Arbitype

io.github.Renwang-Huang由 GitHub 帳號 Renwang-Huang 發布v0.7.0更新於 Oct 24, 2026

Typed decision tools for AI agents, powered by TypeSafe Jev.

已驗證STDIO僅桌面開發者工具AI 與機器學習

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

Arbitype 是一個本機 MCP 伺服器,為助理提供型別化決策工具——分類、評分、核查、驗證、閘控、路由與審查,由 TypeSafe Jev 驅動。

可以做什麼
分類、評分與判定:從無序標籤中選一個、給出有序評級,或為單一有界條件給出機率,並附分布。驗證與審查:獨立核查多條具名主張,或對整體品質與風險給出帶證據的評估。閘控與路由:把檢查項目和門檻轉換為通過、複核或失敗,或給出一個建議的下一步動作而不執行它。評估與健康檢查:執行自訂的型別化問題集,或檢視本機設定並可選擇檢查服務商狀態。
適用情境
當代理需要有限、結構化的判斷而非自由文字時使用,例如把支援請求路由到一個下一步動作、核查拉取請求中的主張,或依門檻閘控一次發布。適合希望為決策附上機率的工作流程。
執行需求
以本機 stdio 程序執行,透過 uvx 啟動或從 PyPI 安裝,需要 Python 工具鏈。需要環境變數 TYPESAFE_API_KEY,可選 TYPESAFE_MODEL 選擇模型。它透過 HTTPS 呼叫 TypeSafe Jev 服務商,因此需要網路存取。
安裝前請注意
TYPESAFE_API_KEY 憑證會傳送給 TypeSafe Jev 服務商,即時服務商檢查被說明為需主動開啟且付費。機率與信賴度只是模型訊號而非證明,gate 與 review 僅為建議性判斷轉換,不是授權、安全或審批系統。此伺服器不會執行其建議的動作,也不會編輯檔案或執行 shell 指令。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Arbitype,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

Arbitype

Typed decision tools for AI agents.

Classify · Score · Verify · Gate · Route · Review

MCP-native · Powered by TypeSafe Jev

[CI] [Latest release] [Arbitype on PyPI] [MIT license] [Python 3.10 or newer] [MCP 2026-07-28] [Arbitype listed in the MCP Registry]

Quick start · Why Arbitype? · Tools · Benchmarks · Documentation

What is Arbitype?

Arbitype is an MCP-native typed decision layer for AI agents, powered by TypeSafe Jev. It turns probabilistic judgments into structured decision primitives that an agent or program can consume directly.

Arbitype is available on PyPI and the official MCP Registry.

[!NOTE] Arbitype is an independent open-source project. It is not an official TypeSafe AI product or an official integration for any particular agent host.

Quick Start

The fastest way to connect an MCP host is a local STDIO server launched by uvx:

bash
export TYPESAFE_API_KEY="your-key"uvx arbitype

For a pinned, reproducible launch:

bash
uvx --from 'arbitype==0.7.0' arbitype

Or install the package into the current environment:

bash
python -m pip install arbitypearbitype

The API key stays in the process environment. It is not an MCP argument and is never printed to standard output.

Host setup

Inspect detected hosts before writing anything:

bash
arbitype setup --detect --dry-run

Then apply a reviewed plan:

bash
arbitype setup codexarbitype doctor --json

The setup flow is plan → unified diff → confirmation → backup → apply. Use claude, cursor, or vscode in place of codex. Detailed host formats, secret forwarding, --yes, --remove, ownership, and non-interactive behavior are documented in docs/HOST_SETUP.md.

Configuration

At minimum, set TYPESAFE_API_KEY. To select a model explicitly:

bash
export TYPESAFE_API_KEY="your-key"export TYPESAFE_MODEL="jev-latest"

See the full configuration reference for endpoints, timeouts, retries, and request/response limits.

Compatibility

arbitype is the canonical distribution, Python package, and CLI. Existing TypeSafe MCP users should migrate to Arbitype; see docs/REGISTRY_MIGRATION.md.

For the safe migration from the historical distribution:

bash
python -m pip uninstall typesafe-mcppython -m pip install arbitype
SurfaceCanonicalLegacy compatibility
PyPI / CLIarbitypetypesafe-mcp, typesafe-codex-mcp
Python importsarbitypetypesafe_mcp, typesafe_codex_mcp
MCP toolsroute, reviewcodex_route, codex_review

Why Arbitype?

Arbitype is designed around contracts and bounded decisions rather than free-form prose:

PrincipleWhat it means
Contract-firstRequests and provider responses are validated before they reach the agent.
Safe by defaultCredentials stay out of MCP tool arguments and generated host configuration.
Agent-orientedPurpose-built classify, verify, gate, route, review, and score primitives.
PortableZero third-party runtime dependencies and standard MCP STDIO.
MeasuredPublic tool-selection and decision-stability evaluation assets.

The decision flow is:

text
free-form state      ↓  TypeSafe Jev      ↓probabilistic judgment      ↓    Arbitype      ↓typed decision + probability      ↓agent / code branch

Real Use Cases

Start with one of the small, runnable fixtures:

ScenarioToolWhat it demonstrates
Support routingrouteChoose one next action without executing it.
PR verificationverifyCheck several claims independently.
Release reviewreview / gateSeparate holistic review from thresholded checks.
Agent next steprouteKeep the next workflow action bounded.

The example outputs are illustrative fixtures. They are not live model results, accuracy claims, or authorization decisions.

Tools

Arbitype advertises nine read-only, idempotent MCP tools:

ToolUse whenResult
evaluateYou need a custom typed Jev question set.Raw typed Jev response.
classifyYou need one choice from unordered labels.Choice and probability distribution.
scoreYou need one ordered rating or level.Weighted score and distribution.
checkYou need a probability for one bounded criterion.Noul yes/no probability.
verifyYou need several named claims checked independently.Noul answer per claim.
gateYou need checks and thresholds transformed into a signal.pass, review, or fail.
routeYou need one suggested next action.One action; no action execution.
reviewYou need a holistic quality or risk assessment.Review decision and evidence.
healthYou need local diagnostics or an explicit live check.Configuration and optional provider health.

Tool Selection Guide

NeedUseDo not substitute
One unordered labelclassifyroute, which selects an action
One ordered ratingscoreclassify, which has no order
One bounded propositioncheckverify, which handles multiple claims
Several named claimsverifyreview, which assesses a whole object
Checks plus thresholdsgatereview, which is holistic
One next actionrouteclassify, which returns a category
Whole diff, plan, release, or reportreviewverify, which answers claim by claim

Tool descriptions also state USE WHEN and DO NOT USE WHEN boundaries so hosts can select a primitive without hidden prompt conventions.

Probabilities and confidence are model signals, not proof. gate and review are advisory decision transformations, not authorization systems, security boundaries, or approval engines.

Architecture

mermaid
flowchart LR    host["AI Agent / MCP Host<br/>Codex · Claude · Cursor · VS Code"]    arbitype["Arbitype<br/>Typed decision tools"]    jev["TypeSafe Jev<br/>System One Model"]    env["TYPESAFE_API_KEY<br/>process environment"]
    host -->|MCP| arbitype    arbitype -->|validated HTTPS| jev    jev -->|typed probabilistic judgment| arbitype    arbitype -->|structured decision| host    env -. credential .-> arbitype

The public product is Arbitype; TypeSafe Jev is the current provider. Provider configuration intentionally keeps the TYPESAFE_* names because the credential and endpoint belong to TypeSafe.

Benchmark Snapshot

Recorded on the public 120-case Jev-mediated tool-selection evaluation:

MetricResult
Tool-selection accuracy96.67%
Invalid-tool rate0%
Schema-valid rate100%

This is a Jev-mediated evaluation over Arbitype's advertised MCP tool catalog. It is not a Codex, Claude, or Cursor host benchmark and is not a general model-performance guarantee.

Details and reproducible assets:

Security Boundaries

Arbitype is a local MCP adapter and typed decision layer. It is not:

  • a sandbox for untrusted code;
  • an authorization or identity system;
  • a prompt-injection firewall;
  • a security approval boundary; or
  • an official TypeSafe AI product.

It does not execute actions suggested by route, edit files, run shell commands, or treat model probabilities as proof. Read SECURITY.md before using live credentials.

Documentation

Development

The test suite uses local fakes and does not need an API key:

bash
python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -vpython3 -m compileall -q .make checkmake release-check

The official MCP Python SDK interoperability smoke test is in scripts/official_sdk_smoke.py. A live Jev check is opt-in and paid:

bash
TYPESAFE_API_KEY="your-key" arbitype doctor --live

Normal CI does not call the provider or run paid benchmarks.

來源:README.md,提交 e0c3bc3

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

2
  1. v0.7.0最新Sep 22, 2026
  2. v0.6.0Sep 22, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分