language
The ZFL language: the columns of a row, the document fields, their meaning and rules.
無需輸入參數。

io.github.inventor1975由 GitHub 帳號 inventor1975 發布v1.1.0更新於 Nov 5, 2026
Zero-trust logic judge: ZFL claims, algebra derivation steps, sets defined by a property.
遠端零信任邏輯判定服務,對 ZFL 主張、代數推導步驟與自指集合給出附保證等級的判定結果。
Web executable,透過 Streamable HTTP。 遠端服務在工作區中設定後即可從網頁執行環境執行。
把這段提示詞貼上到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等代理程式,或 SourceWeft 對話中。代理程式會讀取該伺服器的安裝指南,先向你展示發布者、端點和登入方式,經你同意後再把它新增到你的客戶端。金鑰不會寫進任何命令。
閱讀 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/io.github.inventor1975%2Fztl-judge/install.md,並按其中說明把這個 MCP 伺服器接入我的客戶端。修改任何設定之前,先告訴我它的發布者、端點和登入方式,等我確認。不要把 API 金鑰寫進命令或我會提交的檔案;問我金鑰應從哪裡取得。把它新增到你客戶端的 mcpServers 設定中。
{
"mcpServers": {
"ztl-judge": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.ztljudge.com/mcp"
}
}
}The AI translates; the measured core judges — truth is never granted on credit, not even to the translator.
A local studio for judging claims and paradoxes. You state one in natural language (any language); an LLM only translates it into ZFL, the formal table language — it never judges. A deterministic, measured ZTL core does the judging: verdicts with warranties, quarantine passports for self-referential systems, and a deterministic back-reading that verbalizes exactly what the core read from your table.
The pipeline embodies the logic it serves: the LLM's output is an unverified
input (the mark Z), and the core is the customs house — truth is never
granted on credit, not even to the translator.
Python stdlib only; the ZTL core is vendored in ztlcore/, so a clone is
self-contained (no submodules, no dependencies). The AI is optional: with no
key the studio runs in pro mode — fill the ZFL table by hand. To enable AI
translation, open ⚙ Model, pick a provider + model + key, or set the env
var, or drop a key into a local .<provider>_key file (all gitignored — no
keys ship).
ZFL v2 is a single table of rows plus a claim. Each row states a fact,
its status (T verified / F refuted / Z unverified — the zero-trust
default), its ground, and — importantly — what it means in words (the
polarity auditor: it lets the back-reading catch an encoding that says the
opposite of what you intended). You never declare whether this is a "statement"
or a "paradox": the genre is computed, and whichever instruments apply fire
— a verdict + warranty for a claim, a passport for a self-referential system.
The studio ships 41 worked examples — open one to see the exact shape of the table, then edit it. The back-reading verbalizes what the core actually read, so your translation is audited by a component that cannot hallucinate.
T/F — verdicts are always two-valued; Z is a
mark on an input, never a verdict), the warranty grade, the passport of
unverified inputs, and the completion table showing how the verdict behaves
under every reading of the unverified rows.Keys stay on this machine, read in order: the Settings field, the env var
(GROQ_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, …), then a local .<provider>_key file.
Supported: Groq, Anthropic (Claude), OpenAI, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, Gemini,
xAI, NVIDIA. A stronger model formalizes cleaner; the core judges the same
regardless of who translated.
Built by Claude (Anthropic) as architect and implementer, with Vitaly Reznik as human curator and decision-maker, under a strict honesty discipline: mark boundaries honestly, measure — don't guess, and never claim more than was verified.
Dual-licensed under MIT and Apache-2.0 (see LICENSE-MIT,
LICENSE-APACHE).
來源:README.md,提交 c7e6f19
The ZFL language: the columns of a row, the document fields, their meaning and rules.
無需輸入參數。
Worked examples: questions already written as ZFL documents, ready to judge.
無需輸入參數。
Judge a ZFL document with ZTL, a zero-trust logic: three values, two-valued connectives. Args: document: The ZFL document, as an object or as JSON text: {"rows": [{"name": ..., "means": ..., "status": ..., "ground": ...}], "claim": ...}. Returns: The verdict with its disposition and grade, the receipt, the instruments that applied, the issues found, and what the core read. Read the verdict WITH its disposition: T EARNED = established; F REFUTED = false; F OPEN or Z OPEN = NOT ESTABLISHED, it could still turn either way (do not report it as false) — `why` and `unverified` say what to check; ON CREDIT = holds only on an unverified ground. A compound claim gets T or F; a claim that is a single name gets that name's own value, Z while unverified. The full report is returned whatever `ask` says.
document必填Check an algebra derivation step by step: does each step keep exactly the same solutions? Args: request: {"equations": ["x^2 = x", "x = 1"], "var": "x", "domain": [lo, hi] or null, "domain_verified": true}. Each equation is the next step; one unknown; + - * / ^ with whole powers. Returns: The chain's verdict (its weakest step) and each step's: EARNED = same solutions on the domain; ON CREDIT = the same, on an unverified domain; REFUTED = a solution is lost (e.g. cancelling a factor that can be 0) or gained (e.g. clearing a denominator where the original was undefined), with the witness and the cause; E = the step divides by an expression that is 0 for every value. A request above the public limits is refused with the reason (ok: false, refused).
request必填Judge sets defined by a property, self-reference allowed (Russell's set, a web of trust, a policy rule). Args: universe: {"sets": {name: {"list": [...]} | {"data": {name: "T"|"F"|"Z"}} | {"abs": formula}}, "claims": [formula, ...]}. Formulas: ["in", a, S], ["not", f], ["and"|"or"|"imp"|"iff", f, g], ["all"|"ex", "y", f], ["eq", S, T]; an abs set's own variable is "x". Every name is also an object. Returns: Per set: the members and non-members the definitions ground, and a passport for each membership they leave undecided — PARADOX (no stipulation can repair it), UNDERDETERMINED (consistent; a decision is owed), INTRINSIC, INPUT (verify the given cell), DOWNSTREAM (inherits a quarantine). Per claim: EARNED / REFUTED / EARNED IF STABLE / REFUTED IF STABLE / OPEN, the cells it rests on with their passports, and for a universal claim the instances left undecided. Oversized requests are refused with the reason.
universe必填Ready requests for check_steps and judge_naive (the kernels' own examples).
無需輸入參數。
已滿足適用檢查項的 100%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
human ──meta-chat──► the AI fills a ZFL table (rows + a claim), you sign off │ ▼ validator ──► the deterministic core judges ▼ back-reading (no AI — the second auditor) ▼ verdict · warranty · passport · stipulationspython3 ztlstudio.py # → http://localhost:8190