Cachemiss

io.github.CloudCorpRecords由 GitHub 帳號 CloudCorpRecords 發布v0.1.0更新於 Nov 3, 2026

CI 快取未命中分析:哪些雜湊鍵輸入發生了變化,以及執行為何未命中或回退。

AI 翻譯由 AI 模型根據下方的原文描述翻譯,可能有誤。

原文描述

CI cache-miss analysis: which hashed key inputs changed and why runs missed or fell back.

已驗證STDIO僅桌面

概覽

Cachemiss 的本機 MCP 服務;無需登入;STDIO。

暫無 AI 概覽:以下資訊來自註冊中心條目和服務本身。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Cachemiss,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

cachemiss

The cache was supposed to make CI fast, so why did that run miss? cachemiss takes the cache key template exactly as it appears in your workflow, together with what actually happened on each run, and works out which misses were inevitable and which ones nobody can explain:

  • Hashed inputs — the glob patterns pulled out of the template's hashFiles('...') / hashFiles("...") segments, in order of appearance, duplicates removed
  • Outcome counts — how many runs hit exactly, fell back to a restore key, or missed outright, plus the hit rate (hits over total runs, rounded to four decimal places)
  • A cause per non-hit run — a partial run is exact_key_miss_restore_hit; a miss whose changed files touch a hashed input is hashed_input_changed, with the matching files listed; anything else is unexplained_miss
  • Cause tallies — counts per cause, most frequent first (ties broken alphabetically), feeding the report's most_common_cause and overall diagnosis; an all-hit history diagnoses as cache_healthy with a null most common cause
  • Changed hashed files — the sorted union of every hashed input that changed on a miss run, so you can see at a glance which lockfile or manifest keeps busting the cache

Glob matching follows three rules: a file matches a pattern when it equals the pattern exactly; when a pattern starts with **/, a file matches when it is the remainder of the pattern or ends with / plus that remainder; and a pattern containing * matches segment by segment (splitting on /), where * covers exactly one segment and segment counts must be equal. Matching is case-sensitive.

Everything is computed locally from the inputs you supply: no network, no log scraping, no configuration. Invalid input — an empty key template, a run without an outcome, an outcome outside hit / partial / miss, a non-string changed file — is rejected with an error naming the offending path, and no partial report is produced.

CLI

bash
npx @reneturcios/cachemiss analyze --input args.jsonnpx @reneturcios/cachemiss --version

args.json contains the full arguments object:

json
{  "key_template": "${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}",  "runs": [    { "run_id": "run-201", "outcome": "hit" },    {      "run_id": "run-202",      "outcome": "miss",      "changed_files": ["apps/web/package-lock.json", "src/index.ts"]    },    { "run_id": "run-203", "outcome": "partial" }  ],  "restore_keys": ["linux-node-"]}

changed_files is optional per run, and restore_keys is optional overall (it is echoed into the report). The report is printed as JSON.

Exit codes: 0 on success, 1 on a runtime error (including an unreadable or invalid input file, or invalid input), 2 on a usage error.

MCP server

bash
npx -y @reneturcios/cachemiss mcp

MCP client config:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "cachemiss": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "@reneturcios/cachemiss", "mcp"]    }  }}

Tools

  • analyze_cache_miss — Diagnose CI cache misses from a key template and per-run outcomes.

    • key_template (string, required, non-empty) — the cache key as written in the workflow
    • runs (array, required, at least one) — runs as {run_id, outcome, changed_files?} objects, where outcome is one of hit, partial, miss
    • restore_keys (array of strings, optional) — the restore-key prefixes configured in the workflow

    Returns {run_count, hits, partials, misses, hit_rate, hashed_inputs, restore_keys, cause_counts, misses_detail, changed_hashed_files, most_common_cause, diagnosis}.

Docker

bash
docker run -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/cachemissdocker run --rm -v "$PWD:/w" ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/cachemiss analyze --input /w/args.json

Development

bash
npm installnpm run build   # tsc -> dist/npm test        # tsx --test test/*.test.ts (pure local, no network)npm run dev     # run the CLI from source

License

MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios

來源:README.md,提交 03a1be0

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.1.0最新Nov 3, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分