
Sonde
io.github.anishmoncivarghese由 GitHub 帳號 anishmoncivarghese 發布v0.4.4更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Local code graph for TypeScript, Python and Swift: who calls this, what breaks if I change it.
概覽
Sonde 會把本機的 TypeScript、Python 或 Swift 儲存庫索引成符號層級的圖譜,讓助理一次呼叫就能查詢符號、呼叫端與變更影響。
- 可以做什麼
- 在已索引的儲存庫圖譜中依名稱或查詢尋找符號(find_symbols)。查詢符號之間的關係,例如誰呼叫了某個函式(query_graph)。取得變更的影響範圍,包含相關測試,可依 git diff 計算並受 token 預算限制(get_impact_radius)。搭配的命令列工具還能建立與更新索引、查看狀態與漂移,並依圖譜產生架構文件。
- 適用情境
- 適合助理需要回答程式碼庫的結構性問題時,例如誰呼叫了它、改動會破壞什麼、哪些測試相關,並希望比搜尋迴圈用更少的呼叫與上下文得到答案。不適合沒有共同詞彙的行為類問題,專案明確表示不提供這項能力。
- 執行需求
- 從 npm 套件 @cheppulabs/sonde 安裝的本機程序,需要 Node 22 或更新版本。在專案中執行 sonde init 以建立索引並在專案的 .mcp.json 中註冊伺服器,也可手動索引與設定。不需要帳號、託管服務、API 金鑰或環境變數。Python 儲存庫需使用 --resolve 選項才能取得可用的結構性結果。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Sonde,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
Sonde
A local code-context engine for AI coding agents. Sonde indexes a TypeScript,
Python, or Swift repository into a symbol-level graph in SQLite and exposes
three MCP tools — find_symbols, query_graph, and get_impact_radius — so an
agent can answer who calls this, what breaks if I change it, and which
tests relate to it in one call instead of a search loop.
What the benchmark actually shows
The honest claim is not "finds what grep cannot". A competent agentic search loop finds the same structural evidence — we measured it, on a real 19,409-line repository, and it scored 1.000 recall on every task.
The claim is the same answers for a fraction of the cost, inside a budget:
Sonde matches the baseline's answers on every structural task while using ~3× less context, 8× fewer calls, and ~147× less wall-clock time — and it never exceeds the caller's token budget, because the packer truncates to it by construction. That is the trade being offered.
Where it loses. Behavioural queries with no shared vocabulary — "where is the retry backoff decided?" — score 0.00. Local semantic retrieval was built and measured and does not fix it (see the design doc §2.2); the capability is therefore not claimed. If your questions are mostly of that shape, an agentic search loop is the better tool today.
Numbers are reproducible: npm run bench:fixture && npm run bench:large.
Full results in BENCHMARK-LARGE.md and
BENCHMARK.md.
Install and run
sonde init indexes the repository and registers sonde as an MCP server in
this project's .mcp.json, asking before it writes anything (skip the prompt
with sonde init --yes). It never touches an .mcp.json it can't safely merge
into — an existing sonde entry that differs from what init would write is
left alone and reported, not overwritten.
For Python repositories, use sonde init --resolve; the default tree-sitter
tier did not pass the project's placement gate for structural queries.
Equivalent by hand, if you'd rather see every step:
No account or hosted service is required.
Architecture documentation
sonde doc writes an ARCHITECTURE.md describing the
repository's modules, how they depend on each other, and what each one exposes —
generated from the graph, so it reports what the code actually does rather than
what someone remembered.
It is meant to be committed and regenerated, not hand-edited. Regeneration is
byte-identical when nothing changed, so it does not churn your diffs; when two
branches both regenerate it, resolve the conflict by running sonde doc again
rather than merging by hand. It refuses to overwrite an ARCHITECTURE.md it did
not generate.
Three things it deliberately does not do:
- It does not draw a dependency it cannot evidence. Module pairs that merely
share symbol names are excluded and counted separately. On this repository two
adapters share the filenames
symbols.ts,parser.tsandreferences.ts, which manufactured 62 heuristic "references" between modules that never import each other — once the second-heaviest arrow in the diagram. - It does not pretend the diagram is complete. The diagram shows the
heaviest dependencies and states how many it omitted; the table below it goes
further, and
--modulehas the rest. A diagram containing every dependency is unreadable and therefore shows nothing. - It does not claim to be current when it is not. The header names the commit it describes and warns when files have changed since.
What it guarantees
- Never returns stale source bytes. Whenever a response includes source, Sonde re-reads and re-hashes the indexed byte range before returning it (spec §8.1, Guarantee A).
- Always reports structural drift, rather than claiming completeness it
cannot verify (spec §8.1, Guarantee B).
sonde statusshows the same drift and tier distribution carried by tool response envelopes. - Every edge is tier-labelled by how it was found —
COMPILER(resolved exactly by a bundled type checker under--resolve: the TypeScript compiler for TypeScript, pyright for Python),LEXICAL(resolved through an import binding or lexical scope),HEURISTIC(member access or another relationship requiring type inference),EXTERNAL(target outside the indexed repository), orUNRESOLVED(genuinely unplaceable, with a reason). - Never fabricates an edge. An unresolved reference becomes
EXTERNALorUNRESOLVED— never a guessed target and never a silently dropped reference.
Accuracy
Sonde measures its zero-setup tree-sitter path against the TypeScript
compiler on a pinned fixture and publishes the result, unflattering numbers
included (spec §12). COMPILER edges use that compiler directly, so comparing
them back to the same authority would not be an independent accuracy test.
Sonde edge accuracy vs the TypeScript compiler
Generated: 2026-08-23T18:16:41.557Z TypeScript: 5.9.3 (bundled; repository TypeScript is never loaded)
What these numbers cover. The oracle measures the tree-sitter resolution
path — the zero-setup default, and the only tier whose accuracy is in question.
COMPILER-tier edges come from the TypeScript compiler itself, so scoring them
against the same compiler would measure nothing; they are exact by construction
and excluded from these figures. Run sonde index --resolve to produce them.
The oracle is filtered to in-repo targets; node_modules and .d.ts
declarations are excluded. Type-only references, JSX intrinsics, export =,
decorators, and declaration merging are known expected divergences (spec §10).
Tier rows compare that tier alone with the complete oracle, making each tier's
independent contribution visible; ALL is the combined result.
Why precision below 1.000 is expected here
These divergences are structural, so reading a precision figure as "how often Sonde is wrong" overstates the error rate:
- Ambiguous member calls emit every candidate. For
x.foo()with two visiblefoodeclarations, Sonde emits both as confidence-weightedHEURISTICedges. At most one matches the compiler, so the other counts as a false positive by construction. The alternative is guessing a single target, which invariant 1 forbids — a wrong resolved-looking edge is worse than two honestly heuristic ones. Precision is therefore capped below 1.000 wherever the fixture contains an ambiguous call. - Constructor calls are ours alone. Sonde emits
CALLSfornew Foo(); the oracle does not model them, so each one is a false positive against ground truth that omits it. - Member-level IMPLEMENTS is ours alone. Sonde derives an
IMPLEMENTS edge from
RegExpRouter.addtoRouter.addonce the class declares it implements the interface. tsc reports heritage clauses at the type level only, so every member-level edge counts as a false positive against ground truth that does not model them. The capability is the reason impact on an interface method works at all, so the precision cost is disclosed rather than removed.
Counts are absolute, not percentages of a large corpus. Fixture edge totals appear below so a single edge's effect on each figure is visible.
tests/fixtures/repos/small
Fixture config SHA-256: e02e2d5003f96d1ad22519f04e10d687fe689cf9298e7fcbc588eab525dce1ad
Oracle edges: 9 · Sonde edges: 7 · one oracle edge moves recall by 11.1%
Overall: precision 0.571, recall 0.889
Regenerate with npm run bench:oracle.
CLI
impact also accepts repeatable --symbol options and
--token-budget <n>. The init, index, update, status, search, query,
impact, doctor, and clean commands accept --json.
Known limitations
- Node 22+ is required.
better-sqlite3needs it; installing on an older Node prints anEBADENGINEwarning but still completes. Ifsondethen fails to run, this is why — upgrade Node rather than ignore the warning. - Python needs
--resolve, and its edges are not oracle-verified. Without it, Python indexes at the tree-sitter tier only, which measured 62.81% unresolved on a real 56-file project and 57.39% on pydantic — far past the 30% ceiling this project requires, so it is not fit for structural queries. With--resolve, a bundled pyright drives aCOMPILERtier and the same corpora measure 27.00% and 17.42% unresolved. That gate measured placement — whether a reference found a target — not whether the target was correct; TypeScript's edges are scored againsttscinORACLE.mdand Python has no equivalent oracle. On the worse corpus the margin is thin: 0.28 points once a known upward bias is reversed. Seeprobes/python-placement/FINDINGS.md. - TypeScript, Python and Swift only; no other language adapter.
- Swift resolution is heuristic, not compiler-backed, and one narrowing
rule is unvalidated. References are narrowed by file visibility and
explicit local type annotations, not full type inference. On a real
376-file Swift application this reached 74.84% placed / 25.16% unresolved
— see
probes/swift-narrowing/FINDINGS.mdfor the full measurement. The third narrowing rule (SwiftPM target boundaries) has never been tested: the validating corpus was an Xcode project, which has noPackage.swiftlayout to supply that signal. The curated Swift SDK symbol table is also deliberately conservative — several ambiguous names were dropped rather than guessed, so some legitimate SDK references may still show asUNRESOLVEDrather thanEXTERNAL. - Compiler resolution for TypeScript (
--resolve) is opt-in because it is materially slower and uses more transient memory. On the 19,409-line Hono fixture, default indexing took 3.58 s;--resolvetook 13.70 s, added 10,329 exact placements/promotions, and changedcallers_of Hono.routefrom zero graph results to eight compiler callers. The Program is discarded after indexing; inline refresh stays compiler-free and explicitly downgrades affected evidence until a fullsonde update --resolve. - Compiler resolution uses bundled TypeScript 5.9.3, not the repository's own
compiler, so version skew is possible and disclosed in
doctorand response envelopes. - A file with a parse error still contributes whatever tree-sitter
recovered from it — this is deliberate (see the design spec §8). Its
parse_stateispartialwhen real declarations were recovered despite the error, orfailedonly when nothing usable came out of it at all. TESTSedges indicate structural relatedness only; they never prove coverage.- Type-only references, JSX intrinsics,
export =/import =, decorators, and declaration merging are known gaps in the tree-sitter extraction path. - No rename inference. Renaming a file changes every stable key derived from its path; anything holding an old key (a saved query, an agent's prior turn) will silently stop resolving rather than following the rename.
- Semantic/behavioural search is not available. It was built and measured —
two embedding models, four document configurations — and none of them beat
lexical/structural retrieval on the task class it was meant to help with.
See design spec §2.2 for the numbers. It is not wired into
find_symbols.
See
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-16-sonde-design.md
for the full design.
來源:README.md,提交 a052d93
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.4.4最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分