Heliograph

io.github.heliograph-io由 GitHub 帳號 heliograph-io 發布v0.4.3更新於 Oct 24, 2026

Run commands on a machine you cannot SSH into. Air-gapped, bastion-only, change-controlled.

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

Heliograph 讓助理對無法登入的機器發布指令,並取回帶時間戳的執行日誌。

可以做什麼
透過選定的傳輸方式(git、中繼、檔案共享、bundle、物件儲存)向遠端 station 發布步驟請求,並在近端追蹤狀態與日誌,每行都帶 UTC 時間戳,還可做間隔分析找出卡住的位置。把同一套 CLI 流程以 stdio 上的 MCP 工具提供,工具呼叫只發布請求,是否執行仍由 station 決定。引導並植入 station 載荷、初始化傳輸方式,並輸出維運方在遠端需要做的設定。診斷目前機器上這套流程能否順利運作。
適用情境
適用於生產環境或客戶管理的環境處於氣隙隔離、位於堡壘機之後,或因政策而非能力被限制存取,而你需要真實的指令輸出而非截圖的情況。也面向需要原始證據而非他人摘要的 AI 編碼代理。
執行需求
以本機 stdio 程序執行,可透過 npx(npm 套件)或單一靜態二進位檔;README 的安裝方式為下載發行版或 Go 安裝。遠端需要植入 station:Bash 4+ 及 git 和 GNU coreutils,Windows 上為 PowerShell 5.1,並需要雙方都能存取的傳輸通道(git 主機、中繼、檔案共享、bundle 或物件儲存)。清單未宣告任何憑證或環境變數。
安裝前請注意
這個工具的用途就是在遠端機器上執行指令,因此步驟可能改變那台機器。README 稱除非維運方另行允許,流程預設唯讀:步驟須宣告唯讀或 action 模式,station 未以 --allow-actions 啟動時會拒絕 action;它也不會以 root 執行。中繼被描述為尚無法端到端使用,beam 傳輸僅有設計尚未實作。植入前應先審閱 station 腳本。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Heliograph,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

[heliograph, by DBHQ]

heliograph

Remote, captured, auditable execution on a machine you cannot log into

[License: Apache 2.0] [Docs]

A free, open-source tool by DBHQ


Someone can reach the machine. You cannot, and you are the one who knows what to ask it. heliograph runs that gap as a loop rather than a relay: you publish a step, it runs on the far side, and the whole run comes back as a log with every line timestamped in UTC, whether it passed or failed.

you        heliograph send net-probe ────────────────▶ transportstation    picks it up within seconds, runs it           pushes status, then the log ──────────────▶ transportyou        heliograph logs --last --gaps ◀────────────

The three ways across

heliograph carries a request to a machine you cannot log into, and brings the log back. There are three ways across the gap, and they differ in one thing: what stays held, and for how long.

Beacon. You cannot reach the machine and it cannot reach you - but you can both reach one agreed place. You leave the request there and walk away. Later the machine passes by, picks it up, runs it, and leaves the log for you to collect. Nobody is ever connected; a message waits in the middle. It is the safest of the three, because the code being run is already on the far side and can be read before anything happens - and the slowest, because you wait for the next visit.

Flare. You can reach the machine's door directly. You knock, hand over the request, wait on the step while it runs, and take the log away in the same visit. Nothing waits in the middle and no line stays open. Faster, because there is no pickup to wait for. The trade: you bring the code with you, so the machine trusts the door rather than vetting the code in advance.

Beam. You and the machine bring up a connection and hold it open. Either side can speak at any moment and the other hears it at once, until you hang up. A real session, not a message or a knock - and the most exposed, because while the line is open anything can travel down it. You turn it on deliberately and close it when you are done. It is designed, and not yet a transport you can pick.

In one line: a beacon holds a message, a flare is a single exchange, a beam holds the connection itself.

Does this sound familiar

  • You have no SSH access to production, and you are not going to be given any.
  • The environment is air-gapped, or behind a bastion, a jump host or a VPN you are not on.
  • It is a client-owned or customer-managed estate. Only their staff can log in.
  • Access is blocked by policy, not capability: restricted, change-controlled, somebody else's sign-off.
  • You are on the fourth round of "can you run this and paste the output", and what came back was a screenshot of half a terminal.
  • You are an AI coding agent driving an investigation, and you need the evidence rather than somebody's summary of it.

If you can just SSH in, you do not need this.

Three roles, one boundary

The boundary is the gap, and the layout states it once:

controlyour machine: the heliograph CLI, heliograph mcp, and the skill that drives them. Go, and whatever the near side can afford
transportthe channel: git, relay, file share, bundle, object store - all behind one interface, so the read-only gates live in one place and cannot drift per transport
stationthe far side: station/bash/, planted into a private transport repo. Bash 4+, git and GNU coreutils. No packages, no credentials, no tunnel

Nothing is ever installed on the far side. The station is plain text you can read before you run - bash 4+, or PowerShell 5.1 for a Windows estate that has no bash and will not be given any - and no Go will ever appear under station/ beyond the one file that lets the CLI carry the payload. CI enforces it. That constraint is the entire proposition on a locked-down box where installing anything is its own change request.

Install

bash
# Linux and macOS, from a releasecurl -sSL https://github.com/heliograph-io/heliograph/releases/latest/download/heliograph-linux-amd64 \  -o /usr/local/bin/heliograph && chmod +x /usr/local/bin/heliograph
# or from sourcego install github.com/heliograph-io/heliograph/cmd/heliograph@latest

A single static binary, no runtime. Checksums are published with each release, and the binary carries the station payload it was built with.

The build is reproducible: packaging/reproduce.sh v0.4.3 rebuilds every released artefact from the tag and arrives at the published hashes, so "the binary in the path is the source you read" is something you check rather than something we say. Full account, including what is not yet covered, at docs.heliograph.io/provenance.

The agent skill - the same loop, driven from Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and friends:

/plugin marketplace add dbhq-uk/marketplace/plugin install heliograph@dbhq         # Claude Code./install-codex.sh                      # Codex, from a clone./install.sh                            # Claude Code, from a clonenpx skills add heliograph-io/heliograph       # any agent, via skills.sh

Use

bash
heliograph bootstrap ~/transport/payments             # plant the station payloadheliograph init payments --dir ~/transport/payments   # git, the defaultheliograph plant                                      # what to send the operatorheliograph send net-probe HOSTS="sql01 sql02"         # publish a requestheliograph watch                                      # follow itheliograph logs --last                                # read the whole logheliograph logs --last --gaps                         # where it stalledheliograph doctor                                     # will this work from hereheliograph mcp                                        # serve all of the above as tools

The operator's whole job is what plant prints: clone the transport repo, run ./start.sh, walk away. The loop is read-only unless the operator said otherwise: every step declares itself (# heliograph-mode: read-only or action), one that declares neither does not run, and the station refuses an action unless it was started with --allow-actions. It will not run as root either.

For an agent, heliograph mcp is the same CLI as typed MCP tools:

bash
claude mcp add heliograph -- heliograph mcp

The gates do not move. A tool call publishes a request; the station still decides whether to run it.

--gaps is the one worth knowing about. "Scan the timestamp column for gaps before reading the content" is the most valuable instruction in the method, and it is arithmetic:

$ heliograph logs --last --gapsdemo-20260906T183628Z.txt5 captured lines
1 interval(s) of 10s or more, longest first.Each is attributed to the line BEFORE it, which is what was running.
   3m12s  after  09:14:02 | Refreshing state...

The gap belongs to the line before it: the stamp on a line is when that line was produced, so a long interval means the operation named on the preceding line is what took the time. A log where every line carries the same timestamp is reported as an error, not as "no gaps".

Status

control CLI over gitworks, tested end to end against a stock station
heliograph bootstrapworks: the binary plants the station it was built with
--gapsworks
MCP server (heliograph mcp)works
bash stationin use over git: the loop, the gates, the capture, Azure hosts, Kubernetes, the Windows launcher
relayworks end to end. heliograph init --transport relay selects it, both stations implement it, the relay server is deployed, and TestCLIDrivesARelayStation drives the whole loop in CI
file share, bundle, object storestation transports exist for all three in the bash station (station/bash/transports/); init selects share, bundle and objstore. The PowerShell station carries share but not bundle or objstore
Azure Blobworks end to end, through drop.sh in the station payload rather than the CLI. It is what the Azure Function host uses
PowerShell stationships. station/powershell/ is ~2,600 lines carrying git, share and relay, and CI runs it on a Windows runner. Design: A8
documentation sitedocs.heliograph.io: the CLI, the transports, and the far side - the station, the runner, steps, hosts, Azure, Windows, containers, services, secrets, security and the capture contract

A transport that works on one side of the gap is not a transport, so this table names both sides. Git and relay are driven end to end by the CLI and proved in CI; what the others still need, and in what order, is the roadmap.

This table was wrong for some time, and the reason is worth keeping. Until 21 Sep 2026 it said relay was "half a transport" that "no CLI command can select", that the station had no transport for share, bundle or object store, and that the PowerShell station was "planned". All four were false against the code in this repository. The documentation site did not drift, because transports_doc_test.go binds it to initTransports and to the station transport directories - and nothing bound this file. It is bound now, by TestReadmeTransportClaimsMatchTheCode.

The cost was not confined here: skills.dbhq.uk/heliograph deliberately published the more conservative claim because this README contradicted the documentation site, and recorded that it would stay understated "until heliograph settles which is true". This is that settlement.

The relay

Both sides dial out over ordinary HTTPS, so an estate needs no git host, no storage account and no VNet. Hosted, and self-hostable from the same binary.

Not yet usable end to end. The station side is complete and the server is deployed; no CLI command can select it, so the near side is the missing half.

The relay cannot read your logs, and cannot make a station run anything. That second half is the one that matters: a relay able to forge a request would be code execution inside every estate at once. Content is end-to-end encrypted with keys the relay never holds, and every message is signed. Nothing bespoke - age primitives plus Ed25519. The full account, including what DBHQ can and cannot honestly claim, is in docs/specs/2026-09-06-relay-encryption-design.md. The relay server is its own repository, heliograph-io/heliograph-relay, because it holds no keys and must be publicly, obviously incapable of reading anything it carries.

What the beam is, and what it costs

The beam is designed and not yet built; what follows is what it will do when it lands.

Two of the three shapes never hold a connection open. A beacon leaves a message where both sides can reach it, and needs nothing to be reachable, ever - no inbound port, no endpoint, no tunnel. A flare knocks, waits and leaves; what it does not do is hold the line open once the answer is back, and between the two of them an estate that will not have a held-open line at all still gets the whole job done.

The beam does hold a line open, live and two-way, and that is a tunnel. A blue team will read a held-open channel as one, because it is one. So it is off unless it is explicitly enabled on both ends, it is sealed and signed, and the station refuses to establish one unless it was started to allow it. Where an estate forbids a reverse connection, the beacon and the flare are the answer and nothing is lost but latency.

Every command still runs on the far side because someone with legitimate access chose to let it.

Layout

cmd/heliograph/         the control CLI, and `heliograph mcp`cmd/heliograph-seal/    key generation for the relay transportcmd/heliograph-site/    the static site generatorinternal/transport/     git | relay | share | bundle | objstoreinternal/bootstrap/     `heliograph bootstrap`: plants the embedded stationinternal/wire/          the request and status documents that cross the gapinternal/seal/          sign-then-encrypt, for the relayinternal/logfile/       gap analysisinternal/mcp/           JSON-RPC over stdio, no dependenciesinternal/estate/        which transport a name refers tointernal/plant/         what to send the operatorstation/bash/           the bash station: everything that runs on the far sidestation/bootstrap.sh    the no-CLI bootstrap: clone this repo, run it by handskills/heliograph/      the agent skill: drives the CLI, and nothing elsetests/                  the station's own suite, conformance contract includedsite/content/           the documentation, one source, three renderingsinfra/                  terraform: DNS, Pages, R2 statedocs/specs/             the designs, written before the code

The two halves used to be separate repositories, split along Go-versus-bash rather than along the gap, and every reader had to work out which half they were looking at. dbhq-uk/heliograph-skill was merged in on 2026-09-08 with its full history; the reasoning is in docs/specs/2026-09-08-station-and-skill-merge.md.

That repository was deleted on 2026-09-17 and the name is not in use. It stayed public and archived after the merge, and an archived repository is read-only rather than unreachable: it still cloned, its install.sh still ran, and the station in it had no request-env guard at all (heliograph-cloud#274). Its history is kept privately; this repository's own history carries the merge.

Development

ROADMAP.md is where the work stands: what heliograph is for, what works today, and the epics for now, next and later. Known defects are issues labelled type: bug. CONTRIBUTING.md covers working on it and AGENTS.md is for an AI agent doing so. The skill is skills/heliograph/SKILL.md; docs/dev-setup.md sets it up from source with live edits.

Licence

Apache 2.0 (c) 2026 DBHQ Consulting Ltd, and the prose under site/content/ is CC BY 4.0. Relicensed from MIT on 2026-09-17; every commit up to and including b689f9c stays available under MIT for ever. NOTICE says why Apache rather than MIT, and what the change does not take away.

The relay is a separate repository and a separate licence: heliograph-relay is FSL-1.1-ALv2, fair source, converting to Apache 2.0 two years after each release. No shape is ever gated: beacon, flare and beam all work on a relay you host yourself.

Full statement, including the professional-services grant and its honest limit: https://docs.heliograph.io/licence

來源:README.md,提交 7f1c507

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.4.3最新Sep 17, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分