simframe

io.github.lvlrSajjad由 GitHub 帳號 lvlrSajjad 發布v0.23.1更新於 Oct 24, 2026

Always-warm iOS Simulator and Android emulator frames: agents read the screen in ~20ms

已驗證STDIO僅桌面瀏覽器自動化開發者工具

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

讓編碼代理以快速文字畫面地圖讀取、點擊和導覽 iOS 模擬器或 Android 模擬器,並記住看過的畫面。

可以做什麼
  • 把目前畫面讀成帶點擊座標的編號文字地圖,並查看自上次查看後有哪些變化
  • 一次呼叫跑完整個流程(點擊、輸入、捲動、等待、斷言),支援備用選擇器與選用步驟
  • 導覽到曾去過的畫面或從記憶重播已儲存的流程,也可只說明目標讓它在本機驅動
  • 無人看管地爬取應用程式,記錄每個畫面和轉換,並以文字或縮圖回顧近期操作
  • 啟動應用程式、開啟深層連結、授予隱私權限,並查看應用程式儲存的資料
  • 執行單一步驟、等待變化、列出模擬器與仿真器,以及要求限制尺寸的截圖查看版面與配色
適用情境
適合需要代理在 iOS 模擬器或 Android 仿真器中操作或驗證應用程式的情況,例如走完註冊或結帳流程、確認清單是否載入、排查按鈕為何沒有反應,同時控制 token 用量。
執行需求
透過 npx 以 stdio 在本機執行,需要 Node 18+。iOS 需要裝有 Xcode 的 Mac 與已啟動的模擬器;Android 需要執行中的仿真器。第一次呼叫會從原始碼建置小型 Swift 守護程序,約 15 秒。啟動多個裝置時需以 --device= 或 SIMFRAME_DEVICE 指定。
安裝前請注意
它會在模擬器中點擊、輸入和啟動應用程式,因此會改變應用程式狀態;Delete、Pay、Send 等破壞性標籤不會被猜測或替換。守護程序連結私有 Apple 框架,Xcode 升級可能使其失效。僅支援模擬器與仿真器,無法連接實機。外掛與 MCP 伺服器只裝其一,否則會有兩個伺服器同時驅動同一裝置。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 simframe,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

simframe

[ci] [npm] [license] [Glama score]

Eyes, hands and memory for a coding agent driving the iOS Simulator or an Android emulator. The agent reads the screen as text with tap points, runs a whole flow in one call, and remembers screens it has seen — so it stops paying a screenshot, a model round trip and a re-read for every single step.

[simframe driving Settings on an iPhone 17 Pro simulator: one call, four verified steps, no screenshots, and the screen returned as text with tap points]

The same app session for a fraction of the tokens. On a real React Native field app, agents did two jobs end to end, submitting for real: create a service request, and add an asset. Measured per run, 2026-10-03:

who droveboth jobs donetool callsscreenshotstokens
Opus with Claude Code's built-in simulator tool, no simframeyes~176112296k
Opus with simframeservice request (the session blocked the asset upload)~50≥4118k
Opus briefing a Sonnet driver with simframe (the plugin's driver agent)yes~88few128k, on the cheaper model

Same model, with and without simframe: 2.5× fewer tokens and 3.5× fewer calls. The Sonnet driver did everything the no-simframe run did, with 2.3× fewer tokens, half the calls and a handful of images where it took 112. It is one run per setup, so read it as a measured example, not a rate; the full write-up, including what it does not show, is in docs/BENCHMARKS.md. It is not near human speed yet, and that is measured too. A person who knows the app did the same two jobs in about 1.5 minutes (medians of five runs: 39 s and 49 s). The agents took 13–16 minutes, 9–10× slower, because they read and verify every step and each model turn costs seconds. Fewer turns per flow, and flows replayed from memory, are what the roadmap is about.

Install in ten seconds

You need a Mac with Xcode (you have one if you have a simulator) and Node 18+. Nothing else — no idb, no Appium, no Python.

Claude Code — as a plugin, which brings the MCP server and the skill that teaches the protocol in one install:

bash
claude plugin marketplace add lvlrSajjad/simframeclaude plugin install simframe@simframe

or the MCP server alone:

bash
claude mcp add --scope user simframe -- npx -y simframe mcp

The plugin also ships a driver agent (simframe:simframe-driver): your main session hands it a goal, it drives on Sonnet with only simframe's tools, and it returns a short report. Limited to simframe, even a small model uses it; with every tool on offer, Haiku never did. The driver needs the plugin install above. It is wired to the plugin's own tool names, so a server added with claude mcp add alone does not get it.

Pick one, not both: two installs mean two servers driving the same device. If you added it with claude mcp add before, claude mcp remove simframe first.

Claude Desktop — Settings → Developer → Edit Config, then add:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "simframe": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "simframe", "mcp"] }  }}

Cursor — [Install in Cursor] or add the same simframe block to ~/.cursor/mcp.json.

Codex, Windsurf, Zed, VS Code, anything else that speaks MCP — the same JSON block, wherever that client keeps its mcpServers.

Then boot a simulator and ask the agent for something: "open my app and tap through the signup flow", "is the list on the Orders tab loading?", "why does the Save button do nothing?". The first call builds a small Swift daemon from source — about 15 seconds, once.

The CLI is the same thing without an agent in the loop, and the cheapest way to check the install:

bash
npm install -g simframesimframe doctor          # every layer, and which engine carries itsimframe ui              # the current screen as a numbered text map

If more than one simulator is booted, name the one you mean with --device=<udid> or export SIMFRAME_DEVICE=<udid>; simframe refuses to guess, because the command that would act on the wrong one is a tap.

What it changes

An agent driving a simulator is slow for three reasons, and only the first is obvious. Every look is a wait (simctl io screenshot costs ~130 ms, paid on every glance). Every step is a model round trip. And nothing is remembered, so the same screen is re-read and re-reasoned about each time it appears. There is a fourth that is pure waste: an image is the most expensive way to ask what is on screen, and it still does not say what is tappable.

Without simframeWith simframe
Look at the screen~130–400 ms screenshot, blocking~20 ms, already captured
"Did anything change?"a full image~2 ms, text only
Reading a screenan image, ~1,600 tokens, no tap points~330 tokens of text, with tap points
A 10-step flow10 turns, 10 images1 turn, 0 images
Same flow, againevery run is the firstreplayed from memory, every step verified, zero model calls
A real two-task app session~176 calls, 112 screenshots, 296k tokens~50 calls, 118k tokens (same model)

Measured on an iPhone 17 Pro simulator, iOS 26.5, Apple Silicon, against a real production app; the full tables with N, median and p95 are in docs/BENCHMARKS.md.

This is what the agent gets back instead of a picture:

iPhone 17 Pro · 402x874pt · screen a1b2c3d4 "Inbox" (known, 3 known exits)last action: [2] tap — ok: matches the outcome seen 5x beforenav-bar:  #1 button    24,64      Back  #2 text      201,64     Inboxcontent:  #3 cell      201,140    Weekly digest  #4 field     201,196    Search = weekly ~ weekly|  #5 switch    201,252    Notifications = 1tab-bar:  #6 text      62,835     Inbox  #7 text      201,835    Settingsnext: settled; nothing ambiguous — chain the next steps in one sim_do without looking again.

Region, type, label, contents, a tap point, and a number the next call can use as a selector. = value is what the accessibility tree says the control contains; ~ value is what OCR read off the pixels. Where they disagree, that is the point.

The tools

ToolWhat it does
sim_uiStart here. The screen as the numbered text map above.
sim_doThe main tool. A whole flow in one call — tap, type, scroll, wait, assert — each step settling before the next and verified against what it did last time. Fallback selectors, optional steps, and a bounded seek let a batch survive a surprise instead of handing it back.
sim_stateHas anything changed since your last look, and which regions moved.
sim_goto · sim_flow_runWalk to a screen simframe has been to before; replay a saved flow with zero model calls.
sim_goalSay where to get to; simframe drives there locally and returns at a milestone — done with evidence, blocked by the barrier, ambiguous, or not found.
sim_mapCrawl an app unattended, read-only by default, and record every screen and transition so later work runs from memory. Never crosses the verify barrier or leaves the app.
sim_find · sim_tap · sim_type_into · sim_scroll_to · sim_wait_for · sim_assertSingle actions, for when you genuinely only have one step.
sim_launch · sim_open_url · sim_permissionLaunch (confirmed to have reached the front), open a deep link, grant a privacy permission without tapping the alert.
sim_lookThe only tool that returns an image, capped at 1024 px — for layout, colour and spacing.
sim_recall · sim_strip · sim_storageWhat happened in the last minute, as text or as a contact sheet; what the app saved (UserDefaults, AsyncStorage), even on a device that is shut down.
sim_wait · sim_capture · sim_devicesWait for change then settle; manage capture; list simulators and emulators.

Three ways to name a control, anywhere one is named: "Save" (resolved by intent — verbs, typos, synonyms, icon-only controls by their common name), #3 (the number the map gave it, valid for that screen only), or @120,400 (raw points, last resort). A label that matches the destructive vocabulary — Delete, Pay, Send, Sign out — is never substituted for or guessed at.

A Claude Code skill ships in the package and teaches the CLI path, which is cheaper still: a few lines of output instead of a tool result, and no MCP schema in context until a tool is used.

Android

The second backend drives an Android emulator with the same commands, the same screen map and the same memory. Frames arrive at ~41 ms through the emulator console; tap, swipe, text, keys and the clipboard work; simframe devices lists emulators next to simulators. What Android does not have is an accessibility tree, so its screens are read by OCR and CV alone — and simframe doctor says so rather than pretending. Details, costs and the reasoning are in the guide.

How it works, briefly

One Swift daemon per device reads the simulator's framebuffer straight off its IOSurface when the display reports damage, runs Apple's Vision OCR on the same surface, reads the accessibility tree host-side, and sends taps as real down/move/up sequences over the HID channel — no PNG, no file, no spawned process. Frames land in ~/.simframe/<udid>/, input goes over a 0600 Unix socket, and the MCP server and CLI are thin clients over both.

Screen memory keys a merged element map by a structural fingerprint, so a screen seen before is a file read. A transition graph records which action led from which screen to which, so sim_goto plans a route and a saved flow replays with no model in the loop.

Every layer degrades rather than fails, and never quietly: simframe doctor reports each one and --strict turns any downgrade into a non-zero exit. The private frameworks the daemon links are documented, with evidence, in docs/PRIVATE_API.md.

Read on

docs/GUIDE.mdthe full guide: recovering without a round trip, screen memory and the two hashes, navigating by memory, the CLI, diagnosing a wedged simulator, keeping a session cheap, the roadmap
docs/BENCHMARKS.mdevery number, with N, median, p95, machine and the measurement traps
docs/EXPERIMENTS.mdwhat we believed before measuring, and the fourteen times it was wrong
docs/DECISIONS.mdthe judgements that changed the plan, including a phase cancelled by its own measurement
docs/DEFERRED.mdevery known defect, open or closed, with the evidence
docs/ARTICLE.mdAgents shouldn't blink — the argument the whole thing adds up to

Almost everything here was decided by a measurement rather than an argument, and several measurements reversed a decision that had already shipped. Two headline results: a warm transition graph removes about 27% of an agent's model round trips, and a one-line threshold on a number the daemon already computes beat every local model tried as a step supervisor — 95% against 77–91%, at zero latency.

Limitations

  • Simulators and emulators only; nothing here can reach a physical device.
  • The daemon links private frameworks. They survived the iOS 26 transition, but an Xcode upgrade can move a symbol; doctor names the broken layer and --engine=screenshot still works.
  • Android has no accessibility tree, so screen identity there rests on OCR geometry alone: thinner and noisier than iOS.
  • Hardware buttons: only home. The other codes are unverified and a wrong one can crash the device, so they return an error rather than a guess.
  • The confirm vocabulary (OK, Save, Done…) is English.
  • It speeds up confirming a fix, not locating one. A bug in a stale closure is not visible in any frame.

The full list, with the measurements behind each item, is in the guide.

Releasing

npm version is the only way to bump a version — its hook keeps server.json in step — and git push --follow-tags runs a workflow that publishes to npm and the official MCP Registry with no secrets. Why it is built that way, and the release that once vanished for a week, is in the guide.

License

MIT

來源:README.md,提交 b961906

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

11
  1. v0.23.1最新Oct 4, 2026
  2. v0.22.0Oct 3, 2026
  3. v0.21.0Oct 3, 2026
  4. v0.20.1Oct 1, 2026
  5. v0.19.1Oct 1, 2026
  6. v0.19.0Sep 25, 2026
  7. v0.18.0Sep 17, 2026
  8. v0.17.0Sep 17, 2026
  9. v0.15.1Sep 16, 2026
  10. v0.15.0Sep 16, 2026
  11. v0.14.3Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分