Writing MCP

io.github.hannasdev由 GitHub 帳號 hannasdev 發布v3.29.3更新於 Oct 24, 2026

Metadata-first fiction editing and reasoning tools for long-form writing projects.

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

把長篇小說的稿件索引到 SQLite,讓 AI 助理先查詢場景、人物與支線,再進行可審閱、可回溯的正文編輯。

可以做什麼
  • 同步並索引稿件資料夾,依標題、梗概、標籤、人物、地點或版本做關鍵字中繼資料檢索
  • 尋找場景,檢視人物弧線、地點檔案、關係弧線與支線線索
  • 在中繼資料縮小範圍後,再讀取特定場景的正文
  • 提出、提交或捨棄正文修改,並透過快照與 git 歷史回溯
  • 更新場景中繼資料、從正文重新推導中繼資料,並以先預覽的批次方式修復場景與人物關聯
  • 準備審閱包,並為場景加上後續備註
適用情境
適合擁有大量場景、人物與連貫性限制的長篇小說作者或寫作團隊,希望只載入相關片段而非整份稿件,並需要可追溯、可復原的 AI 輔助編輯。
執行需求
以 stdio 在本機執行,通常透過 npx 執行已發佈的 npm 套件;使用 SQLite 相關參數需要 Node.js 22。必須設定環境變數 WRITING_SYNC_DIR 指向稿件同步資料夾,DB_PATH 與 OWNERSHIP_GUARD_MODE 為選用。未宣告任何身分驗證。
安裝前請注意
它會修改所設定同步資料夾中的稿件檔案,請先備份並審閱暫存的差異再提交。批次人物關聯補全在啟用取代模式並明確確認時會覆寫既有連結。部分工具的回傳結構有不相容變更,既有自動化腳本可能需要調整。索引僅為關鍵字/FTS 檢索,並非語意搜尋。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Writing MCP,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

mcp-writing

[CI] [GitHub release] [npm version] [npm downloads] [Node.js] [License: AGPL v3]

An MCP service for AI-assisted reasoning and editing on long-form fiction projects.

Designed to work with OpenClaw but compatible with any MCP-capable AI gateway.

Quick launch

For local stdio MCP clients, run the published package directly:

sh
WRITING_SYNC_DIR=/path/to/sync-dir DB_PATH=./writing.db npx -y @hanna84/mcp-writing

The CLI wrapper defaults to stdio transport and adds the Node 22 SQLite flag automatically when needed.

VS Code extension

For VS Code-native setup flows (including prose styleguide setup), use:

What it does

Instead of feeding an entire manuscript to an AI and hoping it fits in the context window, mcp-writing builds a structured index from your scene files. The AI queries that index first — finding relevant characters, beats, and loglines — then loads only the specific prose it needs.

Current status:

  • Core platform complete: Metadata-first analysis, SQLite-canonical structural and relationship metadata, compatibility sidecar maintenance, AI-assisted prose editing with confirmation + git history, review bundles, and Scrivener Direct extraction are all implemented.
  • Recently completed: Human Input Forgiveness made selected request-boundary inputs more forgiving, clarified keyword metadata search boundaries, and recorded temp-fixture replay validation while preserving stable canonical IDs.
  • Active development: No initiative is currently selected.
  • Deferred backlog: OpenClaw integration, client-agnostic setup, divisions, and embeddings search.
  • Ideas and open questions: tracked separately so future exploration does not distort the active roadmap.

Who it is for

  • Novelists and writing teams working on long manuscripts with many scenes, characters, and continuity constraints.
  • AI-assisted editing workflows where you want targeted context retrieval instead of full-manuscript prompting.
  • Projects that need traceable, reversible edits with metadata that stays synchronized as drafts evolve.

Documentation

GuideDescription
docs/guides/setup.mdPrerequisites, first-time setup, Scrivener import, native sync format
mcp-writing-vscodeVS Code extension for client-native setup flows
docs/guides/docker.mdDocker Compose, deployment operations, MCP gateway notes
docs/guides/backup-recovery.mdProject backup artifacts, diagnostics, and explicit restore workflow
docs/guides/sidecar-compatibility.mdSidecar compatibility roles, migration posture, and daily-work authority boundaries
docs/foundations/managed-structure-contract.mdDesign boundaries for structural mutation, generated views, import, and maintenance workflows
docs/agents/tools.mdFull tool reference — auto-generated from source
docs/agents/README.mdIndex of agent-focused guidance, examples, and boot files
docs/agents/use-cases.mdAgent-oriented transcripts and prompt/tooling examples
docs/guides/development.mdRunning locally, tests, environment variables, troubleshooting

Breaking changes

describe_workflows surface redesign

describe_workflows now exposes an outcome-first, discovery-first workflow map. This was a breaking change if your prompts or automation depend on previous workflow IDs or ordering; the newer recommended_next_actions tier is additive and appears before the full catalogue.

Update integrations using this mapping:

  • manuscript_exploration -> question_driven_discovery (or targeted_scene_reading when the task is prose inspection)
  • prose_editing -> safe_scene_revision
  • character_management -> character_understanding
  • place_management -> place_understanding
  • review_bundle -> review_preparation

New workflow IDs added:

  • thread_understanding
  • parity_recovery

Styleguide workflows are still available, but no longer positioned as part of the primary daily workflow surface.

find_scenes and get_arc response-shape standardization

find_scenes and get_arc now always return structured envelopes, including non-paginated calls.

  • Envelope fields: results, total_count.
  • Pagination fields are included when paging is active.
  • warning / next_step are included when relevant.

If your integration previously handled raw arrays for non-paginated calls, update it to parse envelopes consistently.

Safe parsing pattern:

js
const parsed = JSON.parse(toolText);if (parsed.ok === false) throw new Error(parsed.error?.message ?? "tool error");const scenes = parsed.results ?? [];const totalCount = parsed.total_count ?? scenes.length;const warning = parsed.warning ?? null;const nextStep = parsed.next_step ?? null;

get_character_sheet, get_place_sheet, list_scene_references, get_relationship_arc response-shape standardization

These metadata-read tools now return structured envelopes instead of flat objects or raw arrays.

  • get_character_sheet and get_place_sheet: previously returned a flat object of field values; now return { results: [row], total_count: 1, next_step }.
  • list_scene_references: previously returned { references, scene_id, project_id }; now returns { results, total_count, scene_id, project_id }.
  • get_relationship_arc: previously returned a raw JSON array; now returns { results, total_count, from_character, to_character }.

Safe parsing pattern for sheet tools:

js
const parsed = JSON.parse(toolText);if (parsed.ok === false) throw new Error(parsed.error?.message ?? "tool error");const sheet = parsed.results?.[0] ?? {};const nextStep = parsed.next_step ?? null;

Safe parsing pattern for list/arc tools:

js
const parsed = JSON.parse(toolText);if (parsed.ok === false) throw new Error(parsed.error?.message ?? "tool error");const items = parsed.results ?? [];const totalCount = parsed.total_count ?? items.length;

Canonical IDs and forgiving inputs

Stable IDs remain the canonical identity for projects, chapters, scenes, characters, places, and relationship writes. When you already know the ID, pass it exactly.

Some request-boundary fields now accept unambiguous human-shaped inputs, such as scene titles, character names, place names, or case variants. Successful tools still write and return canonical IDs, with resolved_from details when the input was resolved from a non-canonical value. Ambiguous matches, near matches, or suggested-only values fail or return advisory suggestions without mutating canonical state.

Tags and Save the Cat beats remain freeform editorial vocabulary. find_scenes can match existing tag and beat casing variants, and metadata updates can suggest nearby existing vocabulary, but supplied tag and beat text is preserved unless you intentionally change it.

search_metadata is keyword/FTS metadata search over indexed titles, loglines, tags, characters, places, and versions. It is not semantic search and does not search prose text; use get_scene_prose after metadata search or structured filters identify likely scenes. Semantic/prose search remains deferred to the Embedding-Based Search backlog.

Usage scenarios

1) Continuity pass before sending chapters to beta readers

Goal: catch inconsistencies before sharing pages.

  1. Run sync after your latest writing session.
  2. Ask find_scenes for scenes involving a specific character or tag (for example, all scenes tagged injury or promise). Canonical IDs remain preferred, but character/POV filters can resolve unambiguous project-scoped character names, tag and beat filters can suggest near matches, and chapter_id accepts exact IDs or unambiguous case variants.
  3. Use get_arc to review that character's ordered progression across the manuscript.
  4. Load only the suspect scenes with get_scene_prose.
  5. Attach follow-up notes with flag_scene where continuity needs a fix.

Outcome: you review one narrative thread at a time instead of rereading the entire novel to find contradictions.

2) Planning and tracking subplot beats during revisions

Goal: make sure subplot threads progress intentionally and resolve on time.

  1. Run list_threads for the project.
  2. Use get_thread_arc to inspect scene order and beat labels for each thread.
  3. When a beat is missing, call track_thread_arc to add or update it on the right scene.
  4. Re-run get_thread_arc to confirm pacing and coverage.

Outcome: subplot structure stays visible and auditable, which reduces dropped threads in late drafts.

3) Tightening scene metadata after heavy prose edits

Goal: keep indexes accurate without manually re-tagging everything.

  1. After rewriting scenes, call enrich_scene to re-derive lightweight metadata from current prose.
  2. Use update_scene_metadata for intentional editorial fields (for example, beat, POV, status, and tags). Tags and beats remain freeform; the tool preserves supplied text while returning suggestions when a value resembles existing vocabulary. It rejects scene characters and places; use connect_character_place_evidence when a scene proves paired sheet-backed character/place evidence, connect_scene_character_evidence for character-only evidence, and connect_scene_place_evidence for place-only evidence. Those relationship evidence tools prefer canonical IDs but also accept unambiguous scene titles, character names, place names, and case variants; ambiguous or suggested-only matches fail without mutating state. Use audit_relationship_metadata for retained sidecar/frontmatter relationship fields. Use list_chapters plus assign_scene_to_chapter or move_scene for chapter placement and ordering.
  3. Use search_metadata for keyword/FTS metadata searches across indexed titles, loglines, tags, characters, places, and versions, and use find_scenes to verify scenes are discoverable under structured filters. After identifying likely scenes, use get_scene_prose for prose context.

Outcome: your AI assistant can reliably find the right scenes without drifting from the manuscript.

4) Safe AI-assisted line edits with rollback

Goal: let AI propose prose edits without losing control of your draft.

  1. Ask the AI to call propose_edit for a specific scene.
  2. Review the staged diff.
  3. Accept with commit_edit or reject with discard_edit.
  4. Use list_snapshots (and optional snapshot_scene) to inspect or preserve revision history.

Outcome: you get AI speed with explicit approval and recoverable history for every applied change.

5) Refreshing scene-character links after imports or major rewrites

Goal: rebuild scene-to-character links in a controlled way after imported prose changes or metadata drift.

  1. Start with enrich_scene_characters_batch using the default dry_run=true to preview inferred links for a project, chapter, or explicit scene list.
  2. Poll get_async_job_status until the batch job completes, then review job.result.results for changed scenes, ambiguous matches, and partial failures.
  3. Spot-check a few affected scenes with get_scene_prose if the changes touch important continuity or cast-heavy chapters.
  4. Re-run enrich_scene_characters_batch with dry_run=false once the preview looks correct.
  5. If you want a destructive overwrite instead of additive merge behavior, use replace_mode=replace with confirm_replace=true deliberately.

Outcome: character-link maintenance becomes a preview-first relationship repair operation instead of a one-off regex script or manual sidecar cleanup.

6) Post-upgrade recovery after legacy migration warnings

Goal: recover index confidence quickly when legacy upgrade warnings indicate ambiguous rows were skipped.

  1. Start by checking get_runtime_config (or describe_workflows) and confirm whether db_migration_warnings contains LEGACY_JOIN_ROWS_SKIPPED.
  2. If present, run sync immediately to rebuild scene relationships from compatibility sidecars and prose metadata.
  3. Continue normal discovery (find_scenes, get_arc, get_thread_arc) and watch for stale-metadata warnings.
  4. When you touch stale scenes, run enrich_scene(scene_id, project_id) to recover metadata parity incrementally.
  5. If many scenes remain stale, switch to enrich_scene_characters_batch (dry-run first) for broader catch-up.

Outcome: upgrade-related data loss risk becomes an explicit, operator-visible recovery workflow instead of a silent state mismatch.

License

AGPL-3.0-only

來源:README.md,提交 329a7db

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v3.29.3最新Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分