
Axiom Meridian
io.github.abeljumanuel由 GitHub 帳號 abeljumanuel 發布v0.1.0更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Serves only the team rules and lessons learned relevant to a project. Code drifts. Meridian doesn't.
發布方自己的服務:Axiom
概覽
一個本機 MCP 伺服器,將團隊的程式碼規則與經驗教訓以 Markdown 建立索引,只向助理提供與目前專案或任務相關的那一部分內容。
- 可以做什麼
- 依作用域查詢規則與經驗教訓,可依類別、嚴重程度和標籤篩選,支援選用的語意排序,沒有嵌入時退回 SQL 篩選。依適用規則審查拉取請求與規劃中的功能。從會議紀錄擷取候選規則與經驗教訓,產生待審提案。建立、審閱並核准提案,在單一交易中寫入 Markdown 檔案與 SQLite 索引。產生專案技能檔案,並檢視上下文、時間軸與存取日誌。
- 適用情境
- 適合 AI 程式助理反覆讀取冗長規範與經驗教訓檔案的團隊,希望在變更正式生效前經過人工核准,並依專案與框架限定知識範圍。最適合在開發者電腦上的 Claude Code 等支援 MCP 的用戶端使用。
- 執行需求
- 本機 Python 3.11+ 套件,透過 uv 安裝(uvx 或 uv tool install)。選用環境變數 KNOWLEDGE_BASE_PATH 指定 Markdown 與 SQLite 知識庫位置,未設定時使用作業系統特定的使用者資料目錄。環境變數 MERIDIAN_ACCESS_LEVEL 設為 read、analyze(預設)或 write。語意搜尋需選用 RAG 元件(約 900 MB 機器學習函式庫),否則僅用 SQL 篩選。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Axiom Meridian,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
Index
- Project fact sheet
- General product description
- System architecture
- Data model
- API specification
- User stories
- Work tickets
- Pull requests
0. Project fact sheet
0.1. Your full name:
Juan Manuel Rojas González ([email protected])
0.2. Project name:
Axiom Meridian — "Code drifts. Meridian doesn't."
0.3. Brief project description:
An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that centralizes a team's institutional technical knowledge — coding rules and lessons learned — and delivers only the slice relevant to the current task, instead of forcing AI agents to read entire knowledge-base files on every session.
0.4. Project URL:
Not applicable (MCP) — Axiom Meridian is an MCP server for local use (stdio) or, optionally, HTTP/SSE bound to 127.0.0.1; there is no publicly reachable deployment URL.
0.5. Repository URL or compressed file
https://github.com/abeljumanuel/axiom-meridian-project
1. General product description
1.1. Objective:
Teams that work with AI coding agents accumulate institutional knowledge as long Markdown files: coding standards per language/framework, architecture decisions, and "lessons learned" from production incidents. This works while the files are small, but as they grow it creates three problems: every agent session re-reads the whole file even when only two or three rules apply to the current task (context and latency cost), relevance is all-or-nothing (there's no notion of "this project uses Quarkus, that one uses Spring Boot"), and there is no governance (anyone can edit the file directly, with no review or traceability).
Axiom Meridian solves this by indexing rules (RN-*) and lessons (LL-*) in an atomic block format, resolving a scope hierarchy (project → framework → language → global) to decide what applies to a given project, and serving only that filtered subset — optionally ranked by semantic relevance — through typed MCP tools. The Markdown files remain the single source of truth, and every change goes through explicit human approval.
More detail in Project Charter and Product Description.
1.2. Key features and functionality:
- Scoped knowledge queries —
query_rules/query_lessonsresolve a project's effective scope chain, apply category/severity/tag filters, and return only active, matching entries. - Atomic, traceable format — every rule or lesson is a self-contained Markdown block (
## RN-JAVA-011,## LL-PSP-003) with structured fields, deterministically parseable and indexable. - Governed lifecycle — extraction and legacy-file migration never write directly to active knowledge; everything lands first in
pending_proposals, andapprove_proposalpromotes the change to the Markdown file and the SQLite index in a single transaction. - PR and feature auditing —
audit_prsurfaces the relevant rules/lessons before a merge;check_feature_against_rulesdoes the same during the planning phase. - Meeting transcript extraction —
extract_rules_from_transcript/extract_lessons_from_transcriptturn meeting notes into candidate proposals. - Hybrid retrieval (SQL + RAG) — when embeddings exist, queries rank by semantic similarity (
BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5via ChromaDB); when they don't, it transparently falls back to SQL filtering, without changing the tool's signature. - Access control and audit log — every tool is gated by an access level (
read/analyze/write); every invocation is recorded, excluding sensitive parameters. - Ecosystem skill generation —
generate_project_skillsemits.claude/skills/files following theagentskills.ioconvention.
Full list in Product Description § Core Capabilities.
1.3. Design and user experience:
By design, Axiom Meridian has no graphical interface of its own: it is an MCP server consumed programmatically by AI agents (Claude Code, VSCode, OpenCode, Kimi CLI) through tool calls, not by a human user navigating screens. The current "user experience" is that of an agent invoking a tool and receiving a scope-filtered JSON response.
A read-only visual panel for a human (knowledge curator or platform admin) to inspect the server's state without writing scripts — server health, scope hierarchy, rule/lesson counts, pending proposals, an embedding projector — is under construction: it is a component explicitly contemplated in the backlog, not part of the current baseline. See US-H1 — Inspect Meridian's status and contents visually (Epic H) and its associated ticket, TICKET-017.
1.4. Installation instructions:
Meridian is a Python 3.11+ package (axiom-meridian) installed with uv, which fetches a compatible Python on its own. Being a standard MCP server, it can be consumed by any protocol-compatible IDE or CLI (Claude Code, VSCode, Cursor, OpenCode, Kimi CLI), but it is optimized for and tested primarily against Claude Code.
macOS / Linux — one-line install:
Any OS, Windows included (PowerShell or a terminal with uv installed):
On Windows, install uv first with powershell -ExecutionPolicy ByPass -c "irm https://astral.sh/uv/install.ps1 | iex"; no installer script is needed there, since meridian setup is plain Python.
install.sh is a thin wrapper around those same commands: it installs uv if missing (after asking), runs uv tool install, and hands off to meridian setup, which asks before configuring each detected client (Claude Code, VSCode, Cursor, OpenCode, Kimi CLI), never overwrites existing knowledge-base files or registrations that point at a different install, and finishes with meridian doctor. Run from a clone (bash scripts/install.sh), it installs that checkout in editable mode.
Claude Code plugin (server + usage skill in one unit): /plugin install meridian --marketplace abeljumanuel/axiom-meridian-project.
Semantic search is optional: install axiom-meridian[rag] (~900 MB of ML libraries) to rank free-text queries by meaning; without it, queries fall back to SQL filtering and generate_embeddings returns a RAG_NOT_INSTALLED error.
KNOWLEDGE_BASE_PATH is optional — Meridian auto-creates the knowledge base directory if it isn't set (~/.local/share/meridian on Linux, ~/Library/Application Support/meridian on macOS, %APPDATA%/meridian on Windows). Per-client configuration, upgrading, installing from source, and troubleshooting: docs/installation.md.
2. System Architecture
2.1. Architecture diagram:
Meridian follows a layered architecture: MCP tool registration → domain tool layer → parsers/RAG/persistence, with a single write choke point (write_block) that keeps the SQLite index in sync with the Markdown files. This pattern was chosen because the project's non-negotiable requirement is that Markdown remains the source of truth while SQLite acts only as an index and state layer; a "database as source of truth" architecture would have been simpler to implement, but would have broken the human reviewability (diff-friendly, Git-versionable) that is the project's whole reason for being. The trade-off accepted in exchange is an extra freshness-validation layer (indexed_files, mtime + sha256) to avoid serving out-of-sync content.
(Diagram inferred directly from the reference implementation's source code — src/meridian/ — and previously documented in docs/03-system-architecture.md.)
2.2. Description of main components:
2.3. High-level project description and file structure
Note: this repository (
axiom-meridian-project) is the capstone's documentation deliverable and hostsdocs/,openspec/, andprompts/. The source-code structure shown below corresponds to the server's reference implementation (working checkoutaxiom-meridian/), which evolves in parallel to this documentation and is what the already-delivered tickets (section 6) build on.
In this repository (axiom-meridian-project), the structure reflects its documentation-first nature:
2.4. Infrastructure and deployment
Meridian requires no cloud infrastructure: it is a local process invoked by the MCP client (stdio) or, optionally, an HTTP/SSE server bound exclusively to 127.0.0.1 (meridian serve <port>), never 0.0.0.0. In HTTP mode a random session token is emitted at startup, required as Authorization: Bearer <token> on every request; the token is never persisted and rotates on every restart.
There is no documented deployment/CI pipeline in this repository yet — the current "deployment" is the local install via scripts/install.sh described in section 1.4. Hardening a networked deployment (multi-client, TLS, rate limiting) is identified as future work in TICKET-015.
2.5. Security
- A higher level includes all lower levels.
- An insufficient level returns a structured
ACCESS_DENIEDerror naming the required level. - Every call — granted or denied — is recorded in
access_log, excluding sensitive parameters (pr_diff,feedback_text,text,proposed_text,new_text). <private>tags are stripped from all inbound text before persistence, on every write path.- The HTTP/SSE transport is bound to
127.0.0.1by design and requires a bearer token (see 2.4).
2.6. Tests
The reference implementation's test suite follows a four-level pyramid, run with pytest / pytest-asyncio:
- Unit (
tests/unit/) — parsers (atomic_parser,legacy_parser),scope_resolver,id_generator,migrations,security,serializers,connection, among others. Validate each module in isolation. - Integration (
tests/integration/) — full end-to-end flows: index + query, proposal lifecycle, access control, RAG queries, skill generation, external file edits. - Contract (
tests/contract/) — verifies that the exposed MCP tool signatures don't change in a backwards-incompatible way. - Benchmarks (
tests/benchmarks/) — performance regression guards; excluded from the default run (addopts = "-m 'not benchmark'"inpyproject.toml) and invoked explicitly with-m benchmark.
Every relevant bug fix (see ADR-003 through ADR-006 in System Architecture) added its own regression test before closing, and the delivered tickets (section 6) reference the specific test file covering their acceptance criteria.
3. Data Model
3.1. Data model diagram:
(ERD verified against the real schema in src/meridian/db/schema.sql of the reference implementation — 17 tables, 1:1 match.)
3.2. Description of main entities:
Extended detail, including the atomic block format and the ID-generation strategy, in docs/04-data-model.md.
4. API Specification
Meridian does not expose a conventional REST API: it exposes a set of typed MCP tools (25+ in the reference implementation — query_rules, audit_pr, create_pending_proposal, etc.), invoked through the MCP protocol (stdio or HTTP/SSE) rather than HTTP routes with verbs. Forcing an OpenAPI 3 specification onto this interface would be misleading: OpenAPI models resources and HTTP verbs, whereas an MCP tool is a function with an input/output schema (JSON Schema) and a "an action a model can invoke" semantics — closer to a function signature than to an endpoint.
As a formal alternative, this project will adopt a Semantic Tool Definition via Declarative Schema, or Model-Oriented Documentation: one document per tool specifying, in JSON Schema, its input parameters, the required access level (read/analyze/write), the response shape, and invocation examples — the same kind of contract already validated by tests/contract/test_mcp_tool_signatures.py in the reference implementation, but exposed as product documentation rather than only as a test. This convention has been identified but is not yet implemented in the project's documentation; it will be addressed in a later delivery, documenting at minimum the three most-used tools (query_rules, audit_pr, create_pending_proposal/approve_proposal).
5. User Stories
Full catalog (8 epics, As a / I want / so that format, MoSCoW priority) in docs/05-user-stories.md. Below, 3 representative ones:
User Story 1 — US-A1 — Query relevant rules for my project (Epic A, priority Must, tool query_rules).
User Story 2 — US-B3 — Review and approve a proposal (Epic B, priority Must, tools list_pending_proposals / approve_proposal / reject_proposal).
User Story 3 — US-C1 — Audit a pull request against known rules (Epic C, priority Must, tool audit_pr).
6. Work Tickets
Full catalog (delivered + backlog, traced to OpenSpec) in docs/06-work-tickets.md. Below, one backend, one database, and one frontend ticket:
Ticket 1 (Backend) — TICKET-001 — MCP server scaffold and core tool surface. Stands up the FastMCP server, the server.py security pattern, the SQLite schema, and the initial tool set. Status: Done.
Ticket 2 (Database) — TICKET-008 — Indexed read path with per-file freshness (ADR-005). Adds indexed_files, rule_tags, lesson_tags; introduces write_block as the single write choke point; moves detail="full" reads to SQLite validated by per-file freshness. Status: Done.
Ticket 3 (Frontend) — TICKET-017 — Read-only observability dashboard, corresponding to US-H1. A read-only web dashboard (server health, scope hierarchy, pending proposals, embedding projector) as a separate local process, reusing knowledge_consumption as a library. Status: Backlog — this is the only frontend component contemplated in the project; its formal specification lives in openspec/changes/add-observability-dashboard/.
7. Pull Requests
Only Pull Requests that close a complete, verifiable deliverable are referenced here. The first valid deliverable is the baseline technical documentation (project fact sheet, description, architecture, data model, user stories, work tickets) — this very README and
docs/.
Pull Request 1 — #1 — Removing duplicates (merged). Cleanup of duplicated content in the baseline documentation prior to this delivery.
Pull Request 2 — Pending. Will be referenced once a PR contains the full first delivery: "Technical documentation: project fact sheet, description, architecture, data model, user stories, work tickets."
Pull Request 3 — Pending.
License
Axiom Meridian is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. See NOTICE for attribution.
The names "Axiom Meridian" and "Axiom JUMA" and their marks are not licensed under the Apache License (section 6, Trademarks). Using them requires the owner's permission.
License transition: versions made available before the change to Apache 2.0 were declared under the MIT License, and copies obtained under those terms remain available under them.
Third-party: the .claude/skills/openspec-* skills are generated by OpenSpec and keep their own MIT license.
Contributions are welcome under the Apache License 2.0 with a DCO sign-off; see CONTRIBUTING.md.
來源:README.md,提交 122e5c9
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.1.0最新Oct 15, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分
其他 Axiom 整合

Axiom
co.axiom官方發布者
Axiom 是一個遠端 MCP 伺服器,讓助理列出資料集與結構定義、執行 APL 查詢,並使用提示詞進行探索、異常與監控工作。
Axiom Lab — AI Pitch Deck & Business Video MCP
由 GitHub 帳號 Axiom-lab-tech 發布
遠端 MCP 伺服器,可將簡報、投影片、產品照片與需求文件轉成經品管檢查的商業影片,付費算圖前先免費產生方案。

AXIOM
由 GitHub 帳號 dragoscv 發布
AXIOM 是給編碼代理用的事務性寫入閘門:在允許的儲存庫根目錄內規劃、檢查、預覽並原子套用檔案變更,並保留可回溯的日誌。

OWL class axiom count, body discarded
由 GitHub 帳號 sadri-dridi 發布
遠端 MCP 端點,提供一批小型、大致無狀態的實用檢查:URL 與主機名稱結構、HTTP 狀態、時區、JSON 合法性與簡單算術。

Axiom — Advanced Math
由 GitHub 帳號 tufantunc 發布
本機 MCP 伺服器,透過 Giac/Xcas 與 math.js 讓助理進行精確的符號與數值數學運算:求解、驗證命題、繪製函數圖。