Recon Kit Mcp

io.github.nan786521由 GitHub 帳號 nan786521 發布v0.13.0更新於 Oct 25, 2026

Read-only network & security recon tools (DNS, TLS, headers, CORS) for AI agents, each graded.

已驗證STDIO僅桌面開發者工具安全與監控

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

一個本機 MCP 伺服器,為 AI 助理提供唯讀的網路與安全偵察工具,涵蓋 DNS、TLS、HTTP 標頭、CORS、子網域與連接埠,並附上評級。

可以做什麼
對網域執行綜合評級的偵察報告,涵蓋 DNS、郵件安全、TLS、HTTP 標頭與接管風險,也可單獨呼叫各項檢查。查詢 DNS 記錄、WHOIS 與郵件安全設定(SPF、DMARC、DKIM)。透過 DNS 字典或憑證透明度日誌列舉子網域,並檢查主機是否有懸空 CNAME 接管風險。稽核 TLS 憑證與協定、HTTP 安全標頭、Cookie 旗標、CORS 政策與允許的 HTTP 方法。辨識網站技術堆疊,讀取 security.txt 與 robots.txt,透過 RDAP 查詢 IP 歸屬,並對單一主機做最多 1024 個連接埠的 TCP 掃描。
適用情境
適合助理協助經授權的安全評估、CTF 練習或學習情境:快速取得某網域安全狀況的評級概覽,或深入單一領域,例如郵件安全、TLS 或子網域暴露面。也適合在對話中對自己擁有的資產做唯讀檢查。
執行需求
以 stdio 方式在本機執行,需要 Python 3.10 以上版本,通常透過 uvx 或原始碼 checkout 啟動。未宣告任何帳號、API 金鑰或環境變數。需要網路存取,部分檢查會查詢憑證透明度日誌、RDAP 等公開服務。
安裝前請注意
這些工具會主動探測目標主機:DNS 查詢、HTTP 請求、TLS 握手與 TCP 連接埠掃描。僅對你自己擁有或已取得書面授權的資產使用;README 明確載明此限制並將責任歸於使用者。連接埠掃描與子網域列舉可能被目標或其服務商記錄或標記。工具為唯讀,不會索取任何憑證。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Recon Kit Mcp,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

recon-mcp

English | 繁體中文

[CI] [PyPI] [Python] [License: MIT]

An MCP server that gives AI coding agents — Claude Code, Codex, Cline, and any MCP client — safe, structured network and security reconnaissance tools.

Most MCP servers wrap CRUD APIs. recon-mcp instead exposes the kind of read-only recon an engineer reaches for when investigating an asset, and returns clean JSON — with a graded verdict — so the agent can reason over results instead of parsing console output.

⚠️ Authorized use only. These tools are for security testing of assets you own or have explicit written permission to assess, for CTF practice, and for education. Do not point them at third-party infrastructure without authorization. You are responsible for how you use this software.

Tools

ToolWhat it does
recon_reportStart here. One call → DNS, TLS, and HTTP headers checked together, with an overall grade
dns_reconDNS + WHOIS + email security (SPF/DMARC/DKIM), graded
subdomain_enumDiscover subdomains via DNS brute-force and/or Certificate Transparency logs
subdomain_takeoverCheck subdomains for a dangling-CNAME takeover risk against known services
tls_checkCertificate, protocols, ciphers, and known TLS vulnerabilities, graded
http_headers_auditHTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, …), graded
cookie_auditRedirect chain + cookie flags (Secure / HttpOnly / SameSite), graded
cors_checkCORS policy probe — flags arbitrary-Origin reflection and wildcard misuse
tech_detectFingerprint the web stack (server, CDN/WAF, language, framework, CMS, JS) from one GET
http_methods_auditReport which HTTP methods a server allows and grade the risk (TRACE/PUT/DELETE)
well_known_auditFetches & parses security.txt (RFC 9116) and robots.txt
ip_infoResolves the host and enriches its IP via RDAP (owner, country, CIDR, abuse)
port_scanTCP port scan of one host (≤1024 ports/call), open ports + services

Example

Just ask your agent: "run a security recon report on example.com." It calls recon_report once and gets a graded overview it can act on:

json
{  "domain": "example.com",  "overall_grade": "F",  "summary": "Overall posture F: email A, TLS B, headers F; 13 actionable issue(s).",  "components": {    "email":   { "grade": "A", "issues": [] },    "tls":     { "grade": "B", "issues": [] },    "headers": { "grade": "F", "issues": [      { "severity": "high", "label": "Missing Content-Security-Policy", "detail": "CSP not set; cannot restrict resource load sources" }    ] }  }}

Need more detail on one area? The agent can call dns_recon, subdomain_enum, subdomain_takeover, tls_check, http_headers_audit, cookie_audit, cors_check, tech_detect, http_methods_audit, well_known_audit, ip_info, or port_scan directly.

Install

Requires Python ≥ 3.10. Runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows (tested in CI).

Recommended — no clone, via uv:

bash
uvx recon-kit-mcp

Or from source (for development):

bash
git clone https://github.com/nan786521/recon-mcpcd recon-mcppython -m venv .venv# Windows.venv\Scripts\activate# macOS / Linuxsource .venv/bin/activatepip install -e .

Use with Claude Code

Add the server (stdio transport). With uvx you don't need an absolute path:

bash
claude mcp add recon -- uvx recon-kit-mcp

Or add it manually to any MCP client config:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "recon": {      "command": "uvx",      "args": ["recon-kit-mcp"]    }  }}

(From a source checkout, point the command at /absolute/path/to/.venv/bin/recon-kit-mcp instead.)

Then just ask: "run a security recon report on example.com" — or target one area, e.g. "check the email security of example.com."

The server also ships a security_recon prompt: pick it from your client's prompt menu and pass a domain for a guided, severity-sorted audit.

Tool reference

recon_report(domain, timeout?) -> dict

Runs DNS/email, TLS, HTTP-header, web-stack (tech_detect), and apex subdomain-takeover checks together and returns overall_grade (as weak as the weakest component, capped at F if a live takeover is found), a one-line summary, components (email / tls / headers, each with its grade and actionable issues), a tech section (detected technologies + any version disclosure), and a takeover section when the apex is at risk. Uses a fast single-handshake TLS check for speed — call tls_check for the full cipher/vulnerability analysis. The best starting point; use the tools below for raw detail.

dns_recon(domain, checks?, timeout?) -> dict

  • records — A, AAAA, MX, NS, TXT, SOA, CNAME, CAA records
  • whois — parsed registration fields + raw WHOIS text
  • email — SPF, DMARC, and DKIM posture, plus advisory MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, BIMI, and DNSSEC signals, and a graded assessment (letter grade A–F, a summary, and per-check findings with severity and a recommended fix). The advisory signals surface as findings but don't move the core SPF/DKIM/DMARC grade.

checks is any subset of ["records", "whois", "email"]; omit it to run all.

subdomain_enum(domain, wordlist?, source="dns", timeout?) -> dict

Discovers subdomains from two complementary sources:

  • source="dns" (default) — resolves candidate labels via DNS. wordlist is comma-separated labels ("www,api,dev"); omit it for a built-in common list. Capped at 512 candidates per call. Returns resolved ips.
  • source="ct" — queries public Certificate Transparency logs (crt.sh) for every name ever certified for the domain. Fully passive; finds real hosts no wordlist would guess.
  • source="both" — runs both and merges, recording which source(s) saw each host.

Returns sources, found_count, and found (each with subdomain, the sources that saw it, and ips when resolved).

subdomain_takeover(hosts, timeout?) -> dict

Checks subdomains for a dangling-CNAME takeover — a subdomain that CNAMEs to a third-party service (GitHub Pages, S3, Heroku, Azure, Fastly, Shopify, …) whose resource was deleted or never claimed, letting anyone who registers that resource serve content on the victim's subdomain. For each host it resolves the CNAME, recognizes known takeover-prone services, fetches the page, and flags the provider's "unclaimed resource" fingerprint and/or a CNAME target that no longer resolves. hosts is one hostname or a comma-separated list (capped at 100). Read-only — DNS lookups plus one HTTP GET per host. Pair it with subdomain_enum: enumerate first, then check the interesting hosts.

Returns checked, vulnerable_count, and results (each with host, cname, service, status, vulnerable, severity, and detail). status is one of not_applicable, not_vulnerable, potential, dangling_cname, or vulnerable.

tls_check(host, port=443, timeout?) -> dict

Returns grade, certificate (validity / expiry / key algorithm), protocols (flags legacy SSLv3 / TLS 1.0 / 1.1), cipher info, forward_secrecy, hsts, vulnerabilities (each with a vulnerable flag), and a findings list.

http_headers_audit(host, port?, use_ssl=True, timeout?) -> dict

Returns grade, score, the observed security headers, and a findings list with a recommendation per header. Defaults to HTTPS (port 443).

cookie_audit(host, port?, use_ssl=True, timeout?) -> dict

Follows the redirect chain from the host (capped at 10 hops, flagging any HTTPS→HTTP downgrade) and audits every Set-Cookie seen for the Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite flags. Returns redirect_chain, final_url, cookies (flags only — values are never returned), cookie_grade, cookie_score, and a findings list.

cors_check(host, port?, use_ssl=True, timeout?) -> dict

Sends one GET with an untrusted Origin and inspects the Access-Control-Allow-Origin / -Allow-Credentials response. Reflecting an arbitrary Origin with credentials is high severity (any site can read authenticated responses); a wildcard or trusted null origin are lesser issues. Returns acao, allows_credentials, reflects_origin, wildcard, severity, and findings.

tech_detect(host, port?, use_ssl=True, timeout?) -> dict

Fingerprints the technology stack behind a website from one HTTP GET. It matches response headers, set cookies, the HTML body, and the <meta name="generator"> tag against a signature table to identify the web server, reverse proxy / CDN, WAF, programming language, web framework, CMS, JavaScript framework, and analytics. Where a version is exposed it is captured and flagged (info) — a precise version eases known-CVE lookup. Read-only.

Returns status, technology_count, technologies (each with name, category, version when known, and evidence), and a findings list noting any version disclosure.

http_methods_audit(host, port?, use_ssl=True, path="/", timeout?) -> dict

Reports which HTTP request methods a server allows and grades the risk. Enabled write/diagnostic methods widen the attack surface: TRACE enables Cross-Site Tracing (XST), and PUT / DELETE can allow file upload or deletion under weak access control. Safe by design — it never sends a mutating request: it actively probes only OPTIONS, HEAD, and TRACE (TRACE merely echoes), and reads PUT / DELETE / PATCH / CONNECT from the OPTIONS Allow header as advertised, never invoking them.

Returns grade, score, allow_header, advertised_methods, trace_enabled, dangerous_methods, and a findings list (each with the method, severity, and a recommendation).

well_known_audit(host, timeout?) -> dict

Fetches and parses security.txt (RFC 9116, tried at /.well-known/ then the legacy path) and robots.txt. Returns security_txt (parsed fields, structural issues, location) and robots_txt (sitemaps, disallow/allow paths, user_agents), each with a present flag.

ip_info(host, timeout?) -> dict

Resolves the host's IP and looks it up in the public RDAP registry (via rdap.org's bootstrap to the right RIR). Returns ip and rdap (handle, name, country, cidr, org, abuse_email).

port_scan(host, ports?, timeout?) -> dict

TCP connect scan of a single host. ports is a string — "22,80,443", a range "1-1024", or a mix — and omitting it scans a built-in common-port set. Hard-capped at 1024 ports per call (single-host recon, not mass scanning). Returns host, ip, scanned, open_count, and open_ports (port + service). Scan only hosts you are authorized to assess.

License

MIT

來源:README.md,提交 a4ca1c7

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.13.0最新Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分