CommitLore

io.github.MongLong0214由 GitHub 帳號 MongLong0214 發布v1.2.0更新於 Oct 27, 2026

Git-native decision memory for coding agents: only the decisions still in force for the edited path

已驗證STDIO僅桌面知識與記憶開發者工具

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

以 Git 為載體的決策記憶,只向編碼代理提供其即將編輯路徑上仍然有效的設計決策。

可以做什麼
  • 編輯前投遞脈絡:依代理即將改動的檔案路徑回傳有效記錄(限制、已否決的方案、警告)
  • 擷取與驗證:將草擬的決策記錄與工作階段紀錄和暫存差異比對後才接受
  • 以 Git 保存記錄:把接受的記錄存成提交 trailer 或 notes,而非託管記憶資料庫
  • 追蹤生命週期:區分有效、被取代與已過期的決策,並回報過時記錄
  • 評定可信等級:以指令、聲明或保留內容的形式投遞,可選簽章模式
  • 透過 MCP 暴露擷取流程,供使用該註冊的主機呼叫
適用情境
適合編碼代理反覆提出倉庫已否決方案的團隊,並希望這些理由隨程式碼一起經過複製、分支與審查。最適合有真實歷史、且確有少量值得保留決策的倉庫;大多數提交不會帶記錄。
執行需求
以本機程序在使用者機器上執行(僅桌面端)。需要 Node.js 22.23.2 以上版本與 Git,安裝腳本會先檢查兩者。每個倉庫需以 CLI 初始化,代理主機需接上外掛或 MCP 註冊。未宣告託管後端、帳號或 API 金鑰。
安裝前請注意
安裝腳本從專案倉庫下載後直接交給 shell 執行,建議先閱讀。預設指令模式只比對提交作者標頭,並非身分驗證;簽章模式在缺少倉庫本機簽署者允許清單時會拒絕授權。每次符合的工具呼叫(包含讀取)都會消耗權杖。Git notes 中的記錄不會被一般複製取得。壓縮合併可能遺失記錄,除非由鉤子或 GitHub Action 承接。guard 為實驗性功能,空結果不代表安全結論。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 CommitLore,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

[CommitLore]

CommitLore

Stop re-reviewing the same bad idea.

Decision authority for coding agents, owned by Git.
Keep constraints, rejected alternatives, and warnings in Git — then deliver only what is still in force, so an agent is not handed a decision the repository already reversed.

No hosted memory. The repository owns the record.

[CI] [Latest release] [Protocol 2.0 Stable] [Node.js 22.23.2 or newer] [MIT License]

English · 한국어 · 日本語 · 简体中文

Install once. Then initialise each repository where you want it to work.

bash
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MongLong0214/commitlore/v1.7.5/install.sh | sh -s v1.7.5
Prefer to read the installer first?
bash
curl -fsSLO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MongLong0214/commitlore/v1.7.5/install.shsh install.sh v1.7.5
# Or skip the script: the checkout it makes is one you can make yourself.git clone --depth 1 --branch v1.7.5 https://github.com/MongLong0214/commitlorenode commitlore/dist/commitlore.mjs --version

It installs a pinned source checkout and a wrapper that runs node <checkout>/dist/commitlore.mjs — no compiled download, no build step.

[commitlore demo prints two recorded decisions for src/pricing.ts, delivers only the active one with its limit and the alternative it ruled out, and says the superseded decision remains in Git without being delivered as current guidance.]


The code survives. The judgment doesn't.

An agent proposes an approach. Your team rejects it because of a non-obvious constraint. The final code preserves the outcome, but usually not why the alternative was rejected. A later agent sees only the code and proposes the same idea again.

CommitLore keeps that judgment beside the code.

What CommitLore does

BehaviorProduct path
CapturesPreserves constraints, rejected alternatives, and warnings that a diff cannot show. Candidates are checked against the session transcript and the staged diff.commitlore capture
PreservesStores accepted records in Git trailers or notes instead of a hosted memory database.commit hooks · refs/notes/commitlore
Tracks lifecycleKeeps active, superseded, and expired decisions distinct.commitlore stale
ScopesSelects decisions for the path an agent is about to edit.commitlore context
Grades trustDelivers records as directives, claims, or withheld content.default / signed mode
DeliversGives supported agents current context before an edit.plugin hook · MCP

Most commits should carry no record. CommitLore is for judgment the code cannot preserve, not for narrating every change.

60 seconds to decision-aware agents

1. Install the CLI

macOS and Linux:

bash
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MongLong0214/commitlore/v1.7.5/install.sh | sh -s v1.7.5

Windows:

powershell
& ([scriptblock]::Create((irm https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MongLong0214/commitlore/v1.7.5/install.ps1))) v1.7.5

Requires Node.js 22.23.2+ and Git. The script checks both before it writes anything.

2. Connect your agent

Claude Code:

text
/plugin marketplace add MongLong0214/commitlore/plugin install commitlore@commitlore

Codex:

bash
commitlore plugin install-codex

The plugin puts no commitlore on PATH, so the commands below need the CLI install as well. The installers also detect and wire supported MCP hosts where they can do so safely; the exact matrix is below.

3. Initialize a repository

bash
cd your-repositorycommitlore initcommitlore context .

Start a new agent session after installing or updating a plugin: a running session keeps the runtime it loaded.

Then work and commit normally. On supported skill integrations, CommitLore is considered during ordinary commit requests and stays silent when there is nothing worth preserving. You do not need to name CommitLore on every commit.

Want accepted records to stage without a per-record prompt? The repository can opt in once with commitlore auto on. That policy is repository-owned and applies to the team, so it is not silently enabled by this page.

What the agent receives

Before editing src/pricing.ts:

text
commitlore: active records for src/pricing.ts
Limit  [claim]      r-price01  a1b2c3d4  calculatePrice owns final checkout pricing only
Ruled-out  [claim]      r-price01  a1b2c3d4  Reuse it for admin quotes | eligibility and rounding semantics differ

[claim] means "weigh this as information." A repository can opt into the stronger signed-authority mode. Delivery gives the agent context; it does not block the edit.

Security model →

Why Git?

The repository should own the judgment behind its code.

CommitLore stores records in ordinary Git trailers and notes, so they branch, merge, clone, review, and survive provider changes with the code they explain.

SQLite is only a rebuildable index. Delete it and Git still holds the record.

Finding an old decision is not enough

A general memory or retrieval system asks:

Which old text looks related?

CommitLore asks:

Which recorded decisions still apply to this path now?

A superseded decision can be highly relevant and still be wrong as current guidance. Relevance and authority are different questions.

How it works

[For src/pricing.ts, the active decision in Git history moves into the context delivered before the next edit, carrying its limit and the alternative it ruled out. An earlier decision that also covered admin quotes has been superseded and stays in history without moving forward as current guidance.]

  1. Capture — an agent drafts only decision context the diff cannot show.
  2. Verify — CommitLore checks the draft against the session and staged diff.
  3. Preserve — the accepted record lives in Git with identity and lifecycle.
  4. Deliver — before a later edit, only active records for that path are returned.

Most commits carry no record. The commit hook validates a record when one is present; it does not invent one.

An existing hook is not overwritten. commitlore init honours core.hooksPath, moves any hook already installed to <hook>.commitlore-chained, and calls it first; commitlore hooks uninstall puts it back.

What happens automatically

HostPre-edit deliveryVerified capture workflowDeterministic every-commit capture
Claude CodeAutomatic through the pluginAvailable through the plugin skillNot certified
CodexAutomatic through the pluginAvailable through the plugin skillNot certified
HermesAvailable after commitlore hermes installAvailable after host installNot certified
Gemini CLI, Cursor, Windsurf, opencodeMCP delivery where the host uses the registrationProcedure exposed over MCPNo
AGENTS.md hostsProcedure onlyProcedure onlyNo

"Available" means the prepare → verify → stage workflow exists. It does not mean every eligible commit is assessed automatically.

Users on supported skill hosts do not need to say "record this in CommitLore" on every commit. The remaining limitation is host initiation, not a required per-record user command.

Squash-merge repositories

A squash merge replaces a branch's commits with one new commit, and that commit does not carry the branch's trailers. If your repository merges with the squash button, a record made on a branch is dropped by the merge unless something carries it onto the commit that squashed it.

Two paths cover that, and one of them needs a one-time setup:

How the squash happensWhat carries the recordSetup
git merge --squash locallyThe installed prepare-commit-msg hook, from SQUASH_MSGNone — commitlore init already did it
GitHub's Squash and merge buttonThe action/preserve GitHub ActionThe workflow below

GitHub performs that merge on its own servers, where no local git hook runs at all, so the local hook cannot see it. The Action is the only place that has what it needs at that moment: the pull request, its commits, and the commit they were squashed into.

Add .github/workflows/commitlore-preserve.yml:

yaml
name: CommitLore squash inheritance
# pull_request_target, not pull_request: a pull request from a fork gets a# read-only token on pull_request, so the job would build the record and then# fail to publish it.on:  pull_request_target:    types: [closed]
permissions:  contents: write   # the one push to refs/notes/commitlore
concurrency:  group: commitlore-notes  cancel-in-progress: false
jobs:  preserve:    if: github.event.pull_request.merged == true    runs-on: ubuntu-latest    steps:      - uses: actions/checkout@v4        with:          # the merge commit is on the base branch, and a closed pull request          # has no merge ref left to check out          ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}          fetch-depth: 0
      # the mirror this action writes; publishing from a checkout that never      # read it would fork the notes history      - run: git fetch --no-tags origin '+refs/notes/commitlore:refs/notes/commitlore'
      # a squash merge usually deletes the branch, and then the pull request's      # own ref is the only one still reaching the commits that carry records      - run: git fetch --no-tags --force origin          '+refs/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/head:refs/commitlore/pr-head'
      # The action runs CommitLore from a checkout of this repository: the      # package is private, so there is no published npm name to fall back to.      # `dist/` is committed (ADR-0011), so nothing needs building.      - uses: actions/checkout@v4        with:          repository: MongLong0214/commitlore          ref: v1.7.5          path: .commitlore-cli          persist-credentials: false
      - uses: MongLong0214/commitlore/action/[email protected]        with:          cli-path: .commitlore-cli/dist/cli.js

Two rules for whoever edits this next, because pull_request_target runs with a writable token: never check out the pull request's head here, and never execute anything reachable from refs/commitlore/pr-head. The fork's commits arrive as data to read trailers from, not as code to run.

commitlore doctor reports whether this is switched on, under squash inheritance. It says so before a record is lost; squash conservation is the row that reports records already gone.

If you merge with merge commits or rebase, records survive on their own and this setup is unnecessary.

A field report, not a measurement

One run, on an unrelated repository, by someone installing v1.2.1 for the first time. Nothing here was measured and none of it is in the evidence logs. It is on this page because the paragraph above asserts a loop that no table here covers.

They asked an agent to fix a rounding bug, mentioned in passing that a decimal library had already been considered and dropped, and ended with "commit it". CommitLore was never named. Part of what the commit carried:

Ruled-out: adopting a decimal library such as Decimal.js | the backend is a  number contract, so it is meaninglessWarn: do not revert the test file to console.assert: it exits 0 even on  failure, so CI passes silentlyProvenance: drafted

The Warn was not dictated to the agent. It hit the trap while working and left it for whoever came next. Provenance: drafted records that no human read the record, which grades it claim — delivered as a report to weigh, not an order.

A later session with no shared history was asked to adopt the decimal library after all. It did not, and named the record as its reason. It also read the grade: a claim is not an instruction, so it checked the stated reason against the code before agreeing with it.

Unlike memory storage

General memory / RAGCommitLore
Primary questionWhat old text is related?Which decisions still apply here now?
AuthorityMemory store or providerGit
ScopeSemantic similarityRepository paths
LifecycleOften append-firstActive · superseded · expired
TrustRetrieved textDirective · claim · blocked
CaptureTranscript or note storageEvidence-checked decision record
PortabilityBackend-dependentOrdinary Git

CommitLore is intentionally narrower. It is not a general user-memory system, conversation archive, or vector database replacement.

Evidence

QuestionMeasured resultBoundary
Did claim-grade context change re-proposal in the registered study?2.8% (16/580) with CommitLore vs 18.8% (109/579) withoutone model, one harness, constructed tasks
Did lifecycle filtering deliver retired records in the measured active projection?0 retired recordssuperseded records were present; expiry was not
Does indexed lookup scale?496 ms p50 at 100k commitsthe no-index fallback is much slower

Index build time follows the number of records, not the number of commits: the expensive pass runs once per record, so a long history that has recorded little builds faster than a short one dense with records.

Path scope is what keeps a large history from reaching the model. On the #167 corpus, only 2 of 10,002 records did:

routemodel-visible recordsrelevant recordsmodel-visible tokens
inject everything10,0022/21,004,554
top-k lexical21/2190
CommitLore path scope22/2335

That measures exposure and recall at a fixed two-record budget — not token cost, billed cost, accuracy, or agent behaviour. One corpus, one query, one pinned embedding model.

The agent study does not establish a universal model effect. Delivery is not proof that a model read or followed a record.

Methods, full tables, exclusions, and negative results →

Limits, trust and privacy

  • Capture is assisted, not deterministic. Supported skills consider ordinary commit requests, but no host is certified to assess every eligible commit.
  • Default directive mode is not authentication. It matches the commit author header, and anyone who can write a commit can set that header — so a [directive] in default mode is policy metadata, not proof of identity. Signature mode additionally requires Git's own verified status and a match in the repository-local commitlore.trustedSigner allowlist; an absent, empty, or unreadable signer allowlist authorizes nobody, so the mode fails closed.
  • Guard is an experimental advisory, not a safety net: precision 44.8% (95% Wilson CI 32.7%–57.5%), recall 22.0% on the 417-decision corpus. An empty guard result is not a safety verdict.
  • Delivery spends tokens on every matching tool call. The pre-edit hook fires on Read as well as Edit, Write, MultiEdit and NotebookEdit, so it runs far more often than an editing agent commits. Each fire spends up to the payload budget — 800 tokens by default, changed with --budget. A repository with no records spends nothing, which means this is a cost that arrives with adoption rather than with installation.
  • An answer may be partial. Coverage is disclosed; absence from a partial result is not proof that no record exists. commitlore coverage reports what a scan reached.
  • Commit trailers travel with a clone; notes do not. Git does not fetch refs/notes/* by default, so a record in refs/notes/commitlore is absent from an ordinary clone until commitlore init configures that mirror.
  • There is no hosted backend. But once the server or hook returns context, the host handles that context under its own policy; CommitLore does not control that data flow.

Security · Compatibility · Evidence

Security and trust model

Records are untrusted until graded. Default author matching is policy metadata, not authentication. Signed directive mode requires Git verification and a repository-local signer allowlist; an absent or unreadable allowlist authorizes nobody. Injection-shaped payload is withheld from model-readable routes.

Full security model →

Installation, upgrades, and old hook generations

The CLI installer cannot rewrite hooks inside repositories it does not know about, and running host sessions retain the runtime they loaded. commitlore doctor names both states and their repair, and commitlore upgrade reports whether a newer release exists.

Installation and upgrades →

Protocol and Git storage

Records are ordinary Git trailers or notes. Protocol 2.0 defines lifecycle, trust grades, validation, and compatibility.

Human guide → · Normative specification →

Evidence and negative results

The repository publishes the methods, exclusions, unsuccessful measurements, and the cases where the original benchmark or diagnosis was wrong.

Evidence → · Self-audit →


Try it on a repository with history.
Tell us where path scope, lifecycle, capture, or installation breaks.

Report a failure case · Read the self-audit


Documentation

Contributing

CONTRIBUTING.md covers the record protocol this repository holds itself to, the release gate, and how to reproduce the evidence.

License

MIT — see LICENSE.

來源:README.md,提交 b18c40f

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v1.2.0最新Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分