Noether Physics

io.github.Ranshiv由 GitHub 帳號 Ranshiv 發布v0.1.2更新於 Oct 24, 2026

Physics assistant: checked equations, live simulations, claims verified against arXiv papers

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

物理研究助理:講解概念、執行模擬、檢查方程式,並對照真實 arXiv 論文核驗引用。

可以做什麼
  • 以類比講解物理概念,提供經量綱檢查的方程式與重新計算的例題
  • 執行六種物理模擬(單擺、阻尼/受迫振盪、含阻力拋體、Rabi、退相干、Jaynes-Cummings),並回報漂移與解析解比對
  • 檢查方程式的量綱一致性,未宣告的符號回傳 unknown 而非猜測
  • 匯入 arXiv 的 LaTeX 原始檔,列出其中方程式並在論文庫中檢索
  • 稽核草稿的參考文獻,於 arXiv、Crossref、OpenAlex 與 INSPIRE 解析每一筆引用
適用情境
適合需要可核驗依據的物理問答:講解概念、快速跑模擬、檢查方程式,或在投稿前找出草稿中不存在或無法解析的參考文獻。
執行需求
以 PyPI 套件 noether-physics 透過 stdio 在本機執行,需安裝 mcp 附加元件;需要 Python 3.12+ 以及連線 arXiv 與引用索引的網路。量子模擬需安裝 quantum 附加元件(QuTiP)。未宣告任何帳號、API 金鑰或環境變數。
安裝前請注意
驗證關卡只確認引文真實存在,不確認其支持該論述,因此應自行閱讀所引原文。引用解析器僅以 8 筆偽造文獻測試,涵蓋範圍也小(58 篇論文、8 個概念)。稽核在引用無法解析時以非零狀態結束,可能中斷 pre-commit 鉤子。arXiv 禁止大量爬取,此工具逐篇抓取並間隔 3 秒。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Noether Physics,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

NOETHER

A physics research assistant that shows its work.

Explains physics concepts with everyday analogies, dimension-checked equations, worked examples it recomputes, and simulations it actually runs. Answers questions from real arXiv papers with every sentence anchored to a verbatim span. Audits your own draft's bibliography for references that don't exist.

bash
pip install noether-physicsnoether explain decoherence

On 0.1.0 or 0.1.1? Upgrade. Those releases confirm fabricated references — the specific failure this tool exists to prevent. See CHANGELOG.md.


Read this before you trust it

This is a research-integrity tool, so its limits matter more than its features.

The verification gate checks that a quote is real. It does not check that the quote supports the claim. A claim can contradict its own citation and still pass. Demonstrated during development: a claim asserting "the experiment detected a nonzero neutron EDM at five sigma" was accepted while citing a passage reporting d_n = 0.0 ± 1.1 × 10⁻²⁶ e·cm — a null result. The quote was genuine, so the gate let it through. Closing that gap needs entailment checking, which needs a language model, and keeping the model outside the verifier is what makes the other guarantees meaningful. So every answer this tool emits ends by saying so, and you should read the quotes.

The reference resolver is now measured in both directions. It resolves 86.5% of real references and was fooled by 0 of 8 deliberately fabricated ones. That second number did not exist until a labelled benchmark was built for it — and the first run of that benchmark caught the resolver confirming 80% of fabrications, some at 0.95 confidence. Three defects were found and fixed. Eight fabrications is still a small sample: 0% means "fooled by none of eight", not "cannot be fooled".

It is small. 58 papers in the test corpus, 8 concepts in the explanation library, quantum coverage limited to two-level systems and one cavity mode. No PDF fallback, so roughly 9% of quant-ph papers (measured: 5 of 55) cannot be ingested at all.

docs/DEFERRED.md is the full account — every gap, with the measurement behind it. It is the honest document; this README is the summary.


Why it exists

2026 audits found a 17% phantom-citation rate in AI-assisted survey papers — references resolving to no digital object — and roughly 146,900 AI-generated fake citations across 2.5M papers in 2025. arXiv now bans authors who submit hallucinated references.

Physics has a structural advantage nobody exploits: arXiv distributes the actual LaTeX source. Equations arrive with their \labels, citations with their \cite keys, sections with their real structure — read, not guessed. Tools in other fields OCR PDFs because their domains have no source. Physics does.

What it does

Explains. Curated prose, not generated — then machine-checked. Every equation is parsed and dimension-checked; every worked example is recomputed and compared against its stored answer, so a typo in the library fails CI rather than teaching you a wrong number.

bash
noether explain decoherence          # analogy, maths, worked example, live simulationnoether concepts                     # what the library covers

Simulates. Six models — pendulum, damped/driven oscillator, projectile with drag (SciPy); Rabi, decoherence, Jaynes-Cummings (QuTiP). Every run halves the step size and reports the drift, and where a closed form exists the numerics are compared against it automatically.

bash
noether simulate rabi --params "detuning=6.28" --blochnoether models

Checks equations. Undeclared symbols return unknown, never a guess — h is Planck's constant or a height, T a period or a temperature. unknown is not a pass.

bash
noether eq 'T = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}' --units 'T=second,L=meter,g=meter/second**2' --vary 'L=0.1..2' --at 'g=9.81'

Reads papers. Ingests LaTeX source, so "equation 14" means the equation the authors numbered 14.

bash
noether ingest 2001.11966noether equations arXiv:2001.11966noether find "vacuum Rabi oscillations"

Audits your draft. Resolves every \bibitem against arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex and INSPIRE. Exits non-zero on unresolvable references or cite keys with no bibliography entry, so it works as a pre-commit hook.

bash
noether audit path/to/your-paper.tex

Measured results

Run noether bench status yourself. As of the last run:

gateresultthresholdverdict
equations100% (31/31)90%pass
retrieval83.3% (10/12) at top-3 of 58 papers80%pass
citations86.5% (32/37)85%pass
resolver0% false positives (0/8 fabrications)≤10%pass

Read these with their scope attached. "Right paper in the top 3" over 58 papers is a real task; over 8 it was nearly free, and an earlier run reported a meaningless 100% because top_k exceeded the corpus size. The citation threshold is 85% rather than 100% because books, theses and pre-digital articles are genuinely not in any index — the residual failures on the nEDM letter are a 1954 Danish journal, a 1955 Pauli chapter and a 1982 Oxford book.

Use it from Claude

bash
pip install "noether-physics[mcp]"claude mcp add --scope user noether -- python -m noether.mcp_server

14 tools. Claude reasons and writes; NOETHER retrieves, checks and records. There is deliberately no write_answer tool — the component that can hallucinate is not the component that decides what ships.

Install

bash
pip install noether-physics              # corepip install "noether-physics[quantum]"   # + QuTiP simulationspip install "noether-physics[mcp]"       # + MCP server

Python 3.12+. From source: uv venv && uv pip install -e ".[dev,quantum,mcp]", then uv run pytest (288 tests, no network — cassettes default to replay and a miss is an error, not a live fallback).

Terms

arXiv forbids bulk crawling. This fetches one paper at a time behind a 3-second interval and caches permanently, so a given paper is downloaded exactly once. Every source, its rate limit and its terms are declared in research/sources/source_registry.yaml; a source not in that file is not called.

No AI-generated imagery. Every figure is extracted from a real paper or rendered deterministically from code and data, and is tagged with which.

Licence

MIT — see LICENSE. Release history: CHANGELOG.md.

The name honours Emmy Noether. The PyPI distribution is noether-physics because noether belongs to an unrelated physical-units library; the command is noether either way.

來源:README.md,提交 35faf21

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.1.2最新Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分