Ratatosk Mcp

io.github.basphere由 GitHub 帳號 basphere 發布v0.10.0更新於 Oct 28, 2026

CNCF release intelligence: typed changes from release notes; check_stack compares versions locally.

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

把 CNCF 發布情報以 MCP 工具形式提供給助理,可檢查升級路徑、瀏覽結構化變更紀錄並跨版本追蹤問題。

可以做什麼
  • 檢查技術棧升級路徑:比對你執行的元件版本,把變更分成必須處理與視設定而定兩類
  • 瀏覽變更串流:依專案、類別或處理桶篩選結構化變更,並用游標分頁
  • 依識別碼反查:找出涉及某個 CVE 編號、CRD、功能開關、參數、設定欄位或相依套件的所有變更
  • 追蹤問題與版本:查看某個問題出現的所有版本、讀取單一版本的完整內容,或列出專案最新版本
  • 探索專案:列出被追蹤的專案及其標準 slug
適用情境
適合維護或升級 Envoy、Istio 等 CNCF 專案時使用,讓助理整理升級路徑上的安全修正、破壞性變更、移除項目與預設值變動,並附上發布說明原文引用作為依據。
執行需求
以本機 stdio 程序執行,通常透過已發布的容器映像啟動,也可使用託管的遠端端點。不需要帳號或 API 金鑰。容器方式需要 Docker;託管端點依呼叫方限流。
安裝前請注意
發布分析為 AI 產生的參考資訊,不提供任何保證,行動前應核對原始發布說明。使用託管端點時,check_stack 的參數會經過伺服器記憶體,CDN 環節的連線中繼資料依該服務商政策處理;自架可讓版本留在本機。get_release 等需指定版本的工具會把該版本放入上游請求路徑。自架可透過 MCP_AUDIT 開啟選用的稽核串流。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Ratatosk Mcp,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

[Ratatosk, a messenger squirrel with a scroll in its bag, waving hello]

ratatosk-mcp

Ratatosk reads CNCF release notes every hour. Your agents get the changes.

English · 한국어 · 日本語

[MCP Registry] [Release] [License] [Glama score]


In Norse myth, Ratatoskr is the squirrel that carries messages up and down the world tree. This one carries release intelligence. ratatosk.io watches 76 CNCF projects and turns every release note into typed, entity-level changes: security fixes, breaking changes, removals, deprecations, changed defaults — each one classified by how you should act on it now. Routine lines are recorded too, but kept out of the way.

This repository is the MCP server that hands those changes to your agent as tools. MCP (Model Context Protocol) is the open standard AI agents use to call external tools; any MCP-capable client — Claude Code, Claude Desktop, kagent, your own SDK agent — can connect. No account, no API key.

Two ways to connect

Hosted — nothing to install. Register https://ratatosk.io/mcp as a remote MCP server in any client that supports remote connectors. The hosted endpoint allows each caller 60 tool calls a minute, counted per caller rather than pooled — for polling or CI workloads, self-host. With the Claude Code CLI:

bash
claude mcp add --transport http ratatosk https://ratatosk.io/mcp

Self-hosted — the same server, running as your own process. Run it with Docker, the Helm chart, or a source build. With Claude Code and Docker installed:

bash
claude mcp add ratatosk -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/basphere/ratatosk-mcp:0.10.0

0.10.0 is the current release; use latest to follow new ones.

Either way, verify the connection:

bash
claude mcp list# ratatosk: … - ✔ Connected

Then ask your agent a question the tools can answer:

You: "We run envoy v1.36.8 and istio 1.30.1. Anything we must do before upgrading?"

Your agent calls check_stack and answers from the record: the CVEs fixed after your version, the APIs removed on your upgrade path, the defaults that changed — separated into what applies to everyone and what applies only if your configuration matches. Each change carries a verbatim quote from the release notes as evidence.

One entry from a real check_stack answer, as the agent receives it (istio, measured 2026-08-20):

json
{  "severity": "high",  "family": "security",  "bucket": "action",  "applies_if": "uses JWKS Resolver",  "quote": "- CVE-2026-31837 / GHSA-v75c-crr9-733c : (CVSS score 8.7, High): JWKS Resolver Failure May Allow Authentication Bypass Using Known Default Keys.",  "same_matter_also_addressed_in": ["1.28.5", "1.29.1"]}

applies_if is a condition the agent evaluates, not prose to read: a stack that runs no JWKS resolver skips this entry without asking anyone. The answer also carries its own privacy line, verbatim: "versions were compared locally; only project slugs were sent to the server."

Other clients (Claude Desktop, kagent, in-cluster agents) and the full setup reference: see the install guide.

Tools

Two things the tools speak in. A change is one thing a release did, taken from an official release note and tied to the exact identifiers it touches (a CVE id, a flag, a CRD, a config field), with a verbatim quote as evidence. Every change carries three axes:

  • family — security, breaking, or deprecated: what kind of thing it is.
  • bucket — action (applies to everyone), check (only if applies_if matches your setup), plan (announced for later), other (the full record).
  • applies_if — a boolean expression you can evaluate against your own manifests, not prose to read.

A matter is the issue underneath, identified by matter_key and stable across releases and branches: the same security roll-up landing on five branches shares one key. Severity lives on the cited advisories and is read from the ledger's current value, not frozen at analysis time.

ToolWhat it does
check_stackTakes the component versions you run and returns the changes on your upgrade path, split by bucket: action_required applies to everyone, check_config only if its applies_if holds. The comparison happens inside the server process — which is your own process when you self-host (how your component versions are handled)
list_changesThe incremental change feed, oldest-analyzed first. Filter by project, family, or bucket; page with the since cursor to keep a local copy in sync
changes_by_entityReverse lookup: every change touching one exact identifier — such as a CVE id, CRD, feature gate, flag, config field, or dependency
get_matterEvery release in which one matter appeared. The same roll-up lands on several branches carrying different advisories — told only the newest, you would assume you were covered
get_releaseOne release in full: its changes, a summary, and the link to the original note. A release with zero changes means it was read and found routine
list_releasesThe newest releases of one project as one-line summaries (dates, counts by bucket and family, highest advisory severity), newest first — the tool for "what changed in X lately"
list_projectsThe roster of tracked projects and their canonical slugs (the short project id every other tool takes) — look names up here instead of guessing

Full per-tool parameters, example calls, and measured responses live in the tools reference.

How your component versions are handled

Self-hosted: check_stack sends only project slugs to the server and compares versions locally, inside this process — the versions you pass it never reach ratatosk.io. The server publishes changes; your agent decides what applies. The version normalizer is bundled (internal/version), so range comparison happens client-side too. This holds for upgrade questions as well: the upstream API has a convenience endpoint (/v1/upgrade/{project}) that receives caller-supplied versions — check_stack does not call it; the comparison is in the source you can read.

One limit on that guarantee: it covers check_stack. Tools that take a version as an argument — get_release(project, version) — put that version in the upstream request path, because fetching a specific release means naming it. That named path is not kept on my side, though: before a log line is written, query strings are stripped and /v1/releases/… and /v1/upgrade/… paths are reduced to their prefix, so neither the slug nor the version lands in a log.

Hosted: your check_stack arguments (the versions you run) pass through the server's memory to produce the same answer, and are not written down. Here is what each layer on the way keeps:

  • The hosted MCP process itself logs only its startup line — a normal request adds nothing.
  • The upstream API's request log writes one line only when the caller sends a traceparent, and that line carries a normalized endpoint label and the trace id — never a path, query, or body.
  • The front-door access log strips query strings, reduces /v1/releases/… and /v1/upgrade/… paths to their prefix, masks caller IPs, and has no field for request bodies.

The hosted endpoint runs with its audit stream off, and I keep it off — not recording request content is the operating stance for that endpoint. One boundary I do not control: connection metadata on the CDN leg follows the CDN provider's own policy. If your requirements rule out that transit, self-host: then only project slugs leave your infrastructure on a check_stack call.

Self-hosting adds the opposite capability: an opt-in audit stream (MCP_AUDIT=metadata or full) that records who called which tool, emitted inside your own infrastructure into your own collectors. The hosted endpoint has none by design. Details in the install guide.

Documentation

Upstream API

This server is a thin client over the public REST API. If you would rather call it directly, GET /v1 on ratatosk.io describes itself. No API key; rate limited at 1200 requests per minute per IP.

Data & terms

The data is served free of charge by ratatosk.io — a term that may change, with advance notice — under its terms of service. Analyses are AI-generated reference information with no warranty — check the original release notes before acting, especially when an agent acts on your behalf. Original notes belong to their respective projects; responses that carry a full note include an attribution notice (raw_notes_notice).

License

The code in this repository is licensed under Apache-2.0.

來源:README.md,提交 b2e0d33

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.10.0最新Oct 17, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分