fallback keeps recall serving), least-privilege wiki roots + traversal-safe backup restore; operations —
memory_diagnose/memory_heal(DB/migrations/L1-files/breaker checks + remigrate/reset-breakers/purge), integrity score in the report card,<cache:break>markers + stable-first inject ordering for provider prompt caches; retrieval — faceted tag queries (dimension:value, same-dim OR / cross-dim AND), memory-kind weights in ACT-R scoring, disclosure triggers («when X, surface Y» recall-side rules); wiring — realcontext_threshold/memory_pressureemitters (Hermes plugin + autohooks daemon),on_turn_endevent,wiki_writestaged mutations with revert, transition-level consolidation revert, causal-link producer onmemory_graph_add; validation — DREAM markers anchored to message start (document-fragment false positives eliminated), post-compaction semantic audit (episode coverage by the L4 set) - Phase F — L0→L4 pipeline (bi-temporal fact intervals, hot/warm/cold L0 tiers with CLACK export, SHA-256 capture dedup, hash-chained journal, provenance drill-down)
- Phase G — self-wiring graph (12 deterministic miners: sessions, markers, provenance, co-retrieval, entities, zero-result questions, wiki↔fact bridges)
- Phase H closeout — EDM/ITS dual-route rerank + eval harness (NDCG@5, drift score, negative-control protocol, LongMemEval-S adapter)
- S17 Stage-1 tail — deterministic retrieval mode, ENGRAM procedural kind, AdaptiveRAG pre-gate (27 LLM-free query features), EMA importance gate, counter-signal aliases, SHA-256 L0 dedup, zero-result miner, ru-NER privacy gate
- S18-19 wave (15 items) — global is_current view +
changed_sincedelta mode, per-query ACT-R min-max, per-block max_chars, semantic dedup gate, channel-granular sources, 3-option conflict contract (supersede/retain/annotate), orphan-anchor GC, nightly gap-registry, per-agent harness breaker, provenance edge filter, wiki↔fact metadata backlinks,wiki_readrelated-facts hydration, RU lemma keys (pymorphy3), 2-class textcat pilot (flag-gated), S17 supplements 8-11 (cold-archive drill-down, confirming layer, junk-vector detector, HDBSCAN clusters), B6 anti-hub degree cap - S20 eval — №11 ablation on MINI + LongMemEval-S (50-question stride): full dual-route arm wins on both datasets, published-baseline comparison (GPT-4o long-context league, above ChatGPT-memory); dense e5-small run 3: no parity gain over hash on this split — hash stays prod
- Hardening wave (1.12.0) — the speaker-layer defect fixed at the writer (
distill_and_routeread a kind where it needed the speaker) plus a provenance-based purge of the 65 rows it had already mislabelled; a kind classifier that no longer hands a permanent label to harness boilerplate or to compound words (pre-commit,mergeCommit); the gap registry getting the reader S18 planned but never built; the L4 expectation measured against the L4 bar instead of the L3 one (71% of thediff_gapbacklog was that one wrong number); and aqualitygate that could not fail now failing correctly — an unpinned scanner had silently moved its JSON schema out from under it - Screenshot / asciinema demo in README
- LLM-assisted consolidation on top of the deterministic sweep
- Stage 2 — tool-surface redesign (slot system, URI keys, inject/key consolidation — planned with the A-remainder)
- LongMemEval full 500-question split + dense-aware threshold retraining (e5-small parity shown, not a win on the 50-question stride)
Contributing
PRs welcome! See CONTRIBUTING.md.
License
MIT © Cipher208
⭐ If this project helps you, star it on GitHub.
來源:README.md,提交 d882df7
工具
0版本歷史
1- v1.0.0最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分
其他 Memory 整合

Memory.fit
fit.memory官方發布者
託管式 Memory.fit 伺服器,讓 AI 讀取你的訓練、睡眠、恢復與飲食資料,並寫回每週計畫、每日目標和飲食計畫。
pg.ddx.io: the PostgreSQL community's memory
io.ddx.pg官方發布者
pg.ddx.io: the PostgreSQL community's memory 的託管 MCP 服務,由 pg.ddx.io 發布;無需登入;Streamable HTTP;29 個工具。
var.gg Naming Memory
gg.var官方發布者
遠端 MCP 伺服器,可依領域概念推薦並檢索韓、日、中、越、英多語言的程式識別字名稱,並提供 ERD 結構查詢。

Counterparts
ai.counterparts
為 Claude Code 與 Claude Desktop 提供的本地優先長期記憶:助理自行寫下關於你與專案的筆記,並在之後的對話中回想起來。

LAHZE - Persian AI Memory Platform
由 GitHub 帳號 pedramgholizadeh 發布
以波斯語為先的地理記憶平臺:發現地點,起草併發布僅限波斯語的記憶。AI 翻譯