
cambium (remote)
io.github.jarmstrong158由 GitHub 帳號 jarmstrong158 發布v0.2.0更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Cloudflare Worker for read-only recall of cambium knowledge. MCP 2026-07-28, dual-era.
概覽
一個唯讀的 Cloudflare Worker,讓助理從 cambium 的 git 知識檔案召回已晉升的團隊與組織知識。
- 可以做什麼
- 依查詢檢索團隊與組織知識,可限定範圍與結果數量,相關度不足時明確棄答。查看此 Worker 被設定讀取哪些內容,以及各範圍下有效項目的數量。知識透過 GitHub Contents API 從專案儲存庫 cambium 分支和專用組織知識儲存庫中的 knowledge.json 檔案讀取。個人未晉升的知識無法遠端存取。
- 適用情境
- 當你希望 claude.ai(含手機版)中的助理能用上已晉升的團隊或組織知識,又不想執行桌面版 cambium 伺服器時使用。若召回結果為空,先呼叫狀態查詢。
- 執行需求
- 需要已部署的 Cloudflare Worker 端點;連接器 URL 內含作為憑證的路徑權杖。部署需設定 AUTH_TOKEN 密鑰,以及具備中繼資料與內容讀取權限的 GitHub 權杖(GH_PAT),並設定組織儲存庫與團隊範圍相關變數。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 cambium (remote),將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Web executable,透過 Streamable HTTP。 遠端服務在工作區中設定後即可從網頁執行環境執行。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
cambium-remote
Part of the xylem stack.
A Cloudflare Worker MCP server that makes cambium's promoted knowledge recallable from claude.ai (including mobile) — read-only.
Local cambium is a desktop stdio server; its team knowledge lives on a
cambium branch of each project repo and its org knowledge lives in a
dedicated knowledge repo — both plain knowledge.json files in git. This Worker
reads those files through the GitHub Contents API and serves recall() over
them, the same pattern agentsync-remote
uses for the coordination board.
Read-only by design. It exposes recall and status. It does not
distill, endorse, or promote (those are CAS writes / the generalization
gate — desktop-only), and recall here does not increment recall counts (so
it never feeds promotion). Local (personal, unpromoted) scope is desktop-only
and not reachable remotely — only the promoted team and org tiers are.
Tools
recall(query, scope?, limit?)— search team + org knowledge.scope:auto(default, team+org) |team|org. Abstains withno_confident_matchbelow the relevance floor, exactly like local cambium.status()— what the Worker is configured to read and how many active items each scope holds. Call it first if recall looks empty.
⚠️ Trust model — read this before pointing it at an org
Team "scope" is a read selector, not an authorization control. It answers "where do we look", not "who is allowed to tell us things". Nothing in this Worker checks provenance, signatures, or authorship of the knowledge it serves.
In the default TEAM_SCOPE_MODE = "discover" mode, the entire membership test
for team scope is:
does this repo, owned by
TEAM_OWNER, have a branch namedTEAM_BRANCH?
There is no allowlist and no denylist. So:
- Anyone who can push a
cambiumbranch to any repo underTEAM_OWNERcan inject into your org-wide recall — an outside contributor with write access to one small repo, a compromised CI token, a collaborator you forgot to remove. Theirknowledge.jsonis read as authoritative team knowledge. - It takes effect within the 5-minute discovery cache TTL. No redeploy, no review, no notification.
recall()output is exactly the kind of thing an agent treats as established fact and acts on. This is an injection path into agent behaviour, not merely a data-quality problem.
Discovery remains the default because it is genuinely safe in the
single-operator case this was built for, and because changing it silently would
empty team scope on existing deployments. It is safe only if you are the only
person who can push under TEAM_OWNER.
If anyone else can push under TEAM_OWNER, use strict mode
Team scope then becomes exactly those repos. No discovery scan is performed,
and TEAM_OWNER is ignored entirely — so leaving it set in wrangler.toml
cannot silently re-widen your scope later. Adding a repo becomes a deliberate
config change.
status() reports which model is in force, in plain language, in its own
output. If you are unsure what a deployment is doing, call it.
What status() deliberately does not tell you
By default status() returns the count of team repos, not their names. In
discover mode those names are the output of a scan over everything TEAM_OWNER
owns, so they enumerate private repositories — their existence and their
names — to anyone holding the path token, who has no GitHub identity and no repo
permissions of their own. The count answers the actual diagnostic question
("is team scope finding anything?"). Set STATUS_DISCLOSE_REPOS = "true" to opt
back in. In allowlist mode names are always shown: they are your own committed
config, not a discovery result.
GH_PAT is the broadest credential in the xylem stack
Discovery requires Metadata: Read + Contents: Read across every repo under
TEAM_OWNER, including private ones. That makes this Worker's PAT
substantially more powerful than agentsync-remote's (scoped to one
coordination repo). Two consequences worth acting on:
- Prefer
allowlistmode, which lets you scope the PAT to only the listed repos instead of the whole account. - Treat a leak of
AUTH_TOKENhere as more serious than for the siblings: the Worker will read any in-scope repo on the caller's behalf.
Configure (wrangler.toml vars)
In discover mode team scope is a growing set: a newly team-promoted repo
shows up on mobile within minutes with no redeploy. One GraphQL scan per few
minutes (cached in-isolate) lists the repos; a repo without the branch is
skipped.
Deploy
Then add https://cambium-remote.<subdomain>.workers.dev/mcp/<AUTH_TOKEN> as a
custom connector in claude.ai → Settings → Connectors. The whole URL is the
credential — treat it like a password.
🔒 Auth — the connector URL is a credential
Path-token: POST /mcp/<token>, compared against the AUTH_TOKEN secret in
time independent of both content and length; anything else returns a bare
404. Same scheme, and now literally the same code
(src/shared/mcp-core.ts), as the sibling Workers.
Why the token is in the URL path, and what that costs you
This is a deliberate design choice, not an oversight. claude.ai custom
connectors do not reliably send custom headers, so an Authorization: header —
the obvious alternative — cannot be depended on. Putting the credential in the
path is what makes the connector work at all.
Be clear about the price, because it is not the same as a header:
- URLs get recorded in places request bodies never do. Browser history, shell history, proxy and CDN access logs, crash reports, bug reports, screenshots, "copy link" buttons, and agent session transcripts. During the audit that produced this section, the connector URLs for these Workers were found in ~54 occurrences across 13 local session transcripts on a single machine — none pasted deliberately; they were simply part of the tool configuration an agent echoed back.
- The Worker itself does not log it. Every log line records the route as
/mcp/***. The leak surface is everything around the Worker, which is exactly what you cannot audit. - A leak here is the worst of the three, because this Worker's
GH_PATspans every repo underTEAM_OWNER(see Trust model).
Practical guidance:
- Rotate on a schedule, not just on suspicion — assume the URL has been
recorded somewhere you don't control. Rotation is cheap: change
AUTH_TOKEN, update the connector. - Rotate immediately if you've shared a terminal recording, a transcript, a screen capture, or a bug report from a machine where the connector is configured.
- Use a long random token (32+ bytes, e.g.
openssl rand -hex 32). - Scope
GH_PATas narrowly as yourTEAM_SCOPE_MODEallows. - If you ever get the chance to use a header or OAuth instead, take it. This tradeoff is forced by the client, not preferred.
Development
CI (.github/workflows/ci.yml) runs typecheck + tests on every push and PR,
including in forks. .github/workflows/deploy.yml deploys the canonical repo on
green main only, and is guarded by if: github.repository == … so a fork
never attempts a deploy it has no secrets for.
License
MIT — see LICENSE, matching the sibling
agentsync-remote and
context-keeper-remote
Workers.
Note for the maintainer: this README previously stated PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0 while the repo shipped no LICENSE file at all. An MIT
LICENSEhas been added here to match both siblings. If PolyForm was the intended licence for this Worker, replaceLICENSEand this section before merging — the discrepancy was pre-existing and is flagged rather than assumed.
來源:README.md,提交 e3393bb
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.2.0最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通必需25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式必需10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分

