
distil
io.github.munhq由 GitHub 帳號 munhq 發布v0.3.4更新於 Oct 28, 2026
Context optimization for LLM agents: tool registry, result masking, budgeting, compaction.
概覽
本機 MCP 伺服器,用來最佳化 LLM 代理的上下文:工具登錄表、結果遮蔽、預算與壓縮層,並可量測 token 與快取成本。
- 可以做什麼
- 透過快取對齊、暫存板、遮蔽、摘要、壓縮與預算等層最佳化代理上下文。
- 以登錄表層與程式碼模式層註冊並路由工具。
- 逐層回報最佳化前後的 token 數與明細。
- 在本機 Claude Code 工作階段紀錄上量測上下文成本,包含清除工具結果的損益兩平表。
- 匯出工作階段並對本機模型執行保留度探測。
- 適用情境
- 適合需要量測或降低長工作階段中上下文與提示快取成本,或想實驗上下文分層與工具登錄表的情況。README 本身指出多數改寫歷史的層得不償失,並建議優先採用供應商原生功能,因此它較適合評估與處理上下文溢出,而非日常使用。
- 執行需求
- 以本機 stdio 程序執行,通常透過 npx 從 npm 套件啟動,因此需要 Node.js;沒有 Node 的使用者可用預先建置的執行檔與 bash 安裝腳本。不需帳號、API 金鑰或設定。Windows 上執行腳本需要 Git Bash、MSYS2 或 WSL。選用的基準測試與探測功能需要本機工作階段紀錄,探測另需模型端點。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 distil,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
[npm] [MCP Registry] [Smithery] [license]
[Install in Cursor] [Install in VS Code]
No account, no API key, nothing to configure. The package is a small wrapper that
fetches the binary for your platform and verifies it against the published
checksums; install.sh and a prebuilt binary remain for anyone without Node.
Cache writes are 2% of your tokens and 28% of your bill
That is not a claim, it is a measurement: 13,814 real agent sessions, 410,742 assistant turns, re-run on 2026-08-29. Every unique token in them was billed 550 times, because a request resends the whole history.
Which means the obvious move — compress the history — is usually the wrong one. Editing history invalidates the cached prefix from the edit onwards and converts reads at 0.1x into writes at 1.25x or 2.0x. You cannot compress your way out of context cost. You can only decline to admit tokens.
[Where an agent session's tokens go: tool results 59.9%, tool calls 17.9%, user text 14.0%, assistant text 7.2%, thinking 1.0%] [How much a rewrite must delete just to break even: 8% with one turn left, 46% with ten, 90% with a hundred]Every tool in this space publishes a savings percentage measured on its own
fixtures. What none publishes is the denominator: what share of a real session
it is allowed to touch, and what that share costs once prompt-cache pricing is
applied. distil measures both on transcripts an agent actually wrote.
What is prior art, and what is not. The cache arithmetic below is not a
discovery. Anthropic's context editing
docs
state that clearing tool results invalidates the cached prefix, and ship
clear_at_least so a clear only fires when it is large enough to pay for that.
The break-even rule is published too: on a 5-minute cache, cleared tokens times
requests-before-the-next-clear must exceed 11.5 times the tokens you keep. The
table in this README reproduces that rule exactly — it was derived
independently, which is a check on the arithmetic, not a contribution.
The gap is empirical. Every source says to calibrate against your own workload,
and none ships a way to do it or publishes what the values turn out to be. That
is what this crate is for: measuring the numbers you need in order to choose
clear_at_least, or to decide not to clear at all.
The full measurement
Measured 2026-08-29 over 13,814 local Claude Code transcripts — 410,742
assistant turns, 212.7M tokens of unique text. Reproduce it on your own corpus
with distil-bench ~/.claude/projects; a corpus grows, so the date matters
more than the decimals.
Those 212.7M unique tokens were billed as 116.9 billion input tokens — every token paid for 550 times, because a request resends the whole history.
Price that at real cache multipliers (read 0.1x, write 1.25x for the 5-minute TTL and 2.0x for the 1-hour):
Cache writes are 2% of the tokens and 28% of the bill. Editing history invalidates the cached prefix from the edit onwards, converting reads at 0.1x into writes at 1.25x or 2.0x. So a rewrite must shrink what it invalidates below:
That table is the published break-even rule in another form: at every row,
cleared x turns / kept equals 11.5 for the 5-minute tier. Use it to pick a
clear_at_least value, and use distil-bench to find the turn count and tail
size to put into it — those are workload properties, and they are the part
nobody publishes.
Per unit of history, at 10 remaining turns: keeping it costs 1.00, compressing it costs 2.15, and never admitting it costs 0. You cannot compress your way out of context cost. You can only decline to admit tokens.
What that means for using this crate
Layers that do not touch history are on the right side of that arithmetic:
CacheAlignLayer (orders content so the stable prefix stays cacheable) and
ScratchpadLayer (keeps working state outside the window).
Layers that rewrite history — MaskingLayer, SummarizationLayer,
CompactionLayer — cost more than they save in the common case. Reach for them
at one boundary only: context overflow, where the alternative is a failed
request and cache price stops being the comparison. BudgetLayer exists for
exactly that moment.
RegistryLayer and CodeModeLayer predate Anthropic's Tool Search Tool and
Programmatic Tool Calling, which do the same jobs natively and better. Prefer
the native features.
For clearing old tool results, prefer the provider's clear_tool_uses context
editing over MaskingLayer: it runs server-side, it takes clear_at_least, and
it is one API parameter against a dependency. Reach for a layer here only when
you need behaviour the API does not offer.
Measuring
See bench/README.md for the external-tool comparison, the
fairness rules, and the two harness mistakes that produced wrong numbers first.
Retention
A saving is only a saving if the model can still answer what the original context could answer.
The probe taxonomy is Factory.ai's;
their write-up defines it and ships no harness. The judge is a Completer,
never a Summarizer — a summarizer may impose summarization framing, which
rewrites both the probe format and the grading instruction.
Using it as a library
This example is kept compilable as
examples/readme_quickstart.rs — run it with
cargo run --example readme_quickstart.
Every layer implements Layer and reports tokens_before, tokens_after and a
detail line, so each one can be measured on its own.
Features
Install
install.sh installs both binaries, drops the skill into every Claude home it
finds, and registers the MCP server at user scope. When the plugin is already
installed it installs the binary only, since the plugin declares the server and
ships the skill itself.
The plugin launches the server with npx -y @munhq/distil, so it needs Node.
It cannot use a plugin-relative path: Claude Code expands ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}
and nothing else does, so a plugin declaring one hands every other client a
literal path that does not exist. install.sh and the prebuilt binaries remain
for anyone without Node.
Platform support
The release publishes six targets and plugin/test_platform.sh holds both the
installer and the plugin launcher to that matrix, so an asset name and the name
asked for cannot drift apart. install.sh and the launcher are bash scripts, so
on Windows they need a shell — cmd and PowerShell cannot run them. Linux
binaries are static musl builds, so they do not need a matching glibc.
Caveats
The corpus is one developer's machine. The ratios are the finding; the
absolute totals are personal. Counts use cl100k_base, which approximates
Claude's tokenizer within a few percent. The break-even model assumes a single
cache breakpoint, so a rewrite confined to the tail costs less than the table
shows — that refines it, it does not reverse it.
Contributing
Build and test instructions, the rules a benchmark change has to follow, and what
a pull request needs before review: CONTRIBUTING.md.
Report a vulnerability privately — SECURITY.md.
License
MIT. See LICENSE.
來源:README.md,提交 3d3f228
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.3.4最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分