
jevreel
io.github.DeepAleph由 GitHub 帳號 DeepAleph 發布v0.2.0更新於 Oct 28, 2026
Search and understand videos without embeddings: contact sheets plus Jev typed decisions.
概覽
把影片切成分格縮圖,用 TypeSafe 的 Jev 決策模型定位、驗證並描述片段,向助理回傳時間點與機率。
- 可以做什麼
- 將本機影片或網址建立索引成分格縮圖、字幕與帶類型的逐分鐘時間軸,並可加入自訂鏡頭問題
- 依描述搜尋畫面、語音或兩者兼具的片段,並在全解析度影格上驗證,給出時間與機率
- 依參考照片找出某個人或物件出現的所有時刻
- 細看畫面:擷取兩個時間點之間的全解析度影格、在單一影格中框選並裁切目標、讀取字幕內容
- 對整段影片提出一個帶類型的問題,並在不發出新請求的情況下篩選已存時間軸
- 列出本機已建立索引的影片
- 適用情境
- 適合讓助理在長影片中找出特定時刻、在真實畫面上驗證並引用準確時間,或用帶類型的問題梳理整部影片或錄影。較適合一次性或探索性的影片提問;若要對大型影片庫反覆檢索,向量索引更省成本。
- 執行需求
- 以 stdio 在本機執行,透過 uvx 啟動,需要 uv、Python 3.11+ 以及 PATH 中的 FFmpeg。使用 Jev 的篩選、鏡頭與整片提問需要 TYPESAFE_API_KEY 中的 TypeSafe API 金鑰;不含時間軸的索引、縮放、字幕與查詢不需金鑰。網址支援與本機語音轉寫來自 [all] 附加元件,未安裝時需在影片旁放置字幕檔。需要連線至 TypeSafe 的網路。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 jevreel,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
jevreel
A zero-embedding approach to video intelligence, using Jev.
[CI] [License: MIT] [Python 3.11+]
jevreel lays a video out on labelled contact sheets, one frame per second and sixty frames to an image, and has Jev, TypeSafe's fast decision model, judge every sheet in parallel. The best windows are re-checked on full frames. Your agent (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Claude Desktop, anything that speaks MCP) gets back moments, times and probabilities, then looks closer itself. No vectors are computed or stored anywhere.
See it work
Five unedited Claude Code sessions using the jevreel MCP server and skill on Blender's open movie Tears of Steel (12:14, (CC) Blender Foundation, CC BY 3.0). Each clip is drawn from its recording: the agent's tool calls, what Jev answered for every sheet and frame, the hits, the cost, and the agent's own answer, quoted. Click a clip for the full-resolution video.
1. Find a three-second moment
2. Search the dialogue
[Use case 2: speech-mode search over caption lines, the picked line, and the agent's answer]
3. Read what's on screen
[Use case 3: finding the newspaper in the first five minutes and the headline the agent read]
4. Find a person from a photo
[Use case 4: searching by a reference photo, verified windows, and every moment on a timeline]
The reference photo is a crop of the frame at 9:18, so the 9:17 hit is its own source; the other seven are what the search found.
5. Map a whole film
The session starts with two failed calls, left in: a shell command the recording didn't allow, then a wrong folder. The error names the folder relative paths resolve from, and the next call works.
Why a decision model instead of embeddings
Multimodal embedding models already search video well: EmbeddingGemma 2 (October 2026) puts text, images, video frames and audio in one vector space and runs on a phone. jevreel takes a different route to the same goal, with different trade-offs.
- Your question, not a fixed notion of "similar". An embedding index decides at index time what counts as close. A decision model judges the question you ask now, and returns a probability your code can threshold, sort and gate on.
- Every second, cheaply. Jev charges for input tokens only, and output is free. A contact sheet is sent once and every question about it rides along in the same request, so jevreel screens the whole video at one frame per second instead of a handful of keyframes.
- Questions are nearly free, so ask many. Lenses add your own typed questions to every minute at almost no extra cost, then filter them as often as you like for nothing.
- The expensive model only sees what passed. Your agent gets the few moments that matter, as full-resolution frames, rather than a pile of thumbnails.
- Typed answers, not just rankings. Yes/no with the second it happens, one of your options, or a level on your scale, per minute or for the whole video.
Embeddings are the better fit for querying a large library over and over: once the vectors exist, each search is a lookup that costs nothing, while every jevreel question pays Jev for the minutes it screens (about $0.02–0.03 per hour of video). The two combine well: embeddings to shortlist videos, jevreel to find, verify and describe the moment.
How it works
- Index. Sample the video at 1 fps and tile the frames onto 1568 px contact sheets, each tile
labelled
T01,T02, and so on. Fetch captions, or transcribe locally. Ask every sheet a fixed set of questions once (people, on-screen text, cuts, setting, activity, a representative frame) plus any lenses you add, which gives a typed timeline. - Screen. One request per sheet: a yes/no (Noul) for "is it in this minute" plus a Choice over tile IDs for "which second". Screen and speech are separate questions combined in code.
- Verify. The top-ranked windows (by rank, not threshold) are re-checked with one yes/no per full frame, every half second around the pick. Screening ranks a one-second event correctly even when it can't confirm it; verification confirms it, or throws out a false lead.
- Look closer.
zoomre-renders full-resolution frames;locateputs a Box around a target in one frame and crops it;wholeanswers one question about the entire video from a storyboard, the timeline and the transcript.
Answers are cached: the same images and questions to the same model never cost twice.
This follows TypeSafe's own patterns. Their line-search cookbook pairs a Choice over labelled units with a Noul for "is it there at all". Their images guide searches a large image by Choice over tiles and looks closer only where needed. Their Box guide gates every box behind a Noul and checks its edges.
Quickstart
You need Python 3.11+, FFmpeg on your PATH, and a TypeSafe API key.
[all] adds URL support (yt-dlp) and local speech-to-text (faster-whisper). Without them, jevreel
indexes local files and uses .srt or .vtt captions saved next to the video.
Lenses: your own questions on every minute
A lens is a set of typed questions asked of every sheet and kept as timeline columns. Questions can
be noul (yes/no, plus the second it happens), choice (one of your options) or score (levels,
lowest first).
Use it from your agent
The MCP server exposes ten tools. The skill teaches agents the workflow: ask, look before claiming anything, cite times.
As a plugin
The plugin bundles the MCP server and the skill. It starts the server with
uvx --from "jevreel[url]==0.2.0", so you need uv and FFmpeg on
your PATH. Local speech-to-text is left out to keep the first start quick; for it, add the server
by hand with jevreel[all] as shown further down.
Claude Code asks for your TypeSafe API key when you enable the plugin and keeps it in your system's credential store:
Codex passes plugin servers only an allowlist of environment variables, so save the key once. The same command installs the environment the plugin starts, so its first start is fast:
By hand
Claude Code
Codex
Claude Desktop, Cursor and other mcpServers clients
VS Code uses the same entry under "servers" with "type": "stdio".
The skill (Claude Code, Codex and other agents that read Agent Skills):
Agents without MCP can use the skill with the CLI alone; every command prints JSON.
Tools
jevreel measure <video> reports what one contact sheet costs at several grid sizes on your account.
Python
Configuration
What it costs
Measured on 2026-10-15 with jev-1.14.0 at $0.042 per million input tokens, on a 10-minute 1080p video:
One question across an hour of video comes to about $0.02–0.03. Asked at index time, lens questions
ride along with the default ones, which is where the "nearly free" comes from: an 8-question request
cost about the same as a 2-question one. TypeSafe doesn't document image token counts yet. These
figures are what the API reported. Check yours with jevreel measure.
Measured on a real video
A 10-minute 1080p gameplay capture, no speech, every result checked against the frames by hand:
Limits
- Brief events need screening to rank their window. Verification looks every half second, but
only in the top-ranked windows (6 by default). An event that screening ranks below that is not
checked. Raise
JEVREEL_VERIFY_TOP, or lowerJEVREEL_TILES_PER_SHEETfor larger tiles. - No sound beyond speech. Audio reaches Jev only as transcript text.
- Jev's image support is experimental. TypeSafe calls images and Box "dreamer-ready", not production-ready, and says limits and accuracy can change between releases.
- Jev's real image minimum is 280 px per side. The docs say 256, but the API rejects anything smaller than 280 (measured 2026-10-15). jevreel pads every image itself.
- Thresholds need tuning on your footage. 0.5 to report and 0.7 for "strong" follow TypeSafe's examples. They held up on the test video, which is one video.
Contributing
Issues and pull requests are welcome. See CONTRIBUTING.md. Coding agents should read AGENTS.md.
License
MIT. jevreel is an independent project, not affiliated with TypeSafe AI. Jev is TypeSafe's model and is used through its public API under TypeSafe's terms.
來源:README.md,提交 6c89b26
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.2.0最新Oct 17, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分