
memalyze
io.github.mahaoboy由 GitHub 帳號 mahaoboy 發布v0.1.0更新於 Nov 1, 2026
Self-hosted agent memory: redaction before write, append-only audit, local embeddings.
概覽
自架的離線代理記憶伺服器,寫入前先脫敏、每次讀取都留稽核,並使用本機嵌入模型。
- 可以做什麼
- 儲存記憶,在去重、索引與嵌入之前先做脫敏,並回報觸發了哪些規則
- 依向量相似度檢索記憶,並以關鍵字補足;向量路徑不可用時降級為純關鍵字搜尋
- 依 id 軟刪除記憶,重複刪除也安全
- 用簡單的 echo 工具確認 MCP 連線正常
- 透過命令列把僅可追加的稽核日誌匯出為 CSV 或 JSON,並產生一致的資料庫快照
- 適用情境
- 適合需要把代理記憶留在本機或自有伺服器、不能依賴雲端 API 或執行時下載模型,且要能回答「誰在何時讀了哪些資料」的情境。對合規或離線環境,以及希望工具面盡量小的使用者較合適。
- 執行需求
- 以本機靜態二進位透過 stdio 執行,或使用 Claude Desktop 的 MCPB 安裝包,或以 Docker 搭配 Streamable HTTP 執行。本機嵌入需要 Ollama 端點(預設 qwen3-embedding:0.6b 模型(約 640 MB)。從原始碼建置需要 Go 1.27+。透過環境變數設定,例如 MEMALYZE_DB、MEMALYZE_OLLAMA_URL 與 MEMALYZE_HTTP_TOKEN。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 memalyze,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
memalyze
MCP-native, self-hosted memory for AI agents — with the governance an enterprise will actually ask for.
One static binary. Local embeddings. No cloud, no graph database, no Python stack. Redaction happens before anything is written; every read is audited.
Website · MCP Registry · v0.1.0
v0.1.0 is out — static binaries for linux/darwin/windows, checksums published alongside.
The problem
Every agent framework ships its own memory: a vector table here, a JSON file there, a "notes" folder somewhere else. Three things follow, and all three hurt in production:
- You cannot audit it. "Which customer's data did the agent read last Tuesday?" has no answer, so security review stops the project.
- You cannot deploy it offline. Most options either call a cloud API or download model weights from HuggingFace at runtime — both fail inside a bank, a hospital, or a factory.
- You cannot keep it small. Twenty-three tools, a graph database, and a Python dependency tree later, the "memory feature" is a second product to operate.
memalyze is the middleware that fixes those three, and nothing else.
What is different
* A database trigger rejects UPDATE on audit_log; DELETE is not blocked, so anyone
with the database file can remove rows. It is append-only at the SQL level, not WORM — export
to object-lock or syslog storage if deletions are inside your threat model
(SECURITY.md).
Not another mem0, and not Basic Memory either: those are good at remembering. memalyze assumes remembering is becoming a commodity and competes on governance, offline operation, and a deliberately small surface.
30-second demo
No Ollama, no network, no MCP client:
It writes a memory containing a phone number, an e-mail and a resident ID, then shows:
- what is actually stored (
[REDACTED:phone], not13800138000); - that searching for the original number returns 0 hits;
- that a business-word search still hits, returning the redacted text;
- the audit rows for the two writes and the two reads.
Details and transcripts: docs/s15-redaction-audit.md.
Quick start
1. Binary + local embedding model
Prebuilt, checksum-verified (Linux/macOS; Windows: take the .exe from the release page):
From source (Go 1.27+): make build, then ./memalyze --version.
2. Wire it into a harness
Claude Code (project scope):
Cline: copy examples/cline/cline_mcp_settings.json and .clinerules.
Generic harness: examples/custom-harness/ — one prompt contract
plus pseudocode. All options: examples/README.md.
3. Or one-click in Claude Desktop (MCPB)
Download the bundle for your platform from the
v0.1.0 release and open it.
Claude Desktop shows an install sheet and asks where to keep memalyze.db.
The binary inside is the same v0.1.0 build as above. These bundles are new and have not
been opened on a real macOS/Windows desktop yet — if the install sheet does not appear,
use the plain binary. The server is also listed in the
MCP Registry.
4. Or run it in Docker (memalyze + Ollama + model pull)
Point a Streamable-HTTP MCP client at http://127.0.0.1:8080/mcp with
Authorization: Bearer $MEMALYZE_HTTP_TOKEN. See docs/s16-docker.md.
Tools
Four, on purpose. Every extra tool is a decision the model has to make.
There is no memory_context tool: memory_search already returns text you can paste
into a prompt, and two overlapping tools make model choice worse (D-017).
Governance
Redaction (write path). Rules run in memory.Service.Add before dedup, FTS and
embedding — so plaintext never reaches the main table, the full-text index or a vector.
Modes: enforce (default), dry-run (count only, for tuning), off (debugging).
Custom rule packs are JSON: examples/redaction-rules.json.
Audit (read path). Append-only audit_log (a database trigger rejects UPDATE):
actor, tenant, scope, action, memory id, timestamp, result count, degraded, redaction
count. The search text itself is stored as SHA-256 + length unless you explicitly set
MEMALYZE_AUDIT_QUERY_PLAIN=1.
What is not here yet: per-user authentication (one token per process, actor from
env), audit retention/purge, reversible redaction, audit UI.
Retrieval, measured
Numbers from S8 on a 60-memory Chinese corpus, 16 queries, measured not assumed
(docs/s8-retrieval-report.md):
Two counter-intuitive findings that shaped the design: SQLite FTS5's default tokenizer cannot search Chinese at all (0.19 recall until we stored bigram text), and RRF fusion scored worse than vector-only, so v0.1 does not fuse. See D-012.
Latency (S14, cold start fixed): warmup 37.8 s in background, then search 1.14 s with
degraded=false; after five idle minutes a fresh process answers in 1.52 s. If the vector
path is unavailable, search degrades to keyword in ≤3 s instead of hanging (D-015/D-018).
How it works
- SQLite (WAL) with ULID ids, partial unique index for dedup, soft delete, TTL.
- Vectors are
float32little-endian BLOBs; search is brute-force cosine (fine under ~10k memories, and the honest limit of a single-binary design). - Schema migrations are versioned via
PRAGMA user_version(v1 → v2 adds the audit table).
Operations
- systemd:
deploy/systemd/memalyze.service+docs/s16-systemd.md(hardened unit, env file, backup timer). - Docker:
docs/s16-docker.md. backupusesVACUUM INTO, so snapshots are consistent under WAL and include the audit table; it refuses to overwrite an existing file.
Configuration
All through environment variables; defaults work out of the box.
Status
Honest snapshot — this is an early-stage project, not a 1.0.
Known gaps: no per-user auth, no audit retention, the Docker image has not been built in CI (no daemon in the dev environment), brute-force vector scan, Chinese-first defaults (English works, but the tokenizer is tuned for CJK).
Docs
Pilot
Two-week pilot: we install memalyze in your environment, tune the redaction rules to your data, review the audit export with you, and write down the threat-model gaps we find. No fee; you keep the deployment and the notes.
Request a pilot · Integration notes
Non-goals
- Not a SaaS: you self-host, we do not hold your data.
- Not an agent framework: it never takes over the harness.
- Not a knowledge graph: no entity extraction pipeline, no graph database.
- Not feature-maximal: four tools, one binary, and a hard "no" to anything that needs an operator.
License
AGPL-3.0-or-later (LICENSE). Commercial licensing for embedding in closed products:
open an issue titled commercial license.
Contributions: see CONTRIBUTING.md. Security reports: see
SECURITY.md.
來源:README.md,提交 cd42806
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.1.0最新Oct 25, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分