
Nel Veil
io.github.NELPROINC由 GitHub 帳號 NELPROINC 發布v0.2.0更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Free passive security scanning - check any domain's DMARC, TLS, headers, and exposures.
概覽
免費的本機 MCP 伺服器,讓助理對網域做被動安全檢查:郵件偽造、TLS、安全標頭、暴露檔案、子網域接管與合規框架。
- 可以做什麼
- 檢查網域是否可被偽造郵件(DMARC/SPF/DKIM),以及 TLS 憑證與協商通訊協定版本是否安全,檢查是否送出常見 HTTP 安全標頭、是否公開提供 .env 等敏感路徑,並檢查常見子網域是否指向可被他人接管的雲端服務,一次執行全部檢查並提供各模組評分,依編號取回先前的掃描結果,列出或評估對 102 個合規框架的就緒度並附覆蓋說明
- 適用情境
- 適合需要快速、免費、免註冊了解某網域公開安全狀況時使用,例如判斷能否被郵件偽造、憑證是否即將到期,以及取得示意性的合規就緒度訊號,而非正式稽核。
- 執行需求
- 透過 npx 以 stdio 在本機執行,需要 Node.js 18 或更新版本。無需 API 金鑰、註冊或帳號。需要連線至 NEL 公開 API 的網路;選用環境變數 NEL_API_URL 可覆寫 API 基礎位址,僅供對自架後端進行本機開發使用。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Nel Veil,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
NEL VEIL MCP — free domain security checks for AI agents
Ask your agent "can someone spoof email from example.com?" and get a real answer in about ten seconds.
NEL VEIL MCP gives any MCP-compatible agent nine tools for checking a domain's public security posture: email spoofing (DMARC/SPF/DKIM), TLS weaknesses, HTTP security headers, publicly exposed files, subdomain-takeover risk, a combined scan, retrieval of an earlier scan, and compliance readiness against a register of 102 global frameworks.
Free. No API key. No signup.
Install
Claude Code — one command:
Any MCP client — add this to your config file:
Run it directly, to check it works:
It prints a ready line to stderr — something like nel-veil-mcp 0.2.1 ready — 9 tools, free passive tier. — and then waits for JSON-RPC on stdin. That is correct: it is a stdio server, not a CLI, and stdout carries the protocol, so nothing else is ever written there.
Requires Node 18 or newer.
30 seconds: is your domain spoofable?
After installing, ask your agent:
Check if example.com can be email-spoofed.
It calls check_email_spoofing. Real output for example.com at the time of writing:
That domain is in good shape. The finding people are most often surprised by is a DMARC policy of p=none — it looks configured, monitors everything, and blocks nothing.
Tools
Each returns a 0–100 score plus specific findings you can act on.
Compliance
check_compliance maps one passive scan onto a register of 102 frameworks
across Canada, the United States, the EU/EEA, the United Kingdom, Asia-Pacific,
Africa and the global standards — citing the specific provision each finding
bears on.
Read the coverage field before repeating a score. Every framework reports
how many of the scan categories it relies on were actually observed, as 9/16:
- A framework whose relevant checks did not run has a null score and the tier "Not assessed", with a reason. That is unknown, not clean.
- A clean result over fewer than half a framework's categories is "Partial", not "Strong".
- 26 of the 102 are "Not assessable" — an anti-money-laundering regime, a consumer-protection statute, a criminal offences provision or a securities disclosure rule imposes no technical safeguard an external scan could ever evidence. They are listed and explained, never scored.
These are indicative readiness signals from public-surface evidence. They are not an audit, not a certification and not legal advice, and every framework also carries a note on what it requires that no external scan can see — consent records, impact assessments, retention schedules, vendor agreements, board governance.
What this sends — stated plainly
Being precise here matters more than sounding safe, because this is the paragraph you rely on when deciding whether you may point a tool at someone else's domain.
No tool here does port scanning or exploit testing. Those are genuinely intrusive, they need the domain owner's permission, and they are deliberately not exposed over MCP at all.
But "passive" is not the same as "invisible", and several of these tools do more than read public records:
check_tlsconnects to the domain, but only as a browser would. It makes one ordinary TLS handshake to port 443, from NEL's own infrastructure, and reads what the server presents: certificate issuer and subject, the validity window and how many days remain, the subject alternative names, and the negotiated protocol and cipher. Nothing else is contacted, and no third party is asked to test the target. It reports an expired certificate, one expiring within 14 or 30 days, a self-signed certificate, an untrusted chain, a certificate that does not cover the hostname, and a connection negotiated over TLS 1.0 or 1.1. What one handshake cannot tell you: it shows what the server chose for that connection, not everything the server would accept. It does not enumerate supported cipher suites, does not test for Heartbleed, POODLE, DROWN or RC4 support, and produces no letter grade. Those need the deep assessment described below.check_subdomain_takeoveris not DNS-only. It resolves a small fixed list of common subdomain names and makes one HTTPS request to any that point at a known cloud host. It never claims or modifies anything.check_exposed_filesrequests a small fixed list of well-known paths (.env,.git/configand similar). It never brute-forces or fuzzes — the list does not grow or adapt — but these are paths a crawler would not request, so they are recognisable in a target's logs as a security check.scan_domainruns all of the above, and additionally checks whether common admin panels (/phpmyadmin/,/manager/html) are publicly reachable.
Everything above is information the domain publishes. None of it attacks anything. But it is more than ordinary crawling, so prefer running it against a domain you own or are authorised to assess.
Active scanning — port exposure, API probing, proof-of-concept checks, and the deep TLS assessment (tls_labs) that produces the Qualys SSL Labs grade along with the Heartbleed, POODLE, DROWN and RC4 tests — lives at nelprofessional.com, behind DNS-TXT proof that you control the domain. None of it is reachable from this MCP server. That is the right place for it, because a human proves ownership once and NEL can stand behind the result.
Rate limits. Ten single checks and three full scans per minute, per IP address. If you hit it, wait a minute.
Privacy. This package sends no API key, no email address, and no account identifier. Each request carries the domain you asked about and a nel-veil-mcp user-agent. Note that, like any HTTP service, NEL sees the IP the request came from — it is what the rate limit is keyed on.
Configuration
Development
These steps need the git repository, not the published npm package — the tarball ships only dist/, so src/ and scripts/ are not in it.
scripts/mcp-smoke.mjs launches the built server exactly as npx would, performs the MCP handshake, lists the tools and calls one for real — so it catches transport and schema problems a unit test would not.
About NEL VEIL
NEL VEIL is the security scanner behind NEL Professional, a marketplace connecting organisations with verified cybersecurity professionals. The same modules that power this MCP server power the scans on the site.
Full documentation: nelprofessional.com/mcp
License
MIT — see LICENSE.
來源:README.md,提交 24a0a01
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.2.0最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分