
Wallcheck
io.github.CloudCorpRecords由 GitHub 帳號 CloudCorpRecords 發布v0.5.0更新於 Oct 25, 2026
Probe a URL and name the bot wall: vendor, verdict, and evidence. CLI plus stdio MCP server.
概覽
一個本機 MCP 伺服器,對 URL 做一次探測,回報是哪種機器人防護牆攔下它,並給出廠商與證據。
- 可以做什麼
- 探測即時 URL,取得判定結果(可存取、需人機驗證、被硬性封鎖、需登入、限流、無法連線),並附廠商與證據訊號;可選掃描頁面暴露的類金鑰素材,僅以指紋形式回報。對自行擷取的回應做離線分類,不連網。稽核自有網域的代理程式存取狀況:robots.txt、llms.txt、網站地圖、訂閱來源、API 與簽章代理程式就緒度,逐項評級並提供修正建議。
- 適用情境
- 當代理程式的抓取或瀏覽器工作階段失敗,需要判斷是機器人防護牆、登入門檻還是限流造成、以及是誰的牆時適用。也適合網站擁有者檢查自己的網域如何對待自動化代理程式,再決定回報或修正。
- 執行需求
- 以本機 stdio 程序執行。npm 啟動器需要 PATH 中有 Node 20+ 與 Python 3.11+;也可用 Python 3.11+(僅標準函式庫)從儲存庫執行,或使用 GHCR 的 Docker 映像。即時探測、暴露掃描與稽核工具需要網路存取;離線分類工具不需要。未宣告任何帳號、金鑰或環境變數。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Wallcheck,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
wallcheck
Point an agent at a URL. Find out what actually stops it: with receipts.
0.5.0: stamped final at the ship-readiness pass (release candidate at Wave 9). Not yet published; the launch hold stands. What is proven, what is not, and what the ship decision still needs: campaign/LAUNCH-READINESS.md.
Agents die silently on bot walls. A fetch returns 403, a browser session
churns through environment after environment, an upload never starts :
and nothing can say what stopped it, whose wall it was, or show the
evidence. wallcheck probes a URL once, honestly, and classifies what an
agent really hits: OPEN, CHALLENGED, WALLED, LOGIN_GATED,
RATE_LIMITED, or UNREACHABLE: naming the vendor (Cloudflare,
PerimeterX, DataDome, Akamai, Imperva, AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure WAF,
Kasada, AWS CloudFront) and the exact signals
that prove it.
No LLM anywhere in the verdict: the classifier is a deterministic pure
function of (status, headers, body). Same response in, same verdict
out: which is what makes the results safe to put in CI, in an incident
report, or in the public Bot Wall Index.
New in v0.2: signed agent identity. wallcheck keygen mints an
RFC 9421 signing key and wallcheck probe <url> --sign key.json
attaches a real HTTP Message Signature (hmac-sha256,
tag="web-bot-auth") to the probe: an agent with a name, not an
anonymous bot. wallcheck verify-server --key key.json runs a tiny
server that honors only correctly signed requests, so site owners can
test their side. The hmac-sha256 variant covers
bilateral agent↔owner setups; Ed25519 (v0.4) covers the public
directory case: see
validation/wave2/SIGNING.md.
New in 0.5.0: the owner-side audit joins the MCP server as
the audit tool (up to 10 honest GETs per call, same bounded-fetch
discipline as probe_url), the docs pass in Wave 9 corrected every
stale count against measured reality, and the suite stood at 120
tests at the Wave 9 stamp. Waves 10-17 took it to 428 tests (the
Wave 17 audit's 423 predates the W17-007 live fix's 5 fixtures :
see validation/wave17/STABILITY-12.md);
Wave 18's battery v10 plus the W18-007 live fix took it to 481.
Wave 19's battery v11 took it to 532; Wave 20's battery v12 took
it to 571; Wave 21's battery v13 took it to 608; Wave 22's
battery v14 took it to 638; Wave 23's battery v15 took it to
674; Wave 24's battery v16 took it to 710; Wave 25's battery
v17 took it to 747; Wave 26's battery v18 took it to 788;
Wave 27's battery v19 took it to 831.
New in v0.5: the classifier learned the territory the Wave 5 expansion measured: Microsoft Azure WAF, Kasada, and AWS CloudFront detection; the Akamai reference-token deny page; a verdict rule for status 444 (a dropped request is a refusal, never an OPEN); and the end of the false-challenge species where a served page merely embeds a reCAPTCHA/hCaptcha loader for its own forms. All five Wave 5 defects are fixed test-first from live captures (PROBLEMS.md). The index now covers 500 sites (Waves 6-7 expansion, Wave 18 row 500), and Wave 5 ran the first signed-vs-unsigned experiment with the shipped signer (SIGNED-EXPERIMENT.md): an unregistered key changed no verdict anywhere: the measured baseline the campaign's identity front has to move. For owners, the Fix Kit turns audit findings into vendor-verified remediation steps.
New in v0.4: Ed25519 signed identity. The signer now implements
Ed25519 per RFC 8032 in pure Python stdlib (verified against the
official RFC 8032 §7.1 test vectors), so wallcheck keygen --alg ed25519 mints a directory-compatible Web Bot Auth key: the public
half publishes in a /.well-known/http-message-signatures-directory
document, and probe --sign auto-detects the key's algorithm.
Wave 4 also took the index's third data point and ran the first
signed-agent-directory census of all 154 index domains
(DIRECTORY.md).
New in v0.3: the owner-side audit. wallcheck audit <domain>
grades a site's agent-access posture across six checks: robots.txt
AI-agent directives, llms.txt sanity (an HTML soft-404 fails),
sitemap, feed discovery, API discovery, and Web Bot Auth
signed-agent readiness: each PASS/WARN/FAIL with evidence and a
concrete fix, rolled into an A-F grade. First live audits
(validation/wave3/AUDITS.md): our own
properties grade D/F: the audit found real work on our own sites
before anyone else's. v0.3 also adds AWS WAF detection to the
classifier and merges the census into the
Bot Wall Index working table (499 sites after the
Waves 6-7 expansion).
Non-goals
wallcheck will never solve CAPTCHAs, spoof fingerprints or user
agents, or bypass/evade a wall, rate limit, or access control. The probe
identifies itself (wallcheck/<version> user agent). The combat is
detection + evidence + standards: a wall an agent can name is a bug
report; signed agent identity (Web Bot Auth, RFC 9421: prototype
shipped in v0.2, see SPEC.md) is how agents stop being
anonymous in the first place.
Usage
CLI
Example output (a real run: see DOGFOOD.md for the full set):
Exit codes: 0 for OPEN, 1 for any other verdict, 2 for usage
errors: CI-ready. --json prints one stable object:
{url, final_url, status, verdict, vendor, evidence[], elapsed_ms, redirect_chain[]}.
Signed probes and owner-side verification:
Owner-side audit of your own site's agent-access posture:
Seven checks (robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap, feed, API, signed-agent
readiness, security contact) → per-check PASS/WARN/FAIL + evidence +
a fix list, and a grade (out of 14 since the security-contact check
was added; earlier grades were out of 12). Exit 0 for grade A/B,
1 otherwise.
Exposure scan of the page a site serves (opt-in, same single fetch):
Classifies the key-like material the page itself hands an anonymous
visitor — CANDIDATE_EXPOSURE (server-secret classes that should
never be public), PUBLIC_BY_DESIGN (frontend keys, app IDs),
VISITOR_TOKEN (short-lived JWTs). Findings are fingerprint-only:
pattern, class, length and a SHA-256 prefix, never the value. The
method and its disclosure rules live in
campaign/EXPOSURE-LAYER.md.
Verdicts
MCP server
From npm (no install, needs Node 20+ and Python 3.11+ on PATH; the package is a thin launcher over the same Python stdlib code):
Or from this repo:
Tools:
probe_url(url, timeout?): live fetch → classification object.classify(status, headers, body): offline classification of a response you captured yourself. No network.scan_exposure(url, timeout?): live fetch → classification object plus an exposure section (key-like material the page serves, classified, fingerprint-only). One honest GET, same discipline asprobe_url; covers the probe's 64 KB body sample.audit(domain, timeout?): owner-side agent-access audit: grade plus per-check PASS/WARN/FAIL. Up to 11 honest GETs to the one domain, same bounded-fetch discipline asprobe_url.
Add to an MCP client config as a stdio server running either command,
or via Docker with the GHCR image
ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/wallcheck:0.5.0 (see Dockerfile).
Tests
Fully offline: recorded fixtures exercise the pure classifier:
Contributing evidence
Captured responses under validation/ are evidence, and evidence
is scrubbed before it is published: run
python3 scripts/scrub_captures.py on any new capture wave first.
Served pages embed other sites' key material; the scrubber's
redaction table is the exposure scanner's own pattern table, so
anything the scanner can find, the scrubber removes. Private
disclosure material (validation/monster-finding/) and unreleased
candidate findings (validation/exposure-wave*/) are never
published — both paths are gitignored on purpose.
Family
By Rene Turcios: sibling of greenlight (know before you claim an issue: GO/NO-GO with evidence) and mcpaudit (audit any MCP server, scored). Same house rules: deterministic core, named issues, evidence over vibes, dogfood on real targets before claiming anything.
Full product spec, roadmap (Web Bot Auth signing shipped as the
v0.2 prototype; the owner-side audit shipped in v0.3), and the Bot
Wall Index plan: SPEC.md. Validation waves live in
validation/: Wave 2 added depth probing of 77 platform paths
(PATHS.md) and the signing prototype
(SIGNING.md); Wave 3 added the
stability re-probe, the 154-site index, and the audit's first live
runs (AUDITS.md). Wave 4 added the
third stability data point (STABILITY-2.md),
the signed-agent directory census
(DIRECTORY.md), and Ed25519. Wave 5
added the territory growth, the signed-vs-unsigned experiment, and
the owner fix kit; Wave 6 hardened the classifier against 25
adversarial shapes; Wave 7 took the index to 499 sites, ran the
second directory census (4 adopters) and an audit sweep; Wave 8
probed paths on 46 more platforms and took the front-doors file to
65 platforms. Wave 9 stamped 0.5.0-rc and added the audit MCP tool;
Waves 10-28 ran nineteen more stability rounds (rounds 6-24)
and adversarial batteries v2-v20, took the suite to 885 tests,
and kept the launch hold.
License
MIT: see LICENSE.
來源:README.md,提交 6fdd06a
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.5.0最新Oct 25, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分