Mythos Agent

io.github.mythos-agent由 GitHub 帳號 mythos-agent 發布v4.0.1更新於 Oct 27, 2026

Open-source AI security agent: SAST, DAST, and policy-as-code over MCP.

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

開源 AI 安全程式碼審查代理,可掃描本機程式碼庫中的漏洞、金鑰、相依套件與 IaC 問題,並提出修正建議。

可以做什麼
  • 掃描程式碼中的漏洞模式、外洩金鑰、相依套件 CVE、IaC 設定錯誤,以及 API、JWT、加密與隱私問題
  • 執行多階段自主 hunt:產生假設、驗證發現並產生概念驗證攻擊
  • 依根因模式尋找已知 CVE 的變體,並進行資料流污點分析
  • 產生 AI 修補、回答自然語言安全問題,並將發現對應到 SOC2/HIPAA/PCI/OWASP 政策
  • 匯出終端機、JSON、HTML 或 SARIF 報告,並提供本機儀表板
  • 監看檔案變更持續掃描,並檢查已安裝的外部安全工具
適用情境
適合讓助理審查本機程式碼儲存庫的安全問題、依信心程度篩選發現,或檢查某個已知 CVE 的根因模式是否出現在程式碼其他位置。適用於發行前或拉取請求流程中的安全導向程式碼審查。
執行需求
以本機 npm 套件形式執行(npx mythos-agent),需要桌面環境。模式、金鑰、相依套件與 IaC 掃描不需 API 金鑰;完整的自主 hunt 與 AI 功能需設定模型供應商(Anthropic,或透過設定或 ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL 環境變數接入 OpenAI 相容或本機端點)。可選裝 Semgrep、Gitleaks、Trivy、Checkov、Nuclei 等外部工具以擴大涵蓋範圍。
安裝前請注意
AI 相關指令會把程式碼與發現傳送給所設定的模型供應商,可能是第三方;使用本機模型可讓資料留在本機。fix 指令可對檔案套用修補,watch 模式會在存檔時重新掃描。相依套件檢查會透過網路查詢 OSV API。使用前請審閱產生的修補與概念驗證攻擊程式。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Mythos Agent,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

English · 简体中文

[mythos-agent — Cerby the guard puppy]

[mythos-agent — 10-second security check demo]

mythos-agent

AI code-review assistant for application security.

Open-source. Reads your code, flags likely security issues, explains its reasoning, suggests fixes.

[CI] [npm] [License] [Discord] [Node] [Wired scanners] [Experimental scanners] [Rules]

mythos-agent.com

Quick Start • How It Works • Commands • Hunt Mode • Variant Analysis • Integrations • Contributing • Vision • Roadmap


mythos-agent reviews your code the way a reviewer on a security-focused team would. It walks through likely issue patterns, checks for variants of known CVEs, ranks findings by confidence, and suggests fixes you can accept or reject. See VISION.md for the full framing.

For new contributors: the active 6-month working plan is in the pinned issue [Roadmap] mythos-agent H1 2026 Goals. Look for 🙋 markers to spot items where help is wanted. New here? See CONTRIBUTING.md for good-first-issue guidance.

For security teams and EU CRA-compliant downstream manufacturers: see SECURITY.md for our vulnerability disclosure SLAs, docs/security/cra-stance.md for our EU CRA role declaration, docs/security/threat-model.md for our public threat model, and RELEASES.md for our versioning, LTS, and EOL policy. OpenSSF Best Practices Badge (Passing) submission targeted June 2026; releases are signed via Sigstore and ship with CycloneDX SBOMs for downstream Manufacturer compliance.

bash
npx mythos-agent hunt
🔐 mythos-agent hunt — AI Code-Review Assistant
✔ Phase 1: Reconnaissance — 12 entry points, express, typescript, postgresql✔ Phase 2: Hypothesis — 8 security hypotheses generated✔ Phase 3: Analysis — 15 findings (semgrep, gitleaks, trivy, built-in), 22 false positives dismissed✔ Phase 4: Reproduction — 2 finding chains, 3 reproductions
🧪 Security Hypotheses
  [HIGH] HYPO-001 — Race condition: concurrent payment requests could double-charge    src/payments.ts:45 (race-condition)  [HIGH] HYPO-002 — Auth bypass: JWT token not validated after password change    src/auth.ts:78 (auth-bypass)
📊 Confidence Summary
  3 confirmed | 8 likely | 4 possible | 22 dismissed
⛓️ FINDING CHAINS
 CRITICAL  SQL Injection → Auth Bypass → Data Exfiltration  ├── src/api/search.ts:45      — unsanitized input in SQL query  ├── src/middleware/auth.ts:88  — JWT verification skippable  └── src/api/export.ts:23      — bulk export has no ACL
🧪 Reproductions
  SPX-0001 — SQL injection in search endpoint    See repro steps in docs/reproductions/SPX-0001.md
  Trust Score: 2.3/10 — critical issues found

Quick Start

bash
# Installnpm install -g mythos-agent
# Quick scan (no API key needed)mythos-agent scan
# Full autonomous hunt (needs API key)mythos-agent initmythos-agent hunt
# Find variants of known CVEsmythos-agent variants CVE-2021-44228
# Ask security questionsmythos-agent ask "are there any auth bypasses?"
# Check available toolsmythos-agent tools

How It Works

mythos-agent combines three things no other open-source tool does together:

1. Hypothesis-Driven Scanning

Instead of matching known patterns, the AI reasons about what COULD go wrong, generating hypotheses like "this transaction doesn't lock the row, potential race condition" or "this auth check uses string comparison, potential timing attack."

2. Variant Analysis (Big Sleep technique)

Given a known CVE, mythos-agent finds structurally similar but syntactically different code in your codebase. Same root cause, different location. This is how Google's Big Sleep found 20 real zero-days.

3. Multi-Stage Verification

Every finding goes through a confidence pipeline:

  • Pattern scan → candidate
  • AI hypothesis → theoretical risk confirmed
  • Smart fuzzer → dynamically tested
  • PoC generator → concrete exploit proves it's real

Only findings that survive multiple stages are reported as "confirmed."

Commands

CommandDescription
hunt [path]Full autonomous multi-agent scan (Recon → Hypothesize → Analyze → Exploit)
scan [path]Standard scan (patterns + secrets + deps + IaC + AI)
variants [cve-id]Find variants of known CVEs in your codebase
fix [path]AI-generated patches with --apply
ask [question]Natural language security queries
taint [path]AI data flow / taint analysis
watchContinuous monitoring that scans on file save
dashboardLocal web UI with charts and findings table
report [path]Export as terminal / JSON / HTML / SARIF
policyPolicy-as-code with SOC2/HIPAA/PCI/OWASP compliance
rulesCommunity rule pack registry (search/install/publish)
toolsCheck which external security tools are installed
initSetup wizard (Anthropic, OpenAI, Ollama, LM Studio)

Hunt Mode

mythos-agent hunt runs the full multi-agent pipeline:

┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐│    Recon     │ →   │  Hypothesis  │ →   │   Analyze    │ →   │   Exploit    ││    Agent     │     │    Agent     │     │    Agent     │     │    Agent     │├──────────────┤     ├──────────────┤     ├──────────────┤     ├──────────────┤│ Map entry    │     │ Reason about │     │ All scanners │     │ Chain vulns  ││ points, auth │     │ what could   │     │ + external   │     │ + generate   ││ boundaries,  │     │ go wrong per │     │ tools + AI   │     │ PoC exploits ││ data stores  │     │ function     │     │ verification │     │              │└──────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └──────────────┘

Variant Analysis

Find code in your project that has the same root cause as known CVEs:

bash
# Search for Log4Shell-like patternsmythos-agent variants CVE-2021-44228
# Auto-detect and scan for variantsmythos-agent variants --auto

The variant analyzer extracts the root cause pattern from the CVE (not the surface syntax) and searches your codebase for structurally similar code.

Scanners (15 wired + 28 experimental, 329+ rules)

The Default scanners run on every mythos-agent scan. Experimental scanners are implemented + unit-tested classes that ship in the tarball but are not yet reachable from any CLI, HTTP, MCP, or agent entry point. They are tracked by KNOWN_EXPERIMENTAL in the wiring-invariant test.

CategoryWhat it findsRulesStatus
Code patternsSQLi, XSS, command injection, eval, SSRF, etc.25+Default
Framework rulesReact, Next.js, Express, Django, Flask, Spring, Go27Default
SecretsAWS, GitHub, Stripe, API keys, DB URLs, private keys + entropy22Default
Dependencies (SCA)Known CVEs via OSV API (10 lockfile formats)OSVDefault
IaCDocker, Terraform, Kubernetes misconfigurations13Default
AI/LLM SecurityPrompt injection, unsafe eval of AI output, cost attacks13Default
API SecurityOWASP API Top 10: BOLA, mass assignment, broken auth12Default
Cloud MisconfigAWS/Azure/GCP: public storage, wildcard IAM, open firewalls14Default
Security HeadersCSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy8Default
JWTAlgorithm, expiry, storage, revocation, audience9Default
SessionFixation, expiry, cookie flags, localStorage tokens7Default
Business LogicNegative amounts, coupon reuse, inventory races, role escalation6Default
Crypto AuditWeak hashes, ECB mode, hardcoded keys, deprecated TLS11Default
Privacy/GDPRPII handling, consent, data retention (GDPR article mapping)9Default
Race ConditionsTOCTOU, non-atomic ops, double-spend, missing transactions7Default
ReDoSCatastrophic backtracking in regex (nested quantifiers, overlapping alternatives)—Default
Supply ChainTyposquatting, dependency confusion, dangerous install scripts12Experimental
Zero TrustService trust, mTLS, network segmentation, IP-based auth8Experimental
GraphQLIntrospection, depth limit, field auth, batching8Experimental
WebSocketAuth, origin check, message validation, broadcast XSS7Experimental
CORSOrigin reflection, credentials handling, substring bypass7Experimental
OAuth/OIDCMissing state, no PKCE, implicit flow, client secret exposure7Experimental
SSTIJinja2, EJS, Handlebars, Pug, Nunjucks, Twig, Go templates7Experimental
Additional experimental scanners (21 more, not yet wired into default scan)

SQL injection deep, XSS deep, NoSQL, command injection, deserialization, path traversal, open redirect, XXE, input validation, clickjacking, DNS rebinding, subdomain enumeration, dep confusion, environment variables, logging, error handling, cache, email, upload, memory safety, permissions.

Each exists as a class under src/scanner/ and has unit tests in src/scanner/__tests__/coverage-scanners.test.ts / new-scanners.test.ts, but is not invoked by any CLI command, HTTP API route, MCP handler, or agent pipeline. See KNOWN_EXPERIMENTAL in the wiring-invariant test for each scanner's deferral reason. Wiring one up follows the pattern of the HeadersScanner / JwtScanner / SessionScanner / BusinessLogicScanner commits on main.

Beyond the scanners above, mythos-agent ships complementary analyses (not counted in the scanner totals): call-graph + taint engine, DAST smart fuzzer, AI hypothesis agent, variant analysis, and git-history mining.

External tool integrations: Semgrep (30+ languages), Gitleaks (100+ patterns), Trivy (SCA + containers), Checkov (1000+ IaC policies), Nuclei (9000+ DAST templates)

Integrations

PlatformWhat
VS CodeExtension with inline diagnostics + one-click AI fix
GitHub ActionScan on push/PR + SARIF upload to Code Scanning
PR Review BotInline comments on vulnerable lines in pull requests
DashboardLocal web UI at mythos-agent dashboard
SARIFGitHub Code Scanning, VS Code, any SARIF tool
Policy EngineSOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, OWASP compliance mapping

AI Providers

TierProvidersStatus
1 — PrimaryAnthropic (Claude Sonnet / Opus / Haiku)Fully tested. Published catch-rate numbers in docs/benchmarks/external-scores.md are produced with this tier.
2 — Compatible (proxy today, native in stage 2)Anything OpenAI-compatible — OpenAI, Qwen via DashScope/OpenRouter, Gemini, Mistral, vLLM, Ollama, LM Studio, Bedrock, etc.Today: route through any Anthropic-compatible proxy (LiteLLM, OpenRouter, Vercel AI Gateway, Bedrock) by setting baseURL in .mythos.yml or ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL env. Native OpenAI SDK support lands in stage 2.
3 — Local / communityLocal Ollama / LM Studio / vLLMSame code path as Tier 2; called out separately because privacy and cost-of-zero are the use case. Best-effort; agentic tool-use quality depends on local model size.

Pattern scanning, secrets, deps, and IaC work without any API key.

See docs/multi-model.md for the full tier-system policy + the staged rollout (this README is the summary; that doc is the canonical reference).

Comparison

Featuremythos-agentSemgrepSnykCodeQLNuclei
Pattern scanningYesBestYesYesTemplates
Hypothesis scanningYesNoNoNoNo
Variant analysisYesNoNoPartialNo
AI-guided fuzzingYesNoNoNoTemplates
PoC generationYesNoNoNoNo
AI deep analysisYesNoLimitedNoNo
Vuln chainingYesNoNoNoNo
AI auto-fixYesNoFix PRsNoNo
NL queriesYesNoNoNoNo
SecretsYesYesYesNoNo
SCAYesNoBestNoNo
IaCYesNoYesNoTemplates
DASTYesNoNoNoBest
Open sourceYesPartialNoYesYes

This feature table is a capability comparison, not an accuracy claim. For reproducible, third-party-runnable accuracy numbers vs Semgrep CE / Snyk Code / CodeQL on OWASP Benchmark, CyberSecEval 3, Vul4J, and our CVE replay harness, see docs/benchmarks/external-scores.md.

Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

bash
git clone https://github.com/mythos-agent/mythos-agent.gitcd mythos-agent && npm install && npm run build && npm test

Architecture

src/  agents/         Multi-agent orchestrator + Recon/Hypothesis/Analyzer/Exploit agents  analysis/       Code parser, call graph, taint engine, variant analyzer, service mapper  agent/          AI integration, prompts, tools, fix validator  cli/            44 CLI commands  dast/           Smart fuzzer, PoC generator, payload library  policy/         Policy engine + compliance mapping  report/         Terminal, JSON, HTML, SARIF, dashboard  rules/          Built-in + custom YAML + community registry  scanner/        Pattern, secrets, deps, IaC, diff scanners  store/          Results persistence + incremental cache  tools/          External tool wrappers (Semgrep, Trivy, etc.)vscode-extension/ VS Code extensionaction/           GitHub Actionsbot/              PR Review Bot

License

MIT

來源:README.md,提交 a14abd1

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v4.0.1最新Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分