Lynx

io.github.lorenzo-cambiaghi由 GitHub 帳號 lorenzo-cambiaghi 發布v1.9.0更新於 Oct 25, 2026

LynxMCP: 100% local MCP server for the code questions grep can't answer: call graph, hybrid search

已驗證STDIO僅桌面知識與記憶開發者工具

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

Lynx 是本地 MCP 伺服器,為程式碼、文件與 PDF 建立索引,讓助理回答 grep 無法處理的程式碼結構與行為問題。

可以做什麼
以關鍵字與向量混合檢索搜尋程式碼和已索引來源,可只回傳簽章做低成本篩選,或用多種查詢措辭升級檢索,涵蓋單一或全部來源。查詢選用的程式碼知識圖譜,取得呼叫者、被呼叫者、子類別、父類別、匯入、鄰居與最短路徑。定位定義、用法與相似程式碼,並一次呼叫給出符號的定義、呼叫者、被呼叫者與測試。評估影響範圍:含跳數的傳遞呼叫者及需重跑的測試,並只檢索相對基準分支變更的檔案以協助審查。彙整儲存庫或模組,匯出可分享的離線圖譜檢視,並列出來源、查看索引狀態與更新索引。
適用情境
適合大型程式碼庫:需要知道誰呼叫某段程式碼、變更會破壞什麼、某行為在哪裡實作而字面搜尋找不到時;也適合模型訓練資料之後版本的框架文件或 PDF。若儲存庫小到能放進助理上下文,一般 grep 通常已足夠。
執行需求
需本地 Python 環境,以 pipx 或 uv tool install 安裝 lynx-mcp 套件,再用 lynx manager init 建立設定、加入來源並以 lynx build 建立索引。首次建置會下載 130 MB 嵌入模型(磁碟約 460 MB);在 MCP 用戶端以 stdio 指令註冊。未宣告帳號、API 金鑰或請求標頭。
安裝前請注意
唯一的寫入工具是 export_graph,會儲存圖譜檢視檔案;檢索工具標示為唯讀。索引會讀取你的儲存庫、文件與 PDF,選用的 webdoc 來源會抓取公開文件網站,這是除一次性模型下載外唯一的網路存取。專案尚未到 1.x,API 仍可能變動。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Lynx,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

Lynx

LynxMCP is a 100% local MCP server for the code questions grep can't answer: what calls this, what breaks if I change it, where is the code that does X, how does the library version I actually use behave. AST-aware chunking, hybrid BM25 + dense retrieval, an optional code knowledge graph, and your library docs and PDFs indexed next to your code. Works with any MCP client (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Antigravity, ...).

[Tests] [License: Apache 2.0] [Python 3.10+] [Glama score]

[LynxMCP MCP server]

Grep is the right tool when you know the identifier, and your agent already has it. Lynx is for the questions grep cannot answer. Behaviour: "where do we clamp the camera zoom?" matches nothing literal. Structure: who calls this, what inherits from it, what breaks if it changes; polymorphic dispatch leaves no textual trace. Knowledge past the model's training cutoff: the docs of the framework version you run, indexed as a source. Nothing leaves your machine.

What grep can't answer

Each row is measured; the numbers come from the benchmarks below.

QuestionAgentic grepLynx
"What inherits from Field?" (Django, 100 classes over 4 levels)101 grep rounds, one per discovered class4 graph_query calls, file:line on every edge
"What breaks if I change ApplyDamage?"the textual mentions of the nameimpact: every transitive caller with its hop distance, plus the tests to re-run
"Where do we validate session tokens?" on C# (Json.NET)hit@1 33%hit@1 47%
"How does this API behave in the version we ship?"the model's memorythe docs you indexed, cited with the page they came from

Where grep is better, this page says so. On Guava, whose class names document themselves (BloomFilter, RateLimiter), grep ranks higher: hit@1 73% against 60%. On a repository that fits in the agent's context, the built-in tools are fine. Lynx pays off on large codebases, on framework docs your model has gone stale on, and on repeated sessions where re-exploring from scratch is waste.

Quickstart

bash
# 1. Install the CLI (isolated, no venv ritual). About 460 MB on disk, no PyTorch.pipx install lynx-mcp#    or: uv tool install lynx-mcp
# 2. Create a config and point it at your projectlynx manager initlynx source add myproject --type codebase --path /path/to/your/repo
# 3. Build the index (downloads the 130 MB embedding model on first run)lynx build

lynx manager init also offers to open the web UI, where the same source can be added through a guided form with a folder picker. Everything below works either way.

Every tool your AI gets is also a command, with the same name and the same output: lynx find-definition ApplyDamage, lynx impact ApplyDamage, lynx graph query --op callers --symbol ApplyDamage. Add --json to any of them for scripts.

Then register Lynx in your MCP client. Claude Code is shown; the full guide covers Cursor, Antigravity, and generic stdio clients, or let lynx manager ui generate the snippet for you:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "lynx": {      "command": "lynx",      "args": ["serve", "--config", "/absolute/path/to/config.json"]    }  }}

The server answers the MCP handshake in about a second and opens the indexes in the background; a call that arrives earlier gets the loading state back and is retried. If you would rather skip the terminal, there are double-click installers for macOS and Windows.

The tools your AI gets

The tool set is fixed: it does not grow with the number of sources. It is also layered, because every tool definition rides in your client's context on every turn. Three profiles: core (5 tools, about 1,300 tokens of definitions), standard (10 tools, about 2,800 tokens, the default) and full (17 tools, about 4,150 tokens). Set tools.profile in config.json or pass lynx serve --profile full; tools.include adds a single tool to a profile. Tools take a source argument where relevant.

ToolProfileWhat it answers
search(query, source?, outline?)corePrimary hybrid search. Omit source to search every source at once (RRF-fused). outline=true returns signatures only, for cheap triage.
deep_search(queries, source?)standardEscalation: tries multiple query phrasings until one passes a quality threshold.
graph_query(operation, symbol?)standardcallers, callees, subclasses, superclasses, imports, neighbors, shortest_path, overview, surprising_connections, status.
find_definition(symbol)standardWhere is X defined? (AST-precise when the graph is on, BM25 fallback otherwise.)
find_usages(symbol)coreEvery use of X: calls and non-call references (generics, decorators, docs).
find_tests_for(symbol)fullAre there tests for X?
find_similar(snippet)fullDoes code like this already exist?
describe_symbol(symbol)coreOne-shot context for X: definition, who calls it, what it calls, its tests, in a single call.
impact(symbol)coreBlast radius: everything that reaches X transitively through the call graph (with hop distance), plus the tests to re-run.
module_summary(file)fullA file as a unit: the symbols it defines, what it imports, and which files depend on it. (graph)
repo_overview()standard"What is this and where do I start": detected languages, frameworks, entry points, and build/test/run commands.
export_graph(target, mode?)fullRender a shareable, offline graph view (a symbol's blast radius or a file hub) as a single self-contained file. (graph)
search_diff(query, base?)standardSearch only the files changed vs a base branch. Built for code review.
feedback(trying_to_do, tried, stuck)coreThe agent files a report when the index couldn't answer. Stored 100% locally, your signal for tuning sources.
list_sources / get_rag_status / update_source_indexfullIntrospection and maintenance.

Retrieval tools carry MCP readOnlyHint annotations, so clients can auto-approve them. The only write is export_graph, which saves a graph view file. The server ships its usage playbook in the MCP handshake (instructions plus a lynx://guide resource), so your agent knows how to query well without any rules-file setup.

(graph) tools need the optional code knowledge graph enabled for the source. The tool set is per-capability, never per-source.

[Blast-radius graph view: callers above the symbol, callees below, exported as a single offline file]
Shareable graph views: lynx graph export --symbol GetVoxel writes one self-contained, offline file (no server, no CDN) with the symbol's blast radius, who calls it (above) and what it calls (below). Attach it to a PR or archive it for an audit.

How it works

mermaid
flowchart LR    A["Your code + docs + PDFs"] --> B["Tree-sitter<br/>AST chunker"]    B --> C["bge-small<br/>dense embeddings"]    B --> D["code-tokenized<br/>BM25"]    B --> G["Code knowledge graph<br/>(opt-in)"]    C --> R{{"RRF fusion"}}    D --> R    Q(["Your query"]) --> R    R --> RR["Optional<br/>reranker"]    RR --> RES["Ranked code<br/>file : line : symbol"]    G --> GT["Graph tools<br/>callers · subclasses · usages"]
    classDef store fill:#fff3e6,stroke:#e8742c,color:#24292f;    classDef out fill:#e8742c,stroke:#e8742c,color:#fff;    class C,D,G store;    class RES,GT out;
  • Tree-sitter parses 18+ languages (19 grammars, counting TSX) and indexes whole functions and classes, not arbitrary text windows.
  • Retrieval is hybrid: dense embeddings plus code-tokenized BM25, fused with RRF, with an optional cross-encoder reranker.
  • The code knowledge graph (opt-in) records who calls what, inheritance and imports, and answers "what breaks if I change this?" with the actual blast radius.
  • Sources can be codebases, public docs sites (fetched once, on demand; JS-rendered SPAs via optional headless Chromium) and PDFs, searched side by side.
  • A file watcher re-indexes a saved file in about 2 seconds. No manual rebuild ritual.
  • Search and the graph are also served as rows over a local HTTP API, so SQL engines can join your code with tickets, PRs or logs (see Integrations).
  • lynx manager ui gives you guided setup, a query playground, diagnostics and client config snippets in the browser.

Everything runs locally: HuggingFace models are downloaded once, then Lynx switches to offline mode. No telemetry, no cloud index, no code upload. The only network access is the model download and the explicit webdoc fetch step you trigger yourself.

The models run on ONNX Runtime, so there is no PyTorch in the install: about 460 MB on disk, and a 165 MB download on Linux where the torch wheel alone used to bring 4 GB of CUDA libraries. Same model, same vectors, so an index built by an earlier version keeps working.

Open as many sessions on one index as you like: two editor windows, an editor plus the web UI, a CLI query while the server runs. They all search the same index. Only indexing is exclusive, and the process doing it hands over automatically if you close it.

Behind a firewall or on an air-gapped machine? The model can come from a mirror, from this repo's GitHub Releases (the automatic fallback), or from an archive you carry over; see Restricted networks in the guide.

[LynxManager: guided setup, query playground, and diagnostics in the browser]
LynxManager: guided setup, query playground & diagnostics, all in the browser. Full walkthrough

Benchmarks (reproducible)

[Lynx vs agentic grep: fewer tokens to answer on Python, C# and Java; 4 vs 101 tool calls to map a class hierarchy]

Three codebases, three languages, behavioural questions with known ground-truth files, and a grep baseline built to be strong (IDF-weighted multi-keyword ranking with ideal stopword removal, closer to BM25 than to an agent's first rg). Methodology and per-task results: Django, Json.NET, Guava.

grep / LynxDjango 5.2 (Python)Json.NET (C#)Guava (Java)
corpus883 files, 158k lines, 20 questions240 files, 69k lines, 15 questions606 files, 181k lines, 15 questions
hit@595% / 85%67% / 73%93% / 80%
hit@145% / 55%33% / 47%73% / 60%
MRR0.64 / 0.670.47 / 0.580.81 / 0.70
median tokens to answer4,150 / 1,7256,590 / 1,5405,892 / 807
tool round-trips before the code is in context2+ / 12+ / 12+ / 1

Ranking swings with how self-documenting the code is: Lynx ahead on C#, where PascalCase identifiers and sparse comments starve a lexical baseline; mixed on Python, ahead at hit@1 and behind at hit@5 in Django's docstring-rich code; behind on Guava. The token cost does not swing. It drops 58% to 86% every time, because Lynx hands back the whole function with file:line, symbol and score in one call, where grep returns match lines and then needs a read.

The structural gap is of a different kind. "What inherits from Field?" over Django's 100-class hierarchy takes grep 101 rounds, one per discovered class, each a full model inference over the growing context; graph_query answers it in 4 calls from resolved inheritance edges, same recall, file:line on every edge.

bash
# reproduce: Python (Django)git clone --depth 1 --branch 5.2 https://github.com/django/django.git benchmarks/_target/djangopython benchmarks/run_benchmark.py && python benchmarks/structural_demo.py
# reproduce: C# (Json.NET)git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JamesNK/Newtonsoft.Json.git benchmarks/_target/jsonnetpython benchmarks/run_benchmark.py --tasks benchmarks/tasks_jsonnet.json \  --target-dir benchmarks/_target/jsonnet --storage-dir benchmarks/_storage_csharp \  --results-json benchmarks/results_csharp.json --results-md benchmarks/RESULTS_csharp.md
# reproduce: Java (Guava)git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/google/guava.git benchmarks/_target/guavapython benchmarks/run_benchmark.py --tasks benchmarks/tasks_guava.json \  --target-dir benchmarks/_target/guava --storage-dir benchmarks/_storage_java \  --results-json benchmarks/results_java.json --results-md benchmarks/RESULTS_java.md

What it costs, in tokens and in money

Per retrieval, the saving is the measured delta above: 2,400 to 5,100 fewer tokens to get the answer into context. Per session, the tool definitions cost 1,300 tokens (core), 2,800 (standard) or 4,150 (full), so a session has paid for its tool list after the first or second retrieval. outline triage cuts the search step by another 2.4x on broad queries (measured).

In money, for 25 engineers making 60 retrievals a day (31,500 a month), the yearly API bill Lynx removes, as a range across the three codebases:

Flagship model (input $/1M)Measured floorWith the saved round trip
Claude Fable 5 ($10)$9,200 to $19,200$16,700 to $26,800
GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8 ($5)$4,600 to $9,600$8,400 to $13,400

The floor counts only the smaller tool output, no assumptions. The second column adds the one grep round trip Lynx removes, whose 20k-token context is re-read from the prompt cache at a tenth of the input price; that discount is the single modelled assumption, and it is a knob. Run it for your own team, prices and codebase: python benchmarks/savings_calculator.py --devs N, or the interactive savings calculator (presets in pricing.json and measured.json, yours to edit).

[Yearly API bill Lynx removes, by flagship model, for the three benchmarked codebases, with prompt caching]

Read less: outline mode

Every search ranks the same way. search(query, outline=true) (or ?view=outline over HTTP) returns the same ranked hits without their bodies: a one-line signature plus the first line of the docstring, so the agent scans the candidates and reads the single body it needs, by its cited file:line. On a public repo (psf/requests) it cut the search step to 2.4x fewer tokens. When to use which, the measured data and the chart: docs/OUTLINE.md.

Integrations

Search and the code graph are served as NDJSON over a local HTTP API (/api/v1), and the MCP tools compose with any other MCP server your agent has. Everything below stays on your machine; only the other side of a join (GitHub, Jira, Sentry) touches an API.

  • Coral: Lynx is a community source in Coral's registry, lynx.search plus six graph functions, so a behavioural question becomes a SQL table you join with live GitHub or Sentry data.
  • DuckDB: read_ndjson_auto('http://127.0.0.1:8765/api/v1/search?...') is a table, no plugin and no daemon; join code relevance with git churn, error logs or ticket exports.
  • Steampipe: a plugin with lynx_source, lynx_search and lynx_graph tables that join per row, one search per row of another table; prebuilt macOS and Linux binaries on the releases page.
  • GitHub Action: on every PR, a comment with the downstream callers and the semantically related code, indexed locally on the runner.
  • MCP recipes: agent patterns combining Lynx with GitHub, Sentry and Jira MCP servers (triage, PR impact, ticket to code).

Documentation

Full guideConfiguration, all source types (codebase / webdoc / PDF), retrieval internals, tool profiles, troubleshooting
Manager UIGuided setup, playground, diagnostics
Outline modeSignatures instead of bodies: when to use it, measured data, chart
Coral / DuckDB / SteampipeCode search and the code graph as SQL tables
MCP recipesCombining Lynx with GitHub / Sentry / Jira MCP servers
PR impact analysis (GitHub Action)Downstream callers and related code, commented on every PR
config.example.jsonAnnotated example configuration

Status

Developed by one author; APIs may still move before 1.x stabilizes. Issues and PRs are welcome. The test suite runs with pytest and CI must stay green. See ROADMAP.md for what's under consideration (and what is explicitly not planned).

License

Apache 2.0


來源:README.md,提交 67c550c

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v1.9.0最新Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分