Factum

io.github.factum-project由 GitHub 帳號 factum-project 發布v0.1.3更新於 Oct 24, 2026

Auditable memory for AI agents: provenance, cascade retraction, conflict refusal

已驗證STDIO僅桌面資料庫知識與記憶

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

一個本機 MCP 伺服器,為 AI 代理提供可稽核的結構化事實記憶,強制記錄來源,支援串聯撤回與衝突拒答。

可以做什麼
以帶來源標註的知識節點寫入與斷言結構化事實,支援自動產生以內容為基礎的 ID,並在另一個代理斷言同一事實時辨識佐證。查詢已存事實,事實衝突時回傳歧義結果而非猜測。撤回某個來源後,透過反向相依圖自動讓所有衍生內容失效。在共用知識庫上套用索引層級權限過濾與衝突仲裁策略。
適用情境
適合合規敏感型代理、多代理共用知識庫,以及需要回答「代理為何相信某件事」的情境。它儲存經過驗證的結構化事實而非對話脈絡,若還需要語意召回,可與脈絡記憶工具搭配使用。
執行需求
以本機 stdio 程序執行,需用 Cargo 從 Rust crate 建置,並將建置出的伺服器二進位檔註冊到 Claude Code、Cursor 等 MCP 用戶端。預設使用記憶體儲存;啟用 RocksDB 建置選項並指定資料庫路徑後可在重新啟動後保留資料。未宣告任何帳號、API 金鑰或環境變數。
安裝前請注意
專案自述為 v0.1.3 早期階段、尚未達到生產可用,架構決策仍可能變動。它會寫入、撤回並使已存事實失效,撤回會串聯影響衍生節點。尚未實作語意搜尋與記憶整併,也不提供 HTTP 傳輸,遠端部署需要自行封裝。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Factum,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

Factum — Auditable Memory for AI Agents

Status: v0.1.3 — Early stage, seeking early collaborators. Core write/query/retract pipeline works. Not production-ready. Architectural decisions are still open to change.

[CI] [License: MIT] [MCP Registry]

[Factum MCP Demo]

Interactive docs — animated syntax parsing, 7-tuple explorer, query pipeline, token efficiency chart, and MCP architecture diagram.

Every fact an agent writes carries mandatory provenance. When a source is retracted, everything derived from it is invalidated automatically — cascade retraction. When facts conflict, Factum returns Ambiguous instead of guessing.

A structured knowledge language (S-expression based), Rust implementation, stdio MCP server — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP client.

Status: v0.1.3, early stage. Core write/query/retract pipeline works; no semantic search or memory consolidation yet — Factum handles verified structured facts, not conversation context. Best suited for compliance-sensitive agents, multi-agent shared knowledge bases, and anywhere "why did the agent believe X" needs an answer. See the multi-agent usage guide for shared knowledge base patterns.

How is this different from Mem0 / Zep / Letta?

Unique to Factum: grammar-enforced provenance · cascade retraction · conflict refusal.

Not (yet) in Factum: embedding-based semantic retrieval · memory consolidation · HTTP transport.

Complementary: Mem0/Letta store and retrieve context; Factum stores auditable structured facts. They can run side by side via MCP.

What this means in practice

Agent memory pain pointFactum mechanism
Can't tell "user said" from "LLM inferred"5-level provenance + grammar-enforced model name on Extracted nodes
Stale memory used as current factSoft delete + cascade retraction via reverse dependency graph
Conflicting memories silently pick oneAmbiguous — refuses to answer rather than guess
Memory pollution (prompt injection)Provenance chain makes contamination traceable and retractable
Enterprise can't let agents store sensitive dataIndex-level permission filtering — no post-query leakage

Academic context: The STALE benchmark (2025) shows that even the best LLM agents achieve only 55.2% accuracy at detecting when their own memories are outdated — confirming that memory staleness is an unsolved problem in agent systems.

Key Features (Implemented)

  • Node 7-tuple: Every knowledge node carries id, predicate, validity, provenance, confidence, authority, and permissions — plus optional :note for human-readable context
  • Auto node IDs: Use "auto" as the node ID in factum_insert or factum_assert to auto-generate content-based IDs — no manual ID management
  • 5-level provenance: Verbatim / Summary / Extracted / Derived / Asserted — full audit chain
  • Grammar-enforced model reference: Extracted nodes MUST carry model + version — the parser rejects them if missing (not just a documentation convention)
  • Cascade retraction: Derived nodes auto-invalidate when upstream sources are retracted (via deps_rev reverse dependency graph); configurable node limit prevents cascade explosion in large knowledge bases
  • Corroboration detection: When a second agent asserts the same fact, factum_assert returns corroborated (not an error) — independent agreement is the most valuable multi-agent signal
  • Conflict arbitration: LatestWins / HighestAuthority / Unanimous / WeightedVote — pattern-aware grouping ensures value conflicts trigger arbitration; returns Ambiguous when it cannot uniquely resolve
  • Index-level permissions: No post-query filtering — prevents aggregate leakage
  • Lossless numerics: All numbers use Dec(i128, u8) — zero floating-point error
  • MCP bridge: JSON-RPC 2.0 tools/resources; stdio transport verified with real MCP clients (Claude Code, Cursor)

What's Implemented vs. What's Not

ModuleStatusNotes
factum-core (types, lexer, parser, serialize)✅ Implemented100% syntactic round-trip
factum-rt (store, query, arbitration, permissions, verifiers)✅ ImplementedIn-memory store (default) + RocksDB persistence (--features rocksdb); 5 column families, WriteBatch atomic writes
factum-mcp (JSON-RPC bridge)✅ Protocol + handlerstdio transport verified end-to-end; HTTP transport not yet implemented (remote deployment requires custom wrapper)
factum-bench (benchmarks)✅ ImplementedSyntax round-trip + token efficiency + query perf
factum-l (latent space projection)❌ Not startedResearch item — see ROADMAP.md
Wikidata/Mathlib corpus converters❌ Not startedM2 milestone
Lean/Z3 verifiers❌ Not startedOnly Schema + DecimalRange verifiers implemented
Embedding-based semantic search❌ Not startedNot on roadmap — consider using Mem0 alongside Factum
Memory consolidation/summarization❌ Not startedNot on roadmap — consider using Letta alongside Factum
Inspector (visual debugger)❌ Not started

Quick Start

bash
# Buildcargo build
# Run testscargo test
# Run democargo run -p factum-demo
# Build with RocksDB persistence backendcargo build --features rocksdbcargo test --features rocksdb
# Build MCP server with RocksDB persistencecargo build --release -p factum-mcp --features rocksdb --bin factum-mcp-server
# Fuzz (requires nightly)cargo +nightly fuzz run fuzz_parser -- -max_total_time=600

Use as an MCP server (Claude Code / Cursor)

bash
# Build the MCP server binary (in-memory, default)cargo build --release -p factum-mcp --bin factum-mcp-server
# Or build with RocksDB persistence (survives restarts)cargo build --release -p factum-mcp --features rocksdb --bin factum-mcp-server
# Register with Claude Code (in-memory)claude mcp add --transport stdio --scope local factum -- "$(pwd)/target/release/factum-mcp-server"
# Register with Claude Code (persistent — recommended for agent memory)claude mcp add --transport stdio --scope local factum -- \  "$(pwd)/target/release/factum-mcp-server" --db-path ~/.factum/store
# Verify connectionclaude mcp get factum

See Getting Started with Factum MCP for the full guide.

Factum-F Syntax Example

scheme
; Acme Corp knowledge graph(node n001  :pred (instance-of @ACME-CORP organization)  :conf 0.99 :auth 0.95 :perm public  :src (asserted "wikidata"))
(node n004  :pred (shareholder-major @ACME-CORP @FOUNDER-1 0.73 :since #date(2001-03-15))  :conf 0.85 :auth 0.8 :perm confidential  :src (extracted "doc002" [100 200] (model "claude-sonnet-4" "2025-01")))
(node n006  :pred (subsidiary-of @ACME-SUB @ACME-CORP :since #date(2001-03-15))  :src (derived n001 "rule-subsidiary-merge")  :deps [n001])

When n001 is retracted, n006 is automatically invalidated — the agent knows it can no longer trust the subsidiary relationship.

Three-Layer Architecture

LayerWhat It MeansStatus
Agent ReadAgent receives Factum-F as context via MCP — lower token overhead than verbose JSON✅ Token efficiency measured (real o200k_base: canonical −62%, compact −53% vs JSON)
Agent WriteAgent generates Factum-F nodes — parse uniqueness guarantees one valid interpretation, error classes enable self-correction✅ See authoring guide
Latent Reasoningfactum-l: encode Factum-F into continuous thought vector, reason in latent space, decode back for audit🔬 Research item — not started, not blocking layers 1-2

A structured knowledge language underpins the memory layer — S-expression based for parse uniqueness, with Dec(i128, u8) for lossless numerics and mandatory model references for LLM self-auditing. Full design rationale in docs/design-rationale.md.

Token Efficiency — The LLM-Native Metric

TL;DR: Factum canonical form saves ~62% tokens vs verbose JSON with the same metadata. All numbers measured with real o200k_base (GPT-4o) tokenizer via tiktoken-rs.

FormatReal tokens (5 nodes)vs verbose JSONWhat it includes
Factum canonical238−62%Full 7-tuple: provenance + confidence + validity + permissions
Factum compact (JSON)290−53%Same 7-tuple, JSON with numeric tags
Markdown181−71%Assertion text only — no provenance, no confidence, no permissions
JSON (pretty)623baselineSame 7-tuple metadata in verbose JSON encoding

Run cargo test -p factum-bench test_token_efficiency_real_tokenizer -- --nocapture to reproduce.

Key finding: The canonical S-expression form (238 tokens) is more token-efficient than the compact JSON form (290 tokens) — BPE tokenizers split JSON delimiters but merge S-expression parentheses. The form designed for correctness is also the most token-efficient.

Round-Trip Fidelity — What Exactly Is 100%?

  1. Syntactic round-trip ✅ — parse(serialize(parse(x))) == parse(x). 100% and verified by the test suite + fuzzing. This is the trust foundation.

  2. Semantic round-trip ❌ Not yet measured — requires factum-l (latent space projection, not implemented).

Morpheme Vocabulary — Current State

  • Seed morphemes: 200+ across 9 kinds (Entity, Relation, Quantifier, Modal, Temporal, Status, Action, Attribute, Classification) — covering organizational, people, spatial, financial, product/project, version control, document/knowledge, agent memory, permission, and cause/effect domains
  • Design target: 200–500 (to be loaded from morphemes.toml via build.rs)
  • Status: Sufficient for agent memory use cases. morphemes.toml codegen is a future M2 item for external contributions.

Relationship to Other Formats

FormatHow Factum Differs
RDF / JSON-LDRDF triples carry no per-node provenance, confidence, or permissions. Factum makes these first-class and non-optional.
MarkdownMarkdown has zero metadata. Factum trades human readability for machine verifiability.
JSONJSON has no schema, no provenance, no temporal validity. Factum compact form uses JSON as transport but adds structure and audit chain.
Mem0 / Zep / LettaThese store and retrieve agent memory. Factum adds grammar-enforced provenance, cascade retraction, and conflict refusal. Complementary, not competitive.

Project Structure

factum/├── crates/│   ├── factum-core/     # Data model, lexer, parser, serialization│   ├── factum-rt/       # Runtime: store (InMemory + RocksDB), query, arbitration, permissions, verifiers│   ├── factum-mcp/      # MCP bridge: JSON-RPC tools/resources, stdio transport│   ├── factum-bench/    # Benchmarks: round-trip, token efficiency, query perf│   └── factum-demo/     # End-to-end demonstration├── fuzz/              # cargo-fuzz targets (parser, serialize round-trip, lexer)├── spec/              # Conformance test vectors (JSON, language-agnostic)├── docs/site/         # Interactive visualization (GitHub Pages)├── .github/workflows/ # CI: test + fuzz + gitleaks + Pages deploy├── Cargo.toml         # Workspace root├── ROADMAP.md         # What's planned and in what order├── SECURITY.md        # Vulnerability disclosure├── CONTRIBUTING.md    # How to contribute├── CHANGELOG.md       # Version history├── docs/design-rationale.md     # Why each architectural decision was made├── docs/authoring-for-llms.md   # LLM guide for generating Factum-F└── docs/getting-started-mcp.md  # MCP setup guide (Claude Code / Cursor)

Test Results

Run cargo test to see the current count. Tests cover: types, lexer, parser, serialization, morphemes, depth-limit/DoS protection, conformance vectors, store, query, arbitration, permission, verifier, subscription, MCP protocol/tools/handler, and benchmarks.

CI badge at the top of this README reflects the latest build status.

Security

  • Parser has a depth limit (128 levels) to prevent stack overflow DoS on adversarial input
  • Lexer has a token count limit (1M tokens) to prevent OOM
  • cargo-fuzz targets for parser, serialize round-trip, and lexer
  • gitleaks runs in CI to scan for leaked secrets

See SECURITY.md for vulnerability disclosure.

License

MIT

Trademark

"Factum" and the Factum-F language specification are project names. This MIT license covers code only; the specification may be governed by a separate process in the future.

Contributing

Contributions require DCO sign-off (git commit -s). See CONTRIBUTING.md.


  • MCP Registry name: mcp-name: io.github.factum-project/factum

來源:README.md,提交 6217db4

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.1.3最新Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分