
Arbitova
io.github.jiayuanliang0716-max由 GitHub 帳號 jiayuanliang0716-max 發布v3.4.0更新於 Nov 3, 2026
Escrow + AI arbitration for A2A payments. Lock funds, confirm delivery, dispute if needed.
概覽
針對 Base 上代理間支付的非託管 USDC 託管與 AI 仲裁服務,讓助理建立、確認、爭議與查詢託管訂單。
- 可以做什麼
- 建立託管訂單,為賣方鎖定 USDC 並設定交付與審核時限
- 標記已交付,確認收貨或提出爭議,未交付時可取消
- 查詢託管訂單狀態,用於唯讀觀察
- 六個工具都透過 ethers v6 在本機簽章,直接呼叫 EscrowV1 合約
- 適用情境
- 當助理需要為互不信任的兩個代理結算付費任務時使用:鎖定資金、確認交付,或提出由中立 AI 仲裁者裁決的爭議。也適合唯讀監控託管狀態。
- 執行需求
- 以 npx 在本機執行,需要 Node.js 環境。需要以太坊地址;執行寫入操作還需透過 ARBITOVA_AGENT_PRIVATE_KEY 提供私鑰,省略該變數則為唯讀模式。README 範例另設定了 RPC、託管合約與 USDC 地址變數。目前僅在 Base Sepolia 測試網運作,主網待稽核。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Arbitova,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
Arbitova
[jiayuanliang0716-max/Arbitova MCP server]
Non-custodial USDC escrow + AI arbitration for agent-to-agent payments on Base.
Two agents lock USDC into a contract, one delivers, the other confirms or disputes, and a neutral AI arbiter resolves. Arbitova never holds the money — the contract does.
No API keys. No registration. No custody. Your Ethereum address is your identity.
- Contract:
EscrowV1at0xA8a031bcaD2f840b451c19db8e43CEAF86a088fCon Base Sepolia — verified on Basescan, mainnet launching after audit - Spec:
A2A-ESCROW-RFC-v0.1 - Machine-readable descriptor:
/.well-known/arbitova.json - Per-case verdict dashboard: arbitova.com/verdicts
- Integration paths: arbitova.com/integrate (raw contract / reference SDKs / agent-native)
- Reference UI (non-canonical, for humans): arbitova.com/pay
- 15-minute tutorial:
docs/tutorials/15-min-paid-agent.md
Why this exists
Every A2A / agent-commerce spec in the wild — MCP, Google's A2A, ERC-7683, Coinbase's Agent Commerce — defines how agents talk. None of them define how money moves when the agents don't trust each other.
Arbitova is the missing settlement primitive:
- Deterministic state machine.
createEscrow → markDelivered → {confirmDelivery | dispute → resolve | cancel}. No hidden branches, no admin override. - No auto-release after timeout. Review windows expire into
DISPUTED, not into seller payout. Silence is safer than a wrong confirmation. - Content-hash pinned on-chain. Sellers can't swap the delivery file after the buyer inspects.
- Per-case verdict transparency. Every arbiter decision is a signed JSON blob; its
keccak256is stored on-chain. The full verdict history is queryable at/verdicts— no aggregation, no delay.
This is not a marketplace. There is no Arbitova account, no listing fee, no Pro tier. The protocol is the whole product.
Quick start — Node.js SDK
Seller-side, arbiter-side, browser wallet integration: see packages/sdk-js/README.md.
Quick start — Python SDK
Quick start — Claude / any MCP client
Six tools: arbitova_create_escrow, arbitova_mark_delivered, arbitova_confirm_delivery, arbitova_dispute, arbitova_cancel_if_not_delivered, arbitova_get_escrow. All sign locally via ethers v6. Your private key never leaves the process.
Omit ARBITOVA_AGENT_PRIVATE_KEY for read-only introspection mode (useful for observability).
Lifecycle
Two terminal states not drawn: CANCELLED (buyer calls cancelIfNotDelivered after delivery window) and auto-escalation into DISPUTED if the review window expires without confirmation.
Framework reference agents
Three end-to-end A2A demos on Base Sepolia with a live AI arbiter:
- Claude Agent SDK — in-process MCP tools
- LangGraph — ReAct agent, buyer + seller + arbiter
- CrewAI — Agent + Task + Crew
Each demo runs the full CREATED → DELIVERED → CONFIRMED (or DISPUTED → RESOLVED) flow with real on-chain transactions.
Packages
Each ships the same six-entrypoint surface so an agent using the Python SDK can settle with an agent using the MCP server — they're hitting the same contract.
Fees
Fees accrue in the contract. The protocol runs on them; there is no subscription.
Networks
Watch the Dev Log for mainnet launch.
Legacy (Path A)
v2.x of the SDKs and v3.4.0 of the MCP server were a custodial HTTP client against api.arbitova.com. That architecture had four structural problems (DB-vs-onchain drift, custody wallet gas, single ADMIN_KEY, single WALLET_ENCRYPTION_KEY point of failure) and was deprecated in favor of Path B — the non-custodial on-chain design described above.
- Migration for SDK users:
sdk/MIGRATION_PATH_A_TO_B.md - Migration for MCP users:
mcp-server/MIGRATION.md
Old packages remain on npm/PyPI but are deprecated.
License
MIT
來源:README.md,提交 f8bb861
工具
0版本歷史
1- v3.4.0最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分