
Agent Observability
io.github.KryptosAI由 GitHub 帳號 KryptosAI 發布v1.0.7更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Trace AI agent execution: every tool call, every error, every dollar. Open source, local-first.
概覽
一個本地優先的 MCP 伺服器,把 AI 代理工作階段的工具呼叫、token 用量、決策與評級記錄到本機 SQLite 資料庫,並提供儀表板。
- 可以做什麼
- 記錄工具呼叫,包含名稱、所屬伺服器、耗時、狀態、輸入與輸出,並記錄每個工作階段的 token 用量與估算費用,記錄決策點(情境、選項、所選方案與理由),給出 A–F 工作階段評級及理由,再讀取完整工作階段報告或列出歷史工作階段及其評級、token 總量與費用。搭配的本機儀表板與 REST 介面提供工作階段、工具呼叫、token、決策、搜尋、統計與 JSON 匯出。
- 適用情境
- 當你想為 Claude Code、Cursor 或 opencode 的工作階段留下「飛行記錄器」時使用:查看執行了哪些工具、失敗原因、花費多少,並保留讀取或修改檔案的稽核軌跡。適合調校提示詞與估算開銷。
- 執行需求
- 透過 npx(套件名稱 agent-obs)以本機 Node.js 程序執行;未宣告驗證、環境變數或標頭。安裝會為偵測到的代理寫入 MCP 設定,資料保存在使用者家目錄下的本機 SQLite 資料庫。儀表板監聽本機埠 9400。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Agent Observability,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
agent-observability
Open source agent observability — see what your agents did, why they failed, and what it cost. Runs locally. No cloud required.
Quick Start
One command. No manual config. No copy-paste.
This auto-detects your AI agent (opencode, Claude Code, Cursor) and configures everything:
- Adds agent-obs to your MCP config
- Adds the self-reporting instruction
- Tells you what to do next
Then restart your agent. Every action will now self-report.
What you'll see
After running a task in your agent, the dashboard shows:
- Every tool call with duration and status
- A-F session grade (how efficient was your agent?)
- Cost per session in tokens and dollars
- Full audit trail of what was read, edited, and executed
Manual setup (if setup can't detect your agent)
opencode: Add to opencode.json:
Claude Code: Create .mcp.json:
Cursor: Add to Cursor Settings > MCP:
See Agent-Specific Setup below for detailed per-platform instructions including self-reporting directives.
Note: All data is written to a local SQLite database in
~/.agent-observability/. No data leaves your machine.
Proxy mode (fallback)
For agents that can't self-report, wrap any MCP server and every tool invocation gets traced automatically:
Proxy mode captures only MCP tool calls (~30% of typical agent actions). Prefer the setup / MCP server approach above.
Agent-Specific Setup
Claude Code
- MCP Config — Create
.mcp.jsonin your project root:
- Self-reporting instruction — Create
.claude/instructions.md(or reference the existing SKILL.md under.claude/skills/agent-obs/SKILL.md):
- Verify — Run
agent-obs dashboard, open http://localhost:9400, and look for your session after the agent completes a task.
Cursor
- MCP Config — Add to Cursor's MCP settings (
~/.cursor/mcp.json, or Settings → MCP → Add new global MCP server):
- Self-reporting instruction — Create
.cursorrules(or.cursor/rules/agent-obs.md):
- Verify — Run
agent-obs dashboard, open http://localhost:9400, and look for your session after the agent completes a task.
Architecture
API Reference
REST Endpoints (Dashboard)
MCP Tools (Server Mode)
What Gets Tracked
Every tool call
- Tool name — e.g.
read_file,execute_command,search_code - Server — which MCP server handled it
- Duration — wall-clock milliseconds
- Status —
successorerror - Input — full arguments passed to the tool
- Output — full result returned (truncated at 64KB for storage)
Token consumption
- Input tokens — prompt and context
- Output tokens — generated response
- Total tokens — sum per session
- Per-call breakdown — token delta for each LLM round-trip
Cost estimation
Costs are estimated based on published API pricing:
Costs are tracked per session and displayed in the dashboard. You can add custom model pricing via ~/.agent-observability/models.json.
Session grades
Every session receives a letter grade based on efficiency and correctness:
Decision points
When the agent has multiple possible actions, it can record why it chose one over another. Example:
Decision points create an audit trail of agent reasoning, making it possible to understand not just what happened, but why.
Full audit trail
Every action is timestamped and linked to a session. The audit trail answers:
- Who (which agent/user) accessed what data?
- When did each tool call happen?
- What data was read or modified?
- Was the action authorized?
Grade System
Grades are assigned manually by the agent via obs_record_grade or automatically by the dashboard based on session statistics:
- A = Clean — No issues detected. Every tool call succeeded, token usage was efficient relative to task complexity, and the session completed its stated goal.
- B = Minor issues — Some inefficiencies (e.g., reading the same file twice, calling a tool that returned empty results and then trying it again). No failures.
- C = Inefficient — Needs attention. Redundant tool calls, excessive token consumption, or recoverable errors that were eventually resolved.
- D = Risky — Significant problems. Multiple failed tool calls, unusually high cost for the task, or the agent chose demonstrably wrong tools.
- F = Failed — Errors occurred that prevented task completion, or the agent abandoned the session.
Grades accumulate over time. The /api/stats endpoint shows your average grade and grade distribution.
Why This Exists
AI agents are a black box. You tell Claude Code or Cursor to fix a bug, refactor a module, or add a feature — and minutes later you have a diff. But what actually happened in between? How many tool calls did it make? How many tokens did it burn? Which files did it read? Did it try three approaches before landing on one? You have no idea.
This isn't just academic curiosity. Without observability:
- You can't estimate costs. A session that feels quick might have burned $5 in API calls. A session that felt slow might have cost $0.50. You're operating blind.
- You can't debug failures. The agent produced broken code — was it because it read the wrong file? Used a deprecated API? Misunderstood the task? Without traces, you're guessing.
- You can't improve your prompts. Is the agent reading too many files? Calling too many tools? Wasting tokens on irrelevant context? You need data to tune your system instructions.
- You can't audit access. If an agent reads a file containing secrets or API keys, you should know about it. If it makes an unexpected network call, you need to see it.
Agent Observability gives you a flight recorder for every agent session. It answers: what happened, why it happened, and what it cost.
Provenance
This project combines ideas from three prior projects:
AgentShelf (Shopify AI readiness scanner)
AgentShelf scans a Shopify store's theme, apps, admin settings, and custom code to produce an AI readiness score. As it scans, it builds a full audit trail — every file read, every API call made, every finding logged with a timestamp and data source. Pattern adopted here: structured audit trail with per-action timestamps, data source attribution, and session-level summarization.
Veros (FHIR clinical ground truth)
Veros generates synthetic longitudinal patient records (FHIR R4) and uses them to validate clinical decision support agents. Its core principle: "no trace, no answer." Every snippet of clinical reasoning produced by an AI must be traceable back to the specific data element (lab result, medication, condition) that supports it. Pattern adopted here: decision point tracking — every agent choice must cite its basis, making reasoning auditable and contestable.
MCP Observatory
MCP Observatory secures MCP servers — testing them for vulnerabilities, schema drift, and attack surfaces before agents depend on them. It's used by 850+ developers weekly and powers CI pipelines for MCP server security. Use Observatory to secure your MCP servers. Use agent-obs to trace the agents that depend on them. Observatory validates; agent-obs observes.
Pattern adopted here: tool health scoring, session grading (A-F), and automatic degradation flags.
Open Source vs Cloud
This open source package (agent-observability on npm) is the core engine. It's MIT licensed and will always remain free and local-first:
- CLI tools (proxy, server, dashboard)
- Local SQLite storage
- REST API
- MCP server tools
- Full audit trail, cost estimation, and session grading
A cloud version (app.agentobservability.dev) is in development with additional features:
- Team dashboards with shared session history
- Alerting (Slack/email when an agent's grade drops below C)
- Historical analytics (cost trends, efficiency trends over months)
- Role-based access control for audit trails
- SOC 2 compliant infrastructure
The open source package will always be able to run independently. The cloud version is additive, not a replacement.
License
MIT
來源:README.md,提交 2658eef
工具
0版本歷史
1- v1.0.7最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分