
redline
io.github.gowtham0992由 GitHub 帳號 gowtham0992 發布v0.3.0更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Run local prompt regression checks from prompt-response logs in AI coding assistants.
概覽
在本機執行提示詞回歸檢查,把既有的提示詞與回應日誌轉成評測套件,並在提示詞變更上線前給出行為差異報告。
- 可以做什麼
- redline 用你既有的提示詞與回應日誌產生確定性的回歸套件,依行為簽章分組並挑選代表性案例。它會重放修改後的提示詞或比對候選輸出,並指出具體哪裡壞掉:缺少 JSON 鍵、遺失 URL 或數字、表格與程式碼區塊消失、新增拒答、空回答,或明確要求未滿足。報告可輸出為 JSON、Markdown、HTML、JUnit 與 Slack 可用 JSON,本機稽核日誌帶雜湊鏈可供驗證。MCP 介面提供讀取、快速檢查、案例檢視、評測與報告工具,以及設定與審查類工作流程提示。
- 適用情境
- 當你修改提示詞、模型或執行器,想要一個快速、確定性的合併閘門,在使用者看到之前攔住結構性回歸時使用。適合已有提示詞日誌或可觀測性匯出、又不想手寫評測或讓核心訊號依賴 LLM 評審的團隊。
- 執行需求
- 需要本機 Python 環境;套件從 PyPI 安裝為 redline-ai,MCP 伺服器以本機指令 redline-mcp 透過 stdio 執行。核心回歸訊號不需要雲端帳號、API 金鑰或 LLM 評審。若自行設定選用的評審指令與模型轉接器,則需要對應的憑證。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 redline,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
redline
Catch prompt regressions before they ship.
Automatic eval suites from the prompt logs you already have.
redline turns real prompt-response logs into local regression tests. It selects representative cases, replays your changed prompt, and shows the behavioral diff before a bad prompt reaches users.
Website · Docs · MCP · MCP Registry · Security · License
[CI] [GitHub Pages] [PyPI] [MCP Registry] [License: MIT] [Stars]
Start Here
Install from PyPI:
Run the guided local app with the public proof loaded:
This generates the public demo reports, opens the local product app, and shows the full import -> suite -> eval -> review workflow. The demo catches ten synthetic regressions without API keys, private logs, a cloud account, or an LLM judge.
Prefer terminal output first:
The demo writes JSON, Markdown, and self-contained HTML reports under
.redline/demo.
Ask redline what to do next:
status reads local config, suites, reports, history, and audit evidence, then
prints the next command instead of leaving you to infer the workflow.
Open the guided local product app on existing reports:
The app is a local, copy-command workflow: import logs, generate suites, run evals, review regressions, record history, and export CI/MCP setup without the browser executing shell commands.
On headless CI or remote shells, skip browser opening and use the printed HTML path:
First-run troubleshooting
redline: command not found: runpython -m pip install redline-ai, then confirmpython -m pip show redline-ai.- App did not open: use
--no-open --out .redline/app.htmland open or upload that file from your environment. - Suite not found: run
redline suite logs/baseline.jsonl --out redline-suite.json. - Validation failed: run
redline validate redline-suite.json --strictand fix the first reported error. - GitHub Action cannot find a suite: commit
redline-suite.jsonor point the actionsuiteinput at your prompt manifest.
Full guide: docs/troubleshooting.md.
Product Proof
redline has two proof paths: a fast first-run demo and a larger public-data dogfood run.
These screenshots are local artifacts from the 100-row internet dogfood run.
What Is redline?
redline is an open-source, local-first eval tool for AI teams. It uses logs you already have: prompts, outputs, support tickets, traces, model responses, and production JSONL exports.
Instead of asking you to hand-write evals first, redline generates the first suite from real behavior. You can then run that suite every time a prompt, model, or runner changes.
No cloud account is required. No manual test writing is required. No LLM judge is required for the core regression signal. The package has zero runtime dependencies, which keeps installs fast and the default supply-chain surface small.
How It Works
redline gives you three primitives that cover the prompt-regression loop:
For a first pass on two local logs, use one command:
It generates a temporary suite, writes JSON/Markdown/HTML reports plus a guided
local app under .redline/quick-check, opens the focused HTML report, and
prints the concrete behavioral diff. Use --open-app when you want the guided
review workflow to open instead of only the focused report.
1. Logs
Start with prompt-response data you already have. Import JSONL, convert exports from tools like Langfuse or Helicone, capture OpenAI/Anthropic SDK calls, or add bounded FastAPI/ASGI middleware.
Use --detect when you do not know the field names. Use --preview when the
export is new to you; it shows mapped, redacted sample rows without writing a
baseline file.
Suite generation prints a readiness score and improvement suggestions. That score measures suite health, not model quality or candidate safety.
2. Suite
redline groups behavior into deterministic signatures and selects representative cases first. You can add pinned edge cases and explicit requirements when a scenario must never be missed.
3. Eval
Replay a changed prompt or compare candidate outputs. redline names the behavior that broke: missing JSON keys, URLs, numbers, tables, code blocks, refusals, empty answers, or requirement failures.
Product Promise
In under five minutes, on a real prompt log, redline should catch one regression you did not want to ship.
That promise is intentionally narrow. redline is not a hosted eval platform, a generic score, or a replacement for human judgment. It is the local safety loop between "I changed the prompt" and "this is safe enough to merge."
Real Workflow
Build a suite from baseline logs:
Evaluate a changed prompt file through your configured runner:
Or compare candidate outputs you already generated:
When redline finds a blocking change, it exits non-zero for CI and prints the reason:
What redline Catches
redline is deterministic and local-first by default. Optional judge commands are
available for ambiguous changed cases, but redline does not call a cloud model
unless you explicitly configure that command.
That is the point. redline is designed to be the fast merge-blocking gate for regressions that break production systems: invalid JSON, missing required fields, lost tables, empty answers, dropped URLs, changed refusal behavior, and explicit requirement failures. LLM judges are useful for semantic review, but they are slower, cost money, and can be flaky in CI. redline keeps the default gate deterministic, reproducible, and cheap, then lets you add judges only where the structural signal is not enough.
Methodology details live in docs/methodology.md.
Suite generation does not run statistical or embedding clustering by default. It groups logs by deterministic behavior signatures, such as prompt intent, response shape, length bucket, and JSON schema. It picks one representative per group first, then adds high-variance edges and evenly spread prompt-diverse samples from large groups when the case budget allows.
Trust Boundary
A green redline run means no configured high-signal structural blockers were found. It does not prove factual correctness, tone, hallucination safety, policy compliance, or subtle reasoning quality.
That boundary is visible in CLI output and reports because over-trusting eval
tools is dangerous. Each reported case includes a confidence and signal
(structural, shallow_semantic, requirement, judge, or human_judgment)
so reviewers can see why redline is making the call. Use requirements or an
optional judge for semantic risks that structural checks cannot prove.
Product Surface
redline is built around the full prompt-regression loop:
redline watch: collect prompt-response observations from logs, Python functions, OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible SDK calls, or ASGI apps, with best-effort common secrets and PII redacted before write by default.redline import: normalize exported team logs into redline JSONL, with the same best-effort redaction enabled by default. Use--no-redactonly for reviewed local-only logs.RedlineMiddleware: capture bounded JSON FastAPI or ASGI request/response pairs locally, with optional skip diagnostics.redline redact --check: scan logs for common secrets and PII, then write a scrubbed copy when needed. Redaction is best-effort pattern matching, not a privacy boundary; review sensitive logs before sharing.redline cluster: inspect deterministic behavior-signature groups before suite generation.redline suite: generate a representative eval suite from baseline logs.redline prompts: scan many prompt files and write or check a versionable prompt-to-suite manifest. Add--check-suitesin CI when every prompt should already have a built and valid suite.redline suite add: pin hand-picked edge cases the algorithm should never miss.redline budget/redline benchmark: estimate suite or prompt-manifest runtime without executing replay commands, write budget artifacts, and optionally fail on a CI time budget. Add--measure-localto time redline's deterministic local diff work on your suite baselines without calling a model.redline eval: replay each suite case through your local app or model runner.redline diff: compare candidate JSONL outputs against the suite baseline.redline markandredline accept: review intentional changes and promote the new baseline.redline require: add deterministic must-include or must-not-include rules.redline audit --verify: inspect the local audit trail and verify the hash chain. Add--expect-last-hashor--expect-entrieswhen you want to prove the local log tail still matches a checkpoint from CI or release evidence. Add--out-checkpoint .redline/audit-checkpoint.jsonto persist that evidence, then--checkpoint .redline/audit-checkpoint.jsonto verify against it later.redline sbom: write CycloneDX SBOM release evidence for security review.redline app: open the guided local product surface for importing logs, generating suites, reviewing regressions, recording history, and wiring CI/MCP.redline status: show project readiness and the next command from local evidence, including the guided app command, first review case, its reason, and why it matters.redline history,redline compare, andredline dashboard: track quality over time and inspect report artifacts locally. The dashboard surfaces feature-level rollups, prompt-level eval rows, benchmark evidence, and a latest-report review queue when reports come from a prompt manifest. It also warns when reports exist without benchmark evidence from the same project.redline summary: inspect suite readiness, or passredline-prompts.jsonto roll up multi-prompt suite coverage, owners, requirements, and missing suites.redline-mcp: let AI coding assistants run checks inside Claude, Codex, Cursor, Kiro, or any MCP client.
For repos with many prompt files, the manifest becomes the eval plan:
Manifest summaries show readiness across every mapped suite, manifest validation checks every mapped suite, manifest benchmarks aggregate runtime budget, and manifest evals print prompt-level rollups before case details. Large repos can see which prompt files or feature folders need attention first.
When mapped suites are valid, the check prints ready commands such as:
Connect Your App
Any command that reads a prompt from stdin and prints a response to stdout can be a redline runner:
Built-in adapters cover provider-neutral stdio, OpenAI, Anthropic, LiteLLM, HTTP APIs, Python chains, JSONL log imports, and OpenAI/Anthropic SDK capture:
Runner details live in docs/runners.md. Log import and SDK
capture adapters are for building suites from real observations, not for
redline eval replay. The JSONL log adapter includes Langfuse, Helicone,
LangSmith, and Braintrust presets for exported observability logs.
AI Assistant Native
redline ships a local Model Context Protocol server:
Use docs/mcp.md to wire redline into an MCP client. The MCP
surface exposes safe capture-readiness, privacy, audit, scale, read,
quick-check, case-inspection, eval, and report tools plus workflow prompts like
setup_redline_project, check_prompt_change, build_suite_from_logs, and
review_candidate_outputs.
It can also list or copy runner adapters and optional judge templates during setup.
The only mutating MCP tool is guarded: redline_mark requires allow_write: true
and a note before it records an intentional case judgment. Baseline promotion
stays CLI-only.
CI And GitHub
Create config plus a GitHub Actions workflow:
Use redline as a composite GitHub Action from another repo:
For multi-prompt repos, point suite at redline-prompts.json. The action
checks every mapped suite with redline prompts --check --check-suites, runs a
manifest-wide benchmark, then runs the manifest eval.
The action writes JSON, full Markdown, concise PR-comment Markdown, HTML, JUnit,
Slack-ready JSON, history, dashboard, and audit checkpoint artifacts under
.redline/, appends benchmark, concise eval, and trend summaries to the GitHub
step summary, and exits with the eval gate status. Set benchmark-max-seconds
when a suite should fail CI if its worst-case runtime budget grows too far.
Reports
Every diff and eval run can write:
- JSON for machines and dashboards
- full Markdown for detailed summaries, including prompt-manifest rollups
- concise PR-comment Markdown for merge-review surfaces
- self-contained HTML for side-by-side inspection, including feature and prompt eval tables
- JUnit XML for CI test reporting
- Slack Block Kit JSON for CI bots or webhook integrations you control
- GitHub annotations for changed or blocking cases
Example:
Optional Judges
Use judges only where structural checks are not enough. redline sends only
ambiguous changed cases to the configured command as JSON on stdin:
Repo examples and installable templates:
- examples/judge_changed.py
- examples/openai_judge.sh
- examples/anthropic_judge.sh
- examples/litellm_judge.sh
- examples/judges/support_rubric.md
- examples/judges/extraction_rubric.md
- examples/judges/safety_rubric.md
Calibration guidance lives in docs/judges.md.
Config
redline init writes redline.json with a $schema reference for editor
autocomplete. Important keys:
Check setup before relying on a suite:
doctor shows whether the suite has explicit requirements or recorded
judgments before you rely on structural checks in CI.
summary reports a suite readiness score, behavior-group/case coverage, owner
coverage, accepted baseline history, approver coverage, and explicit guard
coverage for cases with requirements or recorded judgments so teams can review
suite readiness before CI.
dashboard also shows audit checkpoint evidence when .redline/audit-checkpoint.json
is present.
Dogfood Assets
The public fixture is synthetic, shaped after public instruction/chat dataset patterns, and documented in examples/public_dogfood_sources.md.
For AI-assistant session dogfood, use
docs/ai-session-dogfood-prompts.jsonl
and normalize raw exports with scripts/normalize_ai_session_logs.py.
Reproducible dogfood case studies live in
docs/case-studies.md.
Public dataset candidates for internet dogfood are ranked in
docs/internet-dogfood-sources.md.
From a repo checkout, record the public demo:
Development
Before cutting a release or asking someone else to try a branch:
Project Docs
- docs/release.md: package, tag, PyPI, and MCP Registry release flow
- docs/launch.md: public alpha launch plan
- docs/troubleshooting.md: first-run and CI failure recovery
- docs/import-guides.md: Langfuse, Helicone, OpenAI chat, Datadog, and custom log import recipes
- docs/methodology.md: behavior grouping, case selection, scoring, and trust boundaries
- docs/calibration.md: tiny fixture showing regressions, changed cases, and neutral cases
- docs/commands.md: compact CLI command reference
- docs/real-log-dogfood.md: redaction-first real-log test protocol
- docs/dogfood.md: first-user dogfood protocol
- docs/case-studies.md: reproducible dogfood case studies
- docs/internet-dogfood-sources.md: public prompt-response datasets for dogfood sourcing
- docs/runners.md: runner and log adapter setup
- docs/mcp.md: MCP server setup
- docs/benchmarks.md: performance contract and CI benchmark artifacts
- docs/repository.md: GitHub repository controls
- scripts/README.md: maintainer script index
- CONTRIBUTING.md: contributor validation
- SECURITY.md: privacy and vulnerability reporting
- LICENSE: MIT open source license
Website source for GitHub Pages lives in site/ and deploys from the
committed static assets on main.
來源:README.md,提交 012d697
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.3.0最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分