
ovecc
io.github.Ovecc-labs由 GitHub 帳號 Ovecc-labs 發布v0.3.1更新於 Nov 3, 2026
Architecture guardrails for AI-written code: dependency graph, impact, dead code, CI gate
概覽
本機 MCP 伺服器,把 Ovecc 的程式碼庫架構分析(相依圖、影響範圍、死程式碼、安全與 CI 閘門)以確定性工具形式提供給編碼助理。
- 可以做什麼
- 查詢已建立索引的儲存庫模型:摘要、元件、耦合、循環相依與相依查詢
- 評估變更風險:符號或檔案的影響範圍、熱點,以及附修正建議的單檔分析
- 找出程式碼劣化:重複程式碼、未使用匯出與無法觸及的檔案、複雜度健康度、架構異味
- 檢查安全與相依套件:密鑰、不安全模式、汙點流,以及離線 OSV 相依套件漏洞稽核
- 落實架構約束:讀取架構契約檔、依契約檢查程式碼、攔阻新增違規
- 產生報告與匯出:一次性架構報告、相依圖 HTML 匯出、機器可讀的能力清單
- 適用情境
- 適合編碼助理在大型或多語言儲存庫中改動程式碼時使用:需要知道某次改動會影響什麼、某個匯出是否仍被使用,或某個拉取請求是否破壞既定架構,而不必把大量檔案讀進上下文。
- 執行需求
- 以本機 stdio 程序執行,通常用 npx ovecc mcp 啟動,或使用已安裝到 PATH 的 ovecc 執行檔。需先對儲存庫建立索引(ovecc index .),會在 .ovecc 目錄寫入模型。除隨附執行檔外無需其他執行環境,無需 API 金鑰,可完全離線使用。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 ovecc,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
CLI-first architecture intelligence: understand your codebase, then hold it to the rules you set.
Rust, one binary, no runtime. Runs offline, with no LLM in the loop.
What is Ovecc
Ovecc reads your repository once and builds a persistent model of it: every file, import, symbol, and call. From that single index it answers the questions you ask about a codebase:
- What breaks if I change this? (
impact) - Where are the dependency cycles and the tight coupling? (
query,summary) - What is duplicated, dead, or over-complex? (
dupes,deadcode,health) - What is insecure, and which dependencies have known CVEs? (
security,audit) - Where is the churn, and who owns this code? (
hotspots)
It is an architecture database with deterministic commands, driven from the CLI, from CI, or by a coding agent over MCP.
[React's dependency graph in ovecc's offline viewer]React's dependency graph, rendered by ovecc export graph --html into a single file you can open directly, no server or CDN needed.
What it costs an agent
Asking whether a new import closes a dependency cycle, on zod, with Claude Sonnet 4.6:
One run, one model, one question, and agent runs are not deterministic. Method and the cases where ovecc loses are in docs/benchmark/BENCHMARKS.md.
Write your architecture down, and hold the code to it
Most tools stop at reading the code. Ovecc goes one step further: you write down which parts of your codebase are allowed to depend on which, in one small file, and every build checks the real code against it.
Here's one for a small app:
Run the check and every breach comes back with a file and a line:
Four kinds of decay caught in one run: a layer reaching where it shouldn't, a
feature tangling into its neighbor, a network call inside code you promised was
pure, and a function creeping past the budget you set. Put ovecc architecture check in CI and the pull request fails on the drift, instead of a reviewer
noticing three months later, or nobody noticing at all.
Don't have one yet? ovecc architecture suggest recognizes the architecture
you already follow (Feature-Sliced, bulletproof-react, Clean/Hexagonal, an Nx
workspace) and writes the file bound to your real folders. Or ovecc architecture init drafts it from your actual import graph, so day one starts
green and you tighten from there. The details are in the contract reference
below.
Install
npm pulls only the binary for your platform. npm i -g ovecc keeps it on your
PATH.
Prebuilt binaries are also on the latest release: Linux
x86_64 and aarch64, Windows x86_64, macOS arm64. There is nothing else to
install: DuckDB is bundled, there is no runtime, and it works fully offline. A
rolling dev build ships on every push to main.
The macOS binary is unsigned, so Gatekeeper quarantines it when a browser downloads it. Clear the flag once and it runs:
curl and npm don't set that flag, so npx ovecc never runs into it.
Build from source
Builds with stable Rust (on Windows use the windows-gnu toolchain; DuckDB is
compiled from source on the first build). The step-by-step Windows setup is in
docs/dev/SETUP.md.
The binary is ovecc (crates/ovecc-cli).
Quick start
If you only ever run three of these, run advise before editing a file,
diagnose instead of violations (same findings, plus the fix and when not
to act), and history to see whether the codebase is improving. summary
prints these as a footer, because a list read once loses to output read every
run.
Every command renders as text, json, ndjson, or markdown via --format
(plus sarif for GitHub code scanning and codeclimate for GitLab Code Quality)
and returns stable exit codes for CI. The full per-command reference, with real
output, is in docs/COMMANDS.md. For pull requests, the repo
ships a drop-in GitHub Action that indexes base and head, comments
the review findings on the PR, and gates on severity.
The architecture contract in depth
.ovecc/architecture.toml is your intended architecture as code. Each component
claims files by path glob; depends_on is the allow-list of what it may import.
ovecc architecture init writes the first draft from the graph you already have,
so every entry mirrors a real import and day one has zero violations. Prefer a
known shape? init --template fsd (or bulletproof-react, nx-workspace,
clean-architecture) drops in a reference architecture, and the diff against your
code becomes your migration plan.
From then on, each run compares code to contract and names what it finds:
- a divergence is an import the contract does not allow,
- a bypass is an import that skips a component's declared public interface,
- an absence is a dependency you declared but never actually use.
Three more checks read past the import graph (JS/TS):
slices = trueisolates a component's sub-folders from each other, the rule behind Feature-Sliced Design and bulletproof-react, with FSD's@xpublic-API escape hatch honored.deny_capabilitiesforbids a component the ambient powers that break purity:network,filesystem,storage,dom,process,time,random. ADate.now()in a pure domain comes back with its file and line.max_cyclomatic/max_cognitiveput a per-function complexity budget in the contract, so "keep the core simple" becomes a rule the build can check.
Interfaces are virtual: you list a component's public entry files and ovecc enforces them on the real imports, so you get encapsulation without barrel files or an extra re-export layer.
Adoption is meant to be gradual. check --freeze records today's violations in a
per-component baseline (one line each, so branches merge cleanly), gates only new
ones from then on, and drops entries as you fix them so the count never climbs.
Agents can read the contract before editing, through ovecc architecture show <path> or the ovecc_architecture MCP tool.
Rules
Simpler, language-neutral policy lives in .ovecc/config.toml, is enforced at
index time, and shows up in violations (and the gate CI check):
Silence a single finding inline with // ovecc-ignore (or
// ovecc-ignore-next-line, and # ovecc-ignore in Python) on the offending
line; it is dropped at index time.
For CI and coding agents
Every command is built to run in a pipeline: pick a format with --format, rely
on stable exit codes (0 clean, 1 a --fail-on threshold crossed, 2 and up
a real error), and emit sarif or codeclimate for GitHub and GitLab. The
drop-in GitHub Action wires review into pull requests.
The same analysis is available to coding agents over the Model Context Protocol.
ovecc mcp runs an MCP server over stdio that exposes each command as a tool
(ovecc_summary, ovecc_impact, ovecc_architecture, ...), so an agent can ask
"is this export used?", "what is the blast radius of BillingService?", or "does
this PR break the architecture contract?" and get the same deterministic answer.
Register it with any MCP client:
With the binary already on PATH, "command": "ovecc" and "args": ["mcp"] start it
without the npm lookup.
Start with ovecc capabilities --format json: it returns every command, the
metrics and rules they emit (each with a definition), the severity vocabulary,
and the exit-code contract, enough to drive an audit without reading these docs.
Every command's JSON is a stable, self-describing envelope, normalized to
repo-relative POSIX paths and byte-identical across runs. The full walkthrough is
in docs/dev/MCP.md.
Languages
The JavaScript and TypeScript family is parsed with tree-sitter and enriched by
the pure-Rust oxc stack: real tsconfig path and exports resolution
(oxc_resolver), plus per-function complexity and exports
(oxc_parser/oxc_semantic). One tree-sitter adapter covers Python, Go, Rust,
and C++. They all feed the same language-agnostic model, so resolution, the call
graph, taint, and the rules work across every supported language. Adding a
language is a new extractor behind the parser boundary, not a core change.
Workspace layout
Ten library crates and one binary, each documented in its own README.md (plus
xtask, the std-only task runner behind cargo xtask):
Design guarantees
- Deterministic before generative. Every finding traces back to explicit facts; the same input produces the same output.
- Local and private. Indexing, analysis, and explanation run on the machine; nothing leaves it.
- Incremental. Re-indexing an unchanged repository re-parses nothing and writes only a new snapshot.
License
MPL-2.0; see LICENSE. Every file in this repository is covered by it
unless the file itself carries a different SPDX-License-Identifier header. Files
with a different header are adapted from
fallow and remain MIT; third-party
attributions are in THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md.
Releases up to and including v0.2.5 were published under Apache-2.0 and remain available under it.
來源:README.md,提交 571f596
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.3.1最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分