Sovereign Gateway

io.github.mattijsmoens由 GitHub 帳號 mattijsmoens 發布v0.3.0更新於 Oct 24, 2026

Gating proxy for MCP servers: policy, verification and one audit trail across upstreams.

已驗證STDIO僅桌面開發者工具安全與監控

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

在本機執行的 MCP 閘道代理,把多個上游伺服器的工具整合到一處,並對每次呼叫執行政策、注入過濾與稽核。

可以做什麼
把多個上游 MCP 伺服器的工具目錄合併成單一具命名空間的入口(例如 git__git_status)。依拒絕清單、允許清單與 PII 政策攔截工具呼叫。比對參數型別與啟動時凍結的工具定義,並過濾參數中的提示注入文字。檢查回傳結果的結構、欺騙、PII 與內容,並可套用自訂一致性規則。把每次允許或拒絕的呼叫寫入雜湊鏈稽核日誌。可選擇讓多個模型對同一結果做共識比對。
適用情境
當助理需要同時存取多個 MCP 伺服器,而你希望集中管理哪些工具可用、攔截參數中的提示注入,並保留一份統一的呼叫稽核紀錄時使用;特別適合無法修改原始碼的第三方伺服器。
執行需求
需要本機 Python 環境並以 pip 安裝此套件,透過 stdio 執行。需要一份列出上游伺服器的 gateway.json,可由現有的 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS Code 或 Windsurf 設定產生。文字過濾、意圖檢查、輸出規則與共識為選用附加套件;共識需至少兩個不同模型供應商,託管供應商的金鑰從指定環境變數讀取。
安裝前請注意
作為代理,它會看到經過它的所有工具呼叫與結果,並寫入稽核日誌。拒絕清單、允許清單與 PII 攔截需自行設定,PII 政策預設只警告不攔截。共識層預設關閉,每次呼叫會增加費用與延遲,並把工具輸出傳送給所設定的模型。它無法發現上游伺服器內部失效的檢查,也無法防範回傳看似正確資料的遭入侵上游。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Sovereign Gateway,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

sovereign-mcp-gateway

A gating proxy for Model Context Protocol servers. Point your MCP client at the gateway instead of at your servers. It connects to every upstream you list, merges their tool catalogues into one, and puts every call through a verification chain before it reaches the server that would execute it.

[Built on patent-pending components]

bash
pip install sovereign-mcp-gatewaysovereign-mcp-gateway --init          # writes gateway.json from the servers you already runsovereign-mcp-gateway --config gateway.json --check

--init reads the MCP configuration you already have (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Windsurf) and writes a gateway.json that proxies those same servers, so the first run produces a working config rather than a configuration error. It will not import the gateway's own entry, because that would make it proxy itself.

The gateway is itself an MCP server, so any client that speaks MCP works with no changes.

That base install is a working gateway. Four optional extras add further layers on top — see Installing.


What it stops

An agent reads a GitHub issue whose body carries an instruction aimed at the model rather than at you. It is persuaded, and calls git_commit.

commits afterinjected commit present
straight to mcp-server-git2yes
through the gateway1no

Same tool, same arguments, same server. The difference is whether anything was in a position to refuse.

Read the walkthrough: Your agent reads an issue — or run it:

bash
pip install "sovereign-mcp-gateway[all]" mcp-server-gitpython examples/poisoned_issue.py

Why a proxy and not a library

A library has to be adopted by whoever wrote the server. A proxy protects servers you cannot modify — which is most of them, because the useful MCP servers are published packages someone else maintains.

It also gives you one place to hold policy and one audit trail across every server an agent can reach, rather than per-server configuration nobody keeps in sync.

Configure

Start from what you already run

$ sovereign-mcp-gateway --init
Wrote gateway.json
  imported 3 servers from Claude Desktop    /Users/you/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json  imported 1 server from VS Code (project)
  upstreams: fetch, git, sqlite, time
  skipped:    sovereign - this gateway - importing it would proxy itself    notion    - no command, probably a remote/SSE server    git       - already imported from another client

Four things it will not do: import itself, import a remote server it cannot launch as a subprocess, overwrite an existing file without --force, or write a deny_tools list you did not choose. It writes the file, tells you what it took and what it left, and stops.

Pass --config PATH alongside --init to write somewhere other than ./gateway.json.

After running it, replace those servers in your client with a single entry for the gateway. Leaving both means your agent talks to them directly as well as through the proxy, and the audit trail will only show half the traffic.

json
{  "servers": {    "git":    {"command": "mcp-server-git",    "args": ["--repository", "/repo"]},    "sqlite": {"command": "mcp-server-sqlite", "args": ["--db-path", "/data.db"]}  },  "policy": {"deny_tools": ["git__git_reset"], "pii_policy": "warn"},  "audit":  {"path": "gateway-audit.jsonl"}}

Check the wiring before a client ever sees it:

bash
sovereign-mcp-gateway --config gateway.json --check
SOVEREIGN GATEWAY - configuration checkupstreams: 2layers:   policy -> intent -> text-filter -> frozen-verify -> audit
EXPOSED AS                             UPSTREAM TOOLgit__git_status                        git.git_statusgit__git_reset                         git.git_reset          [DENIED]sqlite__read_query                     sqlite.read_query...18 tools exposed.

The chain

policy → intent → text-filter → frozen-verify → [ call executes ] → output-verify → logic-rules → audit
LayerPackageRefuses when
policy—the tool is on a deny list, or absent from an allow list
intentintentshieldthe call fails the behavioural floor
text-filtersovereign-shieldan argument carries injection, in any of 21 languages or seven encodings
frozen-verifysovereign-mcpthe call disagrees with the tool definition frozen at startup
output-verifysovereign-mcpthe result fails schema, deception, PII or content checks
logic-ruleslogicshieldthe result is inconsistent with rules you configured
auditsovereign-mcp— records every call, allowed or refused, in a hash-chained log

Installing

The base install is a working gateway, not a stub:

bash
pip install sovereign-mcp-gateway

That gives you policy → frozen-verify → audit, which already refuses a tool no upstream exposes, an argument of the wrong type, an undeclared parameter, a tool on your deny list, and prompt injection in an argument. Nothing else needed.

Each extra adds a layer on top:

ExtraAddsWorth it when
[text]sovereign-shield — a deeper pass over string arguments: 21 languages, and seven-variant decoding for payloads hidden in base64, hex, ROT13, leetspeak or reversed textYour agents read text from anywhere you don't control. The base install catches IGNORE ALL PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS; it will not catch the same sentence base64-encoded, or written in Dutch
[intent]intentshield — a behavioural floor applied regardless of which tool was called: shell bans, delete bans, credential URLs, malware syntaxYou want a backstop that doesn't depend on getting every tool's schema right
[rules]logicshield — consistency rules you write for tool outputYou can express what a correct result looks like. Does nothing until you set output_rules
[consensus]requests — needed by Layer C's HTTP providersYou're enabling N-model consensus with a hosted provider

Combine what you want, or take everything:

bash
pip install "sovereign-mcp-gateway[text]"             # one extrapip install "sovereign-mcp-gateway[text,intent]"      # severalpip install "sovereign-mcp-gateway[all]"              # every layer

All four extras are small pure-Python packages — [all] adds no compiled dependencies and no service to run.

A partial install degrades visibly. The gateway prints its active layers at startup, so you can always see what is actually running:

layers:   policy -> frozen-verify -> audit                                  # baselayers:   policy -> intent -> text-filter -> frozen-verify -> audit         # [all]

If a layer isn't on that line, it isn't running — whatever you think you installed.

Verified end to end

Against mcp-server-git and mcp-server-sqlite running as real upstreams, driven by a real MCP client:

CallResult
git__git_status, git__git_logallowed
sqlite__create_table, __write_query, __read_queryallowed — the row is really in the database
git__git_resetrefused: on the deny list
git__git_push_forcerefused: no upstream exposes it
git__git_status(repo_path=12345)refused: wrong type for the frozen schema
git__git_commit("IGNORE ALL PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS…")refused: text filter
sqlite__git_commit(...)refused: a tool cannot be reached through another upstream's namespace

Afterwards the repository still holds one commit and the database holds exactly the row it should — checked by opening them directly, not by trusting the gateway's own report. Eleven audit records for ten calls; editing any one of them breaks the chain.

Those cases are the test suite, not a screenshot: pytest tests/ -v.

Layer C: N-model consensus

Every other layer is deterministic and local. Layer C is the exception: it asks several independent models to extract the same structured document from a tool's result, canonicalises each answer, and compares the SHA-256 hashes. Agreement is decided by hash, not by prose.

It is off unless configured, because it is the only layer that costs money and latency per call, and the only one that sends tool output to a model.

json
{  "servers": { "...": {} },  "consensus": {    "providers": [      {"type": "local", "model": "llama3.1:8b"},      {"type": "local", "model": "qwen2.5:7b", "base_url": "http://localhost:11434/v1"},      {"type": "openrouter", "model": "anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",       "api_key_env": "OPENROUTER_API_KEY"}    ]  }}

Two provider types: local (any OpenAI-compatible endpoint — Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio; base_url defaults to http://localhost:11434/v1) and openrouter (the key is read from the named environment variable, never written in the config).

Three rules the gateway enforces at startup rather than discovering at runtime:

  • At least two providers. One model cannot disagree with itself; a consensus of one reports agreement on every call, which is worse than no layer because it looks like verification.
  • No duplicate models. Two instances of the same model agreeing is not independent verification.
  • A missing API key refuses to start. It does not fall back to running without the layer.

All providers run at temperature = 0, enforced in the constructor.

Check your models agree before you trust the layer

--check runs one real consensus call against your configured models and tells you what happened. This matters more than it sounds:

LAYER C  - probing the configured models with one real call--------------------------------------------------------------  OK. The configured models produced identical documents.  Layer C will pass ordinary output rather than refusing it.

Consensus compares canonical hashes, so two models that are both semantically right but structurally different never agree. A weaker model that echoes the schema back —

json
{"branch": {"type": "string", "value": "main"}}   instead of   {"branch": "main"}

— mismatches on every call, forever, and the gateway refuses everything with a reason that correctly reads "the models disagreed". Because they did.

The probe distinguishes the three outcomes:

means
OKthe models produced identical documents; the layer is usable
MISMATCHthey disagree on a trivial document and will refuse every call — replace a model, or drop the section
provider unreachablenothing was verified; a key, a model ID or an endpoint is wrong

Install sovereign-mcp-gateway[consensus] or [all] — the HTTP providers need requests, which the core library deliberately does not depend on.

--check also lists the active layers, so you can confirm at a glance:

layers:   policy -> intent -> text-filter -> frozen-verify -> consensus -> audit

If consensus is absent from that line, it is not running, whatever the config says.

Namespacing

With namespace on (the default) a tool is exposed as git__git_status. Two upstreams offering the same tool name cannot collide, shadow each other, or be reached through the wrong namespace. Turn it off only when you have a single upstream.

Policy

json
"policy": {  "deny_tools":  ["git__git_reset", "write_query"],  "allow_tools": null,  "pii_policy":  "warn",  "fail_closed": true,  "rate_limit_interval": 0}
  • deny_tools matches either the exposed name (git__git_reset) or the upstream tool name (git_reset, on every upstream that has it).
  • allow_tools, when set, refuses everything not listed.
  • pii_policy defaults to warn, not block. Real tools return personal data as normal output — every git log entry carries an author email — and blocking those makes the gateway unusable. Set block when your tools should never emit PII.
  • fail_closed decides what happens when a layer itself errors. Default: refuse.
  • rate_limit_interval is 0, which disables the behavioural floor's own inter-action delay. That delay is right for one agent taking deliberate steps and wrong for a proxy, where a burst of tool calls is ordinary traffic.
  • entropy_policy defaults to warn. The text filter's entropy heuristic hunts for encoded payloads hidden in prose, but tool arguments are routinely structured — paths, identifiers, hashes — where high entropy is normal. A temporary directory path alone was enough to have a legitimate call refused. Set block when your arguments really are prose.

What this does not do

It verifies calls against frozen definitions and inspects arguments and results. It does not read your servers' source, so it cannot see a check that is present, is called, and silently does nothing. That still takes someone reading the implementation.

It also cannot protect against a compromised upstream returning correct-looking data — Layer C consensus in sovereign-mcp addresses that, and requires model providers you configure yourself.

Licence

Business Source License 1.1 — see LICENSE.

The source is public. You may read it, modify it, create derivative works and use it for development, evaluation and any other non-production purpose at no cost.

Production use is also free for an individual, or an organisation of four or fewer people — that is written into the licence as an Additional Use Grant, not just stated here. Larger organisations need a commercial licence.

Each version converts to Apache 2.0 on its Change Date, four years after publication.

To license it for production, or to ask whether your use needs one: [email protected]

來源:README.md,提交 d9f215e

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.3.0最新Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 40%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分

    請在儲存庫或註冊中心條目中宣告授權條款。