Repoready

io.github.CloudCorpRecords由 GitHub 帳號 CloudCorpRecords 發布v0.1.0更新於 Nov 3, 2026

評估首次貢獻者就緒度:README、安裝與測試文件、授權條款、CI、鎖檔案。

AI 翻譯由 AI 模型根據下方的原文描述翻譯,可能有誤。

原文描述

Score first-contributor readiness: README, install and test docs, license, CI, lockfile.

已驗證STDIO僅桌面

概覽

Repoready 的本機 MCP 服務;無需登入;STDIO。

暫無 AI 概覽:以下資訊來自註冊中心條目和服務本身。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Repoready,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

repoready

A repository can be technically excellent and still lose its first contributor in the first ten minutes: no README to orient them, no install steps to follow, no test command to prove the setup worked. repoready scores that first experience — from the facts you supply, running nothing.

You hand it the repo's file list (with the README's content when you have it) and, optionally, the package.json scripts. It hands back eight checks in a fixed order, each with a pass or fail and an exact detail string:

  • readme — a README exists
  • install_docs — the README documents installation
  • test_script — a test script is defined
  • test_command_docs — the README documents a test command
  • license — a license file is present
  • contributing — a contributing guide is present
  • ci — CI workflows are present under .github/workflows/
  • lockfile — a known lockfile is present

The first four checks are essential. Alongside the checks, the result counts how many passed (out of 8), lists the essential checks that failed in check order, and sets ready to true exactly when no essential check failed. A repo can therefore score well on the supporting checks — license, contributing guide, CI, lockfile — and still be honestly marked not ready because a newcomer cannot install it or cannot run a test.

The README is the first file in input order whose basename, lowercased, is readme.md or starts with readme.. When its content was not supplied, the two documentation checks say so plainly (README content not supplied) rather than guessing from its name. Basename matching is case-insensitive throughout, CI requires the exact .github/workflows/ path prefix, and the lockfile check recognises package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, Cargo.lock, poetry.lock, Pipfile.lock, and go.sum.

Malformed input — a missing or empty file list, a missing, empty, or duplicated file path, a non-string content, or a package_scripts value that is not a string — is a validation error naming the offending path, and no partial assessment is produced. The computation is pure and local: no network, no configuration, and nothing is executed.

CLI

bash
npx @reneturcios/repoready assess --input args.jsonnpx @reneturcios/repoready --version

args.json contains the full arguments object:

json
{  "files": [    { "path": "README.md", "content": "# Demo\n\n## Install\n\nnpm install\n\nRun npm test to verify.\n" },    { "path": "LICENSE" },    { "path": "CONTRIBUTING.md" },    { "path": ".github/workflows/ci.yml" },    { "path": "package-lock.json" }  ],  "package_scripts": { "test": "node --test", "build": "tsc" }}

The assessment is printed as JSON:

json
{  "checks": [    { "id": "readme", "status": "pass", "detail": "README found at README.md" },    { "id": "install_docs", "status": "pass", "detail": "README documents installation" },    { "id": "test_script", "status": "pass", "detail": "a test script is defined" },    { "id": "test_command_docs", "status": "pass", "detail": "README documents a test command" },    { "id": "license", "status": "pass", "detail": "license file found at LICENSE" },    { "id": "contributing", "status": "pass", "detail": "contributing guide found at CONTRIBUTING.md" },    { "id": "ci", "status": "pass", "detail": "CI workflows found" },    { "id": "lockfile", "status": "pass", "detail": "lockfile found at package-lock.json" }  ],  "passed": 8,  "total": 8,  "essential_failures": [],  "ready": true}

Exit codes: 0 on success, 1 on a runtime error (including an unreadable or invalid input file, or invalid input), 2 on a usage error.

MCP server

bash
npx -y @reneturcios/repoready mcp

MCP client config:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "repoready": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "@reneturcios/repoready", "mcp"]    }  }}

Tools

  • assess_readiness — Assess first-contributor readiness from repo files and package scripts.

    • files (array, required, at least one) — files as {path, content?} objects; path is unique across the set and content is used for the README checks
    • package_scripts (object, optional) — package.json scripts as a string-to-string map

    Returns {checks, passed, total, essential_failures, ready}.

Docker

bash
docker run -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/reporeadydocker run --rm -v "$PWD:/w" ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/repoready assess --input /w/args.json

Development

bash
npm installnpm run build   # tsc -> dist/npm test        # tsx --test test/*.test.ts (pure local, no network)npm run dev     # run the CLI from source

License

MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios

來源:README.md,提交 ce249f8

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.1.0最新Nov 3, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分