
Evidrift
io.github.bm1016bm-svg由 GitHub 帳號 bm1016bm-svg 發布v0.4.0更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Catch TypeScript API and OpenAPI contract drift in AI-generated code, then revalidate it in CI.
概覽
將 TypeScript 呼叫簽章或儲存庫內的 JSON 值記錄為內容定址憑證,並在 CI 中重新驗證,以捕捉 API 契約漂移。
- 可以做什麼
- Evidrift 是一個本機優先的 CLI,並提供僅用於契約記錄的 STDIO MCP 伺服器。透過 MCP 工具 evidrift_record 與 evidrift_record_json_pointer,助理可以鎖定一項明確假設:已安裝 TypeScript 符號的簽章,或透過 RFC 6901 JSON Pointer 從儲存庫本機 OpenAPI 或 JSON Schema 檔案中選出的標準值。每項假設都會成為 .evidrift 下的內容定址憑證,之後 evidrift check 會重新載入來源並重算契約,給出 PASS、WARNING 或 FAIL。另有僅限 CLI 的 ReproMin 工作流程,透過向回送 HTTP 目標重放來最小化失敗的 JSON 請求。
- 適用情境
- 當 AI 產生或人工撰寫的程式碼依賴可能漂移的外部契約(例如 TypeScript 相依套件簽章或 OpenAPI operationId),並希望在合併前重新檢查該假設時使用。它適合為 CI 加入確定性、非 LLM 契約閘門的團隊。它不是通用的契約測試、靜態分析或正確性證明工具。
- 執行需求
- 需要 Node.js 22 或更新版本;可透過 npx 從 npm 套件 evidrift 執行,或安裝為開發相依套件。MCP 伺服器透過 STDIO 在本機執行,不需要帳號、API 金鑰、雲端後端或網路存取。記錄前目標儲存庫中需已初始化 .evidrift/evidence.lock,且被檢查的相依套件必須已安裝在該儲存庫中。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Evidrift,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
Evidrift — replay-verified JSON reductions and API drift evidence
[CI] [npm version] [Website] [Indexed on TensorBlock MCP Index] [bm1016bm-svg/evidrift MCP server]
Failures arrive noisy. APIs drift quietly. Evidrift turns both into deterministic evidence.
Evidrift has two deliberately separate workflows:
- ReproMin repeatedly removes JSON data, replays each candidate against a disposable local HTTP target, and keeps only reductions that still match the selected failure identity.
- Contract drift records an exact TypeScript call signature or repository JSON value as a content-addressed Receipt, then makes CI recompute it before merge.
Local-first CLI. STDIO MCP server for contract recording only. No account, cloud backend, telemetry, or LLM judge.
[Evidrift — AI dependency lockfile]
The animation is rendered from a captured CLI transcript. The PASS, changed signatures, affected file, and deterministic FAIL come from an actual local evidrift demo run; only the scene headings are editorial.
Quick Start — Minimize a Failing Request
Requires Node.js 22 or newer. The zero-setup demo starts a disposable loopback server, verifies one HTTP failure, minimizes its JSON request, verifies the result again, and shuts the server down:
The result is not selected by an LLM. Every accepted reduction is actually replayed and must match both the expected HTTP status and error identity.
For your own local endpoint:
Then replay the content-addressed artifact once:
See the complete ReproMin fixture, guarantees, and replay safety boundary.
Quick Start — See Drift in One Command
Requires Node.js 22 or newer. Nothing to install globally:
The command creates a disposable local fixture, records the optional options parameter on parseConfig, checks it successfully, changes the fixture so options is required, then proves that evidrift check catches the mismatch. It runs no downloaded package code.
If that is a failure you want caught before merge, star Evidrift on GitHub.
Real-world Lab — React 19 useRef
The synthetic demo is fast; this source-repository lab proves the same workflow against a real,
documented ecosystem change. React's official upgrade guide says React 19 makes the first
useRef argument required. Evidrift records the no-argument overload from
@types/[email protected], upgrades only that type package to @types/[email protected], and reports the
missing overload:
Both package versions are exact and verified after installation. The lab disables dependency
lifecycle scripts, and its final evidrift check must return a deterministic contract mismatch.
See the reproduction and complete trust boundary and the
official React 19 upgrade guide.
Supported Today
Installation — Add It to a Repository
Initialize the current repository without a global install, account, API key, or cloud backend:
To add an idempotent pull-request workflow with file-and-line annotations:
The initializer detects npm, pnpm, or Yarn, adds scripts.evidrift:check, and creates
.github/workflows/evidrift.yml. Existing scripts and workflows are reported and preserved
instead of being overwritten.
To pin Evidrift for a team or CI workflow:
That is the product: make an AI assumption reviewable now, then make CI check the same contract later.
Use It in a Repository
The dependency must already be installed inside the target repository, and the affected code path must name a real file.
When --code includes a line containing an overloaded call, Evidrift asks TypeScript which overload that call actually resolves to. --overload <number> remains an explicit fallback for incomplete or non-compiling call sites.
Lock one value from a repository-local OpenAPI or JSON Schema document:
JSON Pointer follows RFC 6901, including ~1 for / and ~0 for ~. Evidrift reads .json files only; it never fetches URLs or resolves remote references.
Coding agents call the same core through evidrift_record and evidrift_record_json_pointer. Minimal Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor setup is included.
How It Works
The CLI and MCP server are thin entry points over the same core. The complete component map, check policy, resource bounds, and trust boundary are documented in Architecture.
The Files
Evidrift writes one lock and one immutable JSON file per Receipt:
There is no .evidrift/receipts.json. evidence.lock contains only content-addressed Receipt IDs:
Each Receipt stores the claim and affected code plus one deterministic contract: an installed TypeScript symbol signature, or a repository JSON path, pointer, canonical value, and hashes. See the Receipt schema.
Add It to CI
Generate the package script and read-only pull-request workflow:
The generated package script pins the current Evidrift release:
Run the same pinned check locally with npm run evidrift:check.
The generated workflow installs locked repository dependencies with lifecycle scripts disabled, then runs the Marketplace Action. Contract mismatches and integrity failures become PR errors at the affected file and line; source-change and unavailable-evidence results become warnings.
With --format json, GitHub workflow commands are written to standard error so standard output
remains valid JSON. The complete GitHub Actions setup documents the generated
workflow, permissions, package-manager behavior, and manual setup.
The root action.yml provides a Marketplace-ready contract check. It runs only the
network-free contract workflow; ReproMin replay is never triggered by that Action.
CI Behavior
evidrift check does not trust saved matched or verified flags. It validates the Receipt, reloads the source, and recomputes the selected signature or JSON value.
For CI systems, coding agents, and other tools, request a versioned JSON report without changing those exit codes:
The report includes schemaVersion, the Evidrift version, summary counts, and the ordered CheckResult objects. It contains no timestamp or absolute repository root, so equal results serialize identically. See the JSON check report contract.
A one-line manual edit to a Receipt produces an actionable integrity report:
The project workflow runs the full gate on Linux and Windows with Node.js 22 and 24. Third-party Actions are pinned to full commit SHAs.
In a human TTY, check, diff, explain, and demo use a spinner plus green ✅, yellow ⚠, and red ❌ status output. Redirected output, CI, TERM=dumb, and NO_COLOR stay ANSI-free and keep the stable plain-text format used by agents and tests.
Why This Is Not RAG, Sonar, or AI Review
Use all of them if they help. Evidrift covers one gap: the reason code was written can go stale even when the code itself did not change.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is API drift?
API drift is a change to a dependency or contract after code was written against it. Evidrift checks two deterministic forms: the TypeScript call signature selected at an affected code location, and a canonical value selected from repository-local OpenAPI JSON or JSON Schema.
Is Evidrift a contract-testing tool?
It is narrower than end-to-end contract testing. Contract tests exercise provider and consumer behavior; Evidrift locks one explicit assumption that influenced code and revalidates that assumption in CI without running dependency code.
Does Evidrift work with Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor?
Yes. They can call the local STDIO MCP server to create Receipts through the shared verification core. The agent cannot directly mark a Receipt as verified. See the minimal MCP configurations.
Does Evidrift fetch OpenAPI URLs or execute package code?
The contract adapters do not. They inspect installed TypeScript declarations and repository-local .json files without fetching URLs, resolving remote $ref, importing dependency JavaScript, or executing arbitrary commands.
minimize and reproduce are separate, explicit replay commands. They send JSON only to literal loopback HTTP addresses after --confirm-replay yes; they never run during check or through the MCP tools.
Does Evidrift prove that AI-generated code is correct?
No. It detects deterministic evidence drift and Receipt tampering. It does not prove runtime correctness, validate free-text semantics, or eliminate hallucinations. See What Evidrift Does Not Prove.
CLI
Repository-scoped commands accept --root <repo>. record requires an initialized .evidrift/evidence.lock; repro-demo and mcp do not use a repository root.
evidrift mcp starts the same local STDIO server exposed by the evidrift-mcp bin. It exists so package registries and MCP clients can launch Evidrift deterministically from the main npm package.
Trust Boundary
.evidrift/receipts/*.json is untrusted input. Every check:
- Strictly validates lock and Receipt schemas.
- Derives file paths only from full SHA-256 IDs.
- Recomputes the expected contract hash and Receipt content hash.
- Resolves declarations or repository-local JSON without importing package JavaScript, running shell commands, making network requests, or calling an LLM.
- Reports evidence integrity, source drift, semantic support, and runtime correctness separately.
The parser refuses more than 1,024 Receipt IDs or 64 call signatures per symbol. TypeScript evidence is confined to repository files and capped at 256 source files, 2 MiB per file, and 16 MiB total. JSON sources are capped at 4 MiB and selected canonical values at 1 MiB. Dynamic text is rejected or escaped so a Receipt cannot inject terminal controls or fake CI lines.
Content hashes detect inconsistent edits; they do not prove authorship. Someone who rewrites a Receipt, recalculates its ID, and changes evidence.lock can create new internally valid evidence. Git review and branch protection must catch that replacement. See Architecture.
ReproMin has a separate boundary because replay can cause side effects. It accepts only literal loopback HTTP targets, refuses redirects and common secret-shaped input, requires explicit replay confirmation, caps requests and response inspection, and never runs from check or the MCP server. The artifact records what Evidrift observed; its content hash detects inconsistent edits but does not authenticate probe history. reproduce verifies one current replay.
What Evidrift Does Not Prove
Evidrift does not prove code is correct. The contract workflow does not prove a free-text claim, execute runtime behavior, eliminate hallucinations, scan dependency vulnerabilities, or validate arbitrary URLs.
ReproMin does not prove a global minimum or identify the root cause. Without an exhausted budget it establishes only 1-minimality under its documented JSON reducers and the chosen failure predicate. A weak predicate can still describe the wrong bug, which is why status alone is rejected.
The contract workflow resolves overloaded TypeScript calls from the affected path:line when the consumer code compiles and TypeScript can identify one declared overload. Invalid, ambiguous, or missing calls are refused rather than guessed; --overload is the explicit fallback. The Receipt stores the selected normalized signature and hash, so declaration reordering does not cause false drift.
The json.pointer adapter locks canonical values in repository-local .json files. It does not support YAML, URLs, remote $ref, schema validation, or semantic equivalence. It follows repository-local TypeScript declaration imports, but does not expand every named type into a deep structural contract. Missing or unreadable source is a visible but non-blocking warning. These are deliberate limits, not hidden guarantees.
The runnable boss-fight test resolves one of three overloads from a real call using a complex cross-file type alias, survives declaration reordering, and deterministically fails when only the selected overload changes.
Development and UAT
npm run verify runs the release gate. Tests use temporary fixtures and disposable loopback servers; they require no secrets, paid APIs, Evidrift backend, or external network access. The detailed UAT report maps each acceptance case to an automated test and states the remaining risks.
License
來源:README.md,提交 a410e93
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.4.0最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分