
agenthold
io.github.edobusy由 GitHub 帳號 edobusy 發布v0.10.0更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Shared versioned state for multi-agent AI workflows
概覽
為多個 AI 代理提供具版本的共享狀態與衝突偵測,讓並行寫入被拒絕而非默默覆蓋。
- 可以做什麼
- agenthold 是一個 MCP 伺服器,為多代理工作流程提供具版本的共享狀態,採用樂觀並行控制:每個值都帶版本號,若寫入時傳入的版本已過期,寫入會被拒絕並回傳 ConflictError。標準模式提供五個協調工具——register、claim、release、status 與 wait——讓代理對某個資源取得獨占存取、記錄 modified、created、deleted 或 moved 等結果,並等待被占用的資源釋放。進階模式增加直接讀寫版本化儲存區的底層原語,包括 get、set、list、history、delete、watch、clear 與 export。它也可以直接當作 Python 函式庫使用。
- 適用情境
- 當多個代理或行程可能先讀取再寫入同一個值、檔案或資源,而默默覆蓋會破壞結果時使用,例如共享預算、訂單紀錄或同時編輯的檔案。也適合需要帶稽核軌跡的占用與釋放協定、想了解誰改了什麼的情境。它不是協調框架,而是位於協調層之下。
- 執行需求
- 以 Python 套件形式在本機執行(pip 或 uvx),由 MCP 用戶端透過 stdio 啟動。需要以 --db 指定 SQLite 資料庫路徑,首次執行會自動建立。選用參數可設定工作區、占用逾時,以及 HTTP 傳輸的主機、連接埠與路徑。HTTP 模式可透過 AGENTHOLD_AUTH_TOKEN 環境變數或 --auth-token 要求 bearer 權杖。不需要帳號或 API 金鑰。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 agenthold,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
agenthold
Stop your AI agents from silently overwriting each other.
When two agents update the same value, the second write quietly destroys the first. No error, no exception, just wrong data and a system that keeps running. agenthold is an MCP server that gives agents shared, versioned state with conflict detection built in. Think of it as git for your agents' working memory.
[CI] [PyPI version] [PyPI Downloads] [Coverage 80%+] [Python 3.11+] [Ruff] [Glama score] [License: MIT]
The problem
When two agents update the same value at the same time, the second write silently overwrites the first. No exception is raised. The value is wrong. The system keeps running.
[Without agenthold: the silent overcommit problem]
Two agents read a $10,000 budget and allocate from it independently. Total committed: $15,000. The budget object never complains. This is a read-modify-write conflict: each agent's write assumes nothing changed since its read.
How it works
agenthold solves this with optimistic concurrency control (OCC), the same mechanism Postgres uses in UPDATE ... WHERE version = N and DynamoDB uses in conditional writes.
Every value stored in agenthold has a version number. When an agent writes, it passes the version it read. If the stored version has changed since the read, the write is rejected with a ConflictError that includes the current value. The agent re-reads, recalculates, and retries.
[With agenthold: conflict-safe allocation]
The losing agent detects the conflict, re-reads the real remaining budget ($2,000), and adjusts its allocation. The total committed is always exactly $10,000. Every write is tracked.
OCC is the right fit for agent workflows because:
- Agents do work between reads and writes (network calls, LLM inference). You cannot hold a database lock across that work.
- Conflicts are rare. Retrying once is cheaper than acquiring a lock on every read.
- The retry logic is simple, explicit, and fully in the agent's control.
Works with any agent framework
agenthold connects via MCP (Model Context Protocol), the open standard for tool integration. Any framework that speaks MCP can use agenthold with zero glue code.
agenthold is not a framework. It is shared infrastructure that sits underneath your orchestration layer, the same way a database sits underneath your application. Your agents keep their existing tools and logic; agenthold adds the coordination primitive they are missing.
Not using MCP yet? agenthold also works as a Python library you can call directly from any framework. Import
StateStore, call.get()and.set()with version checks, and you have conflict-safe shared state.
Architecture
Every write carries a version number. If the stored version has changed since an agent's read, the write is rejected and the agent retries with current data. This is the same mechanism used by Postgres conditional updates and DynamoDB conditional writes.
Quick start
1. Install
2. Add to your MCP client config
3. Done
Agents automatically coordinate. No CLAUDE.md, no system prompt changes, no namespace design.
When an agent connects, it sees five self-documenting tools: agenthold_register, agenthold_claim, agenthold_release, agenthold_status, and agenthold_wait. The tool descriptions tell the agent when and how to use each one. Server instructions reinforce the protocol when the MCP client includes them.
Resources
agenthold identifies resources by canonical URIs. Tools accept either form:
- Bare path (e.g.
"src/main.py") — resolves against the workspace nameddefault, or the only configured workspace if exactly one exists. - Explicit URI —
"file://<workspace>/<path>"for files,"custom://<name>"for opaque resources.
Equivalent inputs (./src/main.py, src\main.py, src//main.py, an absolute path inside the workspace) all canonicalize to the same internal URI, so two agents using different shorthands never fragment the keyspace. Path traversal (..) and dot segments (.) are rejected at the boundary.
On case-insensitive filesystems (Windows and macOS by default), file resources are matched case-insensitively, so src/Main.py and src/main.py resolve to the same resource — two agents can't both claim the same physical file. This follows the running platform; custom:// names are always case-sensitive.
Configure workspaces with --workspace name=path (repeatable). With no flag, agenthold creates a single default workspace at the current working directory. Multi-workspace setups let one agenthold process coordinate across separate codebases.
Tools
agenthold exposes five coordination tools by default.
agenthold_register
Register yourself and receive a unique agent ID. Must be called once before using agenthold_claim or agenthold_release.
agenthold_claim
Claim exclusive access to a resource before modifying it. Requires a registered agent_id.
Claimed (you hold exclusive access):
If the resource has a non-trivial prior history (deleted, moved, abandoned, or expired), the response also carries previous_outcome, previous_holder, previous_outcome_at, and a hint describing what the previous holder did. For previous_outcome: "moved", moved_to is the new resource URI.
Busy (another agent is working on this resource):
Already claimed (you already hold this claim, idempotent):
agenthold_release
Release your claim with an explicit outcome describing what you did. The outcome is preserved in the free-state record and shown to the next claimant so they don't act on stale assumptions. Requires a registered agent_id.
Outcomes: released (default — no lifecycle claim), modified (changed in place), created (didn't exist before), deleted (no longer exists at this resource), moved (relocated — also pass moved_to with the new resource).
For renames (mv old new): claim BOTH paths, do the rename on disk, then release the source with outcome: "moved", moved_to: "new" and the destination with outcome: "created".
agenthold_status
Check whether a resource is available or currently claimed. Does not require registration.
Available:
If a previous holder declared a non-trivial outcome (deleted, moved, abandoned, expired), the response also includes previous_outcome, previous_holder, previous_outcome_at, and a hint. For moved, moved_to is the new resource URI.
Claimed:
agenthold_wait
Wait for a claimed resource to become available. Blocks the agent turn until the holder releases, or the timeout expires.
Available (resource was released):
When the wait fires on a release with a non-trivial outcome, the response also carries previous_outcome, previous_holder, previous_outcome_at, optional moved_to, and a hint. An agent that was waiting to edit a moved or deleted resource learns why the path became available.
Timeout:
Advanced tools
For custom coordination protocols, agenthold exposes eight low-level primitives via --tools advanced:
agenthold_get · agenthold_set · agenthold_list · agenthold_history · agenthold_delete · agenthold_watch · agenthold_clear_namespace · agenthold_export
These give agents direct read/write/watch access to the versioned state store with full OCC conflict detection. No server instructions are sent in this mode.
See the full advanced tools reference →
Conflict detection
The read-modify-write pattern with expected_version is the core of agenthold. Here is the canonical retry loop:
Why this works: The version number is the contract. If the stored version has advanced since your read, another agent wrote first. You take the current value, recalculate, and try again. The number of retries is bounded by the number of concurrent writers. In practice, agents almost never conflict more than once.
Why not locks? Locks require a lease mechanism (what happens if the agent crashes holding a lock?), add latency on every read, and interact badly with the long I/O waits inherent in agent workflows. OCC pays a cost only when there actually is a conflict.
Use as a Python library
What it looks like in practice
In a multi-agent session, the coordination is automatic. An agent's tool calls look like this:
No system prompt engineering. The tool descriptions guide the agents.
Worked examples
Two worked examples are included, each with a "before" and "after" script.
Order processing: two agents update the same order record concurrently:
Budget allocation: two agents draw from a shared marketing budget:
Configuration
The database file is created automatically on first run. Back it up like any other SQLite file.
HTTP transport
By default agenthold speaks stdio: your MCP client spawns one agenthold subprocess per agent, and those subprocesses coordinate through the shared SQLite file on the same machine. That is perfect for local, single-machine multi-agent runs.
To coordinate agents that live in different processes, containers, or hosts, run one long-lived agenthold server over Streamable HTTP and point every agent at it:
Then connect MCP clients by URL instead of by command:
All five standard tools (and the advanced set, with --tools advanced) work
identically over HTTP — only the transport changes. Because a single server now
serves many agents over its lifetime, set --claim-ttl so a claim held by an
agent that disconnects is automatically reclaimable.
Authentication
To require a bearer token on every HTTP request, set one or more tokens. Prefer the environment variable so the token doesn't appear in process listings:
Clients then send the token in the Authorization header:
Requests without a valid token are rejected with 401 before reaching the store.
Tokens are compared in constant time. Authentication applies to --transport http only (stdio is a trusted local transport). This release is all-or-nothing
authentication; per-namespace scoping is on the roadmap.
The AGENTHOLD_AUTH_TOKEN value is split on commas, so a token itself must not
contain a comma (use repeated --auth-token for such tokens). If authentication
is requested but every token is blank, the server refuses to start rather
than serving without auth.
Security. Bearer tokens are only as private as the transport carrying them — put TLS in front of agenthold (a reverse proxy) for any real deployment. The default bind address is
127.0.0.1(localhost only); binding beyond localhost without--auth-tokenprints a startup warning. Pass--allowed-host <host>(repeatable) to enable DNS-rebinding (Host-header) protection — note this is not authentication and does not replace--auth-token.
Long-lived servers. agenthold does not yet reap idle agent records, so a server that runs for a very long time with high agent churn will accumulate agent metadata. Set
--claim-ttl(so disconnected agents' claims recover) and restart periodically if needed. Automatic reaping is on the roadmap.
Inspecting the store
An agenthold database is just a SQLite file, but you rarely want to open it by
hand. The agenthold command doubles as a read-only inspector so you can see
what agents are doing at a glance — no MCP client required. These commands are
strictly read-only (the database is opened with query_only and no schema
writes), so they never modify the store — even if you point --db at the wrong
file.
Example:
Every command accepts --db PATH (default ./agenthold.db) and --json for
machine-readable output. A bare agenthold (no subcommand) still starts the MCP
server exactly as before — the inspector is purely additive.
Development
Run the tests:
Check coverage:
Lint and type-check:
CI runs on Python 3.11 and 3.12 on every push to main. See CONTRIBUTING.md for detailed guidelines.
Technical notes (design decisions for engineers)
Why SQLite?
SQLite is the right tool for this scope. It is zero-dependency, ships in the Python stdlib, and runs everywhere. WAL mode is enabled so that read-only operations (exports, watches) do not block writers across processes. Write transactions use BEGIN IMMEDIATE to acquire the write lock upfront, ensuring OCC conflict detection works correctly even when multiple agenthold processes share the same database file. busy_timeout is set to 5 seconds so a second writer waits rather than failing immediately. Postgres adds an ops dependency with no benefit at this scale. The storage backend is behind a clean interface (StateStore) that can be swapped for Postgres when the need arises. Choosing a simple tool deliberately is not a limitation.
Why OCC instead of pessimistic locking? Locks require the holder to release them, which means the system must handle crashes, timeouts, and stale holders. That complexity is not worth it when conflicts are rare. OCC pays a cost only when a conflict actually occurs: one extra read and one retry. For multi-agent workflows where agents do significant work between reads and writes (LLM inference, API calls, tool execution), OCC is the correct choice.
What the versioning guarantees:
Each key has a version that starts at 1 and increments by exactly 1 on every write. The state_history table is append-only and records every write before the live record is updated, so a crash between the two writes leaves history consistent. Deletions also write a tombstone entry to state_history (with event_type: "delete") before removing the live record, so the full lifecycle of a key is visible in history. The ordering guarantee is per-key, not global; two different keys can have their versions updated in any order.
What would change for production scale:
Mainly one thing: replace SQLite with Postgres for better concurrent write throughput, replication, and managed hosting. The StateStore interface is already designed to make this a contained change. The network transport and authentication already exist — agenthold serves Streamable HTTP via the MCP SDK's StreamableHTTPSessionManager (so remote agents connect over the network instead of a local process), and --auth-token gates access with a bearer token (see Authentication). Put TLS in front via a reverse proxy for production, and note that per-namespace/tenant scoping of tokens is not yet implemented.
License
MIT. See LICENSE.
mcp-name: io.github.edobusy/agenthold
來源:README.md,提交 d93a54c
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.10.0最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分